Rebane's Ruminations
November 2026
S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930  

ARCHIVES


OUR LINKS


YubaNet
White House Blog
Watts Up With That?
The Union
Sierra Thread
RL “Bob” Crabb
Barry Pruett Blog

  • George Rebane

    Yesterday’s early snowfall left our rooftop satellite dish glommed up and dysfunctional.  So Jo Ann and I, with our puppy, watched the inaugural doings at our neighbors who also happened to be close friends and more wisely had their dish installed at easily accessible ground level.  What we witnessed was and continues to be an historical transfer of power and change of governance, most certainly in its style but hopefully also in its execution.

    TrumpInauguration2017

    President Trump’s inaugural speech painted a decidedly dark and depressed state of our union that he ascribed to years of power accumulation toward a hubristic center that is distant from most Americans.  The basis for his offered solutions to the categorical problems we suffer from is to “give power back to the people.”  This echoes the national perception that our government is supposed to be Lincoln’s ‘of, by, and for the people’.  But today our country is so deeply divided that even this universally accepted shibboleth has a radically different interpretation for the socialist/collectivist Left and the conservative/libertarian Right.

    (more…)

  • [President Trump made the most populist and unambiguous pro-America inauguration speech in history today.  In many ways it was an 'in your face' indictment of his predecessor.  Now it is time to deliver.  Godspeed to our new President!  gjr]

  • George Rebane

    McKee170118Black congressman and civil rights icon John Lewis hasn’t done much if anything for black folks since he joined the legislative gravy train in Washington, so maintains Jason Riley, senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute (here).  What Lewis has done lately is become leader of the de facto Democrat Party’s drive to delegitimize Donald Trump’s election as the nation’s 45th president.  Such a concerted nationwide initiative is a potentially destabilizing first in the modern history of our country. 

    But what Mr Riley makes us aware of (here) is that Congressman Lewis is nothing more than another well promoted black leader who has successfully demagogued his Atlanta constituents as have so many others in Congress whose home districts, all under decades of black Democrat control, continue to languish economically and educationally.  These political leaders have gained enormously from keeping their charges in a plantation mentality – poor and ignorant – and they are not about to let go of their oh so sweet sinecures.

    In response to Lewis’ charge of his “illegitimate” election, Trump’s recent tweet clearly pointed out Lewis’ record as a lawmaker.  And with his civil rights heroism historically secure, the question that still stands is –

    … what do Mr. Lewis’s mostly black constituents in Atlanta have to show for his time in Washington representing them? Atlanta has one of the widest gaps in the country between high- and low-income households, according to the Brookings Institution. A 2015 report by the Annie E. Casey Foundation found that although Atlanta “is considered an economic powerhouse and ‘black mecca,’ its wealth and promise don’t extend to many of its residents, particularly those of color, who struggle to make ends meet, get family-supporting jobs and access quality education.” The study found that incomes for Atlanta’s white residents were more than triple those of blacks; the high school graduation rate was 57% for blacks and 84% for whites; and black unemployment in Atlanta was 22%, versus a city average of 13% and a white rate of 6%.

    Atlanta also hasn’t avoided the surge in violent crime that has hit other major cities in recent years. Last summer the mayor announced the creation of a task force to reduce gun violence, and in November the Atlanta Journal-Constitution reported that the city had been named “one of America’s top 25 murder capitals, according to the latest data from the FBI’s Uniform Crime Report.”

    And to the point that John Lewis is part of what may be termed the nation’s black leadership plague, Jason Riley observes that –

    Mr. Lewis’s poor record is not unique among black politicians with large black constituencies. Atlanta has had black Democratic mayors pushing liberal policies for decades, and blacks have been well-represented as city councilmen and in the top echelons of the police department and school system. Much the same is true of other major cities with large black populations—Baltimore, Cleveland, Philadelphia, Washington—which are lagging economically, notwithstanding black political clout from Congress down to the local school board.  This is what Republicans mean when they say black voters have been getting little in return for their steadfast loyalty to Democrats.

  • The farther backward you can look, the farther forward you can see. – Winston Churchill

    George Rebane

    Well, the Dems now have a rip that’s hard to hide – they are a bit fragmented after the election didn’t turn out as bought and paid for, and their intramural shenanigans were exposed to the world, and everyone now wants to become the DNC chairman.  But the real split is between the Bernie and Hillary factions – Bernie is still not sharing his list of double dummies who bought into his communist-lite copy.  But not to worry, they’ll find a way to come together and continue tearing down the vestiges of what the Founders left us.  The Agenda21 goals are still there waiting to be fulfilled; there are more items that need to be checked off.

