[Wow! I take a little trip into Preconnectivity Land and the sandbox overflows – isn't Hillary's email scandal grand? But boys and girls, let's not forget that the woman has soooo many other scandals to answer for, so concentrating all our energies unraveling her email fu@% ups will work to her benefit if the Dems and the lamestream (with a cooperating FBI and DoJ) can bundle it up and make the whole thing go away. Trying to jump onto another scandal (take your pick) will then seem like so much witch hunting – 'well we didn't get you with the emails, now let's try Benghazi.' My take is that we need to keep her whole ball of putrid wax in focus; compromising national security through her email shenanigans is just one reason she's not qualified for the WH. gjr]

ARCHIVES
- November 2026
- October 2026
- September 2026
- August 2026
- July 2026
- June 2026
- May 2026
- April 2026
- March 2026
- February 2026
- January 2026
- December 2025
- November 2025
- October 2025
- September 2025
- August 2025
- July 2025
- June 2025
- May 2025
- April 2025
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
OUR LINKS
YubaNet
White House Blog
Watts Up With That?
The Union
Sierra Thread
RL “Bob” Crabb
Barry Pruett Blog
-
George Rebane
I’ve been away on the NorCal coast where connectivity and even cell phone service ranges between unavailable and being a sometime thing. With some friends we caravanned up to an RV park near Manchester, and took some day trips up and down the coast to see how folks there were making do. One thing always strikes me in those parts is how our Agenda21 types have made sure that public lands (and beaches) number as few as possible, and those that do allow non-government human visits are made inconvenient to one and all.
Most ‘coastal access’ sites do not allow dogs for reasons that are completely beyond my ken, but it serves well to project the ascendant power of our econazis. And all coastal access sites have their parking lots quite a distance from the surf again for reasons I’ll let you figure out. One access site that did not restrict dogs required you to walk almost a mile on a path of loose sand through row after row of dunes stretching for miles in both directions. It took about 20 minutes for a one way trip. None but the hale and hearty, and desperate to have their puppy run on the sand need apply. The biggest employer there is – you guessed it – the government. Lots of uniformed people from various agencies are up there to make sure the taxpayer does not stray from his permitted path. Why not hire fewer bureaucrats and extend the little one lane roads to within 100 yards of the surf? Let the people who own it have their taxes pay for access so they can enjoy the public beaches.
I noticed the comment stream on the last sandbox has conversations and debates that exceed 250 entries. One leftwing regular doesn’t understand the use of coal in today’s world; he thinks that this fossil fuel has seen its last days and is on the way out. Meanwhile others are telling him that the patron saint of socialism George Soros dropped a bundle into coal investments. Of course our lefty didn’t have clue about that – why would MSNBC report something like that? – and when pressed, made some lame remark about buying low during the recent market dip and then selling high. Someone else had to remind him that Soros bought way before the markets hiccupped. But those conversations go nowhere since such corrections and related questions are simply ignored and papered over by yet another question from leftwing news.
The microcosm of such exchanges mirror exactly what is going on nationally with Hillary’s campaign. She just keeps repeating the same irrelevancies about not handling any emails on her private server that were "marked classified". And her constituents, starting with Obama’s Josh Earnest, just lap it up and repeat same for the greater unwashed. Nevertheless, that scandal itself has taken on a life of its own, and it will take Hillary to places she knows not. Meanwhile fellow Democrats are already sharpening their knives for when the time comes – ‘Et tu, Bidenius?’
[31aug15 update] Constitutional theorist Philip Bobbitt writes on Stratfor a piece revealing a specious practice of debating that is quite common in the national debates, and even on these pages. In ‘Fallacies of Argument’ Professor Bobbitt highlights the ‘guise of accountability’ with
President Barack Obama's observation in his American University address last week that "many of the same people who argued for the war in Iraq are now making the case against the Iran deal." There are two points being made here, and both are insidious.
One is that it is necessary to hold our leaders "accountable" for their alleged mistakes by ignoring their arguments in a current debate in favor of reminding them, and us, of the errors they have made in the past. This is not an argument about the merits — the "arcana" — of a proposed treaty or statute but rather an effort to dispense with such hard work in favor of embarrassing the people with whom one disagrees. Its claim of retribution or payback — "accountability" — for past actions is in fact merely a forensic weapon in a present debate.
You can read the entire article yourself to glean Bobbitt’s second point. But I just wanted to highlight here that our comment streams are full of “effort(s) to dispense with such hard work in favor of embarrassing the people with whom one disagrees.” One does not have to look far.
