Rebane's Ruminations
June 2016
S M T W T F S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930  

ARCHIVES


OUR LINKS


YubaNet
White House Blog
Watts Up With That?
The Union
Sierra Thread
RL “Bob” Crabb
Barry Pruett Blog

[The following piece was submitted by Mr Eddie Garcia of the SOJ Steering Committee.  He may be contacted at sojegarcia@gmail.com.  Tomorrow in the Rood Center the Board of Supervisors will hear a presentation of the county budget from Mr Haffey.]

Eddie Garcia

Last Friday, while I was planning my usual attendance to The Board of Supervisors meeting tomorrow June 7th, I realized that it was a special meeting for a Public Hearing for the purpose of hearing written and oral comments from the public concerning the Budget for next Fiscal Year and a friend pointed out that the budget itself was preceded by a “MESSAGE FROM THE COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER”, the opening paragraph of which reads (I’m quoting but the emphasis is mine):

In contrast to Nevada County, there are a very few areas in the State of California that have not recovered from the Great Recession. These are mostly areas that have supported the ill-fated State of Jefferson movement. This movement has virtually nothing in common with Nevada County either socially or economically. Nevada County is doing better than almost all rural counties. Unemployment in Nevada County has dropped to 4.7% from a high of close to 10%. The Bay Area, Southern California and the Inland Empire have now seen multiple years of stronger and sustained economic expansion with unemployment rates at 3% or lower. There are indications that their economies may be becoming overheated, which is a precursor to a recession. We are almost a year to 18 months behind what happens with the more prosperous areas of the State. Here is the County’s unemployment rate since the Great Recession: …" 

To say the least, I was flabbergasted that a County employee, high ranking as he may be, would publicize his opinions in a public document.  That prompted me to send Mr. Haffey the following email:

Dear Rick,

I cannot begin to tell you how shocked I was to read the first paragraph of  your “Message from the County Executive Officer” that accompanies the Budget proposal for next Fiscal Year.

While you have made your negative feelings about the SOJ well know to me, I think that it is totally inappropriate for you to have included them in your Message.  I really feel that you have exceeded the bounds of  your position in the County.

While, as a private citizen, you are perfectly free to hold and express whatever opinions you like,  I think you have to agree with me that they are not to be expressed within an official document of the County.

Secondly, I think you have, through your comments, made our case (probably unwittingly!) by pointing out that “…there are a very few areas in the State of California that have not recovered from the Great Recession.  These are mostly areas that have supported the ill-fated State of Jefferson movement.”!  Have you thought that these areas you mention might not have recovered because their economies have been decimated by the policies of the State of California?

Finally, I also object to your stating erroneous information about the State of Jefferson movement.  I guess your mind has been made up about our movement from day one.  I remember having been given some time by you to meet in your office to talk about the State of Jefferson and being greeted by: (I have to paraphrase here) “Eddie, I am not going to discuss your movement, I just think it is the worst idea ever!”!!!

I am still very interested in finding out what your reasons are for so strongly opposing our movement and try to explain to you what we feel our reasons are for supporting it.

Some sort of an apology from you would be a good first step towards a possible dialog.

[7jun16 update]  Subsequent to today's BoS meeting on the county's budget, Mr Eddie Garcia sent the following in an email –

Thanks to all of you who showed up at the BOS meeting this morning, there were enough green t-shirts to make the Chairman (Dan Miller) come over to tell us that the only public comment he would allow would be the one directly related to the Budget figures not on the CEO’s message!  However, he said that the CEO would be proffering an apology.  Sure enough when the meeting started, right after the Pledge, the Chair announced that before proceeding with the Public Hearing the CEO Mr. Haffey had something to say.  Then Mr. Haffey proceeded to apologize to whoever felt offended or hurt (I’m paraphrasing here so …) by his remarks; the whole time he was speaking he was looking directly at me.  After he apologized to us, he proceeded to apologize to the Board for the “angst” he may have caused them.

Posted in , ,

25 responses to “Nevada County CEO Exceeds His Bounds (updated 7jun16)”

  1. Jon Dozer Avatar
    Jon Dozer

    There comes a time to stop the entirety of the SOJ nonsense. Its a few years late, but that time is now.
    The CEO speaks truth.

    Like

  2. Harold Hildebrand Avatar
    Harold Hildebrand

    “I was flabbergasted that a County employee, high ranking as he may be, would publicize his opinions in a public document.”
    What about the “yes on W’ dog, pony, and powerpoint show the sheriff was taking around the county? He is politically campaigning for a ballot proposal that he wrote (more or less). Can he do that? Was he doing that on taxpayer time or his own time? Was he wearing his uniform at these “presentations? Was he speaking as a county employee or a private citizen?

    Like

  3. fish Avatar
    fish

    Posted by: Jon Dozer | 06 June 2016 at 07:41 PM
    Ooooh….you sounded just like Jeff Pell…..errr…….Dirty Harry when you said that.
    I think I need a cool washcloth to soothe my fevered brow!!

