Rebane's Ruminations
November 2026
S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930  

ARCHIVES


OUR LINKS


YubaNet
White House Blog
Watts Up With That?
The Union
Sierra Thread
RL “Bob” Crabb
Barry Pruett Blog

  • George Rebane

    [This is the addended transcript of my regular KVMR commentary broadcast on 29 November 2017.]

    Longtime listeners to these commentaries are aware of the approaching Singularity – when super-intelligent machines match and then exceed human intelligence – and what is happening with jobs and employment in these pre-Singularity years.  As machines replace more and more humans in the workplace, and the fewer newly created jobs call for workers with skillsets that require higher intelligence to master, what we have been witnessing is the rise in systemic unemployment in America and other developed countries.  Today, the estimated number of Americans systemically unemployed ranges between 70 and 90 million.  These are people who cannot sell their labor for wages that will maintain their former quality of life.

    A new and alarming symptom of this socio-economic disease is that we have started noticing “deaths of despair” among the class of workers who traditionally had excellent jobs and great prospects for improving their careers and lives.  According to two academics who first discovered this symptom about two years ago, the increasing mortality rates for working age whites “with low levels of education” have now been confirmed.  Nobel Prize-winning economist Angus Deaton and his fellow Princeton University professor and wife, Anne Case report that the death rates for these white workers have increased while the death rates for other demographic groups such as Hispanics and blacks continue to improve.  (more here)

    The causes attributed to this sad state of affairs focus on the changing nature of America’s culture, a subject we have also covered.  Our educational system is broken in several important ways.  A most important one is that kids graduate from high school without any marketable skills along with a carefully instilled yet unrealistic self-image.  Workers in the 40 to 55 age groups have had either several jobs with no definite career direction, or a career that suddenly has disappeared from the job markets.  Drs Deaton and Case also point out that our family structures have weakened markedly with soaring divorce rates and fragile cohabitation relationships that provide little or no support to the dejected and desperately unemployed.  In short, what they call the “pillars of life” – work, family, and church – have crumbled for these white workers, whom we may consider as the early harbingers for what will only get worse as more people permanently lose their ability to earn living-quality wages.

    As we may expect, the increasing mortality rate for this demographic has been impacted by terminal alcoholism, drug overdoses, and suicide.  To fight this growing epidemic that sooner or later will affect other demographic classes, social scientists, economists, politicians, and even some very rich business people have started saying that now may be the time to try some forms of guaranteed national income.  Two countries – Canada and Finland – have launched test programs to see how a sample of their un- and under-employed will fare with such unearned income. (more here and here)

    In the meantime, our government, desperate to protect lower paying jobs, is upping the scrutiny of workers we admit through the H1-B visa program, designed to attract highly skilled people to fill the shortfall of American workers. (more here)  And regionally, smaller communities lacking large manufacturing and service industries were thought to be more insulated from technology-driven unemployment.  A recent study by MIT’s prestigious Media Lab throws water on that hope, and reports that smaller cities and towns, due to their small high-tech worker base, are even more susceptible to automation with the loss of lower level jobs such as cashiers and waiters.  This study (here) is corroborated by other universities and adds one more reason to why it is difficult to create new jobs in Nevada County.

    The bottom line is that almost half of current occupations, or kinds of jobs, in the US are at “high risk” of being automated out of existence in the near future.  And please don’t accept, without large doses of evidence, the popular myth that new technologies create as many or more jobs than they eliminate.  With the advent of smart and soon super-intelligent machines, that is pure pabulum, dispensed only to keep politicians in office while they kick the systemic unemployment problem down the road.  In the meantime, keep your eye on the mortality rates of workers frustrated and without hope.

    My name is Rebane, and I also expand on this and related themes on Rebane’s Ruminations where the transcript of this commentary is posted with relevant links, and where such issues are debated extensively.  However, my views are not necessarily shared by KVMR.  Thank you for listening.

