[Apologies for another overdue sandbox. Boy, they sure fill up fast. I would personally enjoy readers' thoughts on airport massacres, the new venue of choice for terrorists and madmen to carry out mass shootings in highly crowded environments where the shooter is guaranteed by the federal government to be the only one armed (save the readily identifiable and evadable security personnel). And the best part of such exchanges is to once more hear the pinhead progressives conclude that too many CCWs are the real problem. gjr]
ARCHIVES
- January 2026
- December 2025
- November 2025
- October 2025
- September 2025
- August 2025
- July 2025
- June 2025
- May 2025
- April 2025
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
OUR LINKS
YubaNet
White House Blog
Watts Up With That?
The Union
Sierra Thread
RL “Bob” Crabb
Barry Pruett Blog
Posted in Comment Sandbox
270 responses to “Sandbox – 6jan17”
-
Ahhhhh, fresh kitty litter!
It was interesting to hear the FBI had to rely on a division of Google for details on the DNC hack since they were not allowed to actually inspect the servers in question. They relied on a report by the friends of madam liar liar pantsuits on fire. 😉LikeLike
-
Two points, both revealing the Alt-Left mindset, inspired by the torture of mentally disabled man in Chicago.
1). Only white people can be racists.
2). The Alt-left said Trump winning would lead to violence. They forgot to mention it would be coming from them.LikeLike
-
Looks like another example of a crazy person with gun. George, what are you ideas about how we can keep guns out of the hands of crazy people?
LikeLike
-
Hold your horses. It is not as it appears. It’s Islamic Terrorisim.. Fake ID. Story is falling apart. Fake name. Fake story. Canadian Airlines say no one with that name was a passenger. Hold your horses. Whoa Nelly. More to be revealed.
LikeLike
-
Looks like another example of a crazy person with gun. George, what are you ideas about how we can keep guns out of the hands of crazy people?
Well…..I suppose we could have you ask them lots of questions……that leads to other questions……that leads to other questions……that leads to other questions……that leads to still more questions…..until the urge to kill deserts them and they turn the gun on themselves!
Just spitballing here……..LikeLike
-
Oh, here we go. Paul wants to know how we keep guns away from crazy people. As the newly self-appointed expert on libertarianism, I kinda thought Paul would have an idea or two. Instead, it’s just the yapping poodle demanding that everyone answer his questions.
I’ve got a question for Paul – how do we keep anything that can be used to kill one or more people away from anyone who might now, or at some future date, decide to use said object for that very lethal purpose?
The more obvious question is how, as a free society, can we most efficiently equip our citizens with the means to stop crazies, terrorists and other sundry thugs and miscreants from wreaking havoc on innocent victims?
Yes, that is your Friday pop quiz.LikeLike
-
Oh Scott, don’t you know this is just an ‘isolated incident’. Nothing to see here. Let’s talk about recreational marijuana! 🙂
LikeLike
-
While the left continues to try to deny us our Constitutional rights, they fabricate new ones out of thin air.
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/california-must-pay-for-inmates-sex-change-judge-rules/
Lifers get elective plastic surgery on the public dime because of their ‘constitutional rights’???
Oh yeah, I remember this ‘right’ being debated back in the 1700’s.
Another reason to not live in Crazy-fornia.
Good grief.LikeLike
-
Well, I suppose we can pick and chose which amendments we want to hold dear and follow, and which ones we wish to discard. That’s how it works, right?
Preemptive Strike: Yes Paul, I agree with you. Sure, whatever you say….yes, whatever you say…I agree….my silence means I agree with you……sure, whatever you say….LikeLike
-
You mean Scott if I went to prison I could get a nose job? Always been self conscious about my beak. Just a simple little white collar crime might get me some easy time for couple months and I could get my nose remodeled. What a deal
LikeLike
-
Simple “jon”Paul. have everyone who has a legal right (not a felon or nuts) to carry, do so. There are people who are on the road right this minute who have no right to be behind the wheel. Watch the news tonight. I’m sure some drunk or someone without a licence will have killed someone.
Where is it written you have a “right” to drive a car?LikeLike
-
Paul at 3:39 – no Paul, you can’t get a free nose job. Worrying about the size of your nose actually reveals anti-Semitic tendencies and would render you a bad person. You have to have a current politically correct problem that the tax payers will be made to pay for – in this case the male prisoner has a problem being a man. A white male, if you will. And goodness knows, white males are THE problem in the world. That’s most likely the reason the killing was done in the first place. So – in order to fulfill his delusional fantasy, you tax payers have to pay up. If his fantasy was that he was Napoleon, it would be no go.
