Rebane's Ruminations
November 2026
S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930  

ARCHIVES


OUR LINKS


YubaNet
White House Blog
Watts Up With That?
The Union
Sierra Thread
RL “Bob” Crabb
Barry Pruett Blog

  • George Rebane

    Here are a couple of items that are guaranteed to call out the Collectivist Cricket Corps.

    High tax states like California and New York are now suddenly devising legislative back flips trying to keep their rich from moving out.  They have come up with a ruse to favor those daily vilified filthy rich (wink, wink) in the form of tax deductible charitable contributions.  And who will be the charity on the receiving end? (Seat belts please) Why their states’ general fund, that’s who.  It works like this.  Suppose your state’s max marginal income tax rate is 13.3%; just a random number I picked out.  And your income is such that you wind up paying $50K tax to the state.  Before tax reform, you would deduct that from your gross adjusted income and pay the federal rate on the remaining.  Since after tax reform you can no longer do that, the Democrat sleazebags in the state houses have a scheme by which you contribute that $50K to a newly cobbled state charity, then deduct it from your adjusted gross income as permitted by the new 2018 tax law, and wind up paying the federal tax on the remaining, just like before.  The state wins, and you win.

    All the while this is going on, the socialists, who claim that tax rates make no never mind on economic decisions, continue to convince their constituents that all is well, as they stuff cash back into the pockets of those dastardly rich who pay the lion’s share of their state’s taxes, thereby making possible all the vote-buying programs that keep them in office.  Sweet, but I don’t think the courts are going to buy it since a fundamental tenet of charitable giving is that it’s not supposed to benefit the giver.

    And speaking of tax reform, you know, the one that is supposed to take money from the poor, or at least not provide them any benefit while the rich are laughing all the way to their mattresses with all that extra cash to stash.  Here’s just a short list of what’s really going down where real Americans live and work from Forbes, The Hill, Daily Signal, and Washington Examiner, but not from Nancy and Chuckie, that irresistible pair of Lying Lefties.

    [update]  Mr George Boardman wrote a thoughtful column in today’s 15jan18 Union (here) describing the (leftwing?) citizens’ initiative to double the recent temporary increase in Grass Valley’s sales tax and make it permanent.  The money would be used for the usual litany of things, from fixing sidewalks to hiring more police and firefighters.  What always remains unasked is why do we need ever higher taxes to do the same things that were accomplished in past years with existing taxes, especially since the community’s population has decreased.  The answers, of course, are obvious and don’t fit the progressives’ narrative, so that discussion continues to be suppressed.

    Also, I was again sad to see Mr Boardman’s politically correct use of the ‘transient’ appellation.  Apparently, the population of such transients is not only growing, but their criminal consumption of city facilities and destruction of surrounding woodlands is now pretty much out of hand.  Wasn’t it not that long ago that people who had no visible means of support, lived, trashed and slept in public areas, panhandled, and otherwise made citizens apprehensive and brought a lasting pall on a community, weren’t they called bums?  With all of Nevada County’s welcoming and nurturing programs in place, why should anyone like that consider himself a transient?  Transients are people who come, work, recreate, shop, and temporarily enjoy themselves here and then leave.  Why continue to confuse the issue?

    That California is particularly afflicted with such problems through its massive misspent and mismanaged welfare programs that are highlighted in Russ Steele’s 958am comment below.  The Left’s solution to the problem has always been an unabashed practice of Einsteinian insanity.  There is no evidence that this practice will abate.

    [16jan18 update]  Back in 2007 Mike McDaniel and I wrote an SESF report (link here)on the already disastrous state of unfunded liabilities in government workers’ pensions accrued to almost every jurisdiction in California, including Nevada County.  We presented our results to our Supes, who sniffed that we didn’t really understand the sophisticated finances of pension funding and that there was nothing to worry about (more here).  Now eleven years later, even progressives are beginning to realize that the horribly negotiated pension contracts for government employees will most likely be paid off in some fraction on the anticipated dollar.  Today finally, the epiphanies are coming on daily.  It’s hard to tell whether our own left-leaning graphical commentator Bob Crabb is evincing one of his own, or just reporting what is happening across the state in his cartoon filched from 16jan18 Union.

