Rebane's Ruminations

About

November 2026
S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930  

ARCHIVES

OUR LINKS

YubaNet
White House Blog
Watts Up With That?
The Union
Sierra Thread
RL “Bob” Crabb
Barry Pruett Blog

  • Scattershots – 20dec2010 (updated 21dec2010)

    George Rebane

    FCC commissioner Robert McDowell concludes his 20dec2010 WSJ piece on ‘net neutrality’ with – “On this winter solstice, we will witness jaw-dropping interventionist chutzpah as the FCC bypasses branches of our government in the dogged pursuit of needless and harmful regulation. The darkest day of the year may end up marking the beginning of a long winter's night for Internet freedom.”  You may have heard over the last couple of years or so that our government wants to bring ‘fairness to broadband’s onramps’.  The truth, as many have explained over the months leading up to tomorrow’s latest government overreach, is far from 'fairness'.  What this represents is just the latest successful attempt to fix what is not broken.  Another successful enterprise will be brought under the cold hand of government control.  (21dec2010 update here.)

    Jeff Hawkins of PalmPilot fame came up with a new paradigm a few years back (cf On Intelligence) for how machines can learn.  This is called hierarchical temporal memory or HTM. For some background on RR's Singularity Signposts please read this and see comment thread here .  Hawkins deduced a new generalized building block that would mimic how parts of the human brain work.  He argued that assembling these HTM blocks into a mechanical brain would allow the machine to do all kinds of clever things like learn and reason about the world.  To make all this real, he and cohorts started Numenta to commercialize this technology.

    Now MIT Technology Review reports (here) that Numenta is starting to sell these HTM based adaptive learning systems that can do everything from detecting credit card fraud to predicting if a treated patient will suffer a relapse.

    This, of course, bears heavily on what I have described (most recently here) as the ongoing and ongrowing crisis of jobs in America.  The bar for gainful employment keeps getting raised.  Consider what impact machine learning technologies (i.e. HTM and Bayes nets) will have on people who were looking forward to mid-level careers in the so-called ‘knowledge industries’.  Judging from their writings and spoken words, most economists and almost all politicians don’t have a clue about this tsunami.  But you do.

    [21dec2010 update]  AtPac suit against County/Diaz finally becomes newsworthy (here).

    Posted at

    in

    , , , , ,
    6 comments on Scattershots – 20dec2010 (updated 21dec2010)

  • Lovers in a Foxhole

    George Rebane

    Yesterday the Senate passed a bill to revoke the longstanding ‘Don’t ask, don’t tell’ policy banning gays serving openly in the military.  Senator and combat veteran John McCain pronounced the passage a “sad day” for the military, adding "I hope that when we pass this legislation that we will understand that we are doing great damage, and we could possibly … harm the battle effectiveness which is so vital to the survival of our young men and women in the military".  What did he mean by that?

    Before liberals go ballistic on charges of unwarranted ‘discrimination’ and homophobia, it’s good to take a deep breath.  The opposition comes down to open homosexuality in a combat unit that is on par with open heterosexuality in such a unit.  I recall discussing this situation over the years, starting way back when I was on active duty as an artillery officer.  We always came back to the same sticking point – in combat you don’t want two people in love serving in the same unit that is in or about to be in harm’s way.

    It doesn’t matter whether it’s your wife or husband or boyfriend or girlfriend or your same-sex lover.  People naturally make decisions that favor their lover over consideration for larger objectives the achievement of which would put their dear one in danger, or perhaps even sacrifice him/her.  Those kinds of considerations don’t belong in either the heat or anticipation of battle.  And if their existence is known to others, the collateral damage to cohesion and morale can be immeasurable, even to the point of totally compromising the mission and/or the unit.

    So what to do about gays in the military?  Well, you can come up with a slew of other rules and regulations about who can get assigned where.  But if you have a unit that starts out with no one in love (or lust) with each other, but still have the possibility of that happening at some unknown point in the future, you have the same problem.  And it could be even worse for everyone if the lovers attempt to keep their relationship a secret from the others, because their actions will still be dominated by their concern for each other.

    Because it also applies to heterosexuals, this is a tough problem that is totally independent of whether someone promotes or opposes other aspects of homosexual life – like same-sex marriage – in open society.  But I fear that its dissection will always bring in side charges of ‘homophobia’ etc to divert discussion of the real factors involved in having lovers share a foxhole.