    [Addendum]  Some more points to ponder during these pre-Singularity years.  One of the more reprehensible and destructive aspects of progressivism cum socialism has always been their generation of bad public policies that wind up killing jobs in the service of ‘social justice’.  As the progress of technology enables machines to replace more and more humans in the workplace, the Left continues to double that pain by eliminating even more lower level jobs (and thereby abet automation) through their horribly miscreant laws and regulations that mandate and constrain productive economic behavior.  In ‘Forget Robots: Bad Public Policies Could Be Bigger Job Killers’ Lauren Weber provides perspective for this phenomenon by citing some really eye-opening and relevant statistics.

    And to show the cynical nationwide impact of such policies, consider that today there are 6,100,000 unfilled jobs in the US according to the Department of Labor.  (more here) These are jobs that Americans either refuse to do or, sadly, not enough of us are qualified to do.

  • George Rebane

    Norm Sauer presents a more salutary summary of Trump’s tenure in office as a response to the unprecedented campaign of hate the Left has mounted against the president with programs such as ‘The Resistance’, Tom Steyer’s ‘Movement to Impeach’, and Obama’s ‘Organizing for Action’ – a first for a former president who has launched an active program to derail the efforts of his successor.  Mr Sauer’s column – ‘Unprecedented adversity doesn’t derail Trump’ – appears in the 27nov17 Union and is also posted here.

    BoardmanKudos to Union columnist and RR reader George Boardman whose regular Monday column also appeared today in the newspaper’s 27nov17 edition.  Entitled ‘Progressives destroying the Democratic Party I’ve known’, Mr Boardman laments what the progressives have done to the political party that used to espouse his more moderate liberal sentiments.  In reflecting on this shift, he writes about –

    … thoughts (that) have occurred to me in recent years as the Democratic Party has moved farther away from the liberal tenets that are the foundation of my political beliefs. The so-called progressive movement has made my party almost unrecognizable.

    … The big tent Democratic Party is becoming the party of elitists and aggrieved minority groups — however you want to define that term. The party’s post Trump proposals look like they were written by the Sandernista wing. They apparently will be funded by taxing businesses out of existence.

    Donald Trump’s developing deal with Russia and Iran re Syria does not appear to be too artful if reports to date are accurate.  Obama’s comprehensive incompetency in foreign affairs reached its nadir with his invitation to Putin to establish permanent Russian air and sea bases in Syria, achieving in less than a decade what the country’s czars and commissars were not able to accomplish over centuries.  Then he capped that catastrophe with an Iran deal that now let’s the world’s leading sponsor of ragheads quietly complete development of deliverable nuclear weapons while getting paid with billions in pallet loads of dollars FOB Tehran.  It now looks like our president will attempt to exit the Mideast by encouraging Putin and the mullahs to put an end to the Caliphate of ISIS, and then rewarding them with a legitimized Syrian dictatorship that extends Russia’s projection of power and completes Iran’s goal of Mideast hegemon from the Indian Ocean (Arabian Sea) to the Mediterranean.  Now I may be wrong, and Trump really has a subterfuge in mind that somehow drives Turkey – Iran’s competitor for hegemon – back into western arms as Erdogan works to deny Iraq as Teheran’s keystone in their long-sought arc of power.  Here is what the Council on Foreign Relations has to say about Mideast doings.

    [29nov17 update]  Listen to the loudest silence of all.  On RR alone there have been hundreds, if not over a thousand, comments by the Left convicting members of Team Trump on totally unproven allegations of their colluding with Russia to throw the 2016 election.  From them there has not been one peep about the ONLY real evidence of a conspiracy with Russia that occurred with Hillary Clinton and the DNC commissioning Fusion GPS to pay Russian sources to generate a fake dossier on the alleged actions Donald Trump in order to weaken and/or destroy his campaign for the presidency.  To make matters worse, Obama’s FBI then joined in to use that bogus dossier in convincing the FISA court to enable them to launch an investigation of the Trump campaign for exactly the same purpose of which the Clinton campaign was already guilty.  You simply cannot make up this level of perfidy and hypocrisy.  The only thing that piles on to all this is the subsequent behavior of our leftwing lackies – both high and low – who have done everything possible to convict Team Trump for allegedly having thrown the 2016 election with some unknown and implausible aid from Moscow, when the ONLY proven aid went exactly in the opposite direction to torpedo Trump.  So, why the sound of silence about the only reality on Russian collusion cum conspiracy?

