Rebane's Ruminations
November 2026
S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930  

ARCHIVES


OUR LINKS


YubaNet
White House Blog
Watts Up With That?
The Union
Sierra Thread
RL “Bob” Crabb
Barry Pruett Blog

  • George Rebane

    Glennbeck Let me fess up right from the start, so you know from where I come.  We are fans of Glenn Beck on Fox News, and enjoy his hyperventilated tirades and graphically illustrated exposés of the considerable hanky-panky in Washington that passes for government.  But you probably knew that.

    Glenn’s obviously conservative and libertarian screeds have been directed lately at what he identifies as “corruption” at all levels of government starting with Congress and the Administration.  Now, ferreting out corruption in government is a noble yet pretty vanilla undertaking on the American scene.  Nobody will much yell at you for taking that tack, except, of course, those at whom you point your pesky flashlight and catch up to their armpits in the cookie jar.

    But for some reason, Beck doesn’t always draw the stark and obvious conclusions from his investigations, he doesn’t always speak with the courage with which he exhorts us to speak out.  In the arena where he plays every afternoon, accusations of ‘corruption’ are usually assigned to the puff-ball corner.  To me it seems that Beck, more often than not, confuses implementation of a clearly declared and radical socio-political ideology with something that can be lifted from the police blotter of any big city.  And then he gives you a hint that his latest revelation may be bigger than that, but quickly backs off and leaves you to connect the remaining dots.

    In covering the proudly adopted and openly acknowledged Marxist redistribution and control policies of this Administration and Congress, he often short-circuits himself by concluding that all this is due to ‘corruption’.  Well yes; what the Rangles, Dodds, Stevens, and their ilk do to feather their personal nests is good old fashioned American corruption.  But what ACORN, Apollo Group, SEIU, and Obama’s hand-picked czars are doing today should not be viewed as corruption commonly understood.

    (more…)

  • George Rebane

    A “surprised and deeply humbled” President Obama was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize for 2009.  In his response he stated that he does not "view it as a recognition of my own accomplishments," going on to say, "I do not feel that I deserve to be in the company of so many transformative figures that have been honored by this prize,"  We can do naught but share his feelings, and join in his clear and accurate assessment of the award.  From his mouth to God’s ear.

    [10oct09 update] I was awakened this morning by an NPR piece on Obama's award that reviewed the many other accomplished winners of this prize.  It ended with Obama intoning the above quote, and then concluded with words almost identical to mine.  There is a lot of controversy over this prize - but from NPR, whoda thought? 

  • George Rebane

    - ObamaCare’s deficits go “conceptual”
    - Pelosi shows how VAT is not a tax on consumers
    - Locals still confused about unfunded pension liabilities

    The Washington Lies Factory is working overtime in the attempt to deliver something passable that can be labeled ObamaCare.  The Dems, led by Finance Committee Chairman Senator Baucus, have been pressuring the Congressional Budget Office to revise the damning estimates of their various bills’ deficit impacts over the next decade.  With some success they’ve gotten the CBO to go from $1 trillion to $597 billion to $245 billion in added deficits for the Senate versions of ObamaCare.  Now in a last big push, Baucus cajoled the CBO into looking at the latest “conceptual language” version of the Senate Finance Committee bill and issue a “score” for it.

    With obvious heel marks on the floor, the CBO was reluctantly dragged into doing a “preliminary analysis” of the “conceptual” bill, and guess what?  It turns out that this version of ObamCare could reduce deficits by a conceptual $81 billion.  The CBO’s accompanying letter qualified this scoring by stating –

    CBO and JCT’s (Joint Committee on Taxation) analysis is preliminary in large part because the (Finance Committee Bill), as amended, has not yet been embodied in legislative language.

    For those who track these things, Harry Reid now has to merge the Finance Committee bill with the Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions (HELP, love that acronym) Committee bill, which then must be merged with the House version to create the final monstrosity that Obama will sign.  During this long process you will be told by the Dems and their MSM to keep your eye on that $81 billion deficit reduction number, no matter how conceptually preliminary its publication has been.

    (more…)

  • George Rebane

    CalfUdder As longtime supporters of the Salvation Army, Jo Ann and I got an invitation this morning to set up a meeting with Captains Don and Martha Sheppard who are the new heads of our local Nevada County unit.  The Union ran an article yesterday on the progress of a $1.6M government grant that the local SA received “to address homelessness”.  The money is planned to run out in 18 months at which time other proposals for more money will be in the mill “to keep the program going.”

