Rebane's Ruminations
November 2026
S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930  

ARCHIVES


OUR LINKS


YubaNet
White House Blog
Watts Up With That?
The Union
Sierra Thread
RL “Bob” Crabb
Barry Pruett Blog

  • George Rebane

    •    New Army rifle, a truly fearsome weapon
    •    Obama uses FDR’s re-election model
    •    Local left concerned about govt regs on food

    XM25Army’s new “rifle” is game changer – The Army has released the specs on its new XM25 Counter Defilade Target Engagement System (love that name) that is really a shoulder-fired 25mm cannon that fires a laser-ranged projectile.   The shell explodes at a preset distance from its discharge, and this preset distance can be quickly and accurately set by the trooper using the built-in laser sight.  So if you’re a bad guy and take cover behind a berm or corner of a building (the defilade), you’re dead meat.  The trooper just puts the laser dot on the near edge of the defilade, adds a yard or two with his trigger finger, points it above the berm or by the building’s corner and fires.  The shell goes just beyond the defilade and explodes like a grenade.  Next case please.  (H/T to reader)

    Readers know that I always look at these new military and law enforcement sensor and weapon systems with the additional perspective of the 2nd Amendment within the concept of par force.  Governments using the XM25 will have little trouble putting down armed uprisings of people using conventional arms.  That is why future technology augmented autocracies will be very stable.

    Obama uses FDR’s re-election model.  In 1936, at the depth of Depression1, FDR blamed the country’s sad state of affairs on capitalism and corporate interests instead of the grim array of socialist fodder that he had served up since being elected in 1932.  By 1937 his attacks on business were regular fare.  Today Obama has taken that page from our first socialist president and improved upon it with the Occupy Wall Street movement that he and his launched earlier this year.  (more here)  As I have noted before, these demonstrations are now becoming the Obama riots of 2011/12.  Russ Steele on Nevada County 2012 is keeping close track of the progress of this strategic diversion movement of the so-called 99%.

    FDA overreach.  Last week I had another lunch with Nevada City Councilwoman (and former mayor) Reinette Senum.  We met to again discuss her project to launch the Sierra Land Collaborative wherein high-tech and vertical farming methods can be used locally to yield produce for local consumption.  The farms would be staffed by returning veterans and selected homeless people as part of their rehabilitation.   Part of the conversation involved a lament on how the feds are now imposing draconian rules and regs on what kinds of foodstuffs (e.g. raw milk) can be sold by one person to another.  We agreed that bloated governments can turn around to bite even those who promote their growth.  In the meantime Reinette is off to study and support the OWS movement in NYC – we look forward to her report.

    [27oct2011 update]  A reader sent this 1948 cartoon that was released into the season when Americans finally began to see socialism and communism for what they are, and the US changed course markedly from its pre-war track and the road then taken by many European countries led by Great Britain.  History students will remember 1948 as the year Winston Churchill announced that “an Iron Curtain has descended across the continent” of Europe heralded by the Berlin blockade and airlift.

    [29oct2011 update]  Only people rabidly intent on making California a template for a police state would consider the topics discussed in this CARB related hearing of the California Senate.  However, these idiots are dead serious in the deliberations about their plans for California drivers.  And it all comes to you courtesy of the Left.

  • George Rebane

    Last Saturday night we went to dinner with friends, and then on to the evening presentation of Tennessee Williams’ classic ‘Streetcar Named Desire’ being performed at the Nevada Theater.

    Streetcar

    There we saw a wonderful production of the dark drama that moved Marlon Brandon from its theater production and gave him his film start (1951) after the play finished its Broadway run.  And today we can see a well cast and directed (John Diederick) version of the Pulitzer Prize winner right here in our own town.  The production itself is first rate from the sets, to the sound & lighting, to the delivery itself.  The second act, after the intermission, had us on the edge of our seats as Blanche begins to come apart.

    Our own Paul Emery adds ‘Streetcar’ to his growing list of magnificent theatrical productions.  The man wears many hats in our community, and he wears them all well.  So pick up the phone and call (530)478-1974 for information and tickets.  This theater event will end on 5 November; not much time left.

    (Yes, this is the same Paul Emery with whom we lock horns in the comment streams of these pages.)