  • [Norm Sauer, who submits his columns to be concurrently posted on RR, had his latest commentary – ‘Unprecedented adversity doesn’t derail Trump’ – published in the 27nov17 Union.  It appears below.  gjr]

    Norm Sauer

    SauerDonald Trump has been our president for nearly a year. He has accomplished much despite unprecedented resistance undermining everything his administration is trying to accomplish.

    The other day at a local market a woman confided her concern that some locals had outwardly expressed hatred for our president and such hatred concerned her. On reflection, people of “The Resistance” don’t just hate President Trump, but loathe anyone who had voted not to be subject to the government swamp.

    The influence of Obama’s “Organizing For Action” urging resistance to impeachment has changed our society materially and not for the better.

    Since Obama’s presidency everything has become politicized, including the NFL, the national anthem, Hollywood celebrities, Halloween costumes, statues of historically prominent people, etc. We people have forgotten to never discuss race, religion or politics in polite company.

    Also, political correctness, which is like walking on egg shells, abounds and ties in with those who claim to be victimized by others. For example, Bowe Bergdahl, a treasonous deserter who caused fellow soldiers to be maimed or killed, argues mental distress and gets no serious jail time. Tried by an officer of the military swamp who kowtowed to Obama’s upside-down value system that Bergdahl served with “honor and distinction,” and this traitor was worth the release of five high-value Taliban.

    Non-judgmentalism has also crept into our society. The fact that we are so unwilling to draw a line in the sand and say “That’s right” or “That’s wrong” has mired our culture in degeneracy. For example, Kevin Spacey is revealed for sexually assaulting a minor (a crime), but mainstream media deflects by airing instead his coming out as gay (non-crime).

    Meanwhile, the left desires to quash free speech. From campus protesters to the neo-fascist gang antifa, they are so afraid of discussing conservative principles, the Declaration of Independence and our Constitution they resort to rude disruption and/or violence to prevent airing such topics.

    Besides these multiple cultural problems in our society, President Trump must contend with the non-businesslike government that surrounds him.

    His executive orders are stayed by obscure judges in deep-blue states. Deep state employees in the State Department and other bureaucracies drag their feet in obeying their commander’s orders. Senators and congress members the president confers with and strokes go their own way with indifference while no Democrat legislator will do anything but delay and resist.

    Government dereliction of duty mounts as those who serve us have no memory of what is good government.

    Despite no evidence, for over a year President Trump has been investigated for colluding with Russia to win the 2016 election. Meanwhile, the Obama/Clinton administration gave Russia 20 percent of our uranium resources, and the Clinton campaign illegally paid foreign agents for a phony Russian dossier on candidate Trump. Many try to understand how we now live in a country where a special counsel stacked with Democrat donors is charged with investigating Republicans for crimes of which the Democrats are likely guilty.

    In spite of all, it is amazing what President Trump has accomplished. He has nixed the Paris Accords, decertified the Iran deal, pulled out of UNESCO, launched another major pipeline, enforced our borders, appointed good judges, and restored the rule of law.

    By wielding his executive pen, President Trump removed many of Obama’s onerous regulations crippling businesses and jobs. To date the American economy has soared. As Bloomberg reported on Oct. 13, consumer confidence has surged to a 13-year high, while our 4.2 percent jobless rate is the lowest since early 2001.

    On Oct. 17, the Dow hit 23,000 for the first time wand it was the fifth 1,000-point milestone since Trump was elected. Gross domestic product (GDP) growth in the second and third quarters increased to just over 3 percent, a growth number declared impossible by mainstream economic pundits.

