Agenda 21 and the “Pod People”

September 2011
S	M	T	W	T	F	S
	1	2	3
4	5	6	7	8	9	10
11	12	13	14	15	16	17
18	19	20	21	22	23	24
25	26	27	28	29	30

OUR LINKS

YubaNet
White House Blog
Watts Up With That?
The Union
Sierra Thread
RL “Bob” Crabb
Barry Pruett Blog

Agenda 21 and the “Pod People”

03 September 2011

George Rebane

Jo Ann and I have attended many local workgroups and meetings where the pod people were in obvious attendance. These meetings presented ideas and plans for environmental harmony, smart growth, green jobs, local sustainability, and so on. A recent one we attended involved sincere people who promoted the establishment of many small farms in Nevada County on which returning veterans and other dedicated souls would work to locally produce the food we eat while earning a ‘just living wage’ in the process. The room was well populated with some of the most sincere pod people that we have seen in these parts.

Pod people? You’ll have to read the excellent piece – ‘The many tentacles of Agenda 21’ – by Judi Caler in the 3sep11 Union to get the full definition. But if you’re old enough to remember ‘The Invasion of the Body Snatchers’, you’re well on your way to understanding.

RR readers are familiar with Agenda 21 and its American cousin ‘The American Dream Movement’ (here). Agenda 21 is the UN’s comprehensive program to establish global governance in some TBD form whose common denominator is that the UN will evolve into the earth’s governing unit.

Ms Caler’s piece is a well-written summary of how this agenda is overtly, and yet covertly, being implemented by thousands of feel-good consensus preliminaries promoted at local levels. The article concludes with an invitation to become more informed about Agenda 21, and, hopefully, lend your weight behind initiatives to counter it and continue supporting the future of America as a constitutional sovereign nation-state, given us by the Founders and handed down to us by our forebears through the sacrifice of their blood, sweat, and tears.

Recently a new organization formed in Nevada County to fight the monster that is Agenda 21: Reclaiming Our American Rights (ROAR!). If you would like to learn more about Agenda 21 and/or how you can help stop it locally, please contact unagenda21@hotmail.com or 530-559-0828.

A good summary of Agenda 21 can be found at http://www.makingofahome.blogspot.com/2011/06/fascist-stealth-of-agenda-21.html .

Posted in Agenda 21, Current Affairs, Nevada County, Our Country, Our World

118 responses to “Agenda 21 and the “Pod People””

Todd Juvinall

03 September 2011

When I started CABPRO back in 1993 we became part of a movement to defeat these kinds of things. We fought the Feds plan to have Heritage Forests all over the country. (I testified). We fought the Trails program to connect non motorized trails across America (regardless of who owned the land), we fought the Wilderness designations and Wild and Scenic. We sent opposition letters to the Prez about locking up the Staircase Escalante and many others. We couldn’t keep up. It turns out our own government using our tax money was feeding a endless supply of our dough to these eco groups. Well, now we know why don’t we? Anyway, Judi and ROAR, go get them.

LikeLike
RL Crabb

03 September 2011

I’m offering a two-for-one deal on the FOILSAFE tinfoil skull caps this weekend AND a free POD PEOPLE EATER…slices, dices, pulverizes those annoying pods in your backyard before they can steal your soul. Order in the next thirty seconds and I’ll throw in an Illuminati decoder ring…

LikeLike
Todd Juvinall

03 September 2011

What a great country. Crabb should be at Maxine Water rallies with his trinkets.

LikeLike
Mike Thornton

03 September 2011

“FoilSafe”, now that is really funny!
I see a great cartoon coming out of this!!

LikeLike
Bob Hobert

03 September 2011

RL, I will pay $5 just for the illuminati decoder ring. An actual global government might work – if we could just find a suitable nation-state government that has worked over time. Ours was the latest, and last? chance.

LikeLike
Todd Juvinall

03 September 2011

Yeah, me too. I want a decoder ring and a watch with a two way radio like Dick Tracy had. Oh goodie! The tin foil hat though should be painted black so itt can absorb the sun’s rays and keep the brain warm.

