Rebane's Ruminations
November 2026
S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930  

ARCHIVES


OUR LINKS


YubaNet
White House Blog
Watts Up With That?
The Union
Sierra Thread
RL “Bob” Crabb
Barry Pruett Blog

  • George Rebane

    On a mild October late afternoon with fall colors in the air, about 150 good-hearted but misguided people gathered to express their opposition to …, well, it was hard to say.  But a theme that tried to surface was that ‘Corporations are bad, peace is good’.  A couple of Nevada City’s finest stayed quietly in the background; no one expected trouble and no one delivered it.  It was just a planned demonstration of solidarity with those in the big cities like New York and Los Angeles who want to pull down capitalism and replace it with communism.  OK, so they’ll start with socialism, but the communists are a patient lot and know that their turn (opportunity?) will come soon enough – socialism is just a slippery slope to their front door.  No one really knew what they were doing, it was just a nice evening to assemble, walk, protest our sick economy, and while we may, enjoy this great gift which we call the United States of America.

    OccupyNC111019

  • George Rebane

    The ‘morality’ of capitalism, of empire, of wealth redistribution, and many other things are much on the minds of people these days.  Yet, as with notions like race, prejudice, government subsidy, censorship, socialism, …, almost no one comes to the debate with a coherent, let alone operational, definition of the terms they glibly sprinkle into their arguments.  Such ignorance has reached unheard heights that now call for books – e.g. philosopher Jamie Whyte’s Crimes Against Logic – Exposing the Bogus Arguments of Politicians, Priests, Journalists, and Other Serial Offenders (2005) – that have been published on the rising incomprehensibility of public babble.

    To this semantic morass I now wish to add an understanding of the notion of morals and morality since it is often brought up in the comment threads of RR, usually as part of an indictment of fellow readers or their wayward beliefs.  This contribution joins a growing list of other terms on RR (see ‘Critical Thinking and Numeracy’ category) I have defined, many at the request of readers.  The intent of such definitions is to make my commentaries and comments more understandable, and hopefully invite others to appreciate the offered semantics.

    (more…)

  • George Rebane

    Warren Buffet is credited with the following prescription for fixing the deficit and Congress, even though many of the points have been circulating for years (including in these pages).  In order to give Warren full credit – he needs it after the Buffet Tax – I reproduce below the hopefully titled Congressional Reform Act of 2011 which was emailed me by a correspondent with a note from the billionaire himself that it be spread around the country ASAP.  Do your part; if not, then you can continue wondering why the corruption continues on the banks of the Potomac.

    Warren Buffett, in a recent interview with CNBC, offers one of the best quotes about the debt ceiling: "I could end the deficit in 5 minutes," he told CNBC. "You just pass a law that says that anytime there is a deficit of more than 3% of GDP, all sitting members of Congress are ineligible for re-election.

    The 26th amendment (granting the right to vote for 18 year-olds) took only 3 months & 8 days  to be ratified! Why? Simple! The people demanded it. That was in 1971… before computers, e-mail, cell phones, etc. Of the 27 amendments to the Constitution, seven (7) took 1 year or less to become the law of the land…all because of public pressure.

    *Congressional Reform Act of 2011*
    1.     No Tenure / No Pension.  A Congressman collects a salary while in office and receives no pay when they are out of office.

    2.     Congress (past, present & future) participates in Social Security. All funds in the Congressional retirement fund move to the Social Security system immediately. All future funds flow into the Social Security system, and Congress participates with the American people. It may not be used for any other purpose.

    3.     Congress can purchase their own retirement plan, just as all Americans do.

    4.     Congress will no longer vote themselves a pay raise. Congressional pay will rise by the lower of CPI or 3%.

    5.     Congress loses their current health care system and participates in the same health care system as the American people.

    6.     Congress must equally abide by all laws they impose on the American people.

    7.     All contracts with past and present Congressmen are void effective 1/1/12. The American people did not make this contract with Congressmen. Congressmen made all these contracts for themselves. Serving in Congress is an honor, not a career. The Founding Fathers envisioned citizen legislators, so ours should serve their term(s), then go home and back to work. If each person contacts a minimum of twenty people then it will only take three days for most people (in the U.S.) to receive the message.