    RLCrabb180116

    [18jan18 update]  By now everyone should have heard about Apple ‘repatriating’ some of their off-shore billions thanks to President Trump.  And what will they do with that money after they pay the 15% federal repatriation tax (about $38B), why they’ll increase executive salaries and bonuses, pay huge dividends to shareholders, and stuff the rest into mattresses – not.  Actually, as a result they’ll contribute about $350B to the US economy through expansions of new facilities, development of new products, and creating over 20,000 new jobs.  And guess in what state they will not expand their operations – c’mon folks, you can do it.

    Meanwhile our leftwing politicians, lamestream media, and local lying liberals (here) continue practicing ‘truth decay’ (here) telling Americans that the new tax reform law (for which no Democrat voted) only benefits corporations, the rich, and raises taxes for the middle class and poor. (more here)

    The bottom line of all this repatriation by corporations amounts to about $2.5T (yep, that’s trillion) into the US economy from which the feds will collect about $340B in taxes over the next ten years.  And the impact of all this money into America’s pockets will cause the socialists to soil their shorts.  A good interactive graphic explanation of all this is available to WSJ subscribers here; none of this will be covered by the lamestream as will be evident in these pages by the comments from our more blindered readers.

    http://www.wsj.com/graphics/tax-repatriation/ 

  • [Time for some fresh sand as we defocus from the SHC affair.  gjr]

    Posted at

    in

  • George Rebane

    Nancy EubanksMs Nancy Eubanks is one of Nevada County’s prominent progressive voices whose litanies appear regularly in the local press.  In this morning’s (13jan18) Union she assumes her mantel of high dudgeon against the greedy rich, and again champions class warfare and the politics of unrequited envy (here).  Today’s sermon from her mount is a devious diatribe on the impact of the new tax law designed to convince the ignorant that this legislation once more allows the rich to rob the poor.

    Her punchline is that “… the top 0.1 percent will now get a tax cut of $179,000. The average person making between $25,000 and $48,000 will get a temporary tax cut of $310.”  This is raw meat for the unread and the innumerates.  The Tax Foundation tallies the relevant data (here).  It turns out that her quoted range neatly straddles the bottom 50% of taxpayers who pay 2.75% of all income taxes, while the top 1% (not 0.1%) pay almost 40% of all income taxes on slightly more than 20% of all earnings, and way more than all of the top 90% of taxpayers.  And those in her quoted earnings range are overwhelmingly among the 44% of American who pay no federal individual income taxes (here), which explains why the remainder pay only 2.75% of the total federal income taxes collected.

    And Dame Nancy again repeats the socialists’ favorite fiscal shibboleth – tax rates do not impact economic growth, and its most favored version “there is no correlation between tax cuts for the rich and job and wage growth.”  To her and hers it still appears that the rich just continue to shove their added incomes into mattresses and Cayman Island banks.  The last thing they do is consume, invest, and start/grow companies, all of which create and maintain America’s jobs.

  • George Rebane

    No matter what he actually said in that White House meeting on immigration policy, President Trump has again focused a policy discussion on a crux of the matter instead of continuing the same ol’ same ol’ circling of the barn.  I don’t want to debate whether he actually said “shithole country” as the press is attributing, but I hope he did if it gets us off the dime in deciding who should be let in to serve America’s interests as a sovereign and sustainable nation-state.

    Because this is a family-oriented blog (hah!), and in the ensuing discussion we will want to continue using that colorful descriptor without gratuitously sprinkling dirty words all over these pages, I will use the three-letter acronym SHC in the sequel for both expedience and, perhaps, collateral decorum.  Nevertheless, the meaning of that appellation will be made and should remain clear.

    Instead of working on a more polished commentary, I decided to quickly anchor my contribution to the topic in a structured list of propositions that I believe are also embraced more or less by other conservetarians.  If they are also Bayesians like me, then their beliefs of the following will range from near zero (impossible) to near unity (certain), and in the process never saying never for either extreme.