    Posted at

    in

    , ,
    66 comments on Lovers in a Foxhole

  • The Liberal Mind – Government Subsidies

    George Rebane

    Most people consider government subsidies to be the transfer of some form of assets – cash/stuff/services that the government owns - from the government to the subsidized entity.  Not so the liberal of whatever coloration.  In their book the government effectively owns everything, and we the people are allowed to husband and use some things that government owns for a restricted interval that the government deems proper.

    Therefore according to their logic, if the government could, say, tax someone or some corporation more than it is doing now, then those stipulated additional taxes not collected are termed by the lefties as just another government subsidy.  The same goes for the assessment of fees by the government and its agencies.  Since such minds can conceive of no limits to the tribute government can exact in taxes or fees, the amount of such subsidy can be anything that the progressive hand cares to write down.

    Given that form of twisted logic, a liberal can claim that you are receiving any given amount of government subsidy if they feel that you should pay that amount as additional tribute, and are not now doing so.  The same, of course, goes for liberal claims of corporate subsidies.  And here the situation really gets wild and woolly.  Given the long history and complexity of collusion between government and industry groups, corporations, and organized labor, the progressive mind sees no end to subsidies that government continues to give to industry.

    It all depends on how far back you want to go and which pieces of legislation or regulations you want to include in toting up the package of subsidies that you will argue industry has been getting.  The main thing to remember, if one attempts to understand the liberal mind, is that it all belongs first and foremost to the collective or government.  With this in mind, their talk of subsidies all makes ‘perfect sense’.

    Posted at

    in

    ,
    20 comments on The Liberal Mind – Government Subsidies

  • Jobs and Schools – we may be too late

    George Rebane

    [This is the 17dec10 transcript of my regular bi-weekly commentary on KVMR-FM 89.5.  I have provided links to the Compton school and Governor Pawlenty’s public service union references.]

    Remember the story of John Henry, the steel drivin’ man, celebrated in legend and song.  He was extremely strong and fast at chiseling holes into rock and driving spikes to hold down rails.  He chose to go head-to-head with the newly invented steam steel driver in order to save his job; it didn’t work out for John Henry.

    Ever since the early 1800s new technology has been trumping human labor to deliver more, better, faster, and cheaper.  Those who chose to compete with technology were swept away like John Henry.  But in the olden days new technology was still dumb, and workers had an alternative – do something else or retrain and learn to work at a higher skill level with the new machines that were flooding work places.  But as the machines became more complicated and capable, working with them also required more from people – skills that everyone could not master.

    In the last fifty years technology added a new page to its game book – intelligence.  Not only could machines handle work with brute force and high speed, they were now adding smarts to the mix that would let them make fast and reliable decisions, decisions that only people used to make.  And today we have machines that can out-think humans in more and more areas such as medicine, finance, distribution, transportation, and war.  Furthermore, the cost, capability, and reliability of these machines are all racing in the right directions – or the wrong directions if you consider that more and more of us are becoming John Henrys.

    In the world highly paid workers – aka Americans – can only compete if they acquire new skills in which machines are not yet dominant.  But in the United States our government has made that path extremely difficult through its near monopoly of the public schools.  Too many of these schools are now operated by so-called professionals, an alarming number of whom are not qualified to provide the education our youth needs, and instead, featherbed their jobs through government service unions.  The result is that our schools’ output consists overwhelmingly of young workers who cannot even class themselves with the legendary John Henry, a man who at least had a competitive skill set.

    Parents know this and have started protesting the treatment that their children receive in government mandated schools.  Recently in Compton, California parents ‘pulled the trigger’ on a public school, demanding its conversion to a charter school that would better educate their kids.  This type of parental activism may start a revolution that could help put an end to our suicidal educational system.  The teachers’ unions remain vehemently opposed to anything that would get rid of their cadres of ignorant and stupid yet understandably compliant members.

    On the larger scale, leading politicians like Governor Pawlenty of Minnesota are beginning to make a public noise against the growing cancer of government service employee unions.  If we don’t cure this systemic disease, we can see our future in the riots of Greece, Great Britain, France, Italy, and soon other European countries with equally failed socialist expectations.

    Unless our educational system is rapidly reformed into a professional meritocracy, our new unemployment norm will climb above the 10% where it is now.  And from there it will keep rising as our students and unemployed take to the streets demanding an unrealizable redistribution of wealth – a solution put in their heads by dysfunctional teachers, political demagogues, and reinforced daily by agenda driven journalism.

    Today the promise of green jobs to solve our structural unemployment problems is an intentionally distracting placebo.  India and China are making huge investments in supplying the latest energy efficient products with their burgeoning workforce.  It is they who will sell the world ‘cleantech’ products at an economical price. The only way we will buy any green technology manufactured here is when the government sticks a gun to our head and says ‘… or else.’