    In foreign policy, the military is being restored, ISIS is severely crippled, and trade relations as well as strategic alliances are being reordered on an America-first basis. Respected by the Chinese, President Trump received red carpet treatment, five star hotel accommodations, and became the first foreign leader to dine in the Forbidden City since the founding of the People’s Republic.

    President Trump has done a lot of heavy lifting. He is a powerful personality who is seemingly tireless. He understands the art of the deal. If successes like we’ve seen continue, our country and our people will be better for his leadership.

    My prayer is he succeeds so our country succeeds.

  • [Here's a short piece – 'The problem with liberalism: It has no limiting principles' – by Tim Jones that closely summarizes a lot of what RR has been promoting (H/T to correspondent).  Its appearance in the American Thinker again gives lie to the local liberal loonies who continue to maintain that the sentiments and observations appearing in these pages are the rantings of lone rightwing voices found only in these foothills.  My own thesis – that these loonies don't get out very much to find out what's happening in the world – has been proven true countless number of times over the lifetime of RR.  They really should expand their sources if they want to stop coming off as being somewhere between terminally cynical and simply silly.  gjr]

    Posted at

    in

  • [The letters from two local progressive worthies appeared in the 24nov17 Union.  They are published here as a part of the public service component of RR.  My commentaries on the liberal mind pale when compared to the real things.  You really can’t make this stuff up.  gjr]

    Trump-Republican gun culture and gun violence

    When will the 300 million Americans take a stand against these few hundred GOP House and Senate politicians who continue to block any meaningful gun control?

    How many more children, students, family and friends have to die at the hands of guns?

    A few hundred Republican politicians are holding the American population hostage to a NRA mandate. Are you going to take action only after your sons and daughters and loved ones lay buried six feet under the ground?

    Ban weapons of war from our streets and throw the Republican politicians out of office in 2018.

    Ron Lowe, Nevada City

     

    Multiculturism is a beautiful thing

    It's quite clear to me that those pressing for "non-sanctuary" status for Nevada County live in a bubble narrated by Rush Limbaugh, Fox News, and other right-wing extremists.

    I suggest that they broaden their horizons.

    I know some of these folks and I know that they have no firsthand knowledge of the ambitions of immigrants. Said immigrants are keenly interested in participating fully in the American experience. Their biggest obstacles are bigoted attitudes regarding brown skins and foreign accents.

    Multiculturalism is a beautiful thing. Get a passport and learn a little something for yourself.

    The only agenda I see here is fear everything non-white, stoked by inexperience, ignorance, and bigotry.

    Jon Peck, Grass Valley

     

  • George Rebane

    Two men sitting next to each other on an airliner started talking in glowing terms about their home towns.  One was regaling about the history and sights of Philadelphia and the other about the culture and cuisine of New Orleans.  The Philadelphia man was a bit skeptical, and asked his New Orleans fellow about the high crime rate in his city.  The New Orleans man pooh-poohed the reports and said they were overblown.  Finally they started talking about their jobs and Philadelphia asked New Orleans how he earned his living.  To which New Orleans enthusiastically replied, ‘Oh, I have a great job with good benefits.  I’m the tail-gunner on a Budweiser truck.’

    This story has been making the rounds and drawing knowing chortles for some years now.  And then yesterday farce turned into fact with the front-page picture of the guy whose job really was tail-gunner in Macy’s Thanksgiving Day parade.  Modern times creating new jobs.

    Macy'sParade2017

  • George Rebane

    As we again look forward to a family gathering at Casa Rebane, Jo Ann and I wish all of our readers and their families a most happy and meaningful Thanksgiving.  We live in a land still blessed.  Here are a couple of related readings appropriate for the holiday – ‘The Desolate Wilderness’, ‘And the Fair Land’.

    Thanksgiving

     

  • George Rebane

    The latest (2015) release of PISA (Programme for International Student Assessment) scores are out, and the all important ratings for 15-year-olds in now a matter of record.  We have long mourned the performance deficits in our educational system and the resulting standing our students have on the international stage where America must compete more and more in the high tech areas of AI, genomics, and nanotechnology – the main sectors that will determine who will win and lose both economically and strategically in the coming pre-Singularity decade(s).  As the chart below shows, America will not be among the winners.