LikeLike
D. King

03 September 2011

“Order in the next thirty seconds and I’ll throw in an Illuminati decoder ring…”
What, no dog whistles Bob?
You’re well aware of our preferred form of communication.

LikeLike
RL Crabb

03 September 2011

The problem is that the only ones who can hear it are the left.

LikeLike
D. King

03 September 2011

LOL!

LikeLike
RL Crabb

03 September 2011

And don’t think that I’m not on to THE GREAT RIGHT WING CONSPIRACY! I saw Dick Cheney in the DARTH VADER outfit on Jay Leno. CHENEY thinks that if he makes a joke out of his ALTER EGO that people will laugh it off, not knowing that he REALLY IS DARTH VADER and he he serves THE CORPORATE EMPIRE. You need more PROOF? Twentieth Century Fox made the STAR WARS movies and is controlled by RUPERT MURDOCH. LOOK OUT, PEOPLE! They’re turning our MINDS into MUSH!!!
And by using CAPS on certain KEY WORDS you can see that I truly AM a CONSPIRACY NUT and a danger to THE COMMUNITY. Some people think so.

LikeLike
RL Crabb

03 September 2011

P.S. -It’s a WELL-DOCUMENTED FACT that DICK CHENEY has NO PULSE!

LikeLike
D. King

03 September 2011

We should really keep this under our aluminum hats, but it’s space rays causing Global Climate Change.
REALLY!
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2011/08/24/breaking-news-cern-experiment-confirms-cosmic-rays-influence-climate-change/
Exit question: What will these results do to the progressive savants’ Agenda 21 plans?

LikeLike
Paul Emery

03 September 2011

They charged Cheney’s battery for one last go round in the media tents. That should about do it for him. Just think, we were a strategic pretzel away from him being president.

LikeLike
George Rebane

03 September 2011

Sounds like it’s really chuckle up time.
http://www.un.org/esa/dsd/agenda21/

LikeLike
stevenfrisch

03 September 2011

At the risk of providing an unexplained link, I will let this one do the analysis for me:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D7-K6-oNFs8

LikeLike
Paul Emery

03 September 2011

So many conspiracy’s, so little time. We went from Islamic mobs to UN Commie takeovers in less than a week.

LikeLike
Paul Emery

03 September 2011

Oh of course it’s all led by the secret ones in command that installed Diaz as our clerk recorder to begin the software takeover of our election system. Stay tuned for more

LikeLike
George Rebane

03 September 2011

I think you meant ‘conspiracies’ PaulE, and the point that the liberals are uniformly missing is that there have been NO conspiracies reported on these pages. In fact, the point has been made exactly in the opposite sense – it is all out in the open. However, there seems to be a cohort with a response here that does have a common purpose, which seems to avoid any discussion of UN’s Agenda 21 through ridicule of those who bring up the subject. What is there to fear?

LikeLike
RL Crabb

03 September 2011

How about fear itself?

LikeLike
Todd Juvinall

03 September 2011

What is it we have heard from the left over the years about conspiracies? Hmmm. When discussing their paranoia about the Darth Vaders, don’t they always tell us where there is smoke there is fire, or there is always a little bit of truth in every myth? Yep, that would be the left. We are behind every coup, every assassination of some bad guy, installing clandestinely every new leader (Iran, Seychelles) and work in conjunction with other corporatists only interested in profit. Yep, the tin foil hat business should make Crabb rich. (Where are the Emery’sand where is their order?) If only the left could get our money and redistribute.
On a serious note, Agenda 21 is one part of the puzzle by the eco corporatists to return the planet to pre human condition. I just wonder who will write it down when humans are all gone. And who will read it!

LikeLike
RL Crabb

03 September 2011

George has already answered that question. It will be our robot/computer masters, i.e. the Singularity. And I don’t mean to be mean, George. I’ve already seen all this stuff courtesy of the late Drew Bedwell, who used to demonstrate it at local schools in an effort to de-program the youth of Nevada County.
And the Todd-bot is right, there is always some element of truth in conspiracies, be it Steve Frisch’s Ecotopia or the Great Right Wing Version. More than one organized effort, it is more of a collective unconscious. I remember as a teenager being amazed that things that popped into my head in pop culture would show up in England, or LA or SF. Some-how, without an internet to link us, we were all thinking the same things.

