Rebane's Ruminations
January 2026
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

ARCHIVES


OUR LINKS


YubaNet
White House Blog
Watts Up With That?
The Union
Sierra Thread
RL “Bob” Crabb
Barry Pruett Blog

  • “Socialism is the philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy.”  W. Churchill

    George Rebane

    The tyrant’s last refuge of legitimacy on the world stage is that his brand of governance provides the best prosperity for those under his heel.  When it comes to the legitimacy of China and its CCP, we read, “for decades China’s biggest fear was a Taiwanese declaration of independence producing a crisis for which Beijing had no good options. Yet now the regime is telling us its legitimacy will have to rest on reclaiming Taiwan because, with the prosperity machine sputtering, the ruling Communists have no other good answers for why they still rule.”  So conquest of an economically better performing neighbor is now legitimate. (more here)

    Today’s debt ceiling derby is going nowhere.  GOP wants to reduce spending as part of the package, and the Dems want to continue spending under a “clean bill” that will only raise our borrowing limit with no spending limits.  Neither side will give in, even to the GOP proposal that we should only borrow enough to match the percent growth of our GDP.  The Dem proposal would blow this cap by raising our debt to 110% of GDP.  And the Repubs don’t do much better with their current budget which will raise our debt to 106% of GDP.  So go figger.  In the meantime ol’ Forked Tongue Joe promises to consider spending cuts after the GOP accepts his clean-bill demand.  Speaker McCarthy should check with Joe Manchin’s office on the pipeline deal.

    DEI in academe has gone Kafkaesque.  Scott Gerber, a prominent law professor at Ohio Northern University, has been summarily dismissed for having a “lack of collegiality” in his public opposition to the school’s woke policy of diversity, equity, and inclusion.  No specifics have been given on the charge other than Professor Gerber’s views on the practice of DEI “are not part of our diversity, belonging, and inclusion plan.”  As in Kafka’s The Trial (1925), Gerber was accosted by armed police and campus security while in the middle of teaching a class, and marched out to the astonishment of all who witnessed the event.  The book tells the story of Josef K., a man arrested, prosecuted and killed by an inaccessible authority, with the nature of his crime revealed neither to him nor to the reader.  (more here)

    [update] Again we await a new “trove of evidence against the Biden crime family.”  PJ Media report (here) that this latest trove of “bombshell evidence” was to be released today by Rep James Comer chair of the House Oversight Committee investigating the source of all the Biden family millions.  But it appears that this bombshell was just another in the long line of evidentiary duds as the sun sets tonight and all is quiet on the lamestream media front, not even a fizzle of it in the New York Post.

  • [So now outfits that collect and search internet content want to start charging AI companies that make chatbots for the data they use to train their LLMs.  Companies like Google and Amazon get this data for ‘free’ – actually, what it costs them to scrape it from the web – as it is provided also for free by billions of online consumers.  The conundrum is that the very large data repositories don’t want to drive away the AI-based search engines by making their training datasets too expensive.  Until now the whole purpose of those freely accessible datasets has been to have third-party search results point to the data that the Googles and Amazons make available.  And since it costs tens of millions of dollars in power and processing time to make a functioning LLM, everyone involved already has skin in the game.  If it ain’t broke, … .  gjr]

    Posted at

    in

  • George Rebane

    The recent burst of large language models (LLMs) from AI research has reinvigorated the Singularity related topics of machine sentience, sapience, super-intelligence, agency, ethics, morals, …, along with prognoses of what they may have in store for humans when/if they become ascendant.  Most commentators, including yours truly, see a high likelihood of a dystopian post-Singularity future for mankind.

    Among these well-known AI experts are internationally renowned scientists like Nick Bostrom (e.g. Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies, 2014) and Max Tegmark (e.g. Life 3.0: Being Human in the Age of Artificial Intelligence, 2017).  These tomes are worth reading more than once, which I am currently doing.  It turns that both Bostrom (Oxford) and Tegmark (MIT) are established physicists, philosophers, and AI researchers (and both were born in Sweden).

    Their counsel for humanity to proceed carefully into a future not dominated by our species is countered by more hopeful futurists like Hans Moravec (e.g. Mind Children: The Future of Robot and Human Intelligence, 1990) and Ray Kurzweil (e.g. The Singularity is Near, 2005).