-
[OK, can someone besides crickets explain why farmers are experiencing a shortage of field labor with one out four black youth unemployed, along with an unknown high unemployment rate among our illegal aliens? gjr]
-
Goerge Rebane
[This is the addended transcript of my regular KVMR commentary broadcast on 19 August 2015.]
US History is again being revised in our high schools. The new 2014 Advanced Placement US History ‘framework’ is now replacing the old 2010 AP framework, and its adoption will take students one giant step to the Left. Last month at Hillsdale College noted historian Wilfred McClay, now Blankenship Professor in the History of Liberty at the University of Oklahoma, gave a compendious speech on the state of history in America and its readily observed impact on our collective society and thought. The much published historian did not paint a hopeful future for our nation.
McClay states that the new 2014 version of our history “represents a lurch in the direction of more centralized control, as well as an expression of a distinct agenda—an agenda that downplays comprehensive content knowledge in favor of interpretive finesse, and that seeks to deemphasize American citizenship and American world leadership in favor of a more global and transnational perspective. The new framework is organized around such opaque and abstract concepts as “identity,” “peopling,” and “human geography.” It gives only the most cursory attention to traditional subjects, such as the sources, meaning, and development of America’s fundamental political institutions, notably the Constitution, and the narrative accounting of political events, such as elections, wars, and diplomacy.”
-
[Hillary's emails and Obama's Iran giveaway, both are going to overheat. Yet some think that Obama may be rehabilitated enough by next spring to become an invited campaigner for Democrat candidates. If true, then "… you can fool enough of them all the time." will be confirmed again. gjr]
-
George Rebane
You may fool all of the people only some of the time, but you can fool enough of them all the time.
Associated Press published an exclusive report – ‘Lawmakers call for oversight hearings on green jobs measure’ – on the three year aftermath of Prop 39. California voters were bamboozled by our socialist central planners (funded by Tom Steyer of ‘When you’re rich they really think you know’ fame), to vote for a measure to increase taxes on the state’s businesses in order to “create more green-energy jobs.” As evident from AP’s investigative report, Prop 39 has been another travesty that drove more businesses from California, cost hundreds of millions of dollars, and delivered nothing of any use to the state’s citizens, especially the less than brilliant ones who fell for the econuts’ crapola and then voted for it. Prop 39 follows AB32 (q.v.) and a list of anti-growth, anti-business sludge that continues to pour out of Sacramento.
You need to read the AP piece yourself to see the magnitude of this socialist boondoggle. But for the high hard ones consider that they have already taken an additional almost billion dollars from the state’s businesses for the ostensible purpose of helping schools upgrade their infrastructures. Even this amount is much less than the projected take – whoudda thought that businesses wouldn’t leave, change, or otherwise try to avoid this new tribute. Out of the collected monies less than a third has been dispensed, and of that $150M has been spent on consultants who continue to generate plans on how to ‘get the most bang for the buck’ from the remaining loot.
The job stats are even worse. This scheme was supposed to create about 11,000 green jobs a year. But to date it has created fewer than 1,700 jobs in three years, about 5% of the number advertised. And now the same numbnuts in Sacramento who came up with this brainchild are going to try and find out what went wrong, why this is another feel-good bonanza that didn’t deliver and now has to be papered over with propaganda as have been its predecessors. Do not think that there is any learning going on in the state’s capitol; their only aim is to figure out how best to cover up yet another fiscal fizzle.
What these socialists miss was made clear to their earlier forebears in 19th century post-napoleonic France, home of the first nationwide applications of socialist governance. Frederic Bastiat explained the matter in his brilliant essay ‘That Which is Seen, and That Which is Not Seen’ with the vignette on ‘The Broken Window’. California’s and the nation’s entire phalanx of environmental regulatory programs are a sad poster child of the malady ailing the country.
In the story an accidentally broken shop window is initially lamented by onlookers until one worthy points out that the unintended mishap will actually provide a benefice to the community and the greater economy. Why? Because now the shopkeeper will have to engage the glazier to come and repair the window thereby creating new work and releasing the cost of the repair into other hands which is then spent fulfilling their needs and so on as the money spreads into the economy. From this insight everyone on the sidewalk comes to understand the apparent good that will derive from this broken window, and all go home feeling good about the shopkeeper’s loss now that its real impact has been explained to them.