LikeLike
stevenfrisch

03 September 2011

Wow, Bob, a literary reference to Ernest Callenbach.
Seriously, I have never been much of a conspiracy guy. I think the human condition acts against both the idea of and the effectiveness of conspiracy–people are too self centered, too vain, too proud, and too individually power hungry to make good conspiracy theorists. I think its much more likely that people work in concert for things that they share values with others on and it sometimes looks like a conspiracy.
So I would say to George, yes there is an Agenda 21, no one I know even seriously thinks about it or coordinates any activity based on Agenda 21, and they pursue things that can appear the same because they sincerely believe in it and it fits their values.
Just like the Tea Party…….right?

LikeLike
Todd Juvinall

03 September 2011

Todd-bot? Now that is funny. Crabb, are you sure you were not in contact with those people in the UK because the tin foil worked? LOL.
Regarding conspiracies. King George was pissed because those pesky people across the lake were in a conspiracy. Guess he forgot his tinfoil hat.

LikeLike
stevenfrisch

03 September 2011

Todd, I am sure I can find instructions for inserting tin foil in a 21st century tricorne hat if you need them.

LikeLike
D. King

03 September 2011

George,
They are dying on the vine!
http://motls.blogspot.com/2011/09/james-hansen-plans-to-arrest-hillary.html

LikeLike
George Rebane

03 September 2011

Documents like these of UN working groups seem to be silly in their pronouncements because there is an implied authority needed to implement all of these policies. But none is directly named or called for. I wonder why they are wasting their time.
http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N11/278/80/PDF/N1127880.pdf?OpenElement

LikeLike
D. King

03 September 2011

Good question.

LikeLike
D. King

03 September 2011

After all George, with one small sea-change in how energy is produced the whole carbon tax funding scheme crumbles and with that, folds the rest of their agenda. CAGW is all but dead. What’s left?
Answer: The 2012 elections!

LikeLike
Russ Steele

04 September 2011

Steven F,
Here are some sincere beliefs by some like minded people.
A new poll of Republican voters in the early primary state of South Carolina suggests the question of Barack Obama’s eligibility is no fringe issue, as 65 percent of those polled question whether the current occupant of the Oval Office was even born in the U.S.
The automated telephone survey of 750 usual South Carolina Republican primary voters was conducted by the Democratic polling company, Public Policy Polling, from Aug. 25-28.
According to PPP’s published results, when asked, “Do you think Barack Obama was born in the United States?” 44 percent answered “no” and an additional 21 percent answered “unsure” – a total of 65 percent questioning his birthplace – leaving only 35 percent who answered definitively “yes.”

LikeLike
stevenfrisch

04 September 2011

Gosh Russ, I never said that people who believe that President Obama is an alien are a conspiracy, only that they are breathtakingly stupid. Most conspiracies break upon the shoals of one simple fact: most people can’t keep a secret thus the bigger the group necessary to keep the secret the less likely a conspiracy exists. .

LikeLike
George Rebane

04 September 2011

SteveF, I can’t find anyone accusing you of calling the so-called ‘birthers’ a conspiracy. Did I miss a turn in the dialogue, or are you pre-defending a hill about to be attacked?

LikeLike
Paul Emery

04 September 2011

George
I find the topic of Agenda 21 not of interest to me. I’ll leave it in your clubhouse to spat about.
I’m glad to hear that you don’t consider this a conspiracy. What would you prefer to describe it’s function in making the UN the world government?
“Agenda 21 is the UN’s comprehensive program to establish global governance in some TBD form whose common denominator is that the UN will evolve into the earth’s governing unit.”

