Rebane's Ruminations
November 2026
S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930  

ARCHIVES


OUR LINKS


YubaNet
White House Blog
Watts Up With That?
The Union
Sierra Thread
RL “Bob” Crabb
Barry Pruett Blog

  • George Rebane

    Planning1

    The recent spate of social engineering and economic stimulus programs issuing from Washington again motivates communities that hope to get some federal funding to propose and plan local projects that may catch the eye of an appropriate czar in the current administration.  All things ‘green’ seem to garnering most favor, and now everyone claims to have a ‘plan’ on how to spend these freshly minted dollars to create jobs and launch ‘sustainable’ government funded enterprises to save energy and the world.

    Russ Steele, my friend and fellow blogger (NC Media Watch), has been keen to point out some of the foibles of this green effluent flowing from the banks (double entendre intended) of the Potomac.  For this he has been taken to task by his progressive readership (as have I).  One of the prime hurdles to communications on this particular issue seems to be that few know the difference between a statement of objectives or end goals, and a description of how, when, and with what these are to be achieved – in short, a plan.

    Planning2

    Unfortunately, in our land this ignorance starts at the very top.  Our fearless leader does not have a clue as to what a plan is, and is going around the country telling everyone that he has a plan to do this and another to do that.  And all of this is much to the chagrin of his own party’s leadership who would love nothing better than to form up, fall in, and march behind the banner of anything that may remotely look like an Administration plan.

    To short circuit this kind of federal leadership, perhaps we at the local level can do better when it comes to planning for such things as, say, green jobs.  In my long and checkered career, I have given many seminars on planning to communities, corporations, government agencies, and development teams.  Several years ago I wrote a short monograph on community planning in the attempt to fill an obvious gap that I saw when attending local public ‘workshops’ and participating on various committees of charitable, NGO, and county organizations.  This was published as TN0605-1: A Foundation for Community Planning by the Sierra Environmental Studies Foundation of which I am currently the Director of Research.  In part, its abstract reads –

    (more…)

  • George Rebane

    IrvingKristol

    Irving Kristol, the father of neo-conservatism and celebrated observer of our political progress, died yesterday at the age of 89.  His legacy has informed many of us and focused the ire of many more over six decades of public punditry and wordsmithing.  The following excerpt is from one of his regular articles – Income Inequality Without Class Conflict, Dec. 18, 1997 – that appeared in the WSJ.

    It is often said that capitalism—that is, a market economy—is morally obnoxious because its “trickle-down economics” inevitably creates inequality of income and wealth. Now it is certainly true that “trickle-down economics” has that effect. It is also true, however, that if you want economic growth and greater affluence for all, there is simply no alternative to “trickle-down economics,” which is just another name for growth economics.

    The world has yet to see a successful version of “trickle-up economics,” an egalitarian society in which the state ensures that the fruits of economic growth are universally and equally shared. The trouble with this idea—it is, of course, the socialist ideal—is that it does not produce those fruits in the first place. Economic growth is promoted by entrepreneurs and innovators, whose ambitions, when realized, create inequality. No one with any knowledge of human nature can expect such people not to want to be relatively rich, and if they are too long frustrated they will cease to be productive. Nor can the state substitute for them, because the state simply cannot engage in the “creative destruction” that is an essential aspect of innovation. The state cannot and should not be a risk-taking institution, since it is politically impossible for any state to cope with the inevitable bankruptcies associated with economic risk taking.

  • George Rebane

    – The collateral damage from Obamacare.
    – Where is Obama’s plan for healthcare?
    – Michelle demonstrates low carbon, organic shopping.

    When you see Obamacare costs going up in lockstep with your taxes, you start looking at your neighbors a little differently.  The fat guy is no longer just a fat guy waddling down the sidewalk.  You know he’s going to have big time medical problems that he could avoid without all those extra pounds, and you know that you will be paying for the extra burden he will put on our socialized healthcare system.  And you think ‘There oughta be a law against people getting fat like that, ‘cause it costs all of us extra.’  Well as usual, California has got you covered in that kind of thinking, and is actively looking at ways it can prohibit the consumption of sugared soft drinks in the Golden State.  Few people are aware of the collateral damage to our freedoms that all shared cost social programs do.  (At this point some liberal readers immediately conclude again that Rebane is against all government programs, and smugly point out the interstate highways system and local fire department.)  Ol’ pappy taught most of us Golden Rule #2, ‘Them that’s got the gold, makes the rules.’  And if part of that gold for Obamacare comes from us, we’ll have a tendency to start making more rules for our neighbors and back politicians who will help us do it.  And many people think that this is good.

