Rebane's Ruminations
November 2026
S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930  

ARCHIVES


OUR LINKS


YubaNet
White House Blog
Watts Up With That?
The Union
Sierra Thread
RL “Bob” Crabb
Barry Pruett Blog

  • George Rebane

    Predictably Barack Hussein Obama voiced his conclusions and exhortations for gun control before the Roseburg bodies had cooled, the wounded were out of surgery, and any relevant information about the shooter and the shootings had been released by the police – anything to take people’s minds off his debacles in Syria, Iraq, and Afghanistan.  Our national demagogue again addressed the gruberized in an attempt to make them believe that these rare shootings are a national problem that far outweighs those that happen in gun controlled cities day in and day out.  Nowhere did he rise to address the 50 Chicago shootings two weekends in a row – to that sumbich black lives don’t matter, but Agenda21 does.

    According to the Rebane Doctrine all gun control laws in legislative debate should address their impact on the Founders’ intent for including the Second Amendment in our Constitution.  Will the new law make it more difficult for citizens to successfully oppose a future rogue government as anticipated by the Founders and echoed by patriot Americans over the last two centuries?  The progressives promoting world socialism always want to divert us from the hundreds of millions of their own citizens that collectivist tyrants have murdered during the last century.  And they do it with the ever popular, ‘It can’t happen in America.’  In the mid-1930s ‘It can’t happen in Germany’ was used to keep the very educated and cultured masses quiet and compliant, even while Stalin was slaughtering kulaks by the tens of millions a few hundred miles away.

    Anyone want to make book on what part religion, specifically Islam, played in the mind of the Roseburg shooter?  And all that as Team Obama does its best to disarm law abiding America.  (For those interested, I’m prepared to go through some probabilistic calcs on the number of such people still loose in our population who will not be affected one whit by the Left’s proposed new gun laws.  As long as the perp knows he’s the only one with a gun, these killings will continue.  There are just too many of us, and enough of them.)

    [2oct15 update]  Well, the comment stream below has grown enough to attract and include the obligatory leftwing arguments for functionally, if not absolutely, disarming America.  From those commenters we hear nothing about our president rushing to be the first to call for new gun laws, and the first to politicize the event.  The Left, of course, with Alinsky-style retorts, flips that event and accuses those reporting and countering the president’s remarks as instead being the first to politicize this tragedy.

    What is important to note is that the Left again 1) says nothing about the non-enforcement of existing gun control laws, continuing their litany of ‘forget enforcement, just pass more restrictive laws’; 2) spells out no specific laws that could have had any effect on the latest shootings; and 3) totally ignores the horrendous history of state killings of citizens in countries that denied them guns (the Second Amendment’s raison d’etre).  As we see from the comment stream, the Left’s educated elites practice cynicism of the highest order in arguing that our ongoing social breakdown is due to factors such as legal gun ownership, western religiosity, capitalistic greed, market-based income inequality (anti-unionism), intrinsic distrust of government, … .  To them society should be organized around an all-encompassing government guided by collectivist elites under whom work legions of altruistic technocrats striving to implement a comprehensively-regulated social order, all for the “greater good”, that is uniquely visible in their lights.

    Again, I invite the attentive reader, in these first decades of the last great century of Man, to identify any common ground between our polarized and gruberized body politic that would just support functional communication, let alone that may contain a path to reunion as a citizenry of a sustainable sovereign nation-state.

    [6oct15 update]  Rumor has it that President Obama will take his gun control politicizing to Roseburg.  Folks up there don't cotton to Obama, and most certainly his use of this tragic event to grandstand his 2nd Amendment agenda.  The man does not have a sense of decorum or knows that not everyone is a progressive eager to hear the pap he spews.  That, of course, may come as a surprise to some of our locals who think that only a remote group of knuckle dragging old farts in these hills don't take kindly to his politics.  For those progressives, here's an illuminating video of an O'Reilly segment. 

  • George Rebane

    [This is the transcript of my regular KVMR commentary broadcast on 1 October 2015, not 30 September as previously noted.]

    For over two centuries America has had the reputation as being exceptional in the freedoms granted its citizens and guaranteed by its constitution.  However things have changed over the last 50 years or so, and few Americans are aware of it.  Our personal and economic freedoms have taken a dive which has gone unreported by the left-leaning lamestream media, and therefore unknown to those who limit their news to such outlets.  You are fortunate that KVMR is not among them.