    Union columnist Mr George Boardman, who also graces these pages from time to time, made a remarkable assertion in his 16jan17 column comparing the gains and pains to different constituencies from a Trump presidency – “For Trump’s detractors, the worse will mean a halt to the social advancement of those of us who aren’t white heterosexual males, an end to that annoying “political correctness,” more polluted air and water, an end to reproductive and other rights women have taken for granted, and a general coarsening of what passes for civility.”

    It’s hard to catch all the head-turners in that breezy list, and I wager that many did not.  In what recent decade were white heterosexual males still deemed by anyone to be advancing socially in America?  What evidence is there that Trump can outdo the EPA’s and other agencies’ screw ups in creating “more polluted air and water”?  Withdrawing federal funding of abortions suddenly spells “an end to reproductive and other(sic) rights women have taken for granted”?!!  And the “general coarsening” of “civility” occurs almost entirely when leftwing thugs smash windows, burn and loot stores, defecate on police cars, and trash public parks and streets when they rally and march, all in the name of demanding their civil rights (aka more money from the government).

    The Clinton Global Initiative is kaput.  This demonstrates in the most convincing way possible that the whole Clinton thing has been a ‘pay for play’ scam of magnificent proportions.  How many of us were vilified by the local lefties when we pointed this out in the months before November.  Today it's suddenly hard to find people who voted for Hillary and will still defend the woman, her crooked family, and corrupt enterprises.  The lamestream has also been cooperatively reticent to report the countries, international bigwigs, and tinpot dictators who pulled their CGI ‘memberships’ and ‘donations’ after Hillary’s loss.  But there is an upside – little people will get to hear Hillary and Bubba who are now much more affordable and available to speak at the Chamber of Commerce luncheon in Resume Speed, Oregon.

    [update]  Ever wonder why no one has brought up Sen Ted Kennedy’s documented entreaties to the USSR to help defeat President Reagan in his 1984 re-election has never made the news?  That would open some eyes now focused on the unfounded allegations breathlessly reported about Trump’s personal life and contacts with the Russians.  Where are the banner headlines?  (more here, here, and here)

    The Left’s reconstruction of Obama’s legacy now in full swing includes a prominently paraded and most remarkable meme claiming that our first half-black president’s tenure was scandal free.  Leftwingers (including some RR readers) have been employing that narrative in the attempt to cover up the trials and tribulations visited on us by both Clintons and paint the pre-inaugurated Trump administration as being already corrupt.  In ‘Obama’s ‘Scandal-Free Administration’ Is a Myth’ Messrs John Fund and Hans von Spakovsky set the record straight.

    “Trump’s extreme agenda” according to Mayor de Blasio is the new president’s intent to enforce federal immigration laws in self-declared ‘sanctuary cities’, while the political leaders of such cities that harbor illegal aliens, who are fugitives from justice, are not practicing an extreme agenda when they break the laws of the land and impede federal agents attempting to enforce the law.  And to think otherwise makes one a radical rightwinger and racist.  Such is the normal working of a liberal mind.

    [18jan17 update]  Is it now safe to say that The Union is solidly a leftwing newspaper?  Given the strongly-denied, recent longer term audit (here, here, and here), the current spate of pre-inauguration columns and letters, today punctuated with an unmistakably partisan editorial (here) by the paper's Editor Mr Brian Hamilton, it seems that there is no question about which way our local paper leans, or has toppled.  No blame, no shame about all that unless they continue to bullshit the community that they are still an impartial observer and a balanced voice about matters socio-political.  Most certainly it is not what the local looney Left claims is "The Tea Party Gazette".

    President Obama, true to established form, today delivered two whoppers during his last news conference as president.  He told us of an America that still has a “small sliver of folks” who are doing very well, (seatbelts please) while the rest of the country “struggles for scraps”.  Then he gave us the reason for that being that “people of color” aren’t out there doing enough voting because the “United States is the only country among developed countries that makes it harder for people to vote.”  Ever try to vote in Denmark, or Germany, or the UK, or … without having to prove your citizenship and/or residency?  Nevertheless, it is most appropriate that the man exits spewing consistent copy that has characterized his term in office.

  • [Administrivia – am still trying to get commenters to post their topic-relevant comments under the appropriate topic. The sandbox is for stuff for which I don't have a current post. For example, commenting about the record and reputation of John Lewis and Russia's email hacks should go under 'Exactly how did the Russkies do it?' which expands on the gentleman. gjr]

    Posted at

    in

  • George Rebane

    JohnLewis2017Well now that Congressman John Lewis has declared the Trump presidency “illegitimate”, that icon of civil rights and registration-free voting has attracted more Democrat politicians to join him on the leftwing’s bandwagon to oppose our new president.  Lewis’ contention is that the election is illegitimate due to Russia’s “conspiracy” to oppose Clinton, thereby aiding Trump. (here)

    What I have been waiting to hear some pundit or nationally prominent journalist contribute to these reports of Russian participation, now elevated to conspiratorial heights, is a description of the means by which their activities torpedoed Hillary’s candicacy.  We are taught that bad guys are indicted through establishment of their motive, opportunity, and means (MOM) for carrying out their dastardly deed.