    Speaking of Obamacare, few people have noticed that there is no healthcare bill from the White House.  As Obama goes around the country talking about “my healthcare bill” and “my plan”, it’s the Democrats in Congress who are now wondering what in hell is he talking about.  Actually, this tactic has served the First Fibber well as he makes his rounds pumping socialized medicine.  But with five  MichelleShops (yes, five) healthcare bills still running around loose in Congress, Dems like Max Baucus (gang of six fame) are now starting to wish that the President would either defecate or relinquish the receptacle.  It seems that even the dufus division in Washington has noticed that there is a big difference between grand objectives from the podium and a plan to achieve them.  But down in the hinterlands where we live, this little distinction goes completely unnoticed – ‘My plan is to make sure every community has sustainable solar power.’ – and the sheeple marvel at such wisdom while shouting down anyone who points out that the emperor has no clothes.

    Michelle’s little rustic outing is all over the media today.  This morning a reader emailed me the link to Washington Post’s (gasp!) story ‘Hi-Ho, the Derry-O’ of the fiasco.   Shutting down a good part of downtown Washington so that her First Nibs could get some “certified organic Tuscan kale” is quite a glimpse into our collective future.  It’s definitely worth a read.  Oh, and in that bucolic down-home scene, do you notice the two organic shoppers in black? 

  • George Rebane

    Scientists tell us North America today has more trees than ever before.  This is doubly so in the west where entire mountain ranges are matted with thick forests and dense underbrush.  A little more than a century ago these same mountains were covered with copses and sparse stands of trees separated by cleared land of brush and grasses.  Smaller fires regularly thinned out the forests and dried grasslands to provide a healthy environment for the next generation of growth.  In the west, lightning was the natural source of flame, but on the plains and in the eastern part of the continent, Indians regularly set fires to husband their lands and forests for maximum productivity of edible plants, fodder, and game.

    CarsonPass  

    Environmental zealotry bordering on madness has today transformed these forests into a Disneyesque landscape of uniform vegetation that may look good from a distance, but is completely unmanageable when it comes to productivity and conservation.  Where before the land provided for people’s needs, it has now been transformed into a costly and dangerous taboo maintained by cadres of government workers implementing stacks of insane regulations and laws.

    Nevada County’s Supervisor John Spencer recently made another call for sanity in the husbanding of the Sierra forests – ‘Sierra forests on one-way path to destruction’.  We should heed such counsel and again open these mountains for productive uses, recreation, and living spaces compatible with their natural order. 

    The photos are from the eloquent and comprehensive essay Fire in the Sierra Nevada Forests – A Photographic Interpretation of Ecological Change Since 1849 by George E. Gruell.   

  • George Rebane

    MMM2

    The Missing Millions March was held in Washington DC last Saturday, a day that the ‘progressive’ MSM decided to tightly blinder its eyes and see only “sixty to seventy-five thousand” Tea Party protesters converge on the Capitol.  Actually, Washington was shut down by the throngs conservatively numbered in the 1.2 to 2 million range by European media.  The pictures told the story, but our MSM MissingMillionsMarch leaned over backwards to attribute those millions going down Pennsylvania Avenue as Ted Kennedy mourners while pointing to the flags at half staff.  Well, the flags were at half-staff because of 9/11 and the so-called national service day (an add-on abomination to the most important day of remembrance in our times).  And it was strange how the same left-wing lapdogs overlooked such an historic outpouring of grief to their idol when it actually happened.  From what outlets do you get your news?