But for the clear thinkers Bastiat reveals the real situation. The shopkeeper had a good window before spending $100 (modern amount) to get his broken window restored. What we don’t see is that he wanted to spend the same money at the cobbler’s for a new pair of shoes. At the end of this transaction the same $100 would have still been released into the economy through the cobbler’s spending, but in that future the shopkeeper would have wound up with an intact window and a new pair of shoes – in short, his quality of life would have increased for having spent the same amount to do something else that he needed or had planned for his own benefit; to accomplish something more than spend that money to just maintain his status quo, and with fewer dollars in his pocket.
The socialists of 1850 France did not understand any better than do the socialists of 2015 USA, that ‘creating’ jobs by going down the street and breaking more intact windows does not prosper a nation. Today the government ‘breaks windows’ by syphoning money out of our pockets for so many propagandized purposes and projects that benefit absolutely no one save the elites with guns, along with their local lackeys spread across the land who sing paeans to Leviathan for the pittances dropped into their cups. This is the politically correct trickle down economics that those who can’t generate wealth understand so well. The rest of us know that when it comes to economic planning, governments are the historically demonstrated dunces with their ham fisted approach of centralized control.
And the real tragedy is that today, as it was in Bastiat’s time, our gruberized voters never see any of this, for enough of them can be fooled all of the time.
[19aug15 update] Lo and behold, the country is taking note of AP’s findings and adding those to its considerable knowledge of how California leads the nation (the world?) on the Index of Inane and Insane Governments. This morning’s (19aug15) WSJ features a prominent editorial on Steyer’s bamboozle, noting that not only has Prop 39 not met any of its goals by far, but it’s also not known whether it has had any impact on the promised energy reductions. Less known is the proviso that half of the business punishing tax take goes into the state’s general fund for Sacramento’s Society of Sleazebags to spend as they please – did you know that? The WSJ piece concludes that “results rarely matter for the supporters of green subsidies. Their good intentions in spending other peoples’ money is enough.” Given how many topics have appeared first in these pages, over the years I’ve begun to wonder if the WSJ gets some of its good editorial ideas from RR, hmmm … ;-)
-
George Rebane
In response to my 7aug15 commentary – ‘Planned (alternative to) Parenthood’ – in The Union, the newspaper’s 15aug15 edition contains two related pieces illuminating the liberal mind from the logically lame to the deliberately deceitful. The first is a letter to the editor from “Dr Larry and Cheryl Cook” (paywalled here), and the second is an Other Voices commentary (paywalled here) by Ms Kimberly D’Urso, the gratefully aborted president of Nevada County Citizens for Choice. Regular readers may recall our previous consideration of Ms Cheryl Cook in these pages (here and here).
The Cooks’ critique of my commentary is more than mind boggling. They take me to task for my “blatantly exclusionary focus on women undergoing abortions”. Apparently I was remiss in not including a comprehensive treatment of all the mass homicides caused by gun toting lunatics in my 750-word piece on Planned Parenthood that according to their lights attempted to treat “the sanctity of all human life, really?” Well not quite.
-
To understand the workings of American politics, you have to understand this fundamental law: Conservatives think liberals are stupid. Liberals think conservatives are evil. – Charles Krauthammer
George Rebane
Students of American history agree that President Lincoln was the prime instigator of federalism’s decline and the growth of Washington’s power over our land and lives. That the times called for such a reorientation of our body politic is still being debated, but the assumption of the path to collectivism is today denied only by those most ardently at work who promote progress on that same path.
RR FUNDAMENTALS
RECENT POSTS
- Sandbox – 9nov26
- Election Reflections – 3nov26 (4nov26)
- Scattershots – 31oct26 (updated 2nov26)
- The Greatest Economy Denied
- Sandbox – 26oct26
RECENT COMMENTS
CATEGORIES
- Agenda 21 (506)
- All Things Trump (42)
- Books & Media (34)
- Budget (2)
- California (391)
- Comment Sandbox (507)
- Critical Thinking & Numeracy (1,333)
- Culture Comments (759)
- Current Affairs (1,890)
- Film (7)
- Food and Drink (9)
- Games (6)
- General (217)
- Glossary & Semantics (25)
- Great Divide (221)
- Growth (3)
- Happenings (687)
- Investing (43)
- Music (2)
- My Story (63)
- Nevada County (736)
- Our Country (2,474)
- Our World (655)
- Rebane Doctrine (145)
- Religion (38)
- sandbox (2)
- Science (34)
- Science Snippets (166)
- Singularity Signposts (147)
- Sports (3)
- The Liberal Mind (658)
- The Rear View (76)
- Travel (8)
- Trump (5)
- Uncategorized (55)
- We the iSheeple (632)
- Web/Tech (177)