    (more…)

  • George Rebane

    If Oprah runs for president in 2020, I guess our progressives will then label her as a “liar” since she has long maintained that she would not run for public office.  You think that standard has application on both sides of the aisle?  Nah, neither do I.

    The Dems and their El Salvadorean (et al) ‘temporary’ aliens have adopted Lucy’s argument for Charlie Brown to kick the football again.  Just let us in to stay for a while to get relief from the crappy situation in our own land, and we’ll go home peacefully when our time is up.  But now, ‘Oh, look at all the kids we’ve had and how much we enjoy it here, and we can’t go back home now because it’s still too crappy there.’  How many times does that vote-buying amnesty football have to be pulled before the Repubs wise up and not play that game anymore?

    Our own Russ Steele has a piece (here) in the 9jan18 Union advocating broadband in which he points out “Communities with high-speed internet grow faster than those with just limited broadband access, according to studies.”  I think he’s identified why Nevada County is adopting broadband, cell reception, and other growth inducing technologies at a snail’s pace, and it might just have something to do with flying in tight formation with Agenda21.

    The Union published the names of its new editorial board today (here).  And I’m pleased to point out that my bride Jo Ann made the cut.

    It turns out that all those pro-capitalist Republicans in Congress are piss poor at marketing their new tax reform law.  On social media we have the Repubs’ “#2059More” vs the Dems’ “#GOPTaxScam” – I kid you not, more here.  Some people should apply for a full tuition refund for their MBAs in marketing because their schools didn’t teach them anything.  Meanwhile prune-faced Pelosi continues unabashedly to publish her lamestream-ignored and widely accepted lie, that the new law would “raise taxes on 86 million middle class families.”

    In the Stats for Fun’n Profit Department we see that California’s unemployment rate of 4.0% beats the national 4.1% rate.  As a lifelong practitioner of the mathematical arts, it is always amusing to see how you can mangle squigglies until they yield the desired answer, no matter how mind boggling.  We recall that one third of the country’s welfare recipients live, and are apparently gainfully employed, in the Golden State (natch!).  BTW, Nevada County's unemployment is reported at 3.4%, go figger.

    [10jan18 update]  The 10jan18 Union published a letter from its former editor who again duns columnist and RR reader George Boardman.  For some years now the FUE has been on a rag about Mr Boardman, who on that same palette is joined by several others like cartoonist Bob Crabb, the Union’s management, and even yours truly just to underline a point.  The letter itself drips of the journalist’s trademark pettiness (here), and its publication for all to see explains the newspaper’s tongue-in-cheek for letting light shine on its number one critic ensconced in perpetual high dudgeon.  Sweet.

    Former CA criminals who can’t get a liquor license are now being encouraged by Sacramento to become “Marijuana Entrepreneurs” and start selling pot under the state’s new legalized MJ law.  Jason Riley details (here) this latest butt-stupid progressive policy to spread social justice and equal opportunity, all that since most of the targeted would-be ‘entrepreneurs’ to receive the state’s latest “affirmative action” benefits are Hispanic or black.

    By any measure the IRS is an action arm of the Democratic party.  Now it claims immunity from congressional oversight because (seatbelts please) “its rules lack a ‘significant economic impact’ because they’re ‘derived from’ statutes.”  You can read the details of this latest dose of progressive pabulum in a report by the Cause of Action Institute reported in the 10jan18 WSJ (here and here) where they correctly conclude – This is pablum (alternate spelling). Were it correct, rules from every federal agency would be exempt from oversight, since all agency rules are based in statute. If other agencies adopted this mind-set, it would gut oversight of the regulatory state by the elected branches.

