Rebane's Ruminations
November 2026
S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930  

ARCHIVES


OUR LINKS


YubaNet
White House Blog
Watts Up With That?
The Union
Sierra Thread
RL “Bob” Crabb
Barry Pruett Blog

  • Some mistakes are just too much fun to make only once.

    George Rebane

    The left-leaning Associated Press reports ‘Democratic socialism surging in the age of Trump’.  The article is a well-written, comprehensive review of what the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) are and their recent growth spurt as the Democratic Party lurches hard Left.  (We note that know-nothing local lefties are still in denial about that.)  What they are – according to the AP, other observers, and now even some dues-paying members – is socialists, plain and simple.  But even that doesn’t go far enough.

    CommunistUSADSA’s paid up membership has surged from about 6K to 45K in the last year or so, and now includes in its ranks more than a handful of Democrat politicians running for office.  DSA used to be “on the fringes of the liberal movement’s farthest left flank.”  Today they are a “significant force in Democratic politics” that overwhelmingly dominates the public direction the party has taken and openly advertises as its future.   On the DSA’s website we find, and AP corroborates, that there is “little distinction” between ‘democratic socialism’ and just plain good old-fashioned ‘socialism’.  But wait, there’s more to this telling.

    When you read the DSA constitution, you learn that “its members as socialists reject an economic order based on private profit and share a vision of a humane social order based on popular control of resources and production, economic planning, equitable distribution, feminism, racial equality and non-oppressive relationships.”  In short, they are really a new and improved modern day movement of communists who are temporarily hiding under the more acceptable socialist label.  When the time is ripe, they will dispense with this half-way house and co-opt the political pimple that today still calls itself the Communist Party USA (CPUSA).

    The real question is how far will the Democratic Party play along with this headlong rebirth of communism via the waystation of socialism.  Many Democrats, and we all know who they are, have already thrown in their lot with the DSA, and many more Dems are standing by, nervously fingering their hats as they prepare to toss them into the DSA ring.  The times, they surely are a-changin.

    The only speed-bump on the road to complete government control of everything seems to be the label ‘socialist’ that some Dems running for office fear that “people do associate (socialism) with bad things in history”.  Now if we can only hurry up and convince these inconvenient history troglodytes that socialism was really not all that bad, and that we’ll do it right this time around, then we’ll have it made in the shade.  Why?  Because our government educational system has already taught the younger generation that capitalism is bad and socialism is good, and the lamestream media is reinforcing that daily.  It’s those damn older folks who can still remember yesterday who are the problem.

    You can bet the farm that the Deep State “patriots” are already all socialists since their livelihood depends on it.  The only kerfuffle slowing things down is the current lack of a definitive Democrat leadership behind which the young and stupid can join ranks.  Current Dems jockeying for position, like Schumer, Pelosi, Sanders, Warren, Biden, and Waters come across as marginal work products from some second-rate embalming school.  It’s the new cohort of the likes of Ocasio-Cortez, Kaniela Ing, Kamala Harris, etc who are the emerged and unabashed socialist face of the Democratic Party.  And the platform to which they all have signed up sees the abrogation of the Constitution and its defined voter franchise as Job One.

  • Accept the fact that some days you’re the pigeon and some days you’re the statue.

    George Rebane

    As these pages attest, I am not a blinded supporter of all things Trump.  I especially take exceptions to his tweet-in-the-mouth MO with which he often snatches another debilitating defeat from the jaws of victory.  But I did vote for him for two reasons – 1) he promised to try things different from the SOS that has become the Washington quagmire (cf Einstein’s dictum), and 2) given the horrible alternative, he was the clear better choice.

    Since his ‘ascension’ into office, President Trump has accomplished many salutary objectives to America’s benefit, and most certainly to the benefit of our citizens.  Now all of his actions have not been uniformly successful.  The biggest question mark I have relates to his particular initiatives on trade and tariffs.  As we have gone back and forth on this, I don’t understand how the endgame will be to our benefit from such a broad brush application of tariff increases in order to make the trade-game ‘level and fair’  (itself a dubious objective).

    But my training in science teaches me to look through the surrounding chaff and judge the policy on its delivered effects, and in my ignorance not to join some hysterical consensual cohort.  I have no problem in pre-judging policies the effects of which (i.e. transfer function) I do understand and therefore can reasonably predict.  The years of RR attest to my doing so, and readers are always invited to judge and comment on my performance.

