Rebane's Ruminations
November 2026
S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930  

ARCHIVES


OUR LINKS


YubaNet
White House Blog
Watts Up With That?
The Union
Sierra Thread
RL “Bob” Crabb
Barry Pruett Blog

  • George Rebane

    The Grand Experiment of America is nothing less than to test the historical question – Can man govern himself?  Our Founders repeatedly asked that question of themselves as they labored to give the new nation the appropriate tools of governance so as to stack the deck in favor of a ‘Yes!’ answer.  Jefferson’s admonishment put a bow on the prerequisites for such an answer – ‘A nation ignorant and free, that never was and never shall be.’  And over the last fifty years we have embarked on a course that has resurrected the worst fears of those courageous and farsighted men now two and a half centuries past.

    I look at the inventory of evidence and cannot help but start with our national education system which has spread multi-generational ‘dumbth’ deep and wide across the land.   From its schools emerge legions of young deeply ignorant of history and civics with inadequeate tools to help themselves since they are marginally literate and almost totally innumerate.  They join those millions already on the sidelines from the workforce who have no means to evaluate the steady rain of ‘information’ that drenches them daily through countless channels enabled by an accelerating technology.  These are what are commonly referred to as America’s sheeple.  (cf Bryan Caplan’s Myth of the Rational Voter)

    SocialismAscendant
    If we examine some of these deficits operating in the daily round, the picture of where we are headed becomes very clear.

    (more…)

  • George Rebane

    Given the interest in the recent ordnance on large gatherings on private land that Nevada County Board of Supervisors is considering, I promised to ask my supervisor (District #1) Nate Beason for some publishable clarification about what is intended and what is going on regarding this issue.  Specifically, I asked –

    1.    What problem the new ordnance is supposed to address that current laws and ordnances don’t cover?
    2.    What are the high hard ones in your preferred version of the ordnance?
    3.    What is the current progress on adopting such an ordnance?
    4.    Where should people go to find out more?

    Nate was kind enough to give a timely reply to the email I sent him earlier in the day.  His response follows.

    For over 30 years, the County has required that, prior to conducting certain outdoor music events, the event sponsor must obtain an Outdoor Festival Permit from the Sheriff. In the past, these events have been defined as “…any outdoor gathering of more than 100 people for the purpose of participating in or attending a dance, music carnival, ‘rock’ festival, or like musical activity.” 

    At our workshop in January, the BOS took a decision to review and update the current ordinance. The decision was driven by two primary issues.

    First, the potential for large events to occur in the unincorporated area without permits (which they have) and the current lack of enforcement tools provided to the sheriff to address the potential impacts of such events on neighboring properties.

    Second, the BOS expressed an interest in establishing a reasonable mechanism by which wineries and other small businesses might hold occasional outdoor events on properties that do not have or cannot provide sufficient permanent facilities to hold such events.

    A related issue is provision of discretionary enforcement authority to the sheriff regarding events that are exempt from the permitting process and cause disturbances. This enforcement would be complaint-driven and enforcement would be up to the responding officers’ discretion, i.e., a range of enforcement from asking people to please hold the noise down to requiring them to terminate their activities, depending on the nature and/or severity of the impact on the surrounding area. Our current ordinance is silent on this type of activity.

    One of our major concerns is large, unpermitted gatherings at the end of dead end roads with inadequate sanitation and lack of safe emergency egress. We have had several of these types occur in recent years, and they appear to be on the increase. The current ordinance does not give the sheriff a sufficient range of authority to deal with them.

    The first draft was sent back for revision for a variety of reasons. Any future BOS addressal of the issue will be publicly noticed.  Any resident who wishes notification beyond that required by law can call the Planning Department, 265- 1759, and ask to be put on a list of contacts for this specific issue.

    At this point, I can offer very little in terms of specifics, but I hope the foregoing helps.

    Thanks for contacting me,

    Nate

  • [Representaive McClintock made the following speech on the floor of the House today 28 September 2013.  It is here reproduced in its entirety.  gjr]

    Tom McClintock (R-CA4)

    Mr. Speaker:

                A crisis is not a good time for inflammatory rhetoric and ad hominem attacks.  I will simply say that yesterday, the President missed an opportunity to bring both sides together.  That responsibility now rests solely with us.