  • George Rebane

    I've received emails from readers that comments don't post reliably or disappear after they are posted.  Am working on this with TypePad.  Please keep the faith since I don't know when they will get the problem fixed.  Thank you.

    [update]  The problem seems to have been fixed.

  • George Rebane

    In the 24oct11 WSJ, Wharton School academic Peter Cappelli posits that employers are putting too much blame on schools for not turning out educated workers who can do the available jobs (here).  Employers should instead take in the unqualified, and educate them in the skills needed as, he claims, they did in the old days.  This is another example of an inexperienced liberal academic spouting wisdom from his ivory tower.  As a worker in and manager of businesses over the last half century, I assure you that the world he imagines did not exist.  The limited OJT (on the job training) programs implemented then were possible because the minimum wage and hiring/firing situation was much more fluid and conducive to dealing with young promising workers – if they didn’t work out, they were shown the door with no chance of recourse.

    InterviewAnd his claim that you didn’t have to know the job when hired is simply bovine scat.  Then as now, rapid productivity was the name of the game industry wide; things you were taught were only company-specific practices.  With some high school drafting under my belt, at 19 while Eisenhower was still President, I was hired as an entry level draftsman by Genge Corporation and sent to a big aerospace company in Glendale.  We were put on drafting boards located in trailers with no A/C, given small engineering rework tasks to draw up, and watched like a hawk.  If you didn’t cut it, you were out by noon.  Next case please.  (Fortunately I made it and quickly became a senior design draftsman to pay for my undergraduate schooling.)

    The same happened when I walked into my first job as an electronics engineer while still completing my BS.  I was shown my desk, my bench space in the circuit design lab, and given the specifications for a device that had yet to be invented, let alone designed and built.  My job was simply to do it.  Period.  (Four months later I delivered the first synchro-to-digital converter.)

    In both cases, you learned on your own time anything needed that you didn’t already know.  That’s why God invented midnight oil.  And I want to emphasize that my experience was nothing special or extraordinary.  Over the years my peers and I shared our war stories, and they were all the same.  And it never stopped – twenty years later I was hired to turn around an electronics manufacturing company with a unionized factory ready to go on strike.  As an established systems scientist I had never run a complex hardware (educational electronics) company.  The choice again was ‘learn or burn’.  In short, at all levels, from snot-nosed draftsman to corporate CEO, we all had to lay down a thick track of rubber when our wheels hit the pavement, else it was the door.

    Today we have the ‘self-esteem’ generation still entering the workforce with degrees in gender studies, environmental assessment, and the like.  Alongside these aspirants, apologists like Professor Peter Cappelli, who admits to no private sector business experience, study the employment situation and conclude that corporations fighting for survival during a humungus recession (proceeding to depression) should hire and train as permanent employees the unqualified applicants whom the law no longer allows the employer to properly vet, who must be paid an unseemly and unearned minimum wage, and who cannot be easily discharged.  The government has made hiring and employment an expensive minefield of regulations and risk.  It is no wonder to any but the progressive mind that today businesses are hiring slowly if at all, and taking the extra time to employ only the best people they can find.

  • George Rebane

    The one dimensional political spectrum is of great rhetorical convenience, but absolutely worthless when it comes to correctly summarizing the attributes of ideology that the so-called ‘Right’ is supposed hold dear (more here).  The light-minded view is that we start somewhere at the far Left where altruistic collectivism rules the roost under the various labels of communism, socialism, progressivism, and (latter day) liberalism – all various flavors of association that celebrate ‘the people’ over ‘the person’.

    LibConservativeContinuing ‘rightward’, we migrate through a region of ideology inhabited by the ‘moderates’ or ‘the center’, or even the ‘undecideds’ whose ideological make-up is a wavering unknown.  From here we keep going until we start getting tinges of ‘the Right’, and press on until we finally arrive at the ‘far Right’.  When this expanse is outlined, using these or other similar words, one gets a lot of nods from people all of whom think they know the next level of definition.

