Rebane's Ruminations
November 2026
S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930  

ARCHIVES


OUR LINKS


YubaNet
White House Blog
Watts Up With That?
The Union
Sierra Thread
RL “Bob” Crabb
Barry Pruett Blog

  • [OK, it's that time of the year again for the major entertainment event of winter (and here you thought it was SuperBowl) when President Obama tells us again how the country's ills will be cured by taxing the rich and redistributing to the poor, er, middle class.  Tomorrow night's the night, brace yourself with an abundant serving of your favorite adult beverage.  And not to worry if you miss it; we are told that the half-life of a State of the Union speech is about five minutes.]

  • George Rebane

    What price glory?  I’ve watched presidential press secretaries for decades pitch with a serious face the world according to their boss.  But something that Josh Earnest, the current Chief Lackey to our twice elected Liar-in-Chief, said rang a special bell.  The whole country is talking about Obama’s prevarication about the ISLAMIST jihad and ISLAMISTS’ use of terrorism.  Our president draws the country’s ire on himself by refusing to connect Islam in any shape or form to the multi-decadal Islamist attack on the west.  He instead chooses to look at these acts, and now territorial offensives, as isolated criminal attacks by people who have misunderstood and perverted the religion of peace as a cover.

    Obama2014But let’s again be charitable and attribute Obama’s understanding of world events to an epochal, unique, and rare attack of cranial densititis.  Can we in all honesty say that such a deficit has afflicted his entire White House staff, or is there some ass kissing and boot licking going on to keep those staff positions on your resume?  Josh Earnest presents himself as a reasonable and well-spoken man.  Yet when he claimed yesterday that attributing the most recent spate of raghead attacks to radical Islam is “in error” because we don’t know their source since “there are many kinds of terrorists in the world”, he did go beyond the pale.  How can that man say such things day after day and then look at himself in the mirror?  It truly boggles the mind; who does he think will hire him after his gig at the White House ends?  (Oh, I know I know, there are all kinds of sleazebag outfits out there that need values-free mouthpieces.  But who wants to work for them pushing the same crap to the public as a career move?)

    Is it or isn’t it a war between civilizations?  Well, that discussion is now in the public forum.  Many public figures and even heads of state have come out recently declaring that it really is a war.  And yet many others, led by Obama and including UK’s David Cameron, continue to hold back.  Cameron not so much since he takes every opportunity to include ‘Islam’ and ‘Islamist’ into statements about the jihadist attacks in Europe and the territorial wars in the Mideast and Africa.  But he still doesn’t yet “want to characterize it as a war.”  Now if we take the Obama/Cameron progressivist argument to one of its logical conclusions, then the military activities we have had in the Mideast since 2003 have also not been war or, if you will, wars.  Why? because the military actions we have engaged in since then have involved fighting that is just as intense, involving more casualties than we suffered, with participants who are much more organized (enough to conquer, hold, and administer territories) and adhere to a coherent objective, and join in combat that now ranges over multiple continents.  And this time we don’t call it a war?  But the cherry on the cake is that everyone on the other side, including the millions upon millions of so-called moderate Muslims, fervently believe Islam is engaged in a holy war with the infidel west.  Anyone think that there exists a progressive who will say, ‘Oh shit, well when you look at it that way, I guess we are at war.’  Don’t hold your breath.

    (more…)

  • George Rebane

    LakeviewORTraveling with some friends, we just returned from a visit to Lakeview – at 4,798 feet ‘The Tallest Town in Oregon’.  Lakeview sits at the north end of Goose Lake, a huge drainage basin shared by California and Oregon.  It also advertises itself as the ‘Gateway to the Oregon Outback’ which is the sparsely populated high desert of the state’s eastern region.  The town of about 2,200 has definitely seen better days.  And from talking to the locals, the worst is yet to come.  What happened?

    During our stay we had a chance to talk to owners of three businesses.  Each had lived there for at least twenty years, and they told us a story of what happens when a town decides to buy into an imported glory road.  Historically Lakeview grew as the seat of Lake County and the commercial center for ranching and timber enterprises in southern Oregon, in later years adding a dollop of tourism that took advantage of the nearby mountains for camping, skiing, and some awesome hang gliding.

    Then in the 1990s came some new folks with slick talk of smart growth, things natural, and sustainability.  They pitched the community on getting some OPM (other people’s money) to develop natural sources of wind, solar, and geothermal energy.  In the future, business and living would be controlled as they are in the big cities.  New zoning laws were passed, and strict business ordinances put in place.  With the help of a couple of big name foundations and government grants things were going to get organized – things were going to become progressive as reflected in the town’s new ‘mission statement’  

    The mission of the Town of Lakeview is to provide citizens with a safe, family-oriented community while promoting sustainable development of our human, economic and natural resources. We progressively seek a positive future while honoring our heritage.