    About the Singularity, Moravec (Carnegie-Mellon) advises his readers that “human equivalence is just the beginning, not an upper bound. Once the tireless thinking capacity of robots is directed to the problem of their own improvement and reproduction, even the sky will not limit their voracious exploration of the universe. … Moravec challenges us to imagine with him the possibilities and pitfalls of such a scenario. Rather than warning us of takeover by robots, the author invites us, as we approach the end of this millennium, to speculate about a plausible, wonderful postbiological future and the ways in which our minds might participate in its unfolding.”

    And it is our postbiological future that I would like to expand on here.  Moravec, Kurzweil, and others of their ilk have been describing a post-Singularity world that is inhabited by both intelligent machines and various forms of ‘transhumans’ – humans who have shed their evolved mortal coils and taken up new forms in both the physical and computational sense.  A popular scenario has some of us living in cyborg bodies.  Another inviting future has us living in virtual worlds as computational entities, and still others have us co-habiting the material (real?) world with superintelligent machines exercising some manner of peer relationships.

    (more…)

  • George Rebane

    Fair, balanced, and scared shitless?

    Tucker CarlsonUnbeknownst to Tucker Carlson, last Friday he broadcast his last show, a  program that has become an iconic fixture in the homes of the largest fraction of America’s cable news audiences.  Readers of these pages have known for the last several years of my assessment that Fox News was losing its edge as the leading media voice against the anti-American Left that is daily championed by the Democratic Party through its boot-licking broadcast and online outlets.

    Tonight Bret Baier’s flagship ‘Special Report’ took the Scared Shitless Trophy by not acknowledging the major news item of the day, let alone daring to even repeat the sparse announcement of the event that was released by Fox Corporation about the “parting of their ways.”

    Everyone tonight is asking how did Fox come to that decision to fire Carlson.  It’s known that Rupert Murdoch is a tough old bastard who makes business decisions based on dollars and cents.  So people on other smaller and independent networks like Megyn Kelly on Newsmax are favoring reasons based on future profitability that requires moving FN toward the center of the political spectrum.

    Meanwhile, the rest of us are standing by to see how Tucker, who can write his own ticket, will now land on his feet in a new sandbox more to his liking.  When he finally does land, you can expect a seismic shift of cable audiences.  The risky part is that he will then have to deliver even more of his gloves-off impactive commentary than in the past.  His new copy will have to shoulder not only the ongoing leftwing and government travesties, but also the added burden of real and represented slings and arrows that this transition made him suffer.

  • [In updating the government’s butt stupid department, we witnessed today a major speech by SecTreas Janet Yellen assuring the Red Chinese that that US has no intention in surpassing them in international trade and economic progress, let alone outcompeting them in military matters.  Then for what in hell are these people getting paid??  gjr]

    Posted at

    in

  • From each according to his ability and to each according to his need – Communist Axiom

    George Rebane

    California consumers will soon be paying for their utilities according to how much money they make.  The long-denied face of Marxism will have arrived in full force if the utilities and the Public Utilities Commission have their way.

    When this authoritarian regime gains a foothold, its principles will then be applied to control the means-based prices of life’s other necessities.  This is what always has happened when the butt stupid half of a country’s citizenry takes to using the government gun to milk their productive neighbors.  Our Left has always denied that their goal is organize America according to Marxist-cum-Communist principle.  Today they have gained enough support from our double dummies that they can talk about their progress to authoritarian rule out in the open.

    All this is in the works in California because this is the way Gavin Newsom’s state government wants it: “The income-based bill proposal is part of the companies’ compliance with legislation passed by the California state government last year requiring these types of plans for utilities. The California Public Utilities Commission would have to approve the proposal and make a final decision by mid-2024. The fixed rate could start showing up on bills as soon as 2025.” After that, watch for the wall to be built around California to keep those who are productive from escaping becoming slaves to “equity,” unless the whole country has embraced Marxism by then. (more here)

     

  • “U.S. Universities Urge Students to Report One Another for ‘Bias’ ”

    George Rebane

    Professors Ivan Mannovic (Stanford) and John Ellis (UC Santa Cruz) report that today’s universities are laying in another expensive layer of administrative bureaucracies designed to encourage students and other academics to report each others’ DEI infractions for general approbation, remediation of the accused, and TBD punishments.  The East German Stasi (secret police) last employed one third of its population to perform similar functions on its citizens.  America’s Orwellian conquest proceeds apace, abetted by cadres of reprobates that have the moral credentials of sacks of shit (a more civil description will not serve) lining the hallways of college administration buildings.