    The common view from the lamestream media is that both extremes are autocratic and bad – on one end people like Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot, and the other end with characters like Hitler, Mussolini, Franco, Pinochet.  This is a nonsensical view of the reality of the American Right under which people who call themselves conservatives, libertarians, free-marketers, and even conservetarians are lumped.  The nonsense is that if you fully applied the ideological tenets of these people, then you would return governance and society to what it was under the ‘Rightwing dictators’ listed above, or other knuckle-dragging versions of it.

    This is utter bullcrap, for all the above rogue gallery and their lesser ilk were first and foremost collectivists who claimed to benefit “the people” (“der Volk”), and accomplish that through forging the person into a compliant ideal of the state.  The only difference these despots had was the advertized scope of their interests – national vs international.  This is the exact antithesis of the tenets that conservatives and libertarians hold dear, and are prepared to go to the ramparts to defend.

    (more…)

  • George Rebane

    This year’s Singularity Summit again brought out leading thinkers and workers on the progress being made toward that momentous fin de siècle of human development and evolution.  The annual conference prompted Paul Allen (Microsoft co-founder) and Mark Greaves to write a strong denial on the prospects of a near-term Singularity (here).  This was promptly rebutted by Ray Kurzweil in a fascinating essay on the pace of recent advances in various technologies (here).  In it he dismantles the Allen and Greaves arguments.  Both pieces appeared in the MIT Technology Review; these and their comment streams are worth a read.

    We recall that we are now in the home stretch for the Singularity during which we would expect to see the kinds of reverberations that are going through the employment markets of the developed countries in which technology is being implemented most aggressively to replace human labor.  And that, of course, causes frequent re-evaluation of all current skill sets, and the obsoleting of entire fields of knowledge that used to be the basis for rewarding careers.  These considerations are ignored by our politicians of all stripes.

  • George Rebane

    Now the smelly, pierced, and entrenched ‘Occupy people’ (as described by Andy Kessler and others) will not move from their rancid encampments in San Francisco, Oakland, and other places.  They dare the local authorities to remove them, and promise to resist when the attempt is made.  When questioned about their protests, all their slogans and signs, claiming to represent “the 99%” that wants to bring down the established order, arise from being more than disappointed (aka pissed) that no one respects their expensive degrees in art and minority studies enough to hire them, and that no one told them that that would be the case.

    And so some of them have now learned to answer that they are against “predatory lenders”, and that “corporations are not people”, and “money is not speech”.  Their simple solution is to overturn the capitalistic underpinnings of the American economy that is seen as the source of all their problems.

    OWS_TahrirMomentIn these crowds it’s hard to find one that can discuss corporate personhood and what benefits it provides a society, or what parts of it should be examined for possible revision.  No one can translate the collateral effects of restricting spending one’s money to communicate – since it costs to communicate, rules on monies used to communicate will slide us toward a police state where only certain communications will survive as state approved ‘free speech’.

    Not one can define predatory lending – understanding the roles of lender and borrower and the guaranteeing of loans is beyond their ken.  They seem to conjure up images of a person innocently walking down the street who suddenly finds his pockets stuffed with unwanted money along with a draconian loan agreement to which his signature has been forged, and that person has no idea how it all came about.

    And loonies on the left still tell us that the Occupy movement is just like the Tea Party movement.  One of these seeks to conserve, preserve, and restore the country by acting within the law and its established constitutional underpinnings.  The other wants to overturn the existing order and fundamentally transform the country by acting outside the law and bringing about change through revolution.

    The Occupy movement has finally given the left a populist vehicle to voice and demonstrate their motives, means, and methods that differentiate them from those who seek to preserve America and continue its orderly and lawful evolution.  And these same occupiers claim to be in the mainstream.

    [24oct2011 update]  Obama attempts to compare the Occupiers to the Tea Party movement in a lame and lying attempt to paint his demonstrators as just another expression of mainstream frustration with the world situation in general and the economy in particular.  The video ‘Are the Occupiers like the Tea Party?’ sheds some light on the explicit differences between the two movements.

  • George Rebane

    [This is the transcript of my regular KVMR commentary broadcast on 21 October 2011.  Here I have provided some links to expand the recorded material, and added a recent Ramirez who always summarizes succinctly.]

    The Occupy Wall Street crowd has taken its template from the street critics of Europe’s socialist countries, and its marching orders from a Team Obama that needs to soften up the country for next year’s re-election.  Some media mavens on the left are deliriously happy to report that now they also have their ‘tea party’ movement, but the attempts to compare the two don’t stand up to scrutiny – at least so far.