    All good and fine, but it got us thinking again on how these short-term, ad hoc government-sponsored programs are run.  Sustainability is the big idea these days, yet the declared use of funds like this does nothing to sustainably reduce homelessness – it is a temporary band-aid that must be replaced while the problem remains.

    Seems to me there are two kinds of homeless – those who are there temporarily and should be helped/encouraged to get back on their feet, and those who are there more or less for the long term.  For the latter case an appropriate long-term housing program should be sought and funded.  If we have decided that government should be the source of funding for one or both (which is another story), then let’s screen the folks and issue them the proper long and short-term Public Tit Cards (PTCs) the presentation of which gets them into the right program without further fuss.  (For those whose eyebrows get raised at the notion of a public tit card, consider that most of us already carry them.  For example I have two PTCs – my Social Security and Medicare cards.  And, of course, there are many more kinds floating around out there issued by this or that government agency.)

    (more…)

  • George Rebane

    Cooperation Our President’s series of foreign policy embarrassments have now come to a critical stand-off with Iran.  How Obama responds to Iran’s next betrayal of trust will determine to a great extent the future of the Middle East and the Levant (Near East).  Pajamas TV has a very interesting, accessible, and short presentation (here) of the problem facing the US that applies to and informs all international relations. 

    Nations ultimately act in their self-interest.  Those actions are explained clearly through the application of one of the systems sciences called game theory.  The video dishes out just enough of the science so that an educated viewer will begin to see why always acting altruistically does not provide the best international and/or social orders.  In fact, such behavior is absent in nature.  For a more revealing and stimulating account of the whole affair of conducting relationships, read Robert Axelrod’s classic The Evolution of Cooperation (also referenced in the video). 

    (For the careful reader.  In the video the described tactic ‘Tit for Tat’ is incomplete as introduced, and is implicitly corrected later.  TfT is the hands down winning tactic in the co-operation game known as the Iterated Prisoner’s Dilemma.  The complete rule set for TfT is –

    1. Never defect first;
    2. When opponent defects, retaliate immediately;
    3. In next round if opponent co-operates, forgive and co-operate.

    Omitting immediate retaliation puts one into the ‘food chain’ of the defector, reinforcing future/continued defections in it and others who observe the exchange.)

  • George Rebane

    DoubleEagle Obama can’t be blamed for starting the destruction of the dollar, but he will get a lot of credit for hastening its downfall.  Major world powers have recently begun secret meetings to move oil (and other energy commodities) off the dollar bandwagon.  Why?  Because, as RR readers have been aware for some time, the US government has no choice but to inflate our fiat money out of existence.  We are broke and owe our creditors debts and our citizens huge entitlements denominated in dollars.  There is simply no other way to pay off the putative amounts – more than $120 trillion and counting – than to print or ‘monetarily ease’ the dollar into oblivion.

    The Independent of Great Britain reports –

    In the most profound financial change in recent Middle East history, Gulf Arabs are planning – along with China, Russia, Japan and France – to end dollar dealings for oil, moving instead to a basket of currencies including the Japanese yen and Chinese yuan, the euro, gold and a new, unified currency planned for nations in the Gulf Co-operation Council, including Saudi Arabia, Abu Dhabi, Kuwait and Qatar.
     
    Secret meetings have already been held by finance ministers and central bank governors in Russia, China, Japan and Brazil to work on the scheme, which will mean that oil will no longer be priced in dollars.

    The target date for the transition is reported to be 2018.  Stand by for the vehement denials that will confirm the report.

  • George Rebane

    - EPA’s new approach to regulating the economy
    - ‘Network Neutrality’ will not be wallet-neutral
    - Waiting jobs, unqualified workforce

    – [update] Nevada County is stimulated! (see here)

    In the While We Slept Department – Last Wednesday the EPA invoked “endangerment finding” rules on CO2, confirming that it is a “dangerous pollutant”.  This gas, that we and all critters exhale in each others’ faces, has now become the global bogeyman of the catastrophic warming that is slated to doom us all unless, of course, we do it to ourselves sooner.  In what passes for wisdom, EPA has invoked a 1970s law, intended for other things, to give it control of all emitters of more than 250 tons annually.  However, this amount is so small as to require it to monitor over 41K establishments and over 6 million new construction permits per year – by its own words an “absurd result”.  So for starters, the EPA will arbitrarily up the 250 to 25,000 annual tons, and use the law anyway.  And no one makes a peep that this heavy handed and unelected bureaucracy can rummage around in the old laws drawer, pick out any that it likes, and modify the particulars so it can claim a basis for the next round of economy strangling regulations.   