    According to a recent study by the free-speech watchdog organization Speech First, 56% of American universities have adopted schemes that encourage students to report on one another anonymously for “bias” or “protected identity harm.” This means that anyone who falls short of campus orthodoxy on “pronouns,” transgenderism, microaggressions and proscribed language might soon be denounced and deprived of basic due process, including the right to face an accuser. (more here)

    This evil is, of course, promoted by our Democratic Party as one more of their nationally implemented anti-American initiatives.  Added evidence of this is that no leftwing media outlet nor woke ideological commentariat will acknowledge that this is happening.  Free expression by at least half our population has been relegated to surreptitious exchanges, perhaps whispered in bathrooms with the water running.

    But perhaps the worst aspect of this scheme is that the most destructive of campus bureaucracies—the diversity, equity and inclusion brigade—will grow, for most of the campus bias-reporting systems are housed in DEI offices. Yes, the same group that polices language, forces ideological training down the throats of faculty and students, and mandates loyalty oaths from faculty candidates will be in charge of administering the system of informers. Woke ideologues will obstruct the work of those who still believe that the mission of a university is to foster the free exchange of ideas.

  • [Good news department.  It turns out that if you drink both modestly and regularly, then all kinds of health benefits can accrue to you.  For most men that means no more than two drinks (wine, beer, whiskey) a day, and no more than one drink a day for women – a drink contains about 12-14 grams of alcohol.  Hallelujah!  (More here) gjr]

    Posted at

    in

  • George Rebane

    Now that former president Trump has been indicted by the country’s anti-American left, we are seeing the saner elements from both Right and Left decry the Manhattan idiot DA’s decision in countless media interviews and op-eds.  What strikes me is how these commentators are tippy-toeing around the notion of a violent opposition, while not exactly calling for one – but their message is clear – e.g. the 30mar23 Tucker Carlson program.  So let’s get cut to the chase, are we finally hearing that it’s time to start soaking the cannons?  Thoughts?

    More later.

  • George Rebane

    Led by technical, industrial, and political luminaries like Elon Musk, Yoshua Bengio, Steve Wozniak, et al have published “Pause Giant AI Experiments: An Open Letter” as a warning to civilization about the potential harmful impact that recently released AI developments portend. (more here)  Specifically, the authors “call on all AI labs to immediately pause for at least 6 months the training of AI systems more powerful than GPT-4.”

    AI research company OpenAI recently released ChatGPT, a large language model of a very sophisticated neural network that can understand spoken/written natural language, search its enormous training dataset for pattern-matching answers, and compose a well-formed response, that, while not always factually accurate, is sufficiently compelling to influence its human interrogator.  ChatGPT, based on the GPT-4 LLM, has now been embraced by a number of large and small firms to study, modify, and see how they may integrate it into their daily operations.

    In the interval OpenAI is developing the next advance called GPT-5, and other companies like Google are busy bringing out their own LLM general artificial intelligence systems.  There is a lot of money to be made and power(s) to be brokered by people who will command important knowledge and process domains in sectors like healthcare, pharmaceuticals, genomics, law, energy, quantum computing, algorithmics, and, yes, even physics in general.  And in one form or another LLMs and their descendants will ensconce systemic unemployment – legions of the terminally disgruntled – in the workforces of all developed countries.

    Singularity3At this point some may ask whether the Singularity has already arrived since we now have existential reasons to fear the seemingly ‘intelligent critters’ that have already crawled out of their cribs as having peer intelligence with us.  Moreover, these systems have also demonstrated that they perform better than the best humans in an ever-growing list of endeavors that were dominated by domain experts.  Today many of these LLMs can even fool humans to the extent of passing the Turing Test (q.v.).

    So, as we integrate these AIs into the many systems (energy, transportation, education, law, governance, …)  that make up our civilizations’ grid, we are concerned of their being able to formulate and achieve performance metrics that are dystopic to humankind – in short, they may decide to treat us as vermin and use their grid-embedded powers to be rid of us.  We have reviewed many of such scenarios in this ‘Singularity Signposts’ category of RR over the last 16 years, and will continue to do so as the pace of AI development accelerates and systems yet to be imagined come to the fore.

    In the meantime, the well-intended cautionary letter released yesterday will not slow the pace of research one whit.  The genie is out of the bottle, too many agents and agencies have easy access to the technology, and the rewards are too great to just bring things to a halt for while as we puzzle about notions like machine consciousness, morals, generalized intelligence, ethics, …, and so on.  From my perch, I don’t see how from this point on will we even understand the fundamental paradigm that makes them come alive.  Yes, alive – here I am taking the Skinnerian behaviorist definition of life – they are alive to the extent of what they according to their own initiative will do.  Exciting times ahead.

10 comments on Ruminations – 10may23 (updated)