George Rebane
This will most likely be the last edition of ‘Voter Fraud’. In a correspondence with a reader I asked if he was aware of any site that served as a clearing house for the hundreds of voter fraud reports, affidavits, and suits filed from all over the country – in short, where can we go to see all the publicly declared and gathered evidence alleging voter fraud. He got back to me with this excellent compendium that lists them all and updates the list daily. The site is called https://hereistheevidence.com/ – enjoy.
[5dec20 update] Not set in stone. A lot of the stuff our Left and its lamestream put out about the post-election and its scheduled milestones is simply not true. Here is a piece that explains the matter and links to the related constitutional research document prepared by the Election Integrity Project.
And this editorial – 'With Our Election System Under Assault, Americans Need to Speak Up' – in the Epoch Times pretty well sums up a lot of the country's feelings about the very polarized debate about election fraud.
[6dec20 update] More evidence on the astronomically low probability of obtaining the claimed and/or certified Trump/Biden election results. Anyone who claims to be technically astute in probabilistics will immediately call to question what the so-called ‘non-polling metrics’ indicate about the likelihood of fraud in the election’s aftermath. Patrick Basham of the Democracy Institute did an extensive interview with Mark Levin of FN (here) where he pointed out the anomalies in these metrics which have historically been 100% reliable in identifying the winner of presidential elections.
Suddenly, this time everything went haywire as ALL the metrics pointed to a Trump win, but were nullified with the afterhours arrival of truckloads of mail-in ballots which statistically stunk to high heaven. For example, what do you think of boxes of uncreased mail-in ballots (i.e. NOT mailed) each of whose vote counts came up repeatedly and exactly Biden 50.5% and Trump 49.5%? And other such goings on were apparent in many vote count sessions across the key battleground states.
Basham explained that there are "a dozen or more of these metrics … [that] have a 100% accuracy rate in terms of predicting the winner of the presidential election. … Those metrics, include party registration trends, how the candidates did in their respective presidential primaries, the number of individual donations, [and] how much enthusiasm each candidate generated in the opinion polls. … In 2016, they all indicated strongly that Donald Trump would win against most of the public polling. That was again the case in 2020. So, if we are to accept that Biden won against the trend of all these non-polling metrics, it not only means that one of these metrics was inaccurate, for the first time ever, it means that each one of these metrics was wrong for the first time and at the same time as all of the others." (emphasis mine)
Were such infinitesimally low probabilities to obtain in any other endeavor, every reasonable person familiar with the issues would say that there definitely has occurred a massive anomaly. It is the consideration of such “deeply puzzling” evidence, when added to all the other affidavits submitted under penalty of perjury, that persuades me that this was an historically fraudulent election the (most likely criminal) vagaries of which need to be investigated and brought to light. (more here)
Did China effectively buy Dominion Voting Systems one month before the election? The fraud smoke about this election is sure getting thicker by the day. Not only do the Chinese dominate the board of Dominion’s holding company, but “in a previous voter fraud lawsuit filed by Sidney Powell, a former military intelligence official claims in an affidavit that Chinese operatives had access to Dominion Voting Systems in several key states.” (more here)
[10dec20 update] Now here’s a shot in the shorts of all those on the Left telling the nation a slew of Big Lies about the integrity of the Dominion (Vote Editing) Software. ‘Election Supervisor Shows on Video How Dominion Software Allows Changing, Adding Votes’. This should renew some interest in the courts now chewing on election fraud suits. The evidence tsunami is of historical proportions. I know of no legal battle fought in my lifetime in which the plaintiffs have had such a profusion of evidence.
rebanesruminations.com 
174 responses to “Voter Fraud 5.0 … until the fat lady sings (updated 10dec20)”
“[T]hat form of government which is best contrived to
secure an impartial and exact execution of the law, is
the best of republics. – John Adams
BILL OF COMPLAINT
Our Country stands at an important crossroads.
Either the Constitution matters and must be followed,
even when some officials consider it inconvenient or
out of date, or it is simply a piece of parchment on
display at the National Archives. We ask the Court to
choose the former.”
I love Texas.