    Recently some thought provoking studies have been published which put the United States into perspective with other developed countries, and the resulting picture is not pretty.  But the findings do go a long way to explain the economic and social degradation we experience in the “land of the free and the home of the brave.”

    (more…)

  • [Apologies for the belated opening of the new sandbox.  Sure would like to hear a discussion about the relative merits of Heidi Hall and Cheri West, candidates for District #1 Supervisor.  Also, what can our BoS do to slow down the drain of liberties and our loot to Sacramento?  gjr]

  • George Rebane

    The short term market is certifiably insane.  Yellen will not be able to avoid a rate raise forever, we all know that.  And yes, the centrally planned Chinese economy has predictably blown a tire (progressives call your office), but some people still believe that they are smart/lucky enough to bail just before Yellen ups the discount rate by ¼% and the market does its predictable swoon before going back to basics.  So in this anticipatory period the so-called range trading investors are playing the jittery game, and the algorithmic high frequency traders are making out like bandits milking the oscillating price patterns that they have discovered.  Come on Dr Yellen, do it!

    The Donald has passed his peak, and is now on what we engineers call ‘the back side of the power curve’ – the higher he tries to kick his ‘RPM’ the lower sinks his ‘power’ in the polls.  Some of our commenters have giddily anticipated this, and I believe one worthy even nailed the top.  I predict that the trail down from Mt Trump will be even more entertaining than the climb up, save for the heartburn it will cause the Republican leadership wondering whether he will renege and go for a third party run.

    Putin continues to toy with Obama.  This administration is so butt stupid on foreign policy that they continue to think that Putin is in Syria to help Assad or fight ISIS or … .  Putin’s geo-strategic move is to project Russian power into the Mediterranean and the Levant.  He needs to do this to become a permanent power player in the future of the region no matter who is in Damascus.  And the requirement for that is to get his stuff past the Bosporus and the Dardanelles.  Establishing bases in Latakia and Tartus satisfies that requirement.  He now owns the Syrian seaboard.  And Team Obama remains clueless, still attempting to tell Putin that he has made a “mistake” in putting together a coalition with Syria, Iran, and now Iraq while already entertaining the Saudis and the gulf states.

    [update] Election Polling: When ‘Who Will Win?’ Beats ‘Who Do You Like?’  Microsoft's 'PredictWise' project has incorporated that question into its crowd-source prediction markets.  This is something of which I have been a long time proponent.  The main argument to support the thesis is that "asking people who they expect will win, instead of who they prefer, 'grabs a much larger slice of people’s experience and knowledge, including a whole range of idiosyncratic facts' that are otherwise impossible to quantify".  (more here)

    [1oct15 update]  Elected NJUHSD trustee Ms Linda Campbell was censured by her colleagues on the Board of Trustees.   RR has been no fan of Ms Campbell’s, not only because of her uncouth public behavior, but more importantly because of her ignorance of public education that continues to punish Nevada County’s youth.  (more here and here)

    [2oct15 update] Let me see if I got it right about the idiot in the WH.  Russia is bombing crap out of anti-Assad rebels that we support, and Iran is now using Iraq as a staging area for its ground troops to support Russia's Syrian initiatives.  And in response Feckless Lidder on Pennsylvania Ave goes on the air to "chastise" Russia for making a "big mistake" and being on the wrong side of history.  While no one mentions ISIS.  Whatever happened to the country formerly known as the United States of America?

  • George Rebane

    This little update is primarily to continue the record of recent columns, commentraries, comments, and other contributions to the bubbling pot of preventable global warming (PGW).  As documented in these pages, I wrote a response to a Union piece by a couple of physicians making the usual outlandish claims for the existence of PGW, which they, as is common these days, confounded under the label ‘climate change’.  Other pro and con columns followed the initial piece, the most notable con pieces by skeptics Bob Hren and Norm Sauer (here, here, and here).

    However, for some reason my 8sep15 counter – ‘Bad time for making draconian public policy’ – to the Drs Newsom has drawn particular and ongoing ire from true believers, of which I am unabashedly proud.  The most recent in this sequence was from the Klistoff couple in Grass Valley.  I present it italized below as it appears on The Union’s blog (here)

    A hoax?  Really?