  • George Rebane

    In this information age lies abound more than ever.  And the art of lying involves understanding the three major types of lies.  This piece is an addition to the RR lexicon that may be of use in future discussions. The sequel here is an edited version of a little essay on lying first delivered in 1993 as part of a university lecture on critical thinking.

    The term ‘lie’ has given trouble to semanticists and parents alike because it embraces such concepts as truth, intention, belief, and the roles of the parties involved.  If we look at lying in more scientific terms, we see that it can be cast as a communication event that comprises of a message, its sender, and its receiver.  We offer the following definition.

    A Lie is a Message, the truth value of which is known to be ‘False’ by its Sender, who at the same time anticipates that the Receiver will assign ‘True’ to its truth value.  As such, a Lie is simply a Message intended to deceive.

    This somewhat technical definition is nevertheless sufficiently direct, comprehensive, and operational so as to support a useful analysis of lying – a most popular and ingrained human activity.  The definition obviates such indeterminables as utilities and morality, and avoids the infinite regressions of “he knew that she knew that he knew…” that often cloud any discussion of lying. When the Lie results in consequential injury to the Receiver or third parties, those so injured are called Victims of the lie.  From the definition – and our own experience – it is clear that lies can also prove of benefit to the Receiver and, indeed, in the large can conceivably have a neutral effect on all concerned.

    (more…)

  • George Rebane

    New Scientist, always politically correct, has discovered the possibility that if Greece goes under and reduces its GDP by the predicted 50%, then it will not only leave the eurozone but also the EU.  The real Greek tragedy is that this could well start the dominoes falling, resulting in beggaring half the EU countries, and cause the whole system of European unity to come crashing down.  The upshot of the science journal’s concern is that Europe’s climate control measures will then go by the board since poor countries are never good stewards of the environment.

    They note that “The climate always takes a back seat when economies turn sour, but the impact of a euro break-up would be profound. Any country leaving the euro would also breach the treaties of Maastricht, Lisbon and Rome, and therefore be forced to leave the EU. A euro break-up is likely to shatter the EU, and with it the hard won architecture of climate policy.”  (more here) Socialists are always belatedly surprised that a clean environment only comes arm-in-arm with a good dose of functional capitalism.

    If you’re so rich, why aren’t you smart?  That’s a question no one would ever have thought to ask Mortimer Zuckerman, Democratic billionaire and social scene commentator extraordinaire.  We read Mortimer’s commentaries for years as the final word in the US News & World Report.  Their leftist tilt was always a bit jarring when considered in the context of the centrist editorial policy evident in the rest of the magazine.

    Well, now we find out that Mortimer is disappointed in the man he voted for in 2008 (more here).  Doesn’t anyone pay attention to what the community organizer promised us?  Apparently Mortimer was a bit too busy making his billions to really discover what made it all possible.

    And, of course, the question could also apply to that Wizard of Omaha who is now getting a new tax named after him.  The Buffett Tax on “millionaires and billionaires” is the new replacement for or addition to (depending on the intensity of your faith in government justice) the AMT.  Ol’ Warren is even using the sleazebag trick of arguing that his tax only applies to the hundreds, when America’s great minority (aka federal taxpayers) knows that in reality it will be applied to the millions.  His rationale seems to be that the country already has enough millionaires, and this is just the ticket to put a cork in it.  (more here)

    Elizabeth Warren, Obama’s former consumer czar cum candidate for the Senate, has persuaded legions of leftists that the rich got that way by using taxpayer funded roads, taxpayer funded police for security, and other amenities of a publicly funded society.  Her argument then proceeds that the money they earned was not really earned by them alone, but earned by all the citizens.  Her leaps of economic logic finally conclude that these rich unfairly garnered what could have been more fairly earned by millions of others who apparently couldn’t figure out how to use the roads and the police and the tax code and the … .  Therefore social justice demands that such unfair advantages shosuld be leveled by making them pay an even more generous share of the federal take for eventual redistribution to those who have been cheated by the fickle goddess Fortuna.