    My name is Rebane and I also expand on these and other themes in my Union columns, on NCTV, and on georgerebane.com where this transcript appears.  These opinions are not necessarily shared by KVMR.  Thank you for listening.

    Posted at

    in

    , ,
    38 comments on Jobs and Schools – we may be too late

  • California’s Purple Cargo Cults

    George Rebane

    CARB met yesterday to establish California’s cap n’ tax carbon trading program.  RR readers are aware of how people who passed Econ 101 feel about this mournful event.  (For details and analysis of its larger impact, see Russ Steele’s report on NCMW.)

    CargoCult Meanwhile, the progressives are besides themselves with glee.  Half of them are happy that California’s ‘Global Warming Solutions Act’ aka AB32 will nudge us back toward the stone age, and the remaining dimwits remind me of the Cargo Cult natives of Papua-New Guinea.  These poor souls gathered on mountain tops after WW2 where they built crude wooden replicas of the DC-3s that America used to supply its Pacific forces fighting the Japanese.  The cargo airplanes brought in marvelous things the natives had never seen before, and for a little while that changed their lives.  Now they were trying to attract more of these magical mechanical birds out of the sky filled with all kinds of good stuff.  Such futile ceremonies went on for years.

    Our ceremonies are just beginning.  To many of us it is beyond belief that hereabouts otherwise normal looking people believe we can create jobs manufacturing competitive green tech or ‘cleantech’ products that can be sold worldwide.  In that category China, India, and even Germany are miles ahead of us.  With our coddled and overpaid workers, it will be near impossible to make and sell anything competitively on the world markets.

    The only cleantech jobs that CARB’s new mandates will enable are those created from the ‘government gun to our head’ that force us to buy and install overpriced and unnecessary equipment for our homes and businesses.  Much of this stuff is to be installed by properly licensed workers who will command outlandish wages for their efforts and our detriment.  The bottom line is that the Great California Exodus will accelerate.

    PurplePainters The simple economics of the matter is that you can’t arbitrarily add requirements and attendant costs to boost an economy.  For example, mandating that all internal walls of California’s buildings now must first receive an undercoat of specially processed purple paint to be applied by specially licensed union painters will not boost California’s economy, no matter how many purple paint painters are now out there putting on such undercoats.

    However, in socialist economics this is a perfectly valid way for the government to stimulate an economy in doldrums.  That it hasn’t worked in communist countries and it didn’t work here during the Great Depression is beside the point.  Such historical facts are proscribed in our schools and never mentioned in the lame stream media.  Bring on the purple paint and the purple paint painters.

    Posted at

    in

    , , , ,
    42 comments on California’s Purple Cargo Cults

  • County fails to deliver Diaz documents – cost $20,250? (updated 21dec2010)

    George Rebane

    My sources tell me that – “On December 9, 2010, Magistrate Kimberly Mueller ordered Nevada County to reimburse AtPac for fees incurred in the amount of $20,250 for failing to produce documents as required by law. Magistrate Mueller found that AtPac was diligent in its attempts to obtain the documents, but that Nevada County failed to produce the documents without justification. It is noteworthy to point out that Magistrate Mueller specialized in intellectual property prior to appointment as a federal magistrate.”

    Readers may remember the law suit brought against County Clerk-Recorder Greg Diaz and Nevada County in the matter of some alleged illegitimate transfer of intellectual property (software) by Mr Diaz.  The Union covered part of the story here.

    When I called the county counsel’s office to confirm what should be a matter of public record, I was told that such issues would be referred to outside counsel that county has retained to handle this suit.  After asking for the outside counsel’s contact information, I was directed to a Ms Caroline Mankey in the 424 area code.

    When I called Ms Mankey, she confirmed that such an order had indeed been issued, and that it was a matter of public record.  Nevertheless, she stated that she was not yet “at liberty to comment” further on the matter.  She and her colleague, lead counsel Mr Nabil Abu-Assal, would have to confer with their client before anything further could be released.  She asked that I call her back tomorrow for any additional information that might be available then.  I will do that.

    At this time I will not speculate why the county and Mr Diaz, both claiming innocence in the matter, did not release documents that could well torpedo the remainder of AtPac’s suit, and instead are prepared to reimburse the plaintiff from county coffers as a penalty of their non-cooperation.

    (For the record, I was asked by both offices who I was and whom I represented.  I responded that I was a private citizen representing no one but the audiences of my modest trumpets.)