                Nobody on the Republican side of the aisle wants to see a government shutdown or a credit default.  And I am confident that nobody on the Democratic side wants to see millions of Americans lose the health plans they were told they could keep; or see their healthcare costs skyrocket, or lose their jobs or work hours because of the unintended consequences of Obamacare.

                But these events — that nobody wants to see — are now unfolding.  They will do great damage to our nation that nobody on wants to see happen. 

                If we agree on these fundamental issues, our course should be clear and is only blocked by the kind of partisan division that we heard yesterday from the White House. 

                We can avert these calamities and redeem this institution if we can put aside the name-calling for a few days and get down to business.

                The good news is that we have a process of government that has evolved over centuries that is very good at resolving differences of opinion within and between the two houses of Congress. 

                And in this case, there shouldn’t even be much to resolve: ALL OF US want to see the government stay open; ALL OF US want to see the government’s credit preserved; ALL OF US want to see Americans protected from losing health plans they want to keep; or from being socked with crushing premium increases; or from losing their jobs or having their hours cut back.

    (more…)

  • George Rebane

    [This is the transcript of my regular KVMR commentary broadcast on 27 September 2013.]

    Something happened this week that will change the course of our country and our lives, something that few people noticed.  It happened while we were all in a lather about defunding Obamacare and funding government; while we worried about Iran’s nuclear bomb building and Syria’s civil war; while realizing that today Al Qaeda is stronger than ever, and while we are forgivably exercised about the sophomoric foreign policy and demonstrated ineptness the Obama administration has shown us during the last years.  And rightly so, but going forward, that is not what will trouble us most.

    (more…)

  • George Rebane

    Sustainability, especially of government programs such as healthcare, has been a constant topic of debate on RR since its inception.  Our friends on the Left have trouble understanding that a program is sustainable only to the extent that its cost doesn’t crowd out other programs and consume the country’s GDP in toto.  And that is doubly true if more than one government program develops an expanding appetite for GDP.

    To make this clear to those who are still numerate enough to remember their first semester algebra, consider the following.  In the base year let AH be the amount spent on a program, say, healthcare.  In that year this consumes a fraction fH = AH/AGDP of the country’s total output of goods and services.  Assume that during the next year we witness growth rates of rH and rGDP in their respective sectors.

    At the end of that year we will have spent (1+rH)AH for healthcare out of a GDP that has grown to (1+rGDP)AGDP.  This says that our healthcare spending as a fraction of GDP is now fH+ = [(1+rH)AH]/[(1+rGDP)AGDP].

    For sustainability, this year’s healthcare fraction must be no larger than last year’s.  That means that fH+/fH ≤ 1, or substituing from above we must have (1+rH)/(1+rGDP) ≤ 1.  This requires that the numerator be no larger than the denominator, or that 1+rH ≤ 1+rGDP.  Subtracting one from both sides yields the final requirement, rGDP ≥ rH .  This simply says that the GDP’s growth rate must be at least as large as that of the sustainable program in question; in this case, healthcare.

    Since the first comparison of any government program is always to its fraction of the budget, with similar argument we see that the government’s budget must also grow at least as fast as GDP.  With a healthy GDP growth rate such budget increases are not a problem.  However, with an anemic growth rate, taxes must be increased to grow the government’s budget sufficiently to sustain all its spending programs.  Unfortunately, we then run into the Laffer Curve.  (The astute reader may also offer that some other programs be cut to accomodate more desirable programs in a sputtering economy.  But that may be hoping for too much.)

    [9oct13 update]  And now for the real budget problem (and solution).

    Entitlements

  • George Rebane

    Well, another six years has passed since 2007 when the IPCC issued its last load of hooey piled high and dry.  In Stockholm they are now putting the finishing edits on this year’s hernia pack that updates the latest “peer reviewed science” on the earth’s climate.  And on Friday they will release the whole thing – Fifth Assessment Report (AR5) – including its 30-page ‘Summary for Policy Makers’ that will be the only part read by anyone.