    Well, things didn’t work out as the central planners had it figured.  The projects were delayed, the monies were late, some stuff had been overlooked, and when it came right down to it, people had other ideas which they now had a hard time implementing because of all the new rules and ordnances and codes and … .  Since they could no longer implement their own plans – i.e. continue the free and self-reliant lifestyle that drew and kept them there – people started leaving Lakeview.  Today the town is eerily empty with boarded up stores and empty commercial buildings, as its population has declined for the last twenty years.

    There is a lot more to the story of Lakeview as another place that has suffered from progressive blight, and we’ll add to this piece as relevant data warrants.  But what I want to point out with this report is that such blight has quietly spread pretty much nationwide, most certainly since 2009 when we started getting all those new rules and recovery programs for the Great Recession.  It is charitably clear that no one from Washington has looked at how rural counties have taken the brunt of the ‘new thinking’ that is being imposed bit by piece on our less populated regions.  In Lakeview people know about Agenda21 (they told us so) because they are living it every day.  The real plan for Lakeview is for it to revert to its ‘natural state’ before people arrived.

    As reported here for some years, California’s rural counties are destined for the same future as Lake County.  We see it right here in Nevada County which has a lot more to offer residents than Lake County, Oregon.  Of course, California imposes on us its own unique and widely infamous brand of insanity to impede growth, economic development, public use of public and private lands, and on and on.  Our own imported progressives are very active in creating and sustaining an environment in these foothills which stifles any vestige of human activity that is not according to the outlined objectives of Agenda21.

    Such strategy notwithstanding, we in Nevada County divert ourselves periodically with workshops and meetings that address the holy grail of economic growth.  And we invite speakers from faraway places to tell us how they were able or are still trying to promote such growth.  What we seem to miss is that these hoped for experts come from places that look nothing like our county and community.  Perhaps we should hold more useful gatherings and hear the experiences of people from places like Lake County.  I bet that each of them have a woulda/coulda/shoulda tale to tell that would really resonate with what we have been going through, and maybe even shine a light on some yet-to-be-discovered dark corners where there be tigers waiting for us.

  • George Rebane

    Two Nevada County progressives have claimed to receive different receptions from local folks and the established mover and shaker networks.  In yesterday’s (12jan15) Union we had a long lament by Jim Firth, a leader of the Democrat Party hereabouts.  Upon arriving, Mr Firth quickly jumped into local politics and came away a bit bloodied, having been rejected to seats on local commissions and received a drubbing from the voters in two elections.  He puts the blame squarely on the shortsightedness of the county’s establishment, and an undeserved pummeling in the local blogosphere.

    On the obverse side we see Ms Heidi Hall who has her eyes on Nevada County as a proper stepping stool for higher public office.  Readers may recall that Ms Hall already attempted to unseat Congressman Doug LaMalfa last November.  The lady has an impressive array of impeccable progressive credentials, and now a correspondent advises me that she will be able to promote her brand of politics through two significant Nevada County trumpets – KVMR and The Union for which she will do a weekly radio commentary and write a bi-weekly column.  Quite a different reception from that received by fellow Democrat Jim Firth.  (Full disclosure – I am a former Union columnist and do a regular commentary on KVMR.)

    Both Firth and Hall are devotees of extensive government care, central planning, and a more economically homogeneous society.  So it is a puzzlement why two people with such similar ideologies have fared so differently.  But don’t get me wrong, the jury is still out.  Nevada County remains a distinctly right-of-center county with an unusually large population of retireds.  Perhaps Ms Hall has moderated her tilt to port to account for that.  Her first Union column appeared today wherein she encouraged people to get informed and engage in politics.  Within this seemingly neutral counsel was wrapped her enthusiasm and support for Betty Yee who was elected California Controller last fall.  In there she pointed out Yee’s rejection of “corporate money” without even a whisper of the extensive union funding her campaign enjoyed.  Fair enough – I, for one, do not expect nor want ideologues to attempt some claimed ‘balance’ in their advocacies and apologetics.

    In sum, I hope Jim Firth keeps up the good fight to get into some public office of note, and in that pursuit continues to leave a trail of prescriptive opinion pieces in the paper and on blogs that extol the joys of expanding collectivism in our county.  And I welcome Heidi Hall’s “joining the local punditry”, but do hope that Ms Hall’s future columns and commentaries will depart from her, perhaps understandable, cautious inaugural pabulum to give us all something substantial to chew on.

  • George Rebane

    The pen is mightier than the sword only to the extent that it can evoke more powerful swords.

