[Did President Obama prejudge the FBI investigation of Hillary's email contents and handling? gjr]

ARCHIVES
- November 2026
- October 2026
- September 2026
- August 2026
- July 2026
- June 2026
- May 2026
- April 2026
- March 2026
- February 2026
- January 2026
- December 2025
- November 2025
- October 2025
- September 2025
- August 2025
- July 2025
- June 2025
- May 2025
- April 2025
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
OUR LINKS
YubaNet
White House Blog
Watts Up With That?
The Union
Sierra Thread
RL “Bob” Crabb
Barry Pruett Blog
-
George Rebane
Without a formalized utility, making public policy is guided by topical and anecdotal outliers.
[This is the transcript of my regular KVMR commentary broadcast on 14 October 2015.]
Wealth inequality has been a topic of keen interest and agitation, and concerns about it seem to be increasing, especially with our left-leaning neighbors. Today terms like the ‘one percenters’ are common in any discussion about the economy and the direction our country is taking. Wealth inequality is one of many issues that divide us. People of a conservative bent explain that such an inequality is a natural result of people being different in their work habits, education, intellect, willingness to tolerate risk, and so on. All of these attributes coupled with today’s acceleration of technology create work environments and opportunities where people with such characteristics can make more money than those who lack them.
However, folks on the left are convinced that the unequal distribution of wealth is the result of richer people screwing the poor, and all of that is due to bad public policies which government can mend. As we saw in a recent letter to our local Union, there are many out there who believe that enterprise and entrepreneurship in America fundamentally do not work to benefit society, and have been barely tamed through vigorous application of collectivist remedies under the regulatory umbrella of a caring government.
-
[Well boys and girls, let's gird our loins and prepare for the vibrant and vociferous aftermath of tonight's debate between them that's working to mount the bridge of the ship of state and holler out loud and clear, 'Haaard a'Pooort!!' Polarized pundits predict that the lamestream CNN's moderator will just toss puffballs to Hillary. While that may be so, it's hard to believe that Comrade Bernie the Socialist will not use the occasion to find a scuttle valve or two in Queen Hillary's assumption to the throne. Not all will leave that hall with heads on their shoulders. gjr]
-
George Rebane
The government is corrupt. It’s always a tickle to note the protestations of liberals on these pages who howl when we conservetarians point out that our government is too big, inept beyond belief, costs too much, overreaches into our lives, and is hopelessly corrupt in literally all that it does. The local leftwing lackeys dutifully decry our citations of such violations of public trust as the whine of an ignorant, negligible and soon-to-disappear miniscule minority. Yet the national data keeps coming in to show how out of touch are our neighbors of the Left. Gallup again returns to us polling results that confirm 3 out of 4 Americans believe that our government is indeed corrupt, and the national Right/Left split falls evenly at 48% favoring each. What is it about the definition of 'small minority' that these innumerates don’t understand?
The new movie ‘Truth’ is a hopelessly blatant whitewash of the CBS/Dan Rather scandal of forged documents used to create out of whole cloth a smear of President George W. Bush. It is truly desperation time for Democrats to put out such a movie that will highlight the perennial mischief the Left propagates through its lamestream media. But in this case even CBS is distancing itself from this revisionist propaganda piece about Rathergate. Here is what CBS said to Variety about the film portraying their yellow journalists –
It’s astounding how little truth there is in “Truth.” There are, in fact, too many distortions, evasions and baseless conspiracy theories to enumerate them all. The film tries to turn gross errors of journalism and judgment into acts of heroism and martyrdom. That’s a disservice not just to the public but to journalists across the world who go out every day and do everything within their power, sometimes at great risk to themselves, to get the story right.
Can the combined auras of Robert Redford as Dan Rather and Cate Blanchet as the wicked producer Mary Mapes really convince 2015 Americans that they were the moral equivalents of the heroic Woodward and Bernstein of Watergate fame?