Of course, after all of the nips and tucks and snip snips, he’s still a white male.
But darling, he looks ever so much better in his orange jump suit, don’t you think?
Or don’t you think?LikeLike
-
Topic: How do we catch homegrown Islamic Terror Cells in this age of No Profiling?
Answer: seemingly unrelated bits of information from social media, electronic
payments, e-mail addresses, and other internet communications pieced together to form a picture. Dated article, but I am hitting it from the social media angle in this connected age and how LE is catching some of the bad guys. Article sheds light that Wa-Po and newsfeeds did not at the time .
https://conservativedailypost.com/breaking-isis-cell-found-virginia-arrests-made-massive-muslim-operation-exposed/.
Notice that the gun is pointed at the photographer in the pic. It’s those little things I find enjoyable.LikeLike
-
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
“And the reason is very, very obvious, which is that it has become exceptionally important to Democratic partisans to believe that the reason they lost this election is not because they chose a candidate who was corrupt and who was extremely disliked and who symbolized all of the worst failings of the Democratic Party. It’s extremely important to them not to face what is really a systemic collapse on the part of the Democratic Party as a political force in the United States, in the House, in the Senate, in state houses and governorships all over the country. And so, in order not to face any of that and have to confront their own failings, they instead want to focus everything on Vladimir Putin and Russia and insist that the reason they lost was because this big, bad dictator interfered in the election. And anyone who challenges or anyone who questions that instantly becomes not just their enemy, but now, according to their framework, someone who’s actually unpatriotic, that if you question the evidence, the sufficiency of the evidence to support this theory, that somehow your loyalties are suspect, that you’re not just a critic of the Democratic Party, you’re actually a stooge of or an agent of the Kremlin.”
Looks like Greenwald is figuring out the MO of the libertarian par…….errr…….of the “progressive” left!
https://www.democracynow.org/2017/1/6/glenn_greenwald_democrats_eager_to_blameLikeLike
-
Thank you SFTA – good reading.
“We assess Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered an influence campaign in 2016 aimed at the US presidential election. Russia’s goals were to undermine public faith in the US democratic process, denigrate Secretary Clinton, and harm her electability and potential presidency.
We further assess Putin and the Russian Government developed a clear preference for President-elect Trump. We have high confidence in these
judgements.”
Why – what better way to undermine Americans’ confidence in the US democratic process than to show what the DNC was actually doing?
Was Bernie also guilty of the same exact thing by crying foul? The report is strangely silent on that point. Did they accuse Putin of spreading false information about the election or it’s process or any of the candidates?
It appears that they claim that Putin wanted Trump to win. Certainly Obama has never in any way whatsoever shown any preference for any certain person to ascend to the highest office in any nation. Ever.
“…denigrate Secretary Clinton, and harm her electability and potential presidency.”
Any number of folks have done that, including Obama.
Ah, but this was a foreign entity. And the US has never, ever tried to influence a foreign country’s free elections. Ever. Except, of course, starting with Obama. But that’s different.
If there is anyone out there in the WWW that thinks this would be an issue if Hilary had won, please let us know.
I have a moderately priced bridge to sell you. Cheap.
Just remember – the only reason you voted for Trump was because Putin put the whammy on you.
We know you really wanted to vote for Hillary.LikeLike
-
fish 448pm – Stipulate that your citation is correct re the Democrats’ loss (BTW, one that I agree with). Given that, why would anyone opposed to those losing leftwingers go to the trouble to dispute their self-destructive arguments – especially on these pages? Why don’t we just let them wallow in their losing ways and, perhaps, even encourage them? Would it not serve the greater conservatarian purpose to have them learn nothing from this go around and then repeat their mistake the next time?
I submit that if you don’t believe this, then we must conclude that our left-leaning commenters are indeed ropa-doping those of us who get worked up over their outrageous claims.LikeLike
-
I hope everyone is ready for this wet weekend. It’s gonna be a doozy.
If you don’t have it, now would be a real good time to go “get it”.LikeLike
-
Scott. Our belligerent Left sure didn’t have a problem with “O”and Co. messing with Israel’s democratic processes…Nope, not one bit.(that’s different)
LikeLike
-
re George at 5:09 – Well, yes. But shhhh! I’m trying to unload a bridge.
The more I hear the Dems and the left (Kos Jones Slate etal) the more I know they will F up in the next election as well.
Their main talking point is that ‘failed to make their case’.
