Rebane's Ruminations
November 2026
S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930  

ARCHIVES


OUR LINKS


YubaNet
White House Blog
Watts Up With That?
The Union
Sierra Thread
RL “Bob” Crabb
Barry Pruett Blog

  • George Rebane

    Hillary Hodge running for Nevada County’s District #3 supervisor?!  And claiming that "as a non-profit executive in Nevada County specializing in small business development, I know we can revitalize our community with innovative solutions."  This from a former Union columnist who has publicly been refreshingly frank about her store of knowledge concerning anything having to do with business?  We recall that by her own admission selling her skillset to anyone hereabouts who had to pay her out of his own pocket has proved to be a challenge.  Now as Exec Dir of the non-profit, OPM-funded Sierra Commons (here), we can see what kind of innovative small business development the good lady has in mind for revitalizing our community.   Would I be that far off to doubt that even the Sierra Business Council would have a hard time endorsing her as our county’s revitalizing sparkplug?  Well, maybe.

    Bracing for Ms Hodge’s candidacy is the current District #3 supervisor Dan Miller who writes (here) in the 1aug17 Union to ask why our county’s famed pot growers don’t contribute to the good works which abound in our community.  Pro-pot promoters volubly crow (even on these pages) about the money these people earn and the contribution they make to our local economy.  So Supervisor Miller makes the good point that – It is often mentioned the cannabis industry brings in boatloads of money to our county. Where is it? The Cannabis Alliance reports that they have several hundred members. When you add the nonmember growers to that number, you have a sizable economic engine that ultimately could be used to put cash flow back into the homeless needs. Since the growers do not pay taxes yet, this challenge provides an opportunity for them to participate in a jumpstart of goodwill. … If the cannabis-growing community is truly committed to the welfare of Nevada County, then this idea should resonate with their leadership. Now, we invite them to join us in becoming part of the tradition.

    [update] In today’s Union we have an expose by a Mr Richard Stormgaard who attempts to take to task Ms Cindy Hren’s 17feb17 piece on the form of US governance as defined by our Constitution.  Sadly, what the Nevada City resident winds up exposing to one and all is that he gives new meaning to the notion of light thinking.  In disputing Ms Hren’s excellent pedagogy on pure democracy vs constitutional republic, Stormgaard gives no evidence that he is up to the task.  In the anti-Republican vitriol, founded on forged facts, which makes up the lion’s share of his offering, he doesn’t even define the contending notions.  But he does expose his grossly malformed line of reasoning in claiming that the Right still hews to ‘1828 values’ on governance since the Merriam-Webster definitions of ‘democracy’ and ‘republic’ he attributes to Hren have not changed in the last two hundred years.  The gentleman will no doubt similarly argue that anyone who still defines ‘cat’ as they did in 1150AD is guilty of practicing medieval zoology.  For him semantics are as malleable as they are to Carroll’s Queen of Hearts.  But in all fairness, to get a true measure of the man, do read his contribution (here).

    [4aug17 update]  For the history buffs among us – this we in the west knew more than a hundred years ago –  Winston Churchill 1899: "Individual Muslims may show splendid qualities, but the influence of the religion paralyses the social development of those who follow it. No stronger retrograde force exists in the world."  We now live in the extended shadow of that religion.

    [5aug17 update]  Union columnist Darrell Berkheimer is yet another big government progressive unclear on the difference between affordable housing and low cost housing.  In his 5aug17 ‘Isn’t affordable housing key to western Nevada County’s future?' he goes through the usual liberal song and dance about affordable housing being our absent attractant for middle class families wanting to move and work here.  He goes to great lengths in specifying what kinds of ‘affordable units’ the government should allow to be built by developers who must survive in a world much different from the one he sees.  On top of it all he shows no understanding of the past effectiveness of government mandated ‘affordable housing’ programs in achieving the aims he outlines.  And he is, of course, blind to the chicken/egg reality that jobs have to arrive in tight formation with the availability of LOW COST HOUSING that their workers can buy/rent, and which will subsequently serve as an appreciating asset for their families which they can dispose of as they wish.  Developers know how and where to build low cost housing that sells, if only the government would let them.  Affordable housing is another misguided notion by the central planning elites that is disconnected from how a thriving world works, and another reason that Nevada County is in economic doldrums.