    Now posit with our intelligence community that Russia and/or her commissioned agents, along with anyone else with very modest knowledge about penetrating undefended servers, did actually hack the DNC and Clinton Foundation emails.  What then?  By what means would they reach America’s Democrat constituents to sway their votes away from Hillary.  Here we have to understand the make-up of the audience targeted by this supposed conspiracy.  These are people, especially the Millennials contingent, who among their other intellectual deficits have short attention spans (here), are characterized by their drastically deficient knowledge base, and who don’t follow current events until, charitably, just before the election.  They are mostly what may be termed slogan-cemented voters.

    (more…)

  • George Rebane

    In the aggregate, Millennials lack social skills.  So conclude a number of studies as reported by NPR this morning.  This adds to the list of significant deficits that our new generation has demonstrated (also reported here, here, here, and here).  Most noteworthy are the problems that social services agencies, the military, and law enforcement departments are having hiring new people who know how to meet and communicate face-to-face with other humans.  Both the police and military have hired consulting organizations to study the widespread problem and to develop training programs that will teach these young people the social skills that we formerly picked up from mom and dad, our schools and churches, and other places where human interaction was not stunted by politically correct protocols and abetted by the substitution of online social media.  Modern times.

    Obama finally reveals his demonstrated progressive penchant to have the means justify the ends.  The man now reveals a significant part of his ideology in the recent issue of the Harvard Law Review in which he discusses individual rights and freedoms, and advancing criminal justice reform (here).  A fundamental consideration in assessing the criminality of an act is known as mens rea or “the intention or knowledge of wrongdoing that constitutes part of a crime, as opposed to the action or conduct of the accused.”  It is remarkable that in this lengthy essay our president never considers this seminal factor as he waxes eloquent on all kinds of things such as poverty, inequality, and racial profiling.  But rejoice, now that it doesn’t matter, we finally have a look into the man who has brought a new level of counter-constitutional authoritarianism into our federal government.

    George Soros is reported to have lost over $1B on Trump’s victory.  The sumbich bet the wrong way on the election, going short on the markets knowing that Hillary would win and cause existing investors to head for the doors.  That’s a billion less for him to invest in the nefarious organizations that promote global socialism and rule by the progressive elites.  Thank the Lord for small speedbumps on the road to tyranny.

    NevadaCity_SunsetNevada City is numero uno as the best city to live in west of the Mississippi.  The Feb issue of Sunset – with Tom Coleman’s National Hotel on the cover – featured the 20 best cities, and our little town came out on top.  Given this and the continued commercial success our celebratory events have had over the last year, it should put a little egg drippies on the faces of those who attacked local activist and NC councilwoman Reinette Senum for her inflammatory remarks about the nation’s police for which she publicly apologized.  We all remember the long line stretching around the block of people waiting to excoriate her during a city council meeting last summer.  According to the then reigning histrionicians (those versed in and given to the practice of histrionics), the viral propagation of Ms Senum’s unfortunate observations were supposed to sound the death knell for Nevada City’s businesses and as a place to live.  Even I was taken to task for backing her right and duty to express the opinions of many of her constituents on a matter of national interest and debate. (more here and here)  Full disclosure – Reinette is my longtime favorite liberal in Nevada County no matter how differently we see the world.

    Senator Booker denigrates Senator Sessions at the Senate confirmation hearings.  Booker impugns Sessions with allegations of racism and bias that not only have no basis in reality, but instead present a flood of evidence in Sen Session’s record along with testifying witnesses to counter every bit of the bullshit that Booker attempted to fling in his unprecedented testimony against a colleague.  Of course Sen Booker had no trouble supporting the two clearly racist AGs who precede Sessions when he is confirmed.  (And he apparently did himself no favors for attempting to assume the mantle of Obama in the Democratic Party’s future.)

  • George Rebane

    [This is the addended transcript of my regular KVMR commentary broadcast on 11 January 2017.]

    In a few days we will witness the most tendentious changing of the guard our republic has had since Abe Lincoln was sworn in.  Now that’s ‘tendentious’ like in ‘having or showing a definite tendency, bias, or purpose’.  President-elect Trump and the Republicans want all to know that their prime purpose is to terminate as many of the Obama policies as they can, and put the country back on a rapid growth pattern under a less regulated and taxed kind of governance.  The Democrats, today under an unsettled, dubious, and possibly contentious leadership, are making very public their intentions to disrupt, delay, and hopefully defeat everything that can demonstrate to America that the last eight years have been a slow walking disaster.