    Net Neutrality is a term most people have never heard, and probably don’t want to hear.  But if you use the Internet, and you do since you’re reading this, you might want to make your voice heard on it.  PC Magazine has a good definition –

    Network Neutrality “refers to the absence of restrictions or priorities placed on the type of content carried over the Internet by the carriers and ISPs that run the major backbones. It states that all traffic be treated equally; that packets are delivered on a first-come, first-served basis regardless from where they originated or to where they are destined.”

    We recall that packets are bundles of bits (0s and 1s) into which your content – text, music, video, photo, … – is packaged.  These packets are routed from source to destination via a labyrinth of telecom links through what we view as the Internet ‘cloud’.  But here’s the rub, some content contains realtime files (like audio or video) and other content is made up of non-realtime files like text (simple emails or Word files).  For good quality of service in a busy cloud, you would want the packets of a realtime file to get through so as not to cause dropouts or interruptions during playback at the destination.  This suggests that different types of packets may have to be treated differently (i.e. prioritized) in some fashion – yielding a ‘non-neutral’ network. 

    Government is about to take the next thing that has worked beautifully so far, and have its way with it.  The proposed Net Neutrality (the name should raise an eyebrow) regulations would restrict who could charge how much for what kinds of packets they transmit over the Internet at what speeds.  Most technicians correctly argue that Internet related technologies are evolving so quickly in unpredictable directions, that the proposed regulations would stifle this critical communication medium - like granting the old Ma Bell a telephone monopoly stifled the American phone system in its later decades.  Regulations always have unintended consequences.  But it’s your wallet, and it should be your call to your electeds.  Right now the FCC is slated to quietly manufacture a “crossroads” for the Internet, and then direct which way we should all go.

    There are waiting jobs, but no one to fill them.  Today jobs for accountants, electronic engineers, and physical therapists go begging.  And tomorrow people will be working jobs that have yet to be invented.  Only one thing is certain – no one but the government is inventing jobs for the unskilled, inept, and uneducated (more here).  RR readers know that I believe the greatest social tsunami headed our way is the growing unemployable component of the country’s workforce (here).  Most of the 15 to 20 million unemployed today will never again find a job in the private sector that will maintain their expected quality of life.  And these unemployed will be joined by newly unemployed – both educated and un-educated – as the ‘jobless recovery’ proceeds.  This will become the dominant social reality of these pre-Singularity years.  Yet few understand what’s happening, and fewer want to talk about it.  Systemic unemployment growth has become the latest 'Unmentionable' in our land, joining the established and acknowledged Unmentionables – unfunded entitlement and pension liabilities, dysfunctional public education, and the destruction of the dollar.

    Meanwhile, the federal and state governments are doing all they can to insert friction at every conceivable joint and transit in the machinery of commerce.  In addition to the major economy killers now working their way through Congress, consider that the latest minimum wage ratchet left behind another 300,000 workers comprised of mostly the young (UC Irvine study). 

     

  • George Rebane

    ObamaMcChrystal 
    ‘Blown away’ is an appropriate description of my reaction to the twenty-five minutes the President spent with General McChrystal in Copenhagen aboard Air Force One.  Here the Community Organizer in Chief is in Copenhagen as part of the Three Egos for Chicago presentation, and the General has flown thousands of miles out of theater to meet with Admiral Mike Mullen in Europe to discuss Afghanistan – it makes all the sense in the world for the President and his hand-picked general to meet and discuss what Obama has always called the “important” and “critical” war to secure America against Islamic terrorists.

    So McChrystal flies to Copenhagen to touch base with the Commander-in-Chief, deliver his critical message about new Afghanistan strategy and troop levels required, and answer any questions that his boss would have.  And they spend only twenty-five minutes together.

    To me this was extraordinarily revealing.  It turns out the junior birdman from Chicago and the career military man had nothing to talk about.  Obama has never been in the military or in any activity remotely connected with the military.  His knowledge of history, national projection of power, and war is book learning, if that.  He does not know of family separations, of partings that may be final.  His experience is totally local and political, and it ends where the pavement ends. 