    All this goes to bolster the progressive view that wealth creation is a matter of fortune or luck – some have it, most don’t.  Therefore government’s proper role is to act as the Luck Leveler with a gun.  And how is the correct luck level determined?  Democratically, of course.

    Professor Nouriel Roubini ('Dr No'), national pundit and premier economic prognosticator, has come to recognize that the systemic inequality of people's ability to create wealth in a globalized high-tech world can lead to social instability and blood in the streets.  He even recognizes the impact of the Great Doubling (search RR) on the American workforce.  He doesn't have a solution, but sees only a dark future if things continue as they are (more here).  Welcome aboard!

    Finally, here is a talk by Tarek Fatah, a Pakistani-Canadian Muslim, on Islamism, its intentions for the west, its penetration into the highest government circles (including the White House), and the politically correct silence that we, the children of western civilization, shamefully practice toward enemies sworn to exterminate us.  H/T to RR reader.

    [update] There's finally some good news from Washington.  Apparently the nation's fisc is nowhere near the disastrous state that some of us have reported.  A correspondent and RR reader informs me that the State Department is sending representatives from suitable NGOs on overseas junkets.  Even one of our local NGO executives will be spending some quality time in China and Mongolia on our nickel.  Things are looking up.

  • George Rebane

    As a fresh face in 2008, community organizer, ‘resigned’ lawyer, and sometime senator Barack Obama outspent opponent McCain by $665,000,000 to win the White House.  Most of this advantage was contributed by public service unions.  Given the man’s demonstrated record of incompetence or intention (your pick), stronger medicine is needed for him to prevail in 2012.

    It took about two summer months of demagoguery for Team Obama to launch the so-called ‘Occupy Wall Street’ demonstrations that are destined to turn into what unfettered history will record as the Obama riots.  In these months the socialists were able to assemble a gaggle of the uneducated, unemployed, and unthinking into a mass of “activists” that first occupied a lower Manhattan park, and then spread to satellite demonstrations in cities across the land.  More to come.

    At first these concerned people came together to protest “Wall Street”.  When the media stuck microphones in their faces, the babble that came out made progressive eyeballs roll up from the Oval Office to Berkeley.  These idiots had no message and demonstrated no understanding of what was going on – they just wanted “more” money from a government that was broke and unwilling to go after the “fat cats” to wring out the “fair share” that was purloined from their share of the national weal.

    OccupyWS

    Led by worthies such as former administration Green Czar Van Jones, consumer protector Elizabeth Warren, and The Man himself, the message was fashioned, conferences held, and everyone now has their talking points.  They still don’t know what they are talking about, but at least the words are there.  Local progressives from far and wide – Nevada County included – have held their sympathy demonstrations, are planning solidarity junkets to ‘occupied’ cities, and preparing for the real protests when the proclaimed “revolution” really takes off.

    All this is needed now that Obama’s latest gambit for the next ($447B) stimulus has received a bipartisan rejection.  Obamacare has turned out to be an albatross of titanic proportions for the country (see 17oct11 update below).  There is no sustainable green industry, only a subsidized sham.  The millions of “jobs created and saved” at the cost of trillions cannot be verified by the most dedicated of government agencies.  And a coalition of Democrats (reported by Rep Jim Matheson D-UT) is even joining with Republicans to reduce offshore profits taxes to 5.25% from its current 35% rate which keeps about a trillion dollars from coming back to the United States.

    Meanwhile, Pennsylvania’s state capitol Harrisburg is preparing for a Chapter 9 bankruptcy filing because of unfunded government employee pension liabilities – an event watched by uncounted cities in similar straits.  And now we hear from many knowledgeable sources that we really don’t know the full magnitude of the government’s involvement in creating the current recession (or Depression2 IMHO), and that the whole matter deserves careful study if we are to come out of it better informed.  This, of course, is the last thing that people preparing to fundamentally transform America want.