LikeLike
George Rebane

04 September 2011

PaulE, I take it for just what it is advertized. It is an open program with regular action items to be executed trans-nationally that is designed to put in place global functions of society (e.g. managing the environment, resources, redistribution, …) that transcend and displace the functions currently performed by sovereign nation-states. It is not the only one being promoted. George Soros’ enterprises include others, and so do unions working toward a workers’ internationale as openly discussed by labor luminaries such as Andy Stern and Richard Trumka.
These people and their fellows sincerely believe that the current global structure of societies is outdated, an ‘ancient relic’, and cause of so many of the world’s problems. The future for them is global political unification.
Any hint of conspiracy is just in their modus operandi that proceeds with the firm conviction that the individual steps taken are “not of interest” to most people; much in the same way that the quite open and visible steps taken by the Nazis for total control in the 1930s were of little interest to most Germans. It is proceeding bit by piece, and the keystone (again openly stated by the progressive internationalists) in the arch of independent states is America. That must fall if these goals are to be achieved.
And you’re right, there are much more interesting things to do than to examine this arcane process, no matter how visible.

LikeLike
stevenfrisch

04 September 2011

Russ has been pretty clear in previous posts that he feels that the Obama birth certificate issue is not over, even posting how some think it may have been doctored, and I have posted in the past that I think this is silly. I am assuming that is one reason Russ posted this as an example of ‘like minded’ people coming to conclusions that not everyone may agree are correct and some call a conspiracy. I was merely pointing out that I agree with Russ, that it is not a conspiracy. I’m not ‘defending a hill’ any more than Russ is by responding with this example. I think he assumes I will call it a conspiracy when none dare call it conspiracy.

LikeLike
Steve Frisch

04 September 2011

See now there you go again George, comparing individual actions that might happen to be consistent with goals also expressed within Agenda 21, with Nazism. How do you expect people who may be engaged in those actions to take that comparison? It’s no different than comparing corporatist governance to Nazism, which many here respond quite negatively too. Clearly the goose and gander are not given the same consideration.

LikeLike
George Rebane

04 September 2011

Actually SteveF, the only thing that I am comparing is the gradualism and openness of the current Agenda 21 process and the openness with which the Nazis accreted power – a well known historical sequence.
With regard to what may be the impact on the welfare of Man from a global government to how the accomplished power of the Nazis affected the welfare of the German people and those they conquered, that is a totally separate (semantically orthogonal) topic and discussion. Please do not succumb to such politically correct confusions in these comment streams.
On Ruminations we reject the hip-level ‘one view’ characterizations of any totalitarian regime – be it Stalin’s communism, Hitler’s Nazism, or Mao’s communism – and will not reject the separate discussions of their other several attributes because their prime attributes were evil. The left has never eschewed discussion of Stalin’s infrastructure projects or Mao’s agricultural reforms per se when comparing them with such projects in other countries – even though they cost multiple times the lives and lasted many times as long as Adolph’s rampage.
It seems that only Hitler’s Nazism is the only one-dimensional atrocity that has afflicted mankind. So please get used to our being able to discuss Nazism’s rise to power in the same breath as Agenda 21’s progress. And indeed, there I go again.

LikeLike
Keachie

04 September 2011

I have my orange hardhat covered with aluminum foil, double layered with 1/2 airgap, with a bit of extra for the brim.
I don’t think it stops alien thoughtwaves, or pod people thoughtwaves, or even Teeper Creature brainfarts, but it does a wonderful job of keeping the inside of the helmet much cooler in the sun.

LikeLike
D. King

04 September 2011

Agenda 21?
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/update-gibson-guitar-ceo-says-feds-told-him-to-outsource-labor-to-madagascar/

LikeLike
D. King

04 September 2011

Here is the Youtube Beck interview.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DMaUdwlVNfA

LikeLike
stevenfrisch

04 September 2011

[gratuitous ad hominem crap deleted]

LikeLike
Paul Emery

04 September 2011

So George was NH 2020 part of the UN’s comprehensive program to establish global governance? And when you say that plan is “overtly, and yet covertly, being implemented by thousands of feel-good consensus preliminaries promoted at local levels” why isn’t that considered a conspiracy since it’s being promoted through deception. Or is what you’re saying is that it doesn’t need to be deceptive because no one will pay attention except of course for those in your tent.
You are talking about the ultimate destruction of our sovereignty through UN promoted programs correct?
Def Conspiracy
1.
the act of conspiring.
2.
an evil, unlawful, treacherous, or surreptitious plan formulated in secret by two or more persons; plot.
3.
a combination of persons for a secret, unlawful, or evil purpose: He joined the conspiracy to overthrow the government.
4.
Law . an agreement by two or more persons to commit a crime, fraud, or other wrongful act.
5.
any concurrence in action; combination in bringing about a given result.