    Like

  4. Bill Tozer Avatar
    Bill Tozer

    Nothing makes libbie’s head explode as the mere mention of the SOJ.
    OK, what about this dog and pony show from the NO on Y crowd? Apparently they are now partaking of their product earmarked for sick people suffering from cancer, not to mention the economic impact on our social services and lost sales tax revenue from the local nick-nackery merchants.
    12 p.m. — A caller in the 12000 block of North Bloomfield-Graniteville Road reported that his dog, which is buried at his home, has cameras embedded in its eyes. Those cameras were looking into the caller’s brain, which holds over $40 billion worth of government secrets.
    Must be some good dog and pony shows going on.

    Like

  5. Paul Emery Avatar
    Paul Emery

    George
    Not sure what inspired Haffey to go off on the SOJ crew. SOJ is a well intended but ultimately flawed proposal to equalize representative government for rural Nor Cal Counties.
    Tomorrows local election will be very close in some areas. Democrats are now the majority party in the County and with the predicted Bernie Bump could enhance the standings of Heidi Hall and No on W both of which have waged effective and well funded campaigns. Duane is doing himself no favor by not taking a stand on W yes or no that makes him look like a weak candidate afraid to take a stand on this years most contentious issue. District 1 has in the past been the Democratic stronghold in the County and with the increase in Dems registered could swing things Heidi’s way. Peter VAn Zant easily won two elections with a much smaller Dem percentage.
    Not making any predictions except saying things will be close.

    Like

  6. Jon Dozer Avatar
    Jon Dozer

    “Not sure what inspired Haffey to go off on the SOJ crew”.
    I would imagine inspired him is the desire to MOVE ON and stop wasting County and taxpayer time and money.
    Haffey, his staff, his colleagues, and the BOS have dozens of important agenda items to attend to in 2015. Not a single minute should be spent responding or dealing with anything to do with the SOJ.

    Like

  7. fish Avatar
    fish

    Posted by: Jon Dozer | 07 June 2016 at 07:36 AM
    Not a single minute should be spent responding or dealing with anything to do with the SOJ.

    Excellent…..back to the less masculine, slightly whinier tone that we’ve all come to appreciate from the “jon”.

    Like

  8. George Rebane Avatar

    re JonD’s 736pm – The endless hubris of a progressive – if it isn’t on his agenda, it should be on no one’s agenda. What other expressed desires of 3,000 to 5,000 Nevada County citizens should the BoS spend “not a single minute” dealing with or responding to? A cricket response would be quite suitable.

    Like

  9. Gregory Avatar
    Gregory

    Haffey either speaks for a majority of the Board or not, so if wrath is to be directed anywhere, it should be there.
    I wonder if many Berners will stay home now that their votes will be wasted, Hillary won before California’s hard left had a say.

    Like

  10. Jon Dozer Avatar
    Jon Dozer

    As CEO, Haffey is simply analyzing the facts of the economics and logistics, as SOJ relates to Nevada County. Part of his job. He states the obvious-
    We are hundreds of miles from the Oregon border region- the left behind regions of CA, the sweet spot of the SOJ idea. We are a diversified economy, tightly connected and dependent economically on the Sac and Bay Area regions, our true dance partners- not to Modoc and Humboldt. Clearly those regions are hurting, with little chance of effective representation. LaMalfa territory.

    Like

  11. Jon Dozer Avatar
    Jon Dozer

    Point remains the Mr. Garcia continues to have ample free speech opportunities to speak during each meeting of the BOS, send letters to the Sups and County, wear the hats, t-shirts and bumper stickers and solicit support from local citizens and business for the SOJ idea. Haffey is up to his eyeballs in the more important daily and long term priorities for the County. He made a statement and don’t think he’ll make any more now.

    Like

  12. Patricia Smith Avatar

    I don’t see the financial viability of a State of jefferson. All of the counties signing up for the SOJ are the poorest in the state and they don’t have a way to embellish their income other than to increase mining and timber. Most of the SoJ leadership are against the one homegrown product that could make this area an economic powerhouse, namely medical marijuana. If they embraced taxing and regulating this commodity, they could garner enough support and financial independence to break free. I guess they hate MMJ more than they want their freedom?

    Like

  13. George Rebane Avatar

    PatriciaS 127pm – Your analysis echoes the voice of the stasists. The new SOJ is not restricted to rehabilitating its traditional economic sectors. With a new tax structure and a refreshingly sparse regulatory environment (and congenial climate withstanding), all kinds of businesses (from CA, OR, WA, and points east) and workers will flock to SOJ given its proximity to major markets eager to consume its products and services. The cashflow and balance sheets for the new state will look nothing like the calcified Haffeys today conceive. This may be news to some of our readers (you?), but money naturally migrates to where it is most productive.