    When I have argued that people like to be with similar people in these pages, our leftwing readers have castigated me and agreeing readers as being un-American, racist, and even traitorous to just entertain such thoughts.  That this is a seminal and existential feature of human beings is rejected in their ideology of class-based Marxism.  Now the pendulum definitely appears to be swinging in the other direction.  The Left today is becoming active in their practice of exclusionary cultural Marxism in their attempts to divide America into more and more distinct ethno-racial groups, in the process contending that America’s historic promotion of assimilation is nothing more than a white supremacist ruse for control and domination.  We should no longer seek to remain a dynamically shifting amalgam with the passage of time, but assume distinct ‘race-ethnic’ groups who will contend for their share of the American pie mainly through becoming federally recognized minority cohorts who are due federal funding and preferential treatment under federal law.  The newest of these race-ethnic groups being proposed for the next US census is called MENA (Middle East and North Africa).  Given the already established separation of our Hispanic class, I wonder how our leftwing will now revise their newspeak so as to make seamless this course change for destroying America. (more here)

    [6aug17 update]  The rabid Left is well-known for its successful efforts to stifle free speech that counters the strident collectivist ideology.  Its recent advances in such censorship in academe have now entered the historical lexicon of America.  A reader sent me news of how this constructive proscription of our First Amendment rights has now entered the domain of performance art, specifically in the field of classical music. (more here) As I have asserted in previous commentaries, this no longer is ignorance or stupidity, it is simply evil.

  • George Rebane

    Yesterday we returned home from a two-week visit to Estonia with our grown daughters.  The trip was a long-anticipated odyssey to introduce them to the other half of their heritage, to let them see and walk in the places about which they have heard from their grandparents and me.  For Jo Ann and me it was our second trip since Estonia regained its freedom in 1991.  The journey had special meaning because it was the first time our ‘core family’ had spent time alone after our girls grew up and went to college more than thirty years ago.  Now in their early 50s they are both mothers of grown children, and one is even a 4-time grandmother.

    (more…)

  • George Rebane

    Wasn’t it Mark Twain who remarked that “the recent reports of my death have been greatly exaggerated”?  (Click on the image to enlarge.)

    TeaParty_Aug2017

  • [Ah yes, the filibuster debates are again in season.  Republicans are being admonished by the eternally innocent progressives about messing with the filibuster, as if that were a tradition brought down on the tablets and one that has remained unblemished since then.  It would be utterly       unconsciounable to bring up the recent history of who exercised the 'nuclear option' and under what conditions they pulled the trigger.  In the meanwhile, we are on our way home and thank RR readers for keeping the sandboxes exercised and the comment candles burning.  gjr]

    Posted at

    in

  • [Can the Republican congress govern?  Given the powers it has abrogated to Mueller, the Dems, et al, the question has merit.  More here.  gjr]

    Posted at

    in

  • [Trigger warning – we are on travel, and connectivity might be iffy, so this sandbox might become a bit ripe if I can't freshen it in a timely manner.  To preserve hygiene, be sure you're only flinging sticky mud balls at each other that may stick to the walls 😉  gjr]

    Posted at

    in

  • [This commentary was submitted by Union columnist and editorial board member Mr Norm Sauer.  It appears concurrently in the newspaper's op-ed pages.  gjr]

    Norm Sauer

    Surely, everyone agrees that protecting our citizens’ right to vote to choose their leaders is most important. Votes that are stolen from Americans who vote lawfully are negated as a result of voter fraud and insecure elections by illegal aliens voting, voting for the dead, or people voting who should not vote.

    On Wednesday, July 12, 2017, Thomas Elias’s column gushed about California Secretary of State Alex Padilla’s flat refusal to honor any part of the request of President Trump’s Advisory Commission on Electoral Integrity. Even those on the left, like Bernie Sanders voters, should be concerned with this intransigence.

    Research by Pew Foundation and Migration Policy Institute discloses that California houses between 2.35 to 3 million illegal aliens. Jesse Richman, Political Science & Geography Professor at Old Dominion University, conducted in depth research into illegal aliens voting nationally between 2008 and 2012, and found 2.4 percent of those surveyed said they were registered to vote, had validated voter registrations, and had voted.

    There is an admitted, systematic well-funded effort by Democrats, including California’s super-majority Democrat party, to dismantle the integrity of the election administration system in our country and state. When 80% or more of illegal aliens vote Democrat, California promotes open borders and being a sanctuary state, policies which change the members of our voting public.

    Section 8 of the National Voter Registration Act requires states to clean their voter rolls periodically to remove non-citizens, those who died or moved away, or others no longer eligible to vote. It is a federal crime for non-citizens to vote and a second federal crime for a non-citizen to cast a vote in a federal election in the United States.

    Having clean voter rolls is important to election integrity. Non-citizens, dead persons, and those moving away should be cleaned from the rolls periodically. Many states, including California, show 20% of the rolls are not clean.

    For eight years these federal election integrity measures were fanatically suppressed by President Obama’s Justice Department. Now, the revived enforcement of these laws concern Democrats in California who wish no light shed on our state voter’s rolls.

    In the opinion of many, California probably has one of the most unreliable voter registration systems in the country. California issues driver’s licenses to illegal immigrants allowing them to automatically be registered to vote under the federal motor-voter laws. Since AB60 passed in 2015, 806,000 illegal immigrants received a driver’s license.