    In it they will not be able to account for the temperature record of the past 15 years, nor a lot of other climate related measurables like the record amounts of ice returning to the Arctic inspite of the constant increase in atmospheric CO2.  But it is expected that these government paid scientists and environmentalist ideologues will up their subjective certainty of manmade climate change to 95% from 90%.

    Not known yet is the level of lying that will be included in this edition.  Two years ago Dr Rajendra Pachauri, bandleader of the IPCC, “told the Guardian newspaper that an independent review of the IPCC “found our work solid and robust.” This is not so. The review, conducted in 2010 by a committee of the InterAcademy Council identified “significant shortcomings in each major step of [the] IPCC’s assessment process.” It said “significant improvements” were necessary—and criticized the IPCC for claiming to have “high confidence in some statements for which there is little evidence.” (reported in the 25sep13 WSJ, more here)

    The world has been convinced that the UN’s IPCC is comprised of an unbiased group of qualified scientists studying climate change.  That stretches truth beyond its elastic limit.  “The U.N. has charged the IPCC with weighing the evidence on climate change in an objective manner. The problem is that numerous IPCC personnel have ties to environmental groups, many of which raise funds by hyping the alleged dangers of climate change. This relationship raises a legitimate question about their objectivity.”

    The lamestream will, of course, stand up and deliver their usual knowledge-free salute to whatever is claimed in the forthcoming report.  And our central planners in Washington and Sacramento will use that copy to sustain and grow the stack of laws and regulations that already limit our liberties and cripple our country.  Contact your members in Congress; but then again …

    NSAlistens
    [27sep13 update]  The IPCC Working Group did publish its Summary for Policy Makers with the expected conclusions as the preamble to the full version of their Fifth Assessment Report (AR5) that will issue later.

  • George Rebane

    FutureMindA number of emails, articles, and recent announcements came together that made me again revisit the notion of man’s dream of physical immortality.  What if there were developed a pill that would genomically and/or proteomically rejuvenate a person, and taking such a pill every so many years would keep him going indefinitely?  It seems to me that such a pill, or even a more complex rejuvenation procedure, would put the continued existence of humanity at risk.

    A friend and former colleague, Dr Keith Dutton, just informed me that the company that he coufounded – Lively – was successful in closing a second round of funding, and is now off to the races.  Lively offers a system that enables single older folks to continue living alone and maintaining their independence over a greater span of their life, thereby fulfilling a basic desire by all of us to maintain the homeostasis of normalcy for as long as possible.  Nevada County probably has a lot of customers for such a system.

    Then there’s all the buzz on how education delivery is moving online (see RR posts on MOOCs and all the universities starting to offer their curricula over the internet).  The more important part of that is the efforts of older workers and even retired people who are enrolling in these courses to keep learning more stuff, develop additional skillsets to sell in the workforce, and to continue the never-ending pursuit of fulfillment.  The age cutoff for retiring from a stimulating life seems to be rapidly disappearing.

    My old pal Dr Larry Press at CSUDH (professor of information technologies) has been a longtime promoter of all things internet and networking.  His blog is a good resource for keeping up with the latest in everything from network applications to distance learning.  Apropos to living a longer and much more productive life, Larry’s 23sep13 entry introduces us to FutureLearn, a collaboration of a group of UK universities.  “Their slogan is ‘Learning for life’, indicating a focus on students who are not seeking credit and degrees. That audience may turn out to be more important than traditional university students — more lucrative and more beneficial to society.”

    During these pre-Singularity years the pursuit of life extension (cum immortality) is reaching the entrepreneurial levels of business activity.  Early evangelists like Ray Kurzweil are now being joined by start-ups like Calico (California Life Corporation) which Google has announced as its latest business venture (more here).   Actually, since Kurzweil joined Google, their investment in Calico is probably his doing.

    (more…)

  • George Rebane

    The pressure from the local Left mounts on Sheriff Keith Royal who is slated to introduce Sheriff Mack during a major speaking event in Nevada County on 18 October next.  While Sheriff Royal has given no explicit support to the constitutional sheriffs movement, of which Sheriff Mack is a founder, just that he has agreed to introduce Sheriff Mack has enraged our progressive platoons.  It will be most interesting to see how our politically astute elected lawman handles this conundrum as he looks forward to standing for the office again next year.  (Judi Caler of ROAR emailed this announcement today on the upcoming event.)