    So now we see that Obama’s planned billion dollar war chest will not carry the day no matter how much he outspends his Republican opponent, and it is time for the next stage of strong medicine to keep the ball rolling toward a new USSA – please study the Rebuild the Dream proclamation for the Occupy demonstrations.  The unions will have to contribute more than their hundreds of millions, they will now have to take an active part in organizing the demonstrations and then fill their ranks with bussed in members.  The call for an end to capitalism is loud and clear.  It is even evident on the better quality of professionally printed signs that these “grass roots” demonstrators are carrying as the weeks pass.  How many arrests are needed before these demonstrations turn into undeniable riots?  Nothing less will divert attention from the sad road to socialism on which Obama is leading the nation.

    [17oct2011 update]  Obamacare’s so-called Class (long-term care) program is just one of the many big lies of which the entire nationalized healthcare scam is composed of.  The Democrats now agree with Paul Ryan’s analysis when he dismantled Class at the recent White House healthcare summit.  The math in this sham insurance program doesn’t add up, and that was known from the gitgo by the bill’s authors.  They just wanted another bamboozle added in that would appear to “bend the cost curve downward”, and when it didn’t, it would be repealed by a future Congress.  Well the damn thing won’t add up and the cat’s out of the bag with Sen Judd Gregg’s inserted proviso in Obamacare that says if Class doesn’t measure up actuarially, then it must be omitted from the overall legislation.  So Class is dead and so are all the ballyhooed “savings” of Obamacare since Class was the major contributor to the advertized savings.  A similar treatment now is proposed for all the other gimmicks that make up Obamacare.  And if that bit of responsibility passes Congress, Obamacare will be toast.

    The White House and Dems need to do everything possible to keep this development from becoming the banner headline of the election season.  A solution at hand is to turn on the heat under the OWS demonstrations and see if they can be blown up into Occupy America affair – the messier the better – which will keep the nation’s angry un/underemployed and rent seekers from paying attention to what’s going on behind the curtain.

  • George Rebane

    Less than an hour ago we got our trailer parked (more or less) in its assigned spot.  We have returned from a trip on which I was consigned to the Black Hole of Connectivity.  I notice that the RR comment streams  have continued to grow with a dull roar from which my little squeaks have been absent.  My apologies for any inconvenience or apparent affront caused by my silence; none of this was expected (all RV parks claimed to provide connectivity, but not to my laptop), and no affront was intended. So much has happened in the interval that it will be difficult to select a new point of entry – nevertheless … .   My duty as I see it 😉

  • George Rebane

    [This is the submitted version of my October column that appeared in the 8oct11 print and online editions of The Union.]

    This column has long argued that the American worker is at a distinct disadvantage when compared to workers in emerging economies, and especially when compared to what the American demands as compensation to maintain his ‘right’ to a high standard of living.

    The left has fastened on to the premise that it is the failure of markets that has caused the current glut of workers and high unemployment rate.  This failure must be fixed by more government flexing its muscles to tax, regulate, and spend (sorry, “stimulate”) to create jobs.  Supply side economics is anathema to the crowd in Washington, and we are back to government attempting to create jobs through demand side (Keynesian) policies.

    This didn’t work during the Great Depression – FDR’s 17.1% unemployment rate in 1939 was the same as the one he inherited in 1933.  It was the dynamic trio of Hitler, Stalin, and Tojo who showed how to work the demand side of Keynesianism – after September 1939 everyone was able to find government jobs.

    Earlier this week I woke up to an NPR interview of a venture capitalist and a fellow of the Competitive Enterprise Institute.  Lynn Neary, the liberal interviewer, wanted to know what was wrong with the Occupy Wall Street crowd’s belief that (government) creating jobs would lead to “growth and prosperity”.  In vain, Bill Frezza of CEI attempted to convince NPR that the popular notion of ‘first jobs, then prosperity’ was a myth.