    Obama most likely had a few politically important ‘Afghanistan questions’ shoved in his shorts by his handlers.  He met the general on AF-1, asked his questions, to which the general gave the appropriate clear, concise, and complete answers – and the interview was over.

    A real President would have taken the opportunity of the first meeting with his war theater commander to do more than the bare formalities.  Hell, the ‘opening prayer’ for two guys like that, intent on serving the country, would have taken more than 25 minutes.  That time would have served to get to know a little bit about each other over a freshly opened bottle of Maker’s Mark.  Then they would have spent and hour or two talking about the mid-east, about Iran and Pakistan that border Afghanistan, about the good and the bad of Iraq.  The general is plumb full of good information and assessments of what has worked, and, more importantly, what hasn’t in that region of historical disasters for western nations.  Twenty-five goddam minutes!!

    As President, Obama could have come back fully briefed on the situation in the mid-east instead of getting succinct answers to some quick canned questions.  I mean, the damned interview was carried on as if they were in the Red Carpet Room of United Airlines and someone was rushing to catch a flight.  The last I looked, AF-1 was not a scheduled carrier.  That airplane takes off and flies at the pleasure of the President of the United States of America.

  • George Rebane

    This supposed fresh start in Geneva only gives them new legitimacy, and new hope that they can have their bomb and enhanced global standing too.  (‘Springtime for Mullahs’ 2oct09 WSJ)

    Hot off the press – subsequent to President Obama’s flight to Copenhagen and personal appeal to the IOC on behalf of Chicago, that city was the first eliminated from the running for the 2016 Olympics.

    Ahmedinejad After eight months in office this man has now shown himself to be ignorant, incompetent, indecisive, and apologetic for all things American.  In his behalf, I can confidently conclude that he has attempted to do everything that he promised while campaigning, and we have every reason to believe that neither his energies nor direction will be diverted during the remainder of his term.

    The latest significant poke in the eye, unnoticed by the MSM (aka Mostly Sleeping Media), was by the Iranian mullahs and Ahmedinejad in the multi-national Geneva talks yesterday.  Obama’s delineation of his celebrated “line in the sand” did not even include the word ‘sanctions’ for non-compliance to past agreements and current demands about the recently revealed nuclear facility in Qom.  As pointed out by the pre-eminent commercial intelligence analysis outfit Stratfor –

    According to European foreign policy chief Javier Solana, the meeting’s host, Iran will allow inspectors from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) access to its heretofore secret enrichment site near Qom within two weeks. This is not much of a concession. As a signatory to the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty (NPT), Iran is treaty-bound to allow such inspections (just as all other signatories, including the United States and Russia, are).

    In exchange, the P-5+1 powers agreed to allow Iran to transfer small amounts of low-enriched uranium — typically enriched to 3-5 percent so that it can be used in a nuclear power reactor — to a third country for additional enrichment to the approximately 20 percent fissile mix required for the creation of medical isotopes. That additionally enriched uranium would then be imported back to Iran for medical use (Enrichment of 90 percent or more is required for the creation of a nuclear weapon.) Although on paper this seems like a small concession, it implicitly gives Iran the right to enrich uranium. This is guaranteed legally by the NPT, but only in exchange for full cooperation in inspections. Iran’s unwillingness to cooperate is the root of what has brought us to this point, so the P-5+1’s willingness to take Iran at its word is no small step.

    So Iran took another page out of North Korea’s playbook and ropa-doped us by agreeing again to do something that they had already agreed to do years ago – not that they will do it, or that the IAEA will confirm any of these promises.  (We recall that the IAEA are the UN clowns whose incompetence shielded Iran’s first nuclear weapons program for over a decade until it was revealed by an Iranian dissident group.)  Ahmedinejad will no doubt be the recipient of this year’s coveted Kim Il Jong Prize for bamboozling the west.  And for his part, Obama will be looking forward to a nice thank you note from Rio de Janeiro for his efforts in Copenhagen.

    Meanwhile, he will have the next two weeks to find some more space in the sandbox in which to draw another line without getting his finger smelly. 

  • George Rebane

    … they’ll know we’re still here.

    NCARRA091005 

    [5oct09 update] Sumbich, it worked!  We are on our way to some serious stimulation (Martha, take the children out of the room.).  All it took was a bit more wiggling.  Them bureycrats in Washington don’t take no note of sums such as impress us hill folks.  We needed to up the anty, and up the anty we did – yee haa!  Hat tip to Supe John for this timely update.

5 comments on A Glenn Beck Conundrum