    As millions of others on this planet, my thoughts have turned to Islam and its role in the ongoing global reign of terror exemplified again by the slaughter in Paris last week.  These reflections have been piqued by the diversity of reporting and commentary on these attacks, and how many in the news, commentary, and government industries have trouble calling a spade a spade.  To be accurate, there are a precious few outlets and commentators that dare connect Islam to these events, but most speak only of disconnected and broadbrush notions like ‘criminality’ and ‘terror’ which blossom forth spontaneously out of the void.

    This morning listening to NPR I heard an extended interview with Irshad Manji the author of The Trouble with Islam (2004).  She taught us that in addition to fundamental and moderate Muslims, there now exists a group identified as “reformed Muslims”.  She never said from what these folks had managed to reform themselves, but the tenets of this newest version of Islam seems to have been transplanted from the reformed versions of Christianity and Judaism which have succumbed to the siren call of secular humanism, but have yet to complete their wholesale renunciation of their former religions.

    Ms Manji waxed eloquently about the proper understanding of the Quran which really teaches non-violence, condemns terror, encourages self-discovery of beliefs, promotes free expression, and elevates women in society.  These finer points of progressive Islam have been missed over the centuries, and continue to be misunderstood.  She also seems happy to have discovered that Muslims marrying outside their faith tends to dilute the stricter teachings of the prophet, and will over time bring Islam into a state of rapprochement in countries where such intermingling of cultures is fostered and tolerated.  But what the poor woman apparently misses completely is that that is the raison d’etre for Islamist jihad – Islam per se cannot survive in multi-cultural amalgams such as exist in liberal western countries.

    This report wouldn’t be complete without mentioning that her astounding revelations about Islam have brought forth an uncountable number of the obligatory death threats from fellow believers who for centuries have held quite different views about free expression.

    (more…)

  • [It seems that I just blink, and the last sandbox is overflowing.  Again apologies for the delay in opening a new one.  The comment stream of 'Scattershots – 4jan15' was beginning to bear too many extra-curricular burdens.]

  • George Rebane

    [This is the transcript of my regular KVMR commentary broadcast on 7 January 2015.]

    The recent police killings of two black men, and the revenge murders of two NYC police officers highlight legitimate fears that have now been brought to a fever pitch by grandstanding politicians and activist demagogues.  In New York Mayor De Blasio ran on the alleged evils and racial bias of the city’s police department.  Never mind that the data from policies like ‘broken windows’ and ‘stop & frisk’ did not support any of the popular contentions he used to stir up the city’s black population.

    After the Staten Island death of Eric Garner his honor excoriated his police to the extent of inviting demonstrations in which police were physically attacked to shouts of ‘What do we want? Dead cops!’  This invitation reinforced the image of police targeting black men and ultimately resulted in the assassinations of officers Rafael Ramos and Wenjian Liu by Ismaaiyl Brinsley after posting “They Take 1 Of Ours…… Let’s Take 2 of Theirs, #ShootThePolice.”  The result is a standown of policing in the city with ongoing public shows of disrespect by the police to their mayor.  (more here)

    When we step back and take a cooler and more reasoned look at the numbers that record what has actually happened in fatal encounters between police and civilians, two different pictures emerge.  Each picture is used to support arguments of why blacks fear the police, and why the police fear blacks.  And make no mistake, reasonable or unreasonable, the fear is real on both sides.

    (more…)

  • George Rebane

    Legalization of marijuana (MJ).  Now that California begins its statewide march toward legalizing MJ, it is noteworthy to look at the path such initiatives have forged for our forebears Washington and Colorado.  In both states the ‘leakage’ of medical MJ (MMJ) into recreational MJ (RMJ) markets is now rampant.  Both states’ taxes on RMJ are so high that they have given rise to lively and growing RMJ black markets, and of course, the corresponding growth of the population of illegitimate MMJ consumers, since MMJ is taxed at much lower rates.  In many ways this is a blessing for the MJ law enforcement industry since such over-taxed legalization has not eliminated the lawless side of MJ production and distribution.

    We in California should pay close attention to these happenings as we assemble coalitions and committees to study and propose our own state’s new laws and local codes for MJ.  The main contenders will again be the inevitable fact that most MMJ buyers will be RMJ users, and that the neighborhood nuisance factor will be prominent in considering where and how MJ can be produced.  We should do a better job than so far demonstrated (as predicted) in Washington and Colorado (and Oregon?).