    (more…)

  • George Rebane

    AlAwlaki A lot of people are hyper-ventilating about the CIA’s recent killing of a couple of prime ragheads, Al-Awlaki and his pal Samir Khan.  Both were US citizens when they died from a direct hit by a Hellfire missile.  Both spent a major part of their adult lives in the Al Qaida leadership planning and successfully goading other radical Muslims to murder innocent Americans.  President Obama took justifiable pride in terminating these two killers.

    Al-Awlaki and Khan were long-time self-declared and confirmed enemies of western civilization, and everything we stand for.  They made war on us, and thus were enemy combatants active in a region rife with people like themselves.  Why these traitors were still US citizens is a question we can deal with another time.  But can the government actively pursue and kill people like these without violating some yet to be defined moral principles?  I would argue a definite yes.

    The government daily pursues and purposely kills US citizens for cause and by mistake.  And these dead are pikers when compared with the likes of Al-Awlaki.  There is no moral outcry when a SWAT team breaks into the wrong civilian home and mows down its resident(s) – they got the wrong address, next case please.  We have no problem incinerating people by the dozens in places like Waco.  There is no special due process brought to bear for a police sniper to kill a pregnant woman whom he sees through a curtained window of a mountain cabin in Montana.  And these kinds of killings – on purpose, accidental, in error, you name it – go on constantly.  We do give a nod to the relatives, and say we’re sorry when “mistakes were made”.

    But now to agonize over the morality of finally killing this Al Qaida sumbich, after publicly hunting him for the last several years, seems a little beyond ludicrous – ‘Oh crap, we finally hit what we’ve been shooting at; did we now do a bad thing?’  If it was wrong and immoral, why wasn’t the hunt for him called off when it was first launched and announced in all the media?  Wasn’t the hunt itself and the several missed attempts to nail him then already immoral?  Or is this anguish a part some other agenda that deserves our attention?

    [3oct2011 update]  Berkeley law professor John Yoo writes in today’s WSJ that “American citizens have never been considered immune from lethal force when they take up arms against their country.”  In his piece ‘From Gettysburg to Anwar Al-Awlaki’ he takes a broader historical look at how our government has used lethal force against its citizens.

  • George Rebane

    [This is the addended and linked transcript of my regular KVMR commentary broadcast on 30 September 2011]

    It looks like we’re entering into the season of rights again.  Wisconsin judge Patrick Fiedler has informed the nation that we don’t have and never had any rights to either our cows, our crops, or our gardens, and that we may enjoy their benefits only to the extent that the government permits.  Meanwhile, here in California we are again leading the world in the discovery of a new “fundamental human right”, that being home ownership – everyone has a right to their own home.

    Ladies and gentlemen, none of this is made up or hyperbole.  I am talking about the Foreclosure Modification Act, which California voters will see on their ballots as another initiative in November 2012.  The act will essentially prohibit the lender from foreclosing on a house that is the contracted collateral for the mortgage on the house.

    Specifically, one of the purposes of the act is to “prevent the loss of one's personal home property by foreclosure or other means due to hardship or illness or other calamity.”  Under “other calamity” we find such things as tanking of the real estate market, or interest rate hikes that affect adjustable rate mortgages.  With this new right under our belts, we get to stiff the lender if the market value of our house goes ‘under water’, or we simply can’t come up with the monthly mortgage.  The lender cannot kick us out of our house and must renegotiate the loan to make it compatible with our new financial situation.  It will be one of our rights.

    This kind of rights creep has been going on for the last several decades.  Things we naturally thought were our rights, such as property ownership, have been whittled away to effectively government permitted custodianship or simply criminalized.  And then new rights have been bestowed on us which we never expected to be called rights – like the right to safe hiking trails or nationalized healthcare – which, when enforced, almost always reduce our ability to enjoy what the right is supposed to promote.  You can form your own estimate of what will happen to California’s housing market if we pass the Foreclosure Modification Act.

    (more…)

87 comments on Nevada City Occupied