    [15dec2010 update]  This morning I called Ms Mankey as she advised me yesterday.  The receptionist dutifully took my name and the nature of my call.  After a short delay I was informed that Ms Mankey “was not answering her phone.”  I left my name and phone number with the request that she return my call.  In the interval further corroboration of the above reported action by Magistrate Judge Kimberley Mueller arrived by email.  It seems that Nevada County formally asked for “reconsideration of the Magistrate Judqe's November 78, 2010, Order (Docket No. 56) regarding requests for production of documents and admission.”  This request was denied yesterday and the order to produce the required documents still stands (pdf of court order Download AtPac Order 2).

    Perhaps all this is not newsworthy.  Neither The Union nor Yubanet.com has yet to devote any real estate to its coverage.  Nevertheless, working in the back rows of this vineyard, we await Ms Mankey’s call.

    [21dec2010 update]  Well, maybe it's newsworthy after all.  For the record, I sent Jeff Ackerman an FYI on the original post.  Did not get a response.  But this morning's Union featured this story on its front page (here).  Apparently both RR and The Union are being stonewalled by the county's attorneys on the matter; neither of us have yet to get a call back from Ms Mankey.  Going on no more information than this, it sure is beginning to look like either fog or smoke coming out of the Rood Center.

    Posted at

    in

    , ,
    36 comments on County fails to deliver Diaz documents – cost $20,250? (updated 21dec2010)

  • RR joins Sacramento Connect

    George Rebane

    SacConnectLogo Last week I received a kind invitation from Sacramento Connect (logo nearby) to have Ruminations join Sacramento Bee’s network of northern California blogs.  After making sure I understood the agreement that goes with such a relationship, I accepted and got busy doing all the ‘paperwork’ and installing the little pop-up toolbar that the member blogs feature when you visit them.  Thanks to my blog server TypePad, that little piece of homework is yet pending – you can see what it looks like on Russ Steele’s NCMW.

    I’m not sure what all the means and methods SacConnect has to drive more visitors to RR, but I’m told that they will be forthcoming.  We’ll see.  In any event, I would like to extend a warm welcome to any such new readers.  Take a look around the various categories to see what kinds of stuff I write about.  On the socio-political posts most of the comment threads settle into some very helpful exchanges and expansions once the right-left pyrotechnics die down.  Lately such fireworks are almost all gone, and the loyal and loud opposition now exuberantly doubts my cognitive skills instead of my parentage, hygene, and morals – a much better state of affairs.

    Here in Nevada County I also write a regular column for The Union newspaper, do a regular commentary for KVMR-FM 89.5, and irregular series for community television at NCTV.  The Union columns and KVMR transcripts also appear here immediately after they are published and aired.

    If you are interested in what kind of a person writes these screeds, please see the About link for a short biography.  My beliefs, values, and outlook are marbled and expanded throughout.  A good stake in the ground for this can be found here.  Again, welcome to RR.

    Posted at

    in

    , , ,
    9 comments on RR joins Sacramento Connect

  • What is Art?

    George Rebane

    [For a change of pace from the heated discussions of our country’s future and the fate of Man, I ran into this little vignette from a past correspondence, and thought that I would share it to see what kind of a response it would draw from the eclectic intellects I am grateful to count as RR readers.  Jo Ann’s late Uncle Jerry was a chemist, artist, and a well-read intellect himself.  This piece is from the 6apr07 entry in my journal.]

    IsItArt Some time ago Uncle Jerry and I went around on the question ‘what is art?’ Or longer, can a person tell if something he is experiencing is art?  After some back and forth Jerry came to the conclusion that art can not be defined, only experienced and assessed on an ad hoc basis.  He also implied that being able to arrive at a precise definition of art would somehow cheapen or detract from the entire notion of art in the human experience.  I, as a technician, value the utility of precise operational definitions and believe that their abundance in any culture only serves to improve the human condition.  By ‘operational’ I mean formal or algorithmic to the point that ultimately it can either be programmed on or learned by a non-human (e.g. machine or alien intelligence).

    With this preamble I will now ramble on and reconstruct the definition of art that became my contribution to that lost exchange. …

    Art is an intentionally created stimulus the purpose of which is to give pleasure to its Beholder by first and foremost removing him from the time and place of its experience, and in the process evoking either a new idea or notion that expands/extends the Beholder’s understanding of ‘what is’, and/or ‘what was’ for an experience the Beholder remembers.  Second, art invites extension and repetition of its being experienced.  And the more powerful the art is for the Beholder, the more that art will create a longing or yearning for experiencing it again.