    USPISA2015scoring

    Our deplorable ratings have been covered here for years.  During that same interval progressivist pundits have been white-washing the bad news to our gullibles as nothing to worry about, that we’re doing OK in our super expensive, union-dominated public schools.  The latest spin comes from a team of researchers from the University of Chicago and University of California, San Diego.  These academic worthies have conducted some psych experiments with students and concluded that US kids are just as smart as anyone, but that they’re simply not trying hard enough (also note the inappropriate use of "about average" with the above data).  They ran a test with American and Chinese (first place) math students to see how performance could be improved with cash money prizes. (more here)

    Well, guess what?  It turns out that the Chinese were not much affected since they were already on top, but US kids’ performance improved enough, that according to the pencil pushers, they would have placed 19th instead of the (fasten seatbelts) dismal 36th among the 65 nations taking the PISA tests.  So the conclusion is that our kids just don’t give a crap about doing well on such tests, and they would do much better if motivated by some kind of valuable prize.  (Recall, they’ve all grown up in world where everyone gets a trophy for just showing up and fogging a mirror.)  Now, 19th in the world in math is still horrible for our country’s future, but that claimed improved score is specious on its face.  It assumed that the rest of the world’s scores were static; no other country’s kids were enticed with prizes.  A more rigorous test would have been to offer such rewards to all the test takers, and then see how much our students’ ranking would have improved.

    So that no one misunderstands, American students’ gray matter is just as good as that between the ears of the rest of the world’s students – i.e. we are not genetically disadvantaged.  Where we have a huge deficit is in our carefully inculcated culture of learning – three generations of politically correct schooling and parenting – and a school system designed to keep the bottom quartile of college graduates gainfully employed and fully pensioned (with unfunded pension portfolios).

    The cited study heralds that if we just motivate our students better, their performance can be improved from putrid to piss poor, and we can all stop worrying about our schools.  Well, that’s not the case in any of the three tested areas – science, reading, math – as the above data plot shows. 

    In parting, we should remember two notables.  In Silicon Valley, where STEM jobs/skills dominate, more than half the workers are foreign born and educated.  And to show how good California’s schools and economy are in supplying and attracting born-in-state workers, only 18% of such students qualify for and/or accept jobs in the highly-touted high-tech mecca from which Sacramento draws the lion’s share of its tax revenues. (more here)

    The second notable is the absolute bullpucky in PISA’s testing in the ‘science’ category.  They make it out as if science and math are somehow two separate and disjoint areas of learning, and therefore produce two separable skill sets.  This myth is designed to successfully fool those holding education degrees, and the general public which doesn’t have a clue.  The simple truth of the matter is that for at least the last half century there has been no science without math, and today ALL science is done with and within the language of mathematics.  (emphasis mine)

  • [Can anyone give a cogent definition of an 'inappropriate sexual advance' or 'sexual harassment' that is accepted by more than two people?  If not, then what are we really talking about? gjr]

    Posted at

    in

  • Hold to nothing too violently.  Every fool stands convinced: and everyone convinced is a fool; and the faultier a man's judgment, the firmer his conviction; even with the proof on your side, it is well to make concession; for your reasons are known and your gentlemanliness is recognized; … .  Gracian #183

    George Rebane

    In these pages we have sought, so far with limited success, to make our discussions and debates semantically crisper by using well-defined terms, and editing these definitions as necessary to capture the more nuanced meanings intended.  For example, many keyboards have been pounded over the years debating the definitions and the subsequent uses of socio-political labels such as socialist, communist, capitalist, liberal, progressive, conservative, conservetarian, etc.  The resulting definition derbies seem always to revolve around how attribute comprehensive should the labeled thing be before its assigned label is accepted.