    So now we come to the cacophony of the collectivists that echoes daily across the land – President Trump stole his election through a treasonous conspiracy with the Russians.  And to pile on, he confirms this through his daily genuflections in front of what the Left points out is nothing less than the Russian masterpiece titled The Adoration of The Putin.  The Democratic base, especially the lamestream media and their alt-Left or now established socialist wing, laps up this narrative lock, stock, and barrel.

    Michael Anton, Hillsdale College lecturer and former Trump national security adviser, takes a different view on Trump’s reaction to the treason charges and the overall campaign to unseat him that is much in line with Rebane Doctrine.  In the 20jul18 WSJ piece ‘Why Trump’s Detractor’s Cry Treason’, Mr Anton argues that our own federal government materially meddled much more against Trump in the 2016 election than ever could or did the Russian government, even with Putin’s goading.

    There is more public evidence of American meddling—politicized leaks, gaming a criminal investigation, surveillance of campaign associates, and strings of biased messages by officials—than of Russian. There may be piles of secret evidence of the latter. If so, why not make more of it public? Especially since, as we have been told, acknowledging Russian interference is the patriotic imperative of our time. …

    Few of the president’s opponents actually say that Russia swung him the election. But that’s clearly what they insinuate and want people to believe. Mr. Trump understands this and is frustrated by it. Can you blame him?

  • George Rebane

    [Apologies for the ragged composition of this commentary.  I thought it important enough to get it into the RR record, and invite comments/debate by those who care to consider something beyond current events.]

    How many people are necessary for humans as a species to improve its aggregate quality of life and continue reaching for the stars as AI provides more and more of our fulfillment and wealth creating needs?

    We know that the answer lies somewhere between ‘way too many’ to make us all poor and miserable living in a degraded environment, and ‘way too few’ to give the remainder a sense of being members of a vibrant, enriching, and achieving global community of multiple cultures.  What the actual bookend numbers are, no one knows beyond the ‘way too many’ and the ‘way too few’, quantities that are of little use in a reasoned discussion.

    Some very smart people are again beginning to ask, ‘Why does America need more people?’  Before you blow that question off with hip-level answers like ‘we need more people to work and grow the economy’ or ‘we need more people to do the work that Americans are unwilling to do’, consider some cold hard facts.

    (more…)

  • [Agreed, that last sandbox was getting a little ripe.  Question – will Dems be able to keep the 'would/wouldn't' dust devil alive until November?  gjr]

    Posted at

    in

  • George Rebane

    Remember last winter when Mueller announced the indictment of 13 (that’s thirteen, like in one, three) Russians in his collusion investigation (more here). Remember that we discussed these indictments in the 14feb18 Sandbox (here), and concluded that there would be a snowball’s chance in hell of getting Russia to hand them over for trial.  And then remember that one of the indicted Russians decided to plead not guilty and go to trial in the US, a trial that was supposed have started a week ago (9 July 2018).  And then remember that this was a big surprise to Mueller who would have had to turn over all his evidence to the Russian defense team that he used to obtain the indictment – which evidence he either didn’t have or would have been sticky to share with the Russians.

    Well, now we have forgotten all that with Mueller’s new and improved indictment of 12 Russians (that’s twelve, like in one, two) in his new and improved collusion investigation.  No one seems to remember that these new indictments mysteriously fall one short, and their issuance completely ignores the forgotten 13 indictments and the recalcitrant defendant who pled not guilty and wanted to be tried.  That the lamestream has picked up none of this is not a surprise to most of us here on RR, but the American Thinker did indeed notice and has published ‘The Forgotten II: The Strange Case of the Missing Russians’. (H/T also to RR reader)

    There must be some reasonable explanation for all this, which from my perch appears as utter bullshit – including the timing of the announcement of the latest indictments.  Perhaps our vociferous and all-knowing progressive readers can set the matter straight for us so that we can all go forward giving Mueller full faith and credit for doing something beside what President Trump has labeled a ‘witch hunt’.

  • George Rebane

    AntiSTEMWhile great effort is being made by universities and the state to attract more women into STEM careers, their massively progressive humanities departments at literally all of the nation’s colleges are doing their best to convince women to reject STEM.  The message of these liberal academics is, “STEM is only for those who enjoy “rote” work. Engineering is not creative. There’s only one right answer. You’ll live your life in a cubicle. It’s dehumanizing. You’ll never talk to anyone. And, of course, it’s sexist.”