    Government schools registered yet another new performance low.  This morning NPR announced that California’s reading scores for 3rd graders are in.  Another significant yearly drop.  In San Joachin County scores dropped from a dismal upper 30 percentile range down to around 33%, and Sacramento county suffered a drop from 46% to 42% of these youngsters who had learned to read.  The significance of this is that if a student does not learn to read by the 3rd grade, the likelihood is low that he will ever become a literate person.  And we continue to pump out millions of illiterates every year into a workforce in which they simply have no chance to qualify for a job.  The progressive educators celebrate these results because these ignorant legions do add to the growing cohort of reliable voters for the Democratic Party.

    Why not join the funding of Obamacare with the funding of the nation’s other ‘entitlements’?  Isn’t that what Obamacare really is, another entitlement?  Why treat it separately when the deficit reduction debate heats up in a few days.  Entitlements are the 800lbs gorilla of mandated government expenditures, and keeping them whole gives no hope for reducing deficits, let alone approaching a balanced budget.  I have no idea why the Republicans have not made that obvious connection instead girding their loins to assault Mount Obamacare as a separate objective that is also happens to be this administration’s holy grail.  Throw that damned cup into the bin with all the other spending programs that are driving the country into the mud.

    ObamacareDefund
    Last Wednesday we taped the fifth edition of ‘Breaking Bread’ at the NCTV studios.  The topic of BB5 was the Trans Pacific Partnership multi-lateral trade agreement.  Eric Tombs hosted the show which will air this Sunday and then be available online.  I was one of Eric’s guests in that discussion.  The remarkable conclusion was that we all had problems finding any good parts to the secretly negotiated agreement, especially how it will aid America’s small and medium sized businesses.  Each of us thought that this was a genuine example of corporatism for the benefit of central planners and the big business interests that are trying to become super-national entities with their own laws and courts that supersede the legal rights of sovereign nation states.

    The Public Citizen takes a dim view of the TPP.  The official story is given here on the US Trade Representative’s website.

    BTW, NCTV is now fighting for its life.  There are plans for going forward in a new format, but everything is up in the air until the existing board decides how it will exit.  The official word on the subject is given on the station’s website; stay tuned.

    [update]  Reader Michael Anderson informs us (here) that Sheriff Royal has announced that he will not be introducing Sheriff Mack on 18 October.  Apparently Sheriff Royal called Jeff Pelline to confirm this decision who then posted it on his blog (here).

  • George Rebane


    LavabitRIP Lavabit.
      Lavabit has demonstrably been one of the most secure email services on the internet.  It is now closing its doors much to the consternation of the feds who have not been able to hack into Lavabit’s emails and servers.  And this story is worth a consideration to all Americans who pay lip service to maintaining our freedoms.  According to the report in Xato.net Lavabit’s founder and CEO Ladar Levinson refuses to play along with the feds in opening up his email service to government spying.  The exact nature of the government threat has yet to emerge, but the high hard one is clear –  “The message here is that US courts can force a business to subvert their own security measures and lie to their customers, deliberately giving them a false sense of security.” (H/T to RR reader)

    The damage by teachers unions is more severe than even I had anticipated.  This especially in California where the CTA has f&*#ed over the young people of the state for some decades now.  California teachers get paid at the highest rates in the country, and they produce students that rank among the lowest in literacy and numeracy in the nation.  But the story doesn’t end there,  as academic Jonathan Jacobs writes ‘As Education Declines, So Does Civic Culture’ in the 16sep13 WSJ.  He strongly underlines and extends the message that Charles Murray (Coming Apart) has delivered (covered much in these pages with more to come).

    The bottom line is that we’re turning out millions of 2x4s with faces painted on them.  These students can neither read, write, cypher, nor reason.  And it all comes together in the workplace where “… employers attest, as college instructors will too if they’re being frank, that many college graduates can barely construct a coherent paragraph and many have precious little knowledge of the world—the natural world, the social world, the historical world, or the cultural world. That is a tragedy for the graduates, but also for society: Civic life suffers when people have severely limited knowledge of the world to bring to political or moral discussions.”