    Adding to our disenfranchisement, beginning in 2018 California is moving us toward implementing all mail ballots thereby closing election precincts or voting places. With all mail ballots everyone on the voter rolls gets a ballot, even if non-citizen, deceased, or no longer residing in the voting county if not otherwise removed. And those ballots are returned and counted. They are illegal votes, they offset your and my legal vote, and we won’t know the extent of it. But we do know our right to vote is not being protected by our Democrat politicians.

    Until last year, our California Constitution had barred incarcerated felons from voting. In September 2016, Governor Brown signed into law a Democrat-sponsored bill allowing felons who were moved to county jails to vote despite widespread opposition from law enforcement. How many incarcerated felons will be casting votes hereafter? Who knows?

    Another failure to protect our voter integrity is California does not belong to the “Crosscheck” verification program that allows states to check voter registration lists with each other to see if they had duplicate voters.

    And in our county, I have observed same-day voter registration and voting being allowed. Many of these people vote in more than one state or county in our state. What sort of audit is done to assure these people haven’t voted twice or more? I’m aware of no cross-checking.

    There is no good way to guarantee voter integrity without pristine voter rolls. And the Democrats continued denial of voter fraud, refusal to be transparent, and their questionable manipulation of our voting laws will only perpetuate dirty voter rolls and undermine the integrity of the vote of each of us who are lawful citizens.

    For me, this is unacceptable, and it should be for you, too. And, as for Secretary of State Padilla and columnist Thomas Elias, I say shame on them. They obviously subscribe to changing the public demographics of who is allowed to vote to include non-citizens, dead people, felons, and same-day registered voters thereby disenfranchising law-abiding citizens while securing one-party rule in California.

  • George Rebane

    Were I king, I would order the 52 GOP senators into a big room set up with tables, chairs, cots, and plenty of coffee.  They would be advised to bring their nighties and toothbrushes, and then told to stay in that room until 1) they have hammered out a healthcare bill that ALL 52 could live with and vote for, or 2) they would emerge as members of at least two separate and distinct political parties whose founding documents they had in hand.

    Unless they can deliver some major pieces of legislation, given that they have historical control of COTUS, POTUS, and SCOTUS, Republicans are no longer one united political party that can produce enduring public policies which fulfill the longstanding promises that got them elected, and still hew to the principles they have wrapped themselves in for generations.

    Political parties are supposed to be composed of people with sufficiently overlapping ideologies that make them politically functional in the public forum, and effective institutions when given the opportunity to govern.  If the opportunity to govern serves only to reveal seminal schisms that constructively paralyze them while in power, then they should partition themselves into more cohesive ideological cohorts and as such represent themselves honestly to the electorate.  Doing otherwise, while displaying a facade of apparent power by their sheer numbers, is to promise a fraudulent hope on which they, as a body, cannot deliver.

    So Republicans, find the means to act in unison, or divide yourself into smaller assemblages that can better reflect and represent the fractionation of the country.  BTW, the Democrats are no better in this department, however they were able to put a unified shoulder and a blind eye to the wheel and pass Obamacare in the dark of night, trusting that they would subsequently like whatever they passed.  No one is asking the Republicans to practice the Pelosi Principle.

    In sum, get your act together and do what you were elected to do; or, if you can't, strike that so-called ‘big tent’ because what it covers isn’t working.

  • [Check out what is happening to our (and all?) economies with the advent of the giga-corporations – Microsoft, Alphabet, Amazon, Facebook – that have created oligopolies in several markets.  And the commentary on what these companies know about the dark sides of human affairs – e.g. sources and distribution of fake news – is more than a bit disturbing.  More here.  gjr]

  • George Rebane

    Sowell_170715We continue on our unintended road to the world described in the UN’s Agenda 21 objectives for ‘voluntary global sustainable development’.  Few people know that A21 is the tacit goal quietly accepted by governments across the world (more here).  On RR, we have been railing against this surreptitiously mandated brave new world for years.  But with progressives intractably embedded within all of our government bureaucracies, there is little hope that our course back to liberty from ‘stack & pack’ collectivism can be directed by any democratic means.  Even our own Nevada County staffers have been trained at the nearby ICLEI (International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives) on the means by which progress toward A21 can be quietly achieved (more here).  Here I offer a couple more examples that appear innocuous to the casual reader, and are totally invisible to the low information type citizens.  (As an exercise, see how easy it is to find out what ICLEI stands for; they don’t want to publicize how globalism is reaching its grasp to local levels.  And no progressive will admit that A21 has any influence on America’s public policies – which itself can be used as a handy litmus test for identifying a progressive.)

    (more…)

43 comments on Scattershots – 2aug17 (updated 6aug17)