    Engineering professor Dr Barbara Oakley gives us the lowdown on these not-so-subtle forces in academia that are working to minimize STEM knowledge in favor of topics, majors, and careers in feel-good fields that require ‘skills’ for which no one or very few are willing to pay with money out of their own pockets. (more here)  The anti-STEM professors have not the slightest clue about the level of creativity required for STEM work, nor the nature of the fulfilling careers that STEM fields provide, and, most importantly, that STEM careers are the prime engines of wealth building vs wealth redistribution in society.

    Professor Oakley’s only weak argument is the belief that her light-weight “humanities colleagues unthinkingly malign math and science as the province of uncreative drones.”  I don’t think there is anything “unthinking” going on here.  No matter how ignorant they are of STEM and its careers, the light-weights know they are on thin ice.  Were their female students to be exposed to the truth of the real exhilaration that STEM professions can provide, and the creativity required to succeed in such careers, and the real contribution they would make to society, and the life-changing possibilities that would then be open to them, those smart enough would switch out of their humanities majors in a heartbeat.

    But the real truth here is that the Left has never promoted STEM for the masses because it creates too many problems in their implementation of a compliant governance for the new world order.  With a smattering of STEM, their pedagogically cultivated drones may start having independent thoughts in areas best left untrammeled by inquiring young minds.  What is doubly wasteful in today’s progressive bureaucracies and institutions is that on the one hand we establish and promote  programs – from kindergarten through grad-school – to attract females into STEM subjects and careers, and on the other hand operate a quiet yet pervasive propaganda campaign in academia to denigrate STEM-based thinking and opportunities as somehow being socially deficient and limiting.

  • Intellectual ostracism – the refusal to engage with a person or people who cannot rise to minimum standards of rationality. (Stefan Molyneux in The Art of the Argument – Western Civilization’s Last Stand, 2017)

    George Rebane

    Dems’ final solution for ‘immigration’.  Given our inundation of illegal aliens from the south, the Dems may yet have the best final solution for stopping it.  Just proceed with the unbridled adoption of their welfare, regulatory, and tax policies into the US economy.  The resulting impact on America’s common weal – Venezuela del Norte – oughta make them Latinos think twice before coming north.

    Our lamestream-reported US income inequality at 11-15% is entirely bull pucky.  When over $1T in annual transfer payments and tax policy numbers are figured in, “only 2% of today’s population lives in poverty”.  This is lower than many western developed countries.  But the reported high numbers are a necessary part of the Left’s victimhood narrative to maintain the plantation.  (more here)

    The EU’s socialist market mangling bureaucrats are at it again.  “It has only been about a month since European regulators dropped a bomb on the internet with the rollout of its General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), which imposed major costs on web platforms of all sizes and strengthened the market position of tech titans. … Now, the EU is turning its eye to copyright infringements online, and its proposed rules would be similarly damaging to the internet. The motivations for these new rules are hard to discern, and the extent of the collateral damage is hard to predict.”  This is part of America’s guaranteed future under Democrats. (more here)

  • George Rebane

    [This is the transcript of my regular KVMR commentary broadcast on 11 July 2018.]

    Kavanaugh_2018President Trump nominated Judge Brett Kavanaugh of the prestigious DC Circuit Court of Appeals to replace retiring Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy.  Judge Kavanaugh is one of the most distinguished jurists in America with an impeccable resume and over 300 scholarly legal opinions, 11 of which have been adopted by SCOTUS into their rulings.  He is also clearly acceptable to the man he will replace, since he served as a law clerk for Justice Kennedy.

    Judge Kavanaugh’s nomination is, of course, hailed by the Republicans and all Americans who value his strict constitutionalist credentials.  The man agrees with the Founders that laws should be made by Congress and not in the judicial branch, whose job it is to adjudicate the application of existing law.  Kavanaugh’s confirmation will deny, for at least a generation, the recent use of our courts to make laws that Congress would not pass or be signed by the President.  And overnight that has made him the most despicable enemy of the Left, perhaps, second only to Donald Trump who surprised everyone by being elected President of the United States. 