-
George Rebane
The more tightly ANY system is coupled, the more likely its performance is paced by its weakest and/or its most stupid members. Mother Nature
In the 10oct15 Union there is an opinion piece that perfectly, nay, iconically reveals the liberal mind. ‘Let’s Have a Worthy Debate’ by local politician Heidi Hall and much regaled/reviled meteorologist Dr Michael Mann (of Hockeystick fame) is a call to silence the preventable global warming (PGW) skeptics and banish their voices from the public media. It is a chilling preview of the future that our progressives have in store for Americans.
The Union management appears to be flummoxed by how to properly present all this debate. They are having a hard time sticking to their policy to publish letters rebutting named condemnations (e.g. one of my rebuttals was not published). Admittedly it is a difficult piece of content management, especially about something that people spend most of their time talking past each other, like hiding everything under the misleading umbrella ‘climate change’ which is not even in dispute.
One of the more interesting aspects of the Hall/Mann piece is its stock denigration of skeptics without mentioning one word about the significant science and scientists who have presented counter arguments to PGW in all of its dimensions. To understand the taxonomy of the issues involved in any rational discussion of PGW, please see Drilling Down ‘Climate Change’. But then, censorship not reason is the objective of their piece attacking skeptics; Hall/Mann do not mince words –
Journalists and editorial page editors need to stop wasting ink to give a false sense of equity from “both sides of the issue.” In this time of Internet jockeys thinking that every opinion is equal regardless of their actual understanding of the issue, this matters.
Publishers and bloggers do us a disservice by not distinguishing credible opinion from absurdities, and continuing to give both equal time. We understand that it can be difficult to determine the credibility of opinions. But doing so is, in our opinion, a key responsibility of journalists today.
-
[Leaving the 4oct15 sandbox to complete the debate on rampant racism in Nevada County and on RR, we open a fresh one to permit untrammeled consideration of how the Republicans are faring in their selection of a new Speaker against the background of Hillary's Benghazi and email scandals, and the lamestream's coverage of the whole mess. gjr]
-
George Rebane
Liberty is not free, and efforts to make it appear so inevitably lead to tyranny.
Mr Steven Frisch, who frequently shares his thoughts on these pages, has written an eloquent opinion piece in the 8oct15 Union in which he argues for compliant submission to California’s carbon cap and trade (C&T) program that became law under the notorious AB32 legislation. I believe his Other Voices commentary to be an effective piece of government propaganda for people who, for openers, are not students of liberal governance.
Mr Frisch claims that we should separate C&T from the preventable global warming (PGW) debate, and focus on garnering the 'benefits' he sees coming to Nevada County from that legislation. In his arguments he characterizes C&T as being a new wealth creating instrument and economic boost for California which “has taken bold action to reduce emissions, priced carbon emissions, created a stable market to reduce carbon emissions (the California Cap and Trade Program and the Low Carbon Fuel Standard), and is now realizing a hefty revenue stream to address climate change. That market is returning billions of dollars to state accounts (called the Greenhouse Gas Investment Fund) to invest in emission reduction projects.”
This “hefty revenue stream” is nothing but a naked tax increase on all Californians and those doing business here. The new C&T tax has not and cannot be shown to provide any measurable benefits to California’s environment, but that is how the phony new market place for trading carbon credits continues to be sold to the state’s light thinkers.
Mr Frisch points out that by 2020 the state will be sucking out more than $5B annually in additional taxes from our wallets, but not to worry because the money will be “used to improve transportation networks and infrastructure, install energy efficiency measures, realize water efficiencies, build affordable housing, manage forests and divert waste.” In short, the money will be used to augment state expenditures that would normally have come out of the state’s general fund (now being depleted by growing costs of MediCal, welfare programs, and unfunded pension liabilities).
As a posterchild offspring of AB32 he introduces us to Truckee’s proposed Railyard project for which the city has already been awarded $8M under the guise of redevelopment money which apparently no private interests are willing to gamble without government as a partner (read taxpayer guarantees). The new Railyard is slated to essentially revamp Truckee’s downtown, providing jobs, shops, housing units, and the Lord knows what other goodies for our county’s east end. And yet again we note that this wonderful idea shows little promise to stand on its own legs.