    The ‘occupy’ name has been well chosen, for to occupy means to take possession and control of a space, place, or organization.  Occupiers are foreign to the normal or indigenous population of a place, and seek to replace the pre-occupation order of their target space, place or organization.  The people on the streets today most certainly admit that, although what they want to replace it with is still not nailed down.

    Enough of these demonstrations have gone on to allow some early polling to take place.  Bill Schoen, former Bill Clinton pollster, reports “research (showing) clearly that the movement doesn’t represent unemployed America and is not ideologically diverse. Rather, it comprises an unrepresentative segment of the electorate that believes in radical redistribution of wealth, civil disobedience and, in some instances, violence.”  Moreover, he finds that “the protesters have a distinct ideology and are bound by a deep commitment to radical left-wing policies”, and that “the vast majority of them are employed.” (more here)

    Obama.lemmings

    (more…)

  • George Rebane

    Sue McGuire has announced that she will be running against Nate Beason for the Nevada County District #1 supervisorial seat.  Press release below.

    News Release
    Contact: Julie Johnson
    Phone: 530 263 2060

    For Immediate Release

    Sue McGuire announces candidacy for First District Supervisor

    Nevada County Attorney Sue McGuire this morning announced that she is seeking the office of First District Supervisor for Nevada County.  She believes her deep roots in the community and two decades as an attorney in Nevada County have provided her with the love of the lifestyle here, and the experience that makes her perfect for the job.  Sue’s family has been actively involved in the county for six generations.

    Sue’s first goal as county supervisor will be to ensure that Nevada County retains existing businesses and encourages new businesses that will provide jobs for Nevada County residents.  Given the economy and resulting job attrition in government, it is critical to provide an atmosphere that encourages private sector business.  Sue will review all regulations that may be a hindrance to this goal to determine what is working and alternatively, what needs to be changed.

    McGuire was born and raised in Nevada County, as were her parents, Mel and Bonnie McGuire.  Mel was a self-employed trucker, hauling logs in the warmer months and refrigerated trailers cross-country in the winter.  Her mother was a homemaker and is an artist and writer.  Sue’s grandparents, Tom and Marie McGuire, moved to the area in the 1920s and owned apartments in Nevada City while Tom hauled equipment for the mines and local construction companies.  That included equipment and supplies for construction of the annex to the Nevada County Courthouse and for Nevada City Elementary School. 

    Sue’s maternal grandparents, Val and Lilly Belle Baima, began operating a local organic farm in the 1940s, long before anyone else pursued organic farming.  They received numerous local and state awards for excellence in agriculture.

    Sue graduated from Nevada Union High School and immediately began working in local law offices, while eventually completing law school at night and opening her private practice in Nevada County in 1991.  She worked in the Nevada County District Attorney’s Office from 2003 to 2008, when she decided to return to her current private practice handling civil and criminal cases.

    Sue has volunteered with the American Red Cross, including assisting in Louisiana during the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina, and helped out at the San Francisco Rescue Mission.  She also served as an election official for three elections during the past decade and volunteered with Veteran’s Stand Down.  McGuire is a past local Board Member for Project Jump Start, Anew Day, and the Nevada County Tea Party Patriots.  She currently serves as a regular volunteer at Twin Cities Church and is a mentor attorney with the Nevada County Peer Court.

    McGuire vows to meet with her constituents during her campaign and will continue that practice upon assuming duties as the First District Supervisor.  She plans meeting with community organizations, county staff, and city, state, and federal officials on a frequent and regular basis.

    McGuire feels it is her patriotic privilege and duty to be a public servant in the community that she calls home.

  • “The trouble with quotes on the internet is that it’s difficult to determine whether or not they are genuine.”  Abraham Lincoln

    George Rebane

    This post is unabashedly lifted from and is composed of content, in whole cloth, from reader emails.  (I am still in mourning over Bill Watterson’s decision to retire the strip in 1995; talk about quitting when you’re ahead.)

    CalvinsEcon101A

96 comments on Ruminations – 26oct2011 (29oct2011 update)