    George Rebane’s acrimonious commentary regarding Bill and Christine Newsome’s open letter to Congressman LaMalfa is a sad example of many right-winged opinion pieces and letters published in The Union.

    There seems to be an undercurrent of anger mixed with presumptuous and pedantic platitudes that do nothing to foster mutual understanding of the issues being discussed.

    But now apparently, these articles suggest the existence of an international conspiracy among climate scientists claiming their research is falsified in order to obtain grant money. Wow!

    Is this what Congressman LaMalfa is suggesting when he claims there is political manipulation of climate science? What is the evidence for this? Some even claim there is “global cooling” and that climate change is a hoax. Really?

    Take a look at the world’s glaciers and ice caps. Is their rapid rate of melting consistent with global “cooling”? Where is the data to back up this claim?

    The scientific evidence for climate change, influenced by human activity, is overwhelming. American and International scientific organizations unanimously agree. So what is the political agenda of those who claim it is a hoax?

    Alex and Ronda Klistoff, Grass Valley

    I responded to the above with a letter-to-the-editor that was emailed on 26 September 2015.  It has yet to appear.  (Presumably The Union editor will supply it with a title.)

    True believers in preventable global warming (PGW) denigrate the science and data that counters public policy nostrums designed to sacrifice economies on the altar of human salvation from a promised heat catastrophe in the making.  As commentaries in these pages record, skeptics continue to cite detailed and compelling science to contradict that the PGW ‘debate is over’.

    In their 26sep15 letter Mr & Mrs Klistoff cite my 8sep15 “acrimonious commentary” responding to the 29aug15 OV column by the Drs Newsom, and summarily dismiss major contributors to the ongoing PGW debate.  All true believers live with the comfortable knowledge that government funded research is unbiased, untainted by money, with findings true and pure as the fresh driven snow.  However, research and researchers that have ever had even a smidgeon of industry funding are forever tainted beyond redemption.  And doubly so if these counter any ‘science’ which for them is already beyond debate.

    Those of us who have spent many years doing R&D with the government know that faith to be misplaced.  Government agencies also have agendas, and dispense their monies to advance those agendas.  Therefore for those who consume research, it is ever ‘Caveat Emptor’.

    George Rebane, Nevada City

  • [This commentary by Norm Sauer is destined for The Union in the ongoing exchange with Michael Mann on ‘climate change’.  Mr Sauer, who sits on The Union’s editorial board, has given permission for RR to post it in the interval until things get sorted out with the newspaper.  It appears below as received.  3oct15 update:  The Union did finally publish this piece in today’s edition.  gjr]

    Norm Sauer

    My Other Voices article of September 22, 2015, entitled “If you control carbon, you control life,” questioned the scientific validity of Michael Mann’s “hockey stick.”  Dr. Mann published an OV article in The Union the next day complaining my statements that his contrived hockey stick ignored the Medieval Warm Period are a “falsehood,” and “a distortion, half-truth, or plain untruth.” 

    I take this opportunity to buttress the documented truth of what I wrote.

    The search for truth starts with understanding that if the Medieval Warm Period existed before the industrial revolution then the man-made global warming (MMGW) theory of CO2 forcing sudden warming in the twentieth century is baseless because our recent warming is not unusual, unique, unnatural, nor green house gas related.

    In the 1990s many scientific articles referred to the Medieval Warm Period lasting from about AD 800-1300.  This was followed by the Little Ice Age from about 1300 to 1900.   These were scientifically undisputed facts.

    The United Nation’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s (IPCC) was created to officially work on the global warming issue.  Its first progress report in 1990 on Page 202 showed a graph (see below) in which the Medieval Warm Period was portrayed as clearly warmer than the present.

    By 1995, seeking to include CO2 as a cause of warming, the IPCC report started with the Little Ice Age to show a long slow period of increasing temperatures.  Chapter 8 of the scientific report stated: “No study to date has positively attributed all or part [of the climate change observed] to anthropogenic causes.”  Politics prevailed. This statement was removed from the final report.  The non-scientific Summary for Policymakers read: “The balance of evidence suggests that there is a discernible human influence on global climate.”