    Ever notice the ratio of crappy leftwing vs rightwing policies and proposals?  A short perusal of RR and its comment streams reveals the butt-stupid ratio (perhaps a new public policy metric) to be somewhere between 50:1 to 100:1 in favor of the Left.  The above two entries in this post are just some recent examples from a tsunami of thousands which this country must endure daily.  And also notice when a Republican blunder is encountered, the lamestream and, of course, our local lefty neighbors in these pages go ballistic.  But the constant daily stream of progressive potholes encountered as the country bravely marches into the future is totally ignored in the national media.  Were it not for conservative talk radio, cable news, and rightwing blogs, we’d hear nary a whisper of this silent disaster unfolding.  And some still wonder what are the forces that continue to widen the breach between us.  Some futures are easy to foretell.

    [11jan18 update]  Well sumbich, the Princeton Environmental Institute has published its recent study in the prestigious Nature reporting how current climate models (actually called the General Circulation Models) underestimate the effects of clouds on earth’s temperatures.  Even with these findings they still have to tow the party line, but the seams in the ‘Pay no attention …’ curtain are clearly fraying.  I have been among those who for years pointed out that and other weaknesses in the GCMs used by the global warming hysteria mongers.  Now it seems that one of their own is becoming more skeptical of the purveyed ‘science’ that camouflages our knowledge of what’s really going on with earth’s constantly changing climate.  And again, the PEI guys can only assess their particular part of the enormously complex GCMs which are cobbled together by dozens of cloistered specialists each contributing their part to the resulting Mulligan stew.  (more here and here)

  • George Rebane

    The Union this (8jan18) morning has a problem connecting some dots when they claim that 1) RMJ retailers can’t get licensed in the county because they must buy product only from licensed growers, and 2) the county has yet to forge a new MJ ordinance that allows county growers to get licensed.  What the front-page report (here) misses is that licensed RMJ retailers can buy product from licensed growers in other counties.  Instead it offers this confusing verbiage –

    A licensed dispensary can only buy from licensed growers. Nevada County has no licensed cultivators because its grow ordinance forbids commercial activity. Local growers can't get state licenses because of that ordinance. … That means once a dispensary sells all its Nevada County product, there won't be any more.

    If that obvious approach of buying out-of-county is not possible, then the piece should have clearly stated it instead of leaving readers hanging.

    Then in the same issue's op-ed pages we have a column (here) by county Republican chair Bob Hren decrying the Citizens Advisory Group (CAG) report and how it was drafted.  The CAG draft report will be presented to the Supes tomorrow 9jan18 at 130pm and you can read it here.

    (more…)

  • [Not much talk about Wolff's book on Trump.  Anybody reading it yet?  I thought that would be a hot topic.  Hmmm …   gjr]

    Posted at

    in

  • George Rebane

    The 2018 Tax Reform Act is legislation that I believe will overall reduce taxes for almost all Americans, and with its business-friendly provisions will give a significant boost to GDP growth.  However, its SALT (state and local taxes) provision disturbs me because it is intrinsically flawed both functionally and, yes, ethically.  The latter because it allows the various taxing jurisdictions to make the wage earner pay more in taxes than the total amount he earned.  SALT bases its tax amounts on the total amount earned before any other mandated taxes, fees, and tributes are paid.  If all taxing jurisdictions practice SALT – say local rate is 25%, state rate is 35%, federal rate is 45% – then the taxpayer may wind up owing more than a 100% of his earnings in taxes.  Such policies are intrinsically unfair and unethical.  The jurisdictions should decide their sequence of taxation – say, first local then state then federal – and each apply their rates to the amount that the taxpayer has left after paying his prior tax obligations.  That way the total taxes may approach 100%, but they will never exceed it like in the above example where the taxes sum to 105% of earnings.

    America’s Left either does not understand the use of force by nations, or is consciously working to have our country capitulate to or be destroyed by a foreign power.  As outlined most recently in ‘America’s Checkpoints’, I believe in the former.  It is unconscionable that Democrats like Schumer and Pelosi will hold defense upgrades hostage to their vote buying spending programs.  Without a formidable military feared by our enemies, diplomacy sings castrato.  In short, without credible arms there will be no United States to earn the redistributed monies for our entitlement programs.  And the Left knows this as it plays brinkmanship with what should be a non-partisan funding priority were we truly all Americans.  Mark Helprin of the Claremont Institute lays out the details of the current dire situation in his ‘America’s Alarmingly Archaic Arsenal’.