    Most people will accept a label such as ‘socialist’ or ‘conservative’ if the person, program, or policy can claim some sufficient number of attributes to unambiguously indicate its membership in the labeled class.  As an example, a policy can safely be called socialist if it expands state’s control of the means of production or mandates market-blind distribution of goods, wealth, etc.  Such common usage doesn’t call for implementing all (i.e. the comprehensive set) of the attributes of socialism.  In short, a useful discourse can be had if the parties either understand each other’s use of a label, or accept a working principle that doesn’t make ‘comprehensive’ the enemy of ‘sufficient’.

    Debating definitions can also serve agendas, especially if you determine that your ideology must be sold carefully to broader audiences (e.g. your lightly-read constituencies).  In such cases you don’t want to reveal the complete picture too soon because your audience will then balk.  In these times such has been the case when collectivists of various shades want to hide behind easy-to-embrace social give-aways without going into the details of what it will take to sustain such transfer payments, or if sustainability is even possible.

    So, when you believe in a future in which the state controls more than less of our property and behaviors, a future where markets are greatly curtailed or completely eliminated by state mandated distribution policies, then you don’t want to advertise that too early, even if you believe that such a system will ultimately provide the greatest good to the greatest number.  In that case you will decry the socialist label being prematurely attached to policies that are at best camouflaged in half-way houses on the road to socialism.  You then will argue in favor of the comprehensive definition, and dismiss any sufficient characterization of socialism that doesn’t check off all the dictionary items listed under socialism – ‘my policy doesn’t call for the elimination of all markets, therefore it is not socialism.’

    With comprehensive definitions suppressing the merely sufficient, the debate’s progress will be successfully stifled until the destination is achieved at which time it will be revealed when all of its features or attributes are in place.  In such a forum, one is not allowed to identify himself, say, as a conservative unless he can check off somebody’s complete list of requirements for a conservative.  The same for a ‘free market’ which is then defined as one that is not allowed to have even a smidgen of regulations under which it must operate.  Or the obverse, mandating the ‘free market’ label when a massively regulated market still has a bit of wiggle room left.  It all depends on your agenda.

    Quite often definitions are given in terms of an overarching concept that can stand on its own, but can be expanded to have one or more appended categorical components.  We recently ran into one such term – ‘collusion’ – that is much in the news these days, and forms the crux of an enlarged debate that is attended by participants all wearing ideologically colored glasses.  To illustrate, for the Right ‘collusion’ is seen simply as two or more parties proceeding in confidence to accomplish some end, be it innocent or evil.  The latter being the addended categorical component.  To pursue its current agenda, the Left can only view ‘collusion’ in terms of its categorical component of ‘evil’ firmly clamped to the overarching definition, with the attendant logic that colluding secretly or in confidence must always and necessarily be evil – no further proof is needed. (more here)

    Unfortunately, such definition derbies often lap over to embrace countless faulty logics so prevalent in the comment streams of most blogs including RR’s.  The preceding semantical gymnastics are usually part of a drill that starts by characterizing everything in black/white or binary terms.  If you don’t explicitly condemn/embrace something, then the clear conclusion is that you must love/hate that same thing.  This is the most common and ham-brained way of rejecting the cautionary wisdom that the absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.  Related to this is the so-called ‘argument from ignorance’, so popular today, wherein one ‘asserts that a proposition is true because it has not yet been proven false’.  Both appeal to the same logical fallacy.

    In my experience, also confirmed in these pages, it is overwhelmingly the folks on the Left who don’t want to be explicit about what they actually believe (i.e. the tenets of their credo), and consequently in a debate they sail under false colors as long as possible, and then simply quit the field when such colors no longer serve.  I have yet to meet a person of the Right who, when asked, hesitates to declare the underlying tenet of his credo that gives basis for his argument on an issue.  Perhaps others have had the same experience.

    (Readers may always examine my credo and glossary of terms so as to correct or confirm that my own apologetics conform to my previously stated beliefs.)

     

14 comments on Systemic Unemployment – now it kills (Addended)