    MinorityRightsThe Muslim colonization of Europe.  Those most liberal and progressive Swedes are demonstrating the approach of their breakpoint to the established and growing Muslim enclaves in the country.  As the informed reader knows, such Muslim enclaves are entrenched today in all well-to-do northern European countries, enclaves where Sharia law is openly and blatantly practiced, where indigenous constabularies dare not go, and in which the established lamestream media dare not report on the actual medieval practices and goings-on on formerly Christian, now secular humanist, soil.  (See also ‘Islamophobia 2.0’)

    This colonization and the atrocities of Islam are abetted by our progressive ranks in leadership positions and the gruberized voters filled with politically correct pabulum who continue returning them to those positions.  (Our own foothills run rampant with these types.)  None of these people in the west hold the so-called moderate Muslims to account as they quietly watch the global campaign of murder.  Now one of their own, President al-Sisi of Egypt and leader of the largest Arab nation in the world, in a major speech has accused the global Islamic population of encouraging their own ragheads to spread the carnage in the middle east and elsewhere (more here and here, and H/T to reader).  He joins with the many other leaders of Islam (and precious few westerners) in attesting that we are not in a worldwide ‘war on terror’, but in a resumption of the war between Islam and the west that is promoted and prosecuted by the now multifarious and growing number of radical Islamic factions.  Al-Sisi and other truly moderate (anti-radical) Muslims see no good end for Islam from this escalating conflict, and are trying to convince their own populations to oppose their indigenous radicals.  Only the double dummies of the west are blind to this comprehensive and global reality.

    (more…)

  • [Happy 2015 to one and all, may this year's discussions and debates be equally energetic and stimulating as the jousting that took place in 2014.  I promise to do my part by trying to serve up as many ideological and current events hot buttons as possible.  For this sandbox I throw out 'The New Wave of Graphic Novels' which are hitting the (dare I use word) 'literary scene'.  Would enjoy hearing some reader opinions – especially from RL Crabb - on where this is taking us.]

  • George Rebane

    HecklerVetoFor years RR has documented the sad retreat of our fundamental rights and liberties, the withdrawal of which has not caused many an eyebrow to be raised among the country’s gruberized hosts.  Instead, it has given rise to celebrations of every newly minted political correctness by our neighbors on the Left – for an enlightened society is a society mandated, monitored, and moderated.

    The latest of these celebrate the advent of what has become known as the ‘heckler’s veto’.  This is where a protest – no matter its size, source, or legitimacy – can shut down free speech and cause exercises of the First Amendment to be reclassified as “mechanisms of subordination”.  This, in the eyes of the Left, removes any such protested speech from under the protective umbrella of said amendment.

    In the recent past we have seen hecklers’ vetoes shut down entrepreneur Peter Thiel’s speech in Berkeley, invited commencement speeches by Condoleezza Rice and Christine Lagarde, and (seatbelts please) the ban on wearing American flag T-shirts in an American school on Cinco de Mayo “to avert violence”.  The list can be extended indefinitely, but you get the idea.

    Other initiatives are in the works such as Muslims colonizing western countries working through their Organization of the Islamic Conference to pass laws that prohibit the “defamation of religion” and “any advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination”.  On the secular side China has successfully squelched the participation of their dreaded Falun Gong – a religious society proscribed in China – in holiday observances and exhibitions within these United States.

    Starting back in 1989 with the fatwa calling for the murder of Salman Rushdie (for writing The Satanic Verses), we have seen a progressive growth of such hecklers’ vetoes that most recently gave us North Korea’s attempted censoring of Sony’s movie ‘The Interview’.   To my mind the greatest victim of this scourging of the First Amendment has been the abrogation of free speech on the campuses of America’s colleges and universities that are run amok by their leftwing administrations and professoriates.  And sadly, when we listen to our indoctrinated young emerging from government schools, there is much more of that to come as we recall that great nations, impervious to outside assault, have instead fallen from within.  (More here.  Image by David Klein from the 30dec14 WSJ.)

    [update]  From this post’s comment stream with contributions on both sides of the ‘who suppresses free speech’ issue, I have noticed that the main point which I and David Klein want to emphasize seems to have been either completely missed, or is simply not accessible to some readers.  So let me be more explicit.  The protesting of something by speaking out against it is does not satisfy the definition of ‘heckler’s veto’.  For example groups or event speakers railing against abortion clinics or gun rights has nothing to do with such a veto, simply because the target of the speech – operation of the clinics or private gun ownership – is not impeded by the protesting speech.  But if such protest or threat of protest suppresses (or effectively vetoes) someone’s ongoing or planned expression of free speech, then that is a de facto ‘heckler’s veto’.  In other words, to be a heckler’s veto such heckling must make the targeted speech impossible or induce authorities to shut it down and/or prevent its future expression.

136 comments on Sandbox – 19jan15