Yep – that happens when the bridge collapses in the middle of your sales pitch.LikeLike
-
: George Rebane | 06 January 2017 at 05:09 PM
I think you said it best a long time ago. Because others read this blog and we must keep them informed. Allowing the lefty lies to stand with rebuttal is what got the country into the mess.LikeLike
-
OK,,,,, so the “official” word is, “The ruskies did it”. The vary same “officials” that couldn’t find grounds to jail Hillary. Never mind the train load of public info to the contrary.(before the leaks) Even after the leaks. “nope, she’s too big to jail”.
Corruption of the FED gov. in just about every hall makes anything they say at this point in time suspect.LikeLike
-
Saudi Arabia funded 20% of the I Am With Her Campain. Great Britain to New Zealand and about every Arab, European, and other nation on Earth (including their leaders and government officials) tried to influence the election for My Gal. Our neighbors to the north and south. Our President, First Lady, Vice President, Wall St, Silicone Valley, the MSM including the NYT, Hollywood, academia, and more all tried to influence the election for Hillary. Oh yeah, add The Pope and his millions of followers. Add most all the billionaires. Quite an assembly of the best, brightest, most powerful, most influential people and institutions on earth, including the full muscle and might of USA government and its institutions.
Now, are you saying one 2nd tier country name Russia influenced and swung the national election to Trump and out smarted every power on Earth? Hmmmm? Do you realize how ridiculous that agrument sounds?
The Alt-Left talks incessantly about why Hillary Coldclam Clinton lost. Reverse the question and ask yourselves why Donald J Trump (a totally crude unpredictable political novice) beat Hillary and all the King’s horses and all the King’s men???? I dare ya. Ask not why Hillary suffered the most embarrassing loss in US political history but ask why Trump won. But Trump is crazy!!! Yep, crazy like a fox.
The pundits said that Trump was the only Republican that could lose to Hillary and Hillary was the only Democrat that could lose to Trump.
I am not so sure. I think now that Trump was the only one that could beat Hillary as well as any and all Democrats and all Republicans. All of them. Sure, it didn’t hurt that the nation rejected the Lefties and their message. Oh, their message got out alright. The voters gave it the thumbs down. Don’t call us, we’ll call you. Ask not how Trump won, but why Trump s officially as of today our President-elect.
https://www.facebook.com/lastamericapatriots/photos/a.235087906641439.1073741826.235086849974878/775082042642020/?type=3&theaterLikeLike
-
George
Have you read the document “Assessing Russian Activities and Intentions in Recent US Elections”: released today? I’m giving it a good read and I’m wonder if you are doing the same. Here’s a link.
https://www.scribd.com/document/335886282/Assessing-Russian-Activities-and-Intentions-in-Recent-US-Elections#from_embed?content=10079&ad_group=Online+Tracking+Link&campaign=Skimbit%2C+Ltd.&keyword=ft500noi&source=impactradius&medium=affiliate&irgwc=1LikeLike
-
PE, the enquiring mind, oh wait that’s the Enquirer, never mind. 😉
LikeLike
-
No proof given
LikeLike
-
Break in the action.
How about a nature picture. I love nature stories.
Describes the Deplorables. maybe. We got your back President-elect Trump and Mr. President-elect Trump has our back. Dr. Rebane is the Alpha. Anyway, hope its fit enough for the Sandbox.
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=1583887924961111&set=a.110450362304882.18286.100000197575813&type=3&theaterLikeLike
-
Todd
Do you understand the nature of classified material?LikeLike
-
Did you read the report Don?
LikeLike
-
Paul Emery, it appears you don’t.
LikeLike
-
PE- Did you stop beating your dog?
LikeLike
-
Definitely,, possibly,, maybe, doesn’t add up to fact. We doc.s altered? NOPE.
Were the doc.s factual? YUP.
Is the DNC part of gov.? NOPE Were ballots screwed with by a foreign GOV.? NOPE.
Something the LIBS themselves would love to try and exploit? YUP.
Next time don’t use “password” for your password.LikeLike
-
Walt
did the Russians intend to alter the result of our elections by providing this stolen information to Wikileaks-yep
Is Trump giving this the good ole ‘Whatever” yepLikeLike
-
Would Trump have the same reaction if the players were reversed and Putin tried to tilt the election in Hillaries favor?
You answer that Walt.LikeLike
-
Anybody have aby ideas asto how we can respect 2nd Amendment Rights and still keep guns out of the hands of crazy people. George, any ideas?