    Like

  14. Patricia Smith Avatar

    George, with the mindset of the SoJ, we will never know if it would work because they alienate too many people to ever get the support they would need to make this happen.

    Like

  15. George Rebane Avatar

    PatriciaS 245pm – In what way are you alienated by the SOJ folks?

    Like

  16. Patricia Smith Avatar

    George, the SoJ claim to want smaller government – except when they want to prohibit patients from growing medicine in the privacy of their own backyards. Even CABPRO came on board because of property rights issues. I find the SoJ positions to shift with the wind depending on who proposed the subject in question. They are also short sighted in not embracing the opportunity to tax & regulate MMJ since the tax would only apply to users of the products, but could supply a financial boon to everyone else. Instead they support spending our taxpayer dollars trying to stop the unstoppable (fiscal irresponsibilty). The last thing i would want would be to live in a state that has the same mentality as our current officials. (My way or the highway attitude).

    Like

  17. George Rebane Avatar

    PatriciaS 615pm – pray, where did you hear that?

    Like

  18. Bill Tozer Avatar
    Bill Tozer

    Patricia, I hope we can agree on this, if only in spirit.
    https://www.facebook.com/TheFederalistPapers/photos/a.112478365457075.7231.107705785934333/1134630093241892/?type=3&theater
    Any Statehood consideration is more than one issue. Even the Mormons had to give up polygyny as a condition of Utah’s acceptance into the Union. They still practice polygyny in places in Utah, Nevada, and Arizona. Who knows what a new state would do about growing medicine at this conjecture. Maybe yes, maybe no. It’s all fluid, nothing carved in stone.

    Like

  19. Claudia Taylor Avatar
    Claudia Taylor

    I whole heartedly concur with Mr. Garcia and sent an email to Mr. Hafey myself. It is posted below:
    Mr Haffey,
    Getting right to the point, you were hired (with some of MY tax dollars) for your management skills, not to state anything that even resembles a political opinion on official documents. To do so is totally uncalled for!
    I’m referring to the negative reference you made regarding a very viable effort to bring sanity, ethics, and constitutionality back into governance through the establishment of a 51st state–the State of Jefferson. This state would geographically include 38% of California that has been economically decimated by the poor management of existing “managers”. With all due respect, you are part of the problem. Continuing to just simply accept what is handed down by the state causes decisions to be made that are not good for the North State. Did you ever stop to think that maybe a lot of what the State is doing is not good for the State but rather just a way for some people to line their pockets or gain power and prestige? You and the BOS are supposed to interpose for the citizens against all factors that do not protect life, liberty and property (excessive regulations, mandates, nonsensical laws, etc.). After all, didn’t you take an oath to abide by the California and U.S. Constitutions?
    Again, with all due respect, your opinion about the SOJ has no place in the budget report . . . especially when you have not attended any functions where you could actually learn about the State of Jefferson. Eddie Garcia told me that you even refused to speak with him individually. Maybe you’ll accept an invitation from me to discuss it over a cup of coffee. Are you open-minded enough to do that? I’ll pay for the coffee.
    I respectfully ask that you make a public apology for this overstep of the boundaries of your job.
    Sincerely
    Claudia Taylor
    Avid Supporter of State of Jefferson

    Like

  20. rl crabb Avatar

    Lassen County defeated Jefferson 58% to 42%. Your proposed state is getting smaller every day.

    Like

  21. Jon Dozer Avatar
    Jon Dozer

    RL, now it appears that the choice for Capitol City of the SOJ is down to Alturas and Yreka. Potential economic powerhouses that will attract righteous capital.

    Like

  22. Gregory Avatar
    Gregory

    More than a third of Lassen wanted Jefferson… far from a majority but that’s a lot of people who feel disenfranchised by the current Sacramento hegemony.
    Now is not the time to carve up the state… like a drunk or a junkie who has not hit bottom, the Golden State thinks all is well, just needs another bond fix. Maybe 10, 20 years longer.

    Like

  23. Todd Juvinall Avatar

    RL, If you look at the stats in Lassen employment, you will see the government is the largest. No surprise there.

    Like

  24. fish Avatar
    fish

    Posted by: Gregory | 08 June 2016 at 04:45 PM
    Now is not the time to carve up the state… like a drunk or a junkie who has not hit bottom, the Golden State thinks all is well, just needs another bond fix. Maybe 10, 20 years longer.

    Ding, ding, ding………we have a winner!

    Like

  25. Gregory Avatar
    Gregory

    If a SoJ is created, who’s gonna pay the current state and local public employee pensions?
    Answer: what pensions? Ignoring the smoke and mirrors, they are not fully funded and, eventually, the pot of money in CalPERS and STRS will be reallocated in a way that stiffs the lowest paid retirees the least, but everyone will get a haircut. That’s what happens in a bankruptcy.
    Public employees and retirees in Greece also screamed bloody murder, it’s an important part of the grieving process.
    This can’t happen until after the junkie hits bottom.

    Like

Leave a comment