But the really big benefits touted for California lie in all the new ‘green jobs’ that the C&T taxes promise. This is the biggest of all phony economic arguments that was first revealed by Frederic Bastiat over 150 years ago in his ‘Broken Windows’ dissertation contained in The Law. C&T creates nothing new, but does impose new business and private citizen behaviors that in the scheme of things are completely arbitrary, and ride on the ever growing hubris that government can plan and direct the spending of an additional $5B a year better than can the people from whom that tribute was extracted at gunpoint.
People who think and educate themselves know that money is fungible. C&T tax monies do nothing but replace the general fund monies collected under existing taxes that pay for the laundry list of things spelled out by Mr Frisch who exhorts us to get excited and get in line for our share of Sacramento directed ‘largesse’. But we all should know that the new C&T monies will do nothing more than release general fund monies to pay for new progressive programs that create more Californians on the government tit and buy their votes.
[For those new to these pages, Mr Frisch, a leading progressive in these parts, is employed as president of the Sierra Business Council a nonprofit organization based in Truckee, and the Sierra Small Business Development Center serving a seven county region including Nevada County. His grant and tax funded organizations stand to directly benefit from advising jurisdictions and private concerns in the conformance to a vigorous implementation of AB32 and all its derivatives.]
-
‘A nation ignorant and free, that never was and never shall be.’, Thomas Jefferson
George Rebane
Two items caught my eye about our disastrous public school system that once more confirm the status of our schools, the intellectual level of our gruberized citizenry, and that teachers unions are the work of the Devil, or a dirty communist conspiracy, or the idiot produce of our progressive elites who are beyond remediation, or, who knows, maybe from the heartbreak of psoriasis. But one thing is for certain, our high schools are bad, really bad; and you can see it for yourself right here in River City.
The first thing I ran across in this morning’s paper was a full page ad (must have cost them a pretty penny) by the XQ Super School Project that lamented the status of our high schools citing “seventy-two percent of graduating high schoolers don’t have the skills they need for success in college or a career.” Why should they when in today’s age of accelerating technology and growing systemic unemployment, 50% of our high schools don’t even offer calculus (and you can easily guess why). The XQ folks have gone out nationally to seek ideas for “rethinking” and revamping our high schools. Take a look at their website and mayhaps you may even want to get involved.
-
-
[It turns out that socialist Connecticut, one of the most leftwing, richest, and corporatist states in the Union (hedge funds, corporate headquarters, and Wall Street mavens from NYC) "has a huge pension problem' (here). "Connecticut has roughly half of what it needs to pay future retirement benefits for its workers, meaning the home to scores of hedge funds and some of the country’s wealthiest towns is wrestling with financial distress rivaling that of Kentucky or Illinois." gjr]
RR FUNDAMENTALS
RECENT POSTS
- Sandbox – 9nov26
- Election Reflections – 3nov26 (4nov26)
- Scattershots – 31oct26 (updated 2nov26)
- The Greatest Economy Denied
- Sandbox – 26oct26
RECENT COMMENTS
CATEGORIES
- Agenda 21 (506)
- All Things Trump (42)
- Books & Media (34)
- Budget (2)
- California (391)
- Comment Sandbox (507)
- Critical Thinking & Numeracy (1,333)
- Culture Comments (759)
- Current Affairs (1,890)
- Film (7)
- Food and Drink (9)
- Games (6)
- General (217)
- Glossary & Semantics (25)
- Great Divide (221)
- Growth (3)
- Happenings (687)
- Investing (43)
- Music (2)
- My Story (63)
- Nevada County (736)
- Our Country (2,474)
- Our World (655)
- Rebane Doctrine (145)
- Religion (38)
- sandbox (2)
- Science (34)
- Science Snippets (166)
- Singularity Signposts (147)
- Sports (3)
- The Liberal Mind (658)
- The Rear View (76)
- Travel (8)
- Trump (5)
- Uncategorized (55)
- We the iSheeple (632)
- Web/Tech (177)