LikeLike
-
What PE willfully fails to comprehend is that there were a phalanx of groups trying to influence the election which is a world away from altering results, which did not happen. BBC, BLM, Soros, huffpo, NPR, NBC, NOW, Koch’s, NYT and so on and so on as well as State actors through their own lap dog media hacks.
Doesn’t look like anyone wants to play 50 questions with poor ol’ PE. 😉LikeLike
-
Then I guess Russia has more respect for what America stands for than LIBS. Since the world revolves around the U.S., and didn’t want to see a collapse of world trade, which would in turn plunge them into turmoil. After watching shit happen for the last 8 years, enough was enough. They knew full well Hillary would finish the job.
“O” and the left have decimated our military. Trump says he going to ramp up. Now why would the Russians want that? The Russians are kicking MidEast ass. That give THEM influence in the sandbox. Trump wants to go back guns blazing. Again Why would Russia screw up a good thing?
Hillary sold us out to Russia with uranium sales. Think Trump will try and rework that deal? Putin ain’t that stupid.LikeLike
-
Hay Paul. All the gun laws didn’t stop three pavement ape felons from coming up here and knocking over a smoke shop.
LikeLike
-
Now Walt, don’t go confusing PE with logic, it does not fit his DNC narrative. 😉
LikeLike
-
So Walt are you agreeing that Putin tried to influence our elections for his own benifit?
LikeLike
-
PE- Are you still hacking the DNC? 😉
LikeLike
-
And just what benefit could that possibly be? O great Charnack, channel Putin and see what’s in that KGB mind. (this should be good)
Putin would have Hillary suck… polishing he boots. in foreign affairs. Putin cold put the ol’ band back together.The U.S.S.R rides again.Because Hillary and LIBS are yella’…
So tell us again why Putin would back someone who would be more than happy to give him a swift kick to the nuts?LikeLike
-
Walt, why did the Russian Assembly cheer when Trump won? Also the just released assessment has direct evidence that Trumps higher ups were doing hi fives after Trump won. Explain that to my feeble mind.
LikeLike
-
No dodging Paul. Just what damned benefit? You said this is one.
LikeLike
-
PE is channeling Nancy Karagin again, WHHHHYYYY!? WHHHHYYY!? 😉
LikeLike
-
Anyone, or know anyone who is off grid, or mostly, how their solar is keeping up?
The sun hasn’t been out that much for a while.LikeLike
-
PaulE 710pm – There are no quick solutions to crazies doing what they do, be it with guns, knives, or other implements or methods – that happens in countries and cities with the strictest gun laws. Here in America the Left focuses on gun confiscation because it knows that’s how a free people most effectively stay free from the Leviathan of the elites (no A21 future as long as we have guns). And so as most of us today know, freedom is not free.
Paul, Mr Tozer’s 607pm is an excellent summary of how other powers in the world attempted to sway Americans for Hillary. Your responding to that viz the Russians would most contribute to this discussion.LikeLike
-
Don’t have a clue what you’re talking about Don. Please translate
LikeLike
-
Ya’ sure clammed up there Paul,, Lets hear those benefits you speak of.
LikeLike
-
Paul has already told us he is doing the ropa-dope and all of us are falling for it.
LikeLike
RR FUNDAMENTALS
RECENT POSTS
- Father forgive them for they know not …
- Democrats Ascendant
- Scattershots – 4jan26 (updated 8jan26)
- Sandbox – 4jan26
- Venezuela on path to freedom and prosperity
RECENT COMMENTS
CATEGORIES
- Agenda 21 (490)
- All Things Trump (32)
- Books & Media (34)
- Budget (2)
- California (385)
- Comment Sandbox (488)
- Critical Thinking & Numeracy (1,312)
- Culture Comments (750)
- Current Affairs (1,858)
- Film (7)
- Food and Drink (9)
- Games (5)
- General (215)
- Glossary & Semantics (25)
- Great Divide (208)
- Growth (1)
- Happenings (679)
- Investing (43)
- Music (2)
- My Story (62)
- Nevada County (733)
- Our Country (2,430)
- Our World (629)
- Rebane Doctrine (130)
- Religion (38)
- sandbox (2)
- Science (33)
- Science Snippets (165)
- Singularity Signposts (144)
- Sports (3)
- The Liberal Mind (644)
- The Rear View (74)
- Travel (8)
- Trump (3)
- Uncategorized (45)
- We the iSheeple (620)
- Web/Tech (176)
rebanesruminations.com 
Leave a comment