    (more…)

  • [A little more than a week until the big spectacular at the nations capitol.  Given all the ongoing fireworks surrounding Trump and the floundering Democrats, I suppose we can continue staying involved in this 'Prelude to the Afternoon of a Yawn'.  gjr]

    Posted at

    in

  • George Rebane

    True to form, RR readers couldn’t wait for me to get my act together and post on the 6jan17 intelligence community report about Russia meddling in our 2016 election.  The post ‘The Russians did it’ appeared in due time, but not before its dissection commanded quite a bit of real estate in the 6jan17 sandbox.  Therein a longtime reader, self-declared left-libertarian (although we’re still looking for the libertarian part), good friend, and stalwart member of the RR commentariat takes the side of DNI Clapper and tribe to maintain that their report gives definitive proof that 1) the Russians hacked the emails, 2) it was a dastardly deed the fruits of which should have been eschewed by all Republicans as they were by Democrats, and 3) it most likely put a thumb under the electoral scale to benefit The Donald.

    My conclusion about Russia’s involvement subsumes Trump’s skepticism and goes a bit beyond to wonder what all the fuss is about, or in the vein of Claude Rains' immortal line in Rick’s saloon, “I'm shocked, shocked to find that gambling is going on in here!” (here)  In direct response to which I hubristically wrote – “… your comments here clearly reveal that you interpret the report as intended by the powers that be.  But you can bet the ranch that, to cover their collective asses, Clapper and team wordsmithed that little production in the manner that I and people like me are trained to parse the language – it is part of their professional kit. In my trade you also learn it as you study algorithmics and become an algorist who can actually identify salient contingencies, and then generate code that automatically dissects and handles such complexities. To the uninitiated it is all a smooth amalgam ;-)”

    The potential contours of Russia’s involvement are indeed complex given the number of agents involved – here and overseas – who act through the various possible time lines.  I thought of naming all the agents and delineating their relationships in a grand influence factors diagram (here) to illustrate and substantiate my claim about the beneficial role of algorithmics to understand the purposefully foggy and nuanced report presented to us last Friday.  But that seemed like too much work for what may wind up with my confusing RR readers with people who really cared.  So as Plan B it occurred to me that a fun little problem might illustrate the kind of thinking that Team Clapper put into the report and therefore its equivalent required to properly understand it.

    Six people need to cross the river.  They have a canoe that can carry at most three people.  Having various abilities and handicaps, each of them alone in the canoe can paddle it across the river in 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13 units of time.  With two paddling, the crossing time is one unit less than the slowest paddler’s time.  With three paddling the crossing time is that of the middle paddler.  What crossing scheme – sequence of crossings with identified paddlers – yields the minimum time to deliver all six from bank A to bank B?  This problem is simple enough to be solved with pencil and paper.  So I invite readers to post their solutions in the comments – an easy way is write down the sequence of crossings with 4-tuples like (3,5,0,4), (3,0,0,7), (1,8,13,14), … where the first three numbers denote paddlers by their solo times (zero is an empty seat), and the fourth number is the tally of the total time elapsed after that crossing.

    Here the interesting aspect that communicates the type of thinking required is when you consider an algorithm that can be programmed to have a computer find the optimum solution.  In fact I am working with a SESF TechMentor student to develop a genetic algorithm (GA) that will solve this problem.  A critical component of the GA software will be another sub-algo that can quickly determine whether a solution is sane or not.  Insane solutions don’t terminate within a reasonable number of crossings, or do things like have an empty canoe (0,0,0,15) crossing, or containing paddler(s) who weren’t on the embarking bank of the river, or … .  These insane contingencies must be identified and code generated to efficiently detect them in order to reject the solution as the GA continues its ‘evolutionary’ effort to find ever better solutions.

    IMHO, an exercise like this illustrates the kind of analytical dissections also required to generate the various contingencies AND how they are reported that relate to our email hacking imbroglio, and reports of it coming from people in the government, media, political parties, and NGO individuals.   Most certainly our intelligence analysts have to exercise this kind of disciplined critical thinking to do their work.  Here in our comment streams as we debate issues we often (almost always?) wander off topic, ignore the orthogonality of factors, misattribute meanings, and so on.  I’m sure some of these malaprops are also intentional to inject humor or advance an ideological agenda.  Mea culpa – as an ideologue and commentator I most certainly try to choose words with which to best frame my arguments; but I never intentionally attempt to mislead or derail the debate’s progress for the simple reason that I may be wrong and would not discover my error if I diverted or screwed up the discussion.

    Having said all that, now I’m not sure that I’ve really pushed the peanut ahead.  But I have put a stake in the ground for future reference for anyone to cite when/if we really get serious about seeking resolution rather than circling the barn or just bouncing things off the wall 😉

112 comments on An Early Take on Trump (updated 22jan17)