LikeLike
George Rebane

04 September 2011

PaulE, thanks for your resurged interest. I think I’ve made it pretty clear that there is no deception going on; and yes, disinterest is all that is needed for globalist aims to make progress.
Your definitions for conspiracy are faulty (quite a common occurrence in modern lexicography). Def #5 is closest, but lacks the required element of secrecy or covertness, else a “concurrence of action” is just ‘co-operation’. Conspiracies may be lawful or unlawful. Pray, in the current context, what is the purpose of examining the meaning of conspiracy?

LikeLike
Dixon Cruickshank

04 September 2011

Bean by bean – bit by bit

LikeLike
Paul Emery

04 September 2011

And NH 2020? Was that part of this effort? I remember interviewing some anti NH 2020 types that had were eye witnesses to UN Black Helicopters stationed above Lake Spaulding that were sent to set up a hidden UN base to enforce regulations after passage. I don’t recall the names but they were Drew Bedwell supporters. I’m not making this up.
I got the definition from the on line dictionary http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/conspiracy

LikeLike
RL Crabb

05 September 2011

I’ll back up Paul on the black helicopter story. I heard it too. But here’s another twist to that era of confusion,misinformation and ugliness. One source has told me that one of the first proponents of NH2020 was none other than Russ Steele. Is that true, Russ?

LikeLike
stevenfrisch

05 September 2011

It is indeed true that Russ was one of the early supporters of NH 2020. But he saw an opportunity to leverage a science based process to identify resources and plan to reduce the future cost of development for political gain and flipped, helping to lead the opposition. Some things never change.

LikeLike
Todd Juvinall

05 September 2011

But PaulE, you have stated in these threads you believe there was a shooter on the grassy knoll and a conspiracy to kill Kennedy if I am recalling correctly. Why is your conspiracy any different then the black helicopters?
Regarding NH2020. I was not involved in its defeat to the degree Drew and others were but from my interviews with them then I recall their defense of private property rights and other constitutional issues were the motivation. There were many of the NO people who had been screwed over by overbearing government. That always makes for a lot of new candidates for office. Besides Paul, the YES people were booted by the people in elections for goodness sakes. Isn’t that your favorite thing, elections?
In my view the NH2020 supporters were trying to fill in the blanks of their losses in the General Plan and zoning ordinance updates of the late 90’s. I was there at all the hearings and they were as adamant about their hate for the zoning as the NO people were in opposition. Drew and Robin kicked leftwing ass and you simply can’t handle it.

LikeLike
Paul Emery

05 September 2011

I’m not specific about the”grassy knoll” theory. I believe that the conclusion of the Warren Commission that Oswald acted alone was not very plausible.
It was an anomaly that Izzy Martin became Supervisor in the highly Conservative 4th district so that change was predictable. District 3 has since switched back with Terry Lamphier defeating John Spencer last year.

LikeLike
George Rebane

05 September 2011

“Black helicopters”!? is that some lame (but could be successful) attempt to derail a discussion of UN’s Agenda 21 to which America’s presidents signed on to with great ceremony, not once (Clinton), but twice (Bush2)? It seems that we’re all afraid of Agenda 21 – the left, that its open and broadened discussion will hinder its fulfillment; the right, that its quiet advance will continue to damage the country and take us beyond another tipping point.

LikeLike
Paul Emery

05 September 2011

I was just putting some local historical perspective to the story that just a few years ago the theory that the UN was behind NH2020 was an active dialog in local elections. The Black Helicopters were cited often by Bedwell supporters as evidence that the UN was moving in and creating a secret base. Seems relevant to the topic.
George, was NH2020 par of the UN plan?

LikeLike