    BushPricesLiberal history book guts second amendment.
     
    As a footnote to the above, leftwing academics continue to do their
    share in supplying students a distinctly ‘progressive’ perspective of
    what went on before that got us to where we are (more here).

    Played out daily in the public round is the truth of ‘a nation ignorant and free, that never was and never shall be.’  (Thomas Jefferson)

    Bush2 ended the financial crisis before Obama took office.  As pointed out by an RR reader (here), let’s circle that barn again and take a careful look at what happened before that cold, garbage strewn January 2009 morning in Washington.  Stanford professors Keith Hennessey and Edward Lazear give a succinct accounting of the events and their aftermath (here).  But as we now know, this was a crisis too good to waste in advancing the American socialists’ agenda and fundamentally transforming the nation.

    Ending on a high note and a conundrum for collectivist ideology, it turns out that long ago humans evolved brains built for charity.  This has been obvious to the celebrants of American exceptionalism for a couple of centuries or more, now science weighs in with some clinical evidence.  ‘Hard-wired for Giving’ presents the research story (here), but the bigger thrust is that we really don’t need the government gun to make us care for our neighbors and countrymen.  We did it before socialism, and we can do it again if the feds would back off a mite on their forced redistribution programs.  But that is not the progressive view, and the sheeple (see above) are quickly receding out of the reach of reason.

    Finally, a little ‘pojetry’ –

    The time has come, progressives say
        to speak of many things.
    No not of Obama, the here and now,
        or what the future brings.
    But of the past, the then and there,
        of Reagan’s sins and Bush laid bare,
        and the shape of Clinton’s wings.

    [19sep13 update] … and a little food for thought.

    We are told NOT to judge ALL Muslims by the actions of more than a few Islamic lunatics, but we are encouraged to judge ALL gun owners by the actions of a few lunatics.  Makes you wonder …

  • George Rebane

    The NC Republican Women Federated have been working hard to bring Sheriff Richard Mack to speak in Nevada County.  Today The Union ran a piece on the 18oct13 affair to be held in the GV Vets Hall.  Sheriff Mack is the founder of the nation’s constitutional sheriffs movement and a celebrated public servant to most conservatives.  You can find out more about the man’s thinking on his website here.

    As predictable as the sunrise, our designated reader sent me a copy of the first of what promises to be many hyper-ventilations by the local Left to somehow diminish the scheduled speaking engagement, or preferably to ban it altogether.  The big insult to these open-minded progressives is that Sheriff Mack will be introduced by our own elected Sheriff Keith Royal.  Now isn’t that an outrage if I ever heard of one?

    As pointed out regularly in these pages, it is always the looney Left that wants to proscribe anyone and everyone who doesn’t agree with their message.  Why is that so one-sided?  I’d be quite happy to have them invite Nancy Pelosi, Barbara Boxer, Harry Reid, Maxine Waters, Rev Sharpton, Rev Jackson, Rev Wright, Bill Ayers, …, hell, even Harry Belafonte up here to speak.  I would definitely be in the audience to hear what they had to say.

    [18sep13 update]  Apropos to the asymmetry pointed out above, the comment stream to this post is also illustrative.  In there we see the notion of selective enforcement of laws taken up.  Our progressive commenters are all in a lather about the intentions of certain local sheriffs to enforce only laws, regulations, mandates, etc they consider constitutional or have a proper legal basis.  These commenters treat this notion as if it was invented yesterday by the so-called ‘constitutional sheriffs’, and as if it has not been long practiced by all governmental executive offices during the history of our republic.

    Today’s egregious end-runs by POTUS and various state governors of their respective legislatures that has raised hue and cry across the land does not even come up on their radar.  That Obama publicly stated he will constructively legislate through his agencies and bureaus (both criminal and regulatory) does not concern these worthies one whit.  And that the President has already brought untold misery in job destruction and economic malaise nationwide is not their concern as he has promised to continue this policy for the remainder of his term.

    Reading these commenters and their lines of argument is truly an education in the study of our polarization and the widening gulf that divides us.

88 comments on National Ignorance – Proof of Concept Working (updated 6oct13)