    Unmanned Aerial Vehicles and modern prosthetics are just two of the pre-Singularity areas of technology that continue to astound.  Everyone is now making and deploying UAVs to extend their reach and save lives in war zones.  The new computer-mediated hands that are restoring near-full function to amputees are marvelous exemplars of the rapid advances in the field of machine-amplified-UAVman.  As a registered professional engineer in control and estimation theory, and a lifelong practitioner of such arts for defense and commercial markets, I have a special awe of what is possible now and its extensions in the near future.  That same awe also overlaps an apprehension of the alternative uses of such technologies by an autocratic/tyrannical state.  Every new way of sensing, tracking, reporting, monitoring, and projecting power on the battlefield has a natural counter application by a state’s police organs to keep its civilian population in check.  But not in America, right?

  • [This is the full length piece the first part of which was published today in the 12sep09 Union print edition. The full length version also appears in the newspaper’s online edition.  gjr]

    George Rebane

    In this recession over six million jobs have disappeared so far in the last year or so.  Out of approximately 150 million American jobs that were available in early 2008, that represents about a 4% annual loss.  Because of globalization and accelerating technology, not all of these jobs are coming back when the economy recovers.  Some will go overseas, and some will disappear because smarter and more capable machines will be doing them cheaper.  At the same time a smaller number of new and different jobs will appear.  This is present day reality.

    The bottom line is that fewer jobs will return, and on balance, these jobs will require smarter workers trained in new skills.  This “creative destruction” of jobs will continue into the indefinite future.  So what happens to the workers in developed countries, specifically in America?  To attempt an answer, we have to review some Econ 101 stuff.

    People work to garner wealth, which is something that they conserve and also trade for things they want/need to support a given quality of life (QoL).  How is such wealth created?  In any economy (or system) like a community, country, or even Earth itself, creating wealth requires some input from outside the system.  A little bit of thought will quickly convince you that this input for all of Earth’s economies comes originally from our Sun, either in real time or delayed over variable time intervals.  Think of photovoltaic energy that arrives about eight minutes late, to wind that takes a little longer, to planted crops, to forests, to minerals and fossil fuels, to geo-thermal.  Each of these started with the original fusion burn that resulted in the sun and our solar system, and took longer intervals to become available to us.

    Throughout history to the present day, wealth creation always began with tapping into such solar energy conduits and storage processes.  Somewhere along the line, those who knew how to do it and do things with it got the early and big bundles of wealth.  Those who didn’t tried then to get it by force, or worked in the lower parts of this energy chain as wealth ‘trickled’ down.  Yes, trickle down works – always has, always will.

    If this concept is hard to swallow, just try to imagine a closed community that attempts to satisfy its needs by imposing “buy local”.  There’s only so far you can go with serving each other food, fixing the other guy’s plumbing, and changing the old folks’ diapers.  With nothing coming in from the outside, precious little of this work will be done.  And then what?

    Over the centuries human progress has been measured by how readily (read cheaply) we could tap into this river of energy.  Hello innovation and taking risk!  The smarter among us figured out better ways to tap, and then bet their or someone else’s farm on doing it for fun and profit.  The fun part was optional, the profit part was not.

    At every such juncture, more wealth poured into the economies, trickled down, and life got better for all.  Even the un- or mis-educated benefited from this, and began to live lives that a few generations before were only enjoyed by the very wealthy.  But in the process jobs were constantly eliminated and new ones created.  And at the same time a lot of the wealth began to accumulate with the smart risk takers, and also clever thieves who skimmed, as the wealth trickled through the economy.  Result, the more successful innovation occurred, the more we saw wealth/income disparity.  But remember, all during this time the pie was not fixed and kept growing.

    Now enter the smart machines.  During the last couple of generations machines have started displacing humans as well as working with them in new ways.  And these machines have been crucial to tapping into the river of wealth from the Sun.  Those who could build, operate, and manage these man/machine partnerships kept cutting costs to society and getting richer in the (natural) process.

    At this point humans started being squeezed into a tighter corner of well paying jobs, and then along came what is known as the Great Doubling.  You see, some years back, the people who didn’t believe in all this innovation and inequality decided to go in another direction that they claimed would create workers’ paradises with none of this risk and trickle down.  And when they thought they had things just about right, the whole damn thing collapsed on them.  The result was that in the early 1990s the 1.5 billion workers in the ‘free world’ were suddenly joined by another 1.5 billion workers who were ready to leave paradise and sell their labor in the markets opening up around the world – the Great Doubling.

    (more…)

No comments on Planning for Green