    Finally, art has the ability to extend and/or augment the Beholder in his very being.  From that first experience the Beholder will now look at himself and the world in a manner changed.  This in the sense that the art now joins or is integrated into his overall measure of how he henceforth beholds and experiences life.  The relative power of art to the Beholder is itself measured in terms of the intensity and duration of each such effect on the Beholder.

    The intentionally created stimulus called art can take the form of a static thing or a time extended experience – i.e. a painting, sculpture, …, or a song, symphony, movie, … .  For concreteness we restrict the purposeful creator to be a human.  Else the Grand Canyon can be included in the definition of art, with the putative artist being God.  In this case the purposive link becomes a matter of debate which operational definitions seek to avoid.

    The above definition has so far been personal and subjective to the extent that it is a one-to-one communication between the artist and the Beholder through the mediating art.  Art in the cultural context is the extension of the above definition to a significant fraction of the members of a specific culture.  In that sense, art requires a statistic to be added – e.g. more than 50% of the Moravians consider ‘this’ to be art.  One American or twenty Americans cannot by fiat define ‘American art’ or art from America.  For such a broadly accepted notion, more like-minded Americans need to be involved.

    However, twenty people, perhaps, can designate something as art specifically for the members of the Nevada County Brass Musicians Marching Society or people visiting the Getty Museum.  Their definition will be accepted to the extent that the one-to-one communications between Artist and Beholders is successful.

    Finally, an Artist is a person who can create art on a volitional basis, and in so doing finds fulfillment.

    Posted at

    in

    , ,
    14 comments on What is Art?

  • High unemployment – the new normal

    George Rebane

    [This is the submitted form of my monthly column published in this morning’s (11 December 2010) print edition of The Union.  The online version of it can be found here.]

    This week another batch of economists got surprised.  What they didn’t understand again, let alone predict, was the nation’s unemployment rate – it jumped to 9.8% from 9.6%.  With all the stimulating that’s been going on, wasn’t it supposed to go the other way?  Fortunately, readers of this column were not surprised by the news, and some may even have prepared.

    Let me be specific.  We have an ensconced government that has been and continues to be hostile to the creation of any jobs that do not involve government growth or subsidies.  If that is not enough, our government monopoly schools have produced a workforce that is rapidly going downhill in the global competition department.

    Illustrating these points we begin with last month’s Survey of Current Business put out by the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis.  The report described “a dynamic group of companies that create high-paying American jobs based on significant capital investment and export prowess – precisely the kinds of jobs America desperately needs to build a sustainable recovery.”  This group of international firms has doubled its US workforce through a process called ‘insourcing’.

    (more…)

    Posted at

    in

    , , ,
    6 comments on High unemployment – the new normal

  • Ruminations – 10dec2010

    George Rebane

    Yes, the ‘rich’ can pay more taxes.  But when you make them do that, they will make fewer wealth generating decisions and take the attendant risks that make those increased government revenues possible.

    - British students riot for more OPM
    - The religious give more than the irreligious
    - Nevada City protects its downtown businesses
    - Where to put the new courthouse?
    - Rep Boehner pulls a boner
    - They tax you first, and during, and after you die

    The ‘little darlins’ of Great Britain are tearing up London protesting Parliament’s decision to hike the costs of education.  These costs have gone up for all the reasons that we know.  However, the always remarkable response from the mis-educated brats is that their expenses should continue to be covered by other people’s money.  Their socialist curriculum somehow missed the part about how those monies are earned, and what motivated the earners to work hard for the cash to which they feel entitled.  They also have no clue that the more socialist economies don’t generate all that much to redistribute.

    Years ago the WSJ reported on a study of charitable giving that measured how much more voluntary gifts generate than the charitable receipts from government mediated distributions.  More importantly, it was reported that the left-leaning secular humanists were pretty niggardly when it came to contributing their own bucks to worthy causes.  This has not gone down well with the people claiming the moral high ground.  Today DE Campbell and RD Putnam do an update on that (‘Charity’s Religious Edge’).

    It turns out that people of religion give significantly more than those not so encumbered.  When controlling for all kinds of factors like giving to their own church/temple/mosque, the religious “actually give more money to secular causes than do secular Americans.”  The explanation is still the same old one – the seculars are mostly left-wingers who see the needy being provided for by a government that takes money from the greedy rich and redistributes it accordingly.  Given that, why should they worry?

    (more…)

    Posted at

    in

    , , , ,
    7 comments on Ruminations – 10dec2010

RR FUNDAMENTALS

About the Bastiat Triangle

Glossary & Semantics

A Conservetarian Credo

Commenting Rules

RECENT POSTS

RECENT COMMENTS

CATEGORIES

6 comments on Scattershots – 20dec2010 (updated 21dec2010)