    By 2001 the IPCC Summary for Policymakers had what it wanted: Mann’s “hockey stick” claiming that temperatures in the Northern Hemisphere remained relatively stable over nine hundred years, spiked upward in the twentieth century, and the 1990s was the warmest decade in at least one thousand years. (See chart below.)

    ClimateChange1000yrs

    The problems with Mann’s study were many.  First, the hockey stick focused only on temperature trends in the Northern Hemisphere.  Second, the widely recognized Medieval Warm Period and the Little Ice Age were completely dismissed.  Third, the hockey stick was formed by crudely grafting the surface temperature record of the twentieth century onto a pre-1900 tree-ring record which grafting was innately scientifically flawed.  

    As mentioned, McIntyre and McKitrick’s assiduous studies concluded Mann’s argument for CO2-caused MMGW was “a carefully worked artificial creation”.

    In 1999, a study of tree rings by Keith Briffa of the Climate Research Unit (CRU) of East Anglia University produced a sharp and steady decline in temperature after 1960.

    In 2003, Drs. Baliunas and Soon, researchers at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, contested the hockey stick conclusion in a publication in Climate Research.  After reviewing more than 200 climate studies, they confirmed the Medieval Warm Period and the Little Ice Age were worldwide phenomena not limited to the European and North American continents.  Moreover, they found many parts of the world showed the medieval warmth to be greater than that of the 20th century!

    In 2006, the National Academy of Science (NAS) released a study concluding little confidence can be placed in Mann’s concluding the 1990’s was likely the warmest decade in the last 1000 years.  (NAS, Temperature Reconstruction for the Last 2000 Years, June 2006.)

    Then,  in 2009, “Climategate” revealed leaked emails of East Anglia University’s CRU.   ( For actual emails see Sen. James Inhofe, The Greatest Hoax, 2012, Appendix C.)

    An email from Phil Jones, a CRU climatologist, to Dr. Mann and others dated November 16, 1999, mentions Dr. Mann’s “trick” to hide Briffa’s 1960s’ temperature decline.

    Emails of March 11, 2003 between Dr. Mann and Jones, show their displeasure about Baliunas and Soon’s publication in Climate Review.  Jones’ email threatened to shun Climate Research until “they rid themselves of this troublesome editor.”   Echoing Jones, Dr. Mann responded to punish Climate Research by encouraging “our colleagues in the climate research community to no longer submit to, or cite papers in, this journal.”

    Documentary evidence indicates Dr. Mann is not a disinterested scientist.  He views substantive challenges to his work as heresy.  Unlike Dr. Mann, true scientists welcome criticism and debate as an essential to scientific progress. 

    Dr. Mann launched a petty and invective OV article calling me a liar. He’s wrong.  His “hockey stick” is a documented hoax.

  • George Rebane

    Cheri West, senior aide of Assemblyman Brian Dahle, has declared her candidacy for the District #1 supervisorial slot that will be vacated by Nate Beason next year.  Jo Ann and I only know of her, but don’t know her personally.  She sounds like a worthy candidate to oppose Heidi Hall, her very progressive opponent who is already well known in Nevada County.  Looks like it’s time to start thanking Nate for his service, and manning the ramparts for Ms West.  In socialist California, folks like us in the backwoods are among the last who don’t believe that ‘More government is better.’

    Apropos to the Pope’s visit, I find it hard to understand how the Left can say that capitalism harms the poor and underprivileged, when it and it alone has been the system over the centuries that has reduced hunger, destitution, and ignorance in the world.  Early adopters of capitalism are the countries that have prospered.  An easy test is to examine the countries that have most ruthlessly suppressed capitalism – how are the poor and underprivileged doing in those lands?

    On the VW scandal.  Today we learn that VW’s monkeying with its cars’ pollution control software is a well-trod path in the auto industry pioneered years ago by GM.  This doesn’t excuse the bastards for doing it, but it does shed light again on the ongoing collateral damage from progressive governance.  Car makers regularly game the system in various ways to satisfy the likes of the EPA and CARB in their butt stupid assertions that pollution controls don’t impede performance.  Anybody with a half-assed engineering education learns in his freshman year that that is horse pucky.  It’s part and parcel of the progressive mantra that tax rates don’t affect business decisions/performance.