    And jumping from perfidy to insanity, the Left’s class warfare and identity politics cadres have come up with a new one for the campus wars, soon to be seen on a lamestream commentary near you.  The core contention in understanding the new black-white dialogue on campuses is, “One, that civility, as currently practiced in America, is a white construct. Two, that in a campus setting, the “woke” white student’s endeavor to avoid microaggressions against black peers is itself a microaggression—a form of noblesse oblige whereby white students are in fact patronizing students of color. Not only that, but by treating black students with common courtesy and expecting the same in return, white students elide black grievances, bypassing the “race talk” that is supposed to occur in preamble to all other conversations. Got it?”

    And it gets worse in the context of reasoned debates in which reason is now considered racist.  So, “increasingly at major competitions, there must be a pre-debate debate on the terms of engagement: whether students are required to cite proof or are free to argue wholly from their feelings and so-called lived experience. Far from being banned or even maligned by debate judges, such antics increasingly win converts and, not coincidentally, matches.”  And there is no requirement that your “lived experience” bears any resemblance to the real world.  “Students are pointedly discouraged from rebutting feelings that don’t jibe with verifiable reality.”  (more here)

  • George Rebane

    [This is the addended transcript of my regular KVMR commentary broadcast on 3 January 2018.]

    Before we get into the more serious part of the commentary, I want to wish all KVMR listeners a healthy and prosperous 2018.  We all know it will be another extraordinary year no matter what your political outlook and hopes.

    Last Sunday, New Year’s Eve, Jo Ann and I were preparing for a quiet and intimate evening with friends to enjoy a dinner in front of the fireplace, listen to some laid-back jazz, and play our favorite game of cards while keeping an eye on the happenings in Time Square with the TV on mute.  The Christmas decorations were still up, and the décor extended the festive mood from what turned out to be an entire month of holiday celebrations at our house.  And then I was suddenly reminded of what we saw on the news before our guests arrived.

    The afternoon’s major coverage was about how secure the New Year’s celebrations were going to be across the country, starting of course with Times Square.  There we were shown long lines of would be revelers all lined up at checkpoints manned by police and other serious looking people with submachine guns at the ready, keeping their trained eyes on our east coast neighbors waiting to be allowed in and start celebrating.  We were assured by the newscaster and various officials that there would be, not one, but two cordons of security checkpoints that everyone would have go through before being granted ‘admission’ to one of the most public, open, and historically accessible spaces in the nation.  These scenes brought back many memories and a moist eye, because I was looking at what my country had become in a few short years.

    (more…)

  • George Rebane

    ICFJ_3jan18Was interested to see the nearby full-page ad in the 3jan18 WSJ.  Given that ignorance, indifference, ideology, illiteracy, … are all qualities that often decorate and distinguish their ‘factual, fair, and balanced’ work products, RR has long viewed the journalism profession with a gimlet eye (here).  But now things have apparently gotten so bad that international associations for journalists openly admit that “reporters worldwide” have come to report “falsehoods”, perhaps even unwittingly, for which now organizations such as the International Center for Journalists go to great pains to advertise their ability to “empower” workers in the field to “produce reliable coverage using new technologies and best practices(sic).”  Well, then what kind of unreliable coverage have journalists been producing using their old technologies and sub-par practices?

    In any case, this appears to be a step in the right direction when the industry begins to publicly admit that it has not been performing up to snuff while wallowing in the rising tide of fake news and “falsehoods”, much of it auto-generated to promote agendas and sustain favored ideological narratives.  The ICFJ website is worth visiting.  While their mission statement is commendable, methinks their orientation is not as innocent as they would have you believe.  Mostly, I wonder what are their methods of ‘empowerment’.  But since they are also funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, they can’t be all bad, can they?

55 comments on Scattershots – 15jan18 (updated 18jan18)