    To many of us this nomination and the upcoming confirmation battle represents a milestone in the ongoing destruction of national comity.  The Left has now redirected its perennial attack on this administration by focusing its energies to deny Judge Kavanaugh, with the battle cry issued by Minority Leader Chuck Schumer who yesterday promised, “I’m going to fight the Kavanaugh nomination with everything I’ve got.”  And his ‘everything’ has become the immediate call to all Democrats ranging from moderate, through the alt-Left, to communist bands marching in the streets with hammer & sickle flags.  These are the dedicated worthies whose shout is ‘No Trump, No Wall, No USA at all!’,

    This is reinforced by Tom Perez, chair of the Democratic National Committee, who points to Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez as the “future of the Democratic Party”.  Self-avowed socialist Ocasio-Cortez, who recently won the Democrat primary in Queens calls herself a democratic socialist, and purports to be the new face of the Democratic Party.  In that pivot she is joined by other Democrats such as Cynthia Nixon running for New York governor, and, of course, the established socialist stalwarts, Senators Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren.  Other Democrats stand ready to board that train or, unannounced, are already on it.

    Meanwhile Democratic Party leaders like Nancy Pelosi warn the country that “Civilization as we know it today is at risk in this election.”  And former DNC chair and governor Terry McAuliffe tells us, “The nomination of Judge Brett Kavanaugh will threaten the lives of millions of Americans for decades to come …”  Meanwhile, leftwing organizations such as the National Women’s Law Center have rushed into print obvious lies like Justice Kavanaugh “believes the President is above the law”.

    All of this is the latest and perhaps penultimate chapter of the Left’s anti-Trump national narrative.  Most likely half the country does not believe this extremely divisive screed now erupting against Judge Kavanaugh.    But if you’re a Democrat listening to this, why do you think that your party’s national leadership is telling you these things that they know not to be true?  Do they really think that you are ignorant enough to believe America is at a tipping point to tyranny with the Kavanaugh nomination?  However, if enough of you do believe this, then we really are facing a crisis of governance, because then we are definitely no longer one people under the same Constitution “with liberty and justice for all.”

    More soberly, we recall that civilization, as we know it, truly was at risk during WW2 and the ensuing Cold War, with powerful totalitarian regimes seeking to fundamentally transform the world.  And now the Democratic leadership and its core are telling us that we are there again.  Their emerging solution is to abolish capitalism so as to make the world safe for socialism – a form of governance that, without the support of other people’s free market capitalism, has never ended well.

    My name is Rebane, and I also expand on this and related themes on Rebane’s Ruminations where the transcript of this commentary is posted with relevant links, and where such issues are debated extensively.  However, my views are not necessarily shared by KVMR.  Thank you for listening.

  • [President Trump's trip – is he doing it well, or is his direct and undiplomatic manner going to make things worse for the US when he returns.  And it looks like the Ugly Fat Kid needs another nudge.  gjr]

    Posted at

    in

  • George Rebane

    Unless President Trump has something up his sleeve on the outcome of the current tariff tussle and ensuing trade war, I think our fearless leader is making a big mistake in imposing tariffs – and doubly so for “national security” purposes.  Perhaps this ol’ noggin’ can’t figure out this global art of the deal, perhaps his real gambit is to go all in for abolishing tariffs all around (as he has already suggested), but I can’t see how he can get there from here, and even whether getting there makes any sense at all.

    Now I don’t often agree with noted Princeton economist and syndicated liberal columnist Alan Blinder, but he did a good job explaining the matter of multi-lateral tariffs and the doings with our country’s current account in his ‘A Brief Introduction to Trade Economics’.  Bottom line, among nations unbalanced trade is normal and good for everyone because of something called ‘comparative advantage’ – that’s doing and selling what you do best, and buying from others what they do best.

    Another bad thing about tariffs and resulting trade wars currently overlooked is that consumers will not only pay a lot more for imported stuff, but also for the same stuff we make in America.  Consider the new tariff on motor vehicles imported from the EU and Japan.  If suddenly our consumers had to pay, say, 25% more for a Toyota truck, they would naturally turn to one of our truck makers to get a better deal.  To be specific, consider both GM and Toyota selling comparable pick-ups at your local auto mall for $40K.  If suddenly you have to pay $50K for the Toyota, you’d reasonably turn to see a similar product from GM and the other two American truck makers.  And if that happened, what do you think would be the response of GM, Ford, and Chrysler?  They’re not going to leave close to $10K on the table knowing that their American customers have no better alternatives.

    So without any necessity for collusion, all three will quickly come to the same conclusion and bump their prices to, say, $45K or more.  And as a Lucky Strike Extra, the ‘big three’ no longer will be bothered much by those pesky Japanese always pushing everybody to make higher quality vehicles like they did in the 1970s.  Anyway, you get the idea of why I think tariffs and trade wars suck, especially for us Americans who don’t save much and therefore make it necessary for us to borrow from foreigners to fund our deficits and run the current account balance that we do.

98 comments on Democratic Socialists = proto-communists