    Large multi-national car makers have now become corporatists.  They can make cars that uphold the environmentalists’ BS while being tested and still deliver performance on the highways.  This is a wink-wink relationship that works as long as no one looks too carefully behind the curtain.  And then some wonks at the University of West Virginia didn’t get the message and looked behind the curtain; the rest now is history, both settled and still being made.

    The same goes on with business tax rates and certain companies that dutifully tell their progressive legislators that all is well with higher taxes.  Why?  Because they own the market segments where they can pass the added tax costs on to the consumers who dutifully pay higher prices while being told by the same politicians and unionists that the corporations are making obscene profits (when the profits remain unchanged as promised).  What really happens is that the poor middle class and welfare schlubs take it in the shorts without a clue as to how they are being milked.

    [update] Gun-free Australia’s crime rates are soaring after law abiding citizens were forced to surrender their arms.  As usual the butt stupid politicians are at pains to explain why homicides, assaults, and armed robberies are up – armed robberies up 44%, in Victoria state alone homicides are up 300%.  Over the previous 25 years all national crime rates were dropping until their liberals decided to spend hundreds of millions of dollars for mandated repurchases of legal firearms from its citizens.  It probably would have done no good to remind the idiots down under that now only criminals have guns, and the bad guys all know it when they walk into a house or a store.  Up here we are still unclear on the concept, as the Left does its best to abrogate the Second Amendment through an increasing pile of ever more byzantine regulations on gun ownership, accessories, ammunition, and usage.  And check out the crime rates in our Democrat controlled cities where draconian gun laws are in effect.  (H/T to RR reader and correspondent.)

     

  • Believers, make war on the infidels who dwell around you. Deal firmly with them. Know that God is with the righteous. Quran 9:123

    George Rebane

    Republican candidate Dr Ben Carson set off the most recent political dust-devil predictable with his response to whether he would support a Muslim becoming President of the United States.  However, the question of devout Muslims serving in governments is an important issue today when radical Islam and Islam colonizing the west have become the world’s most destabilizing socio-political forces against which secular humanism and collectivist ideologies are not only helpless but actually abetting.

    Muslim_PresidentTo examine this issue we must first look at man’s belief systems regarding his cosmology and ideology.  By cosmology we mean the entirety of his picture of existence ranging from the structure of the universe(s) to the humongous Planck scale ocean of quantum events in which we all swim and derive our being.  Cosmology also subsumes or is subsumed by a person’s religion.

    By ideology we mean a person’s set of structured tenets that describe his vision or preference of a particular socio-political order that guides, controls, and informs human activity on earth.  Here we divide such ideologies into loose categories of collectivism – e.g. communism and socialism of the international or national kind – and classical liberalism as bequeathed by our Founders and clarified by, say, Frederic Bastiat’s The Law.

    Over the years RR has been fortunate to be a forum for the arguments from heartfelt adherents of a wide range of ideologies and cosmologies/religions embraced by its readers and commenters.  And as such, these debates again underline that a devout person’s religion trumps his ideology – God’s plan and druthers supersede that of Man.  In all nations with a religious citizenry allegiance is paid to ‘God and country’ in that order.

    (more…)

  • [Exciting days – the Pope pays a political visit to the US, China's Xi Jinping is lecturing American business in Seattle while waiting for his turn to bamboozle Obama, and Hillary swings wildly to the left with new price control proposals while 'the outsiders' winnow the Republican field.  gjr]

  • George Rebane

    Was just thinking about today's more than interesting, long, and expensive election season we all are suffering through.  And the money part kind of stuck with me.  We know that money drives politics.  What drives politicians may be up for debate, but you can’t go too far off base assuming that power, fame, and fortune come in close to the top of the motivation heap.

    Today campaigns cost way too much and last too long, especially given the attention span of the typical voter.  Two plausible reasons for this are 1) voter dumbth, and 2) constant need for content by the media.  The more contentious, controversial, and confusing they can make the candidates’ messages, the more there is to report, analyze, dissect, and goad to keep the election pot boiling, and the more ads can then be sold.

    (more…)

281 comments on Obama shoots from the lip on Roseburg (updated 6oct15)