The complaint is a long read but easy to understand. Not a lot of legalese. Whoever wrote it made it very plain for the nonlawyer to understand. Bottom line argument is that officials in PA, MI, GA, WI violated state law repeatedly and such violations unlawfully benefited Biden.
LikeLike
https://justthenews.com/sites/default/files/2020-12/Texas%20Lawsuit%2012%20-%208-%2020.pdf
This link is better
LikeLike
Barry is loving the Texas lawsuit to overturn the election results and throw it to Trump.
Trouble is there is not much of a Federal connection to their lawsuit. Just some ramblings supposedly related to the 14th Amendment.
Good luck Barry!
“Legal experts responded to news of the lawsuit’s filing by criticizing it as “insane” and “a new leader in the ‘craziest lawsuit filed to purportedly challenge the election’ category,” with election law expert Rick Hasen describing the suit as “utter garbage” and “a press release masquerading as a lawsuit.”
Among the reasons the legal challenge is likely to fail, according to experts, are that the court may find Texas does not have standing to sue, it brought the legal challenge too late, or that there’s no evidence to support that the state elections were unconstitutional, and it also may take long enough for the case to be decided that the issue may be moot.”
https://www.forbes.com/sites/alisondurkee/2020/12/08/texas-asks-supreme-court-to-overturn-biden-win-in-last-ditch-election-lawsuit/?sh=3445077934e6
LikeLike
“Just some ramblings supposedly related to the 14th Amendment.” That right here is quality analysis Doug. Some shit about the Fourteenth Amendment. Lol. Tell that to former slaves and black folk who relied on the shit about the Fourteenth Amendment to obtain civil rights from states that were violating the Constitution. You would be better served arguing on the more liberal blogs in town that censor educated viewpoints in favor of your type of ill-advised and ignorant rhetoric.
In an effort to truly engage Doug, please educate me as to why you believe that Plaintiff State (Texas) does not have standing. :Let’s start there. Something simple.
LikeLike
Or as Ahnold memorably said “Chust some plo chobs…”
Maria was notably not amused.
LikeLike
Well Bar and Lar, I see why you guys love Texas.
Texas loves to sue.
https://www.texastribune.org/2017/01/17/texas-federal-government-lawsuits/
LikeLike
Here you go Bar and Lar, have at it. Tell me how the 14th applies.
Section 1.
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
Section 2.
Representatives shall be apportioned among the several states according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons in each state, excluding Indians not taxed. But when the right to vote at any election for the choice of electors for President and Vice President of the United States, Representatives in Congress, the executive and judicial officers of a state, or the members of the legislature thereof, is denied to any of the male inhabitants of such state, being twenty-one years of age, and citizens of the United States, or in any way abridged, except for participation in rebellion, or other crime, the basis of representation therein shall be reduced in the proportion which the number of such male citizens shall bear to the whole number of male citizens twenty-one years of age in such state.
Section 3.
No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any state, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any state legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any state, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.
Section 4.
The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned. But neither the United States nor any state shall assume or pay any debt or obligation incurred in aid of insurrection or rebellion against the United States, or any claim for the loss or emancipation of any slave; but all such debts, obligations and claims shall be held illegal and void.
Section 5.
The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.
LikeLike
http://amylhowe.com/2020/12/08/texas-tries-hail-mary-to-block-election-outcome/
Texas tries Hail Mary to block election outcome
In a last-ditch effort to forestall the outcome of the 2020 presidential election, Texas sought on Tuesday to file a lawsuit directly in the Supreme Court, attempting to delay the Electoral College vote and prevent four states – Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin – from casting their Electoral College votes for President-elect Joe Biden, who won the popular vote in each state. This highly unusual use of the court’s original jurisdiction — which is most often used to resolve interstate disputes involving, for example, water rights — came just six days before each state’s electors are required by law to meet and cast their ballots in the Electoral College.
The filing by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton accuses government officials in the four states of using the COVID-19 pandemic to make changes to their states’ election laws through “executive fiat or friendly lawsuits, thereby weakening ballot integrity.” The state officials, Paxton writes, “flooded” their states with absentee ballots and “weakened the strongest security measures protecting the integrity of the vote-signature verification and witness requirements.” As a result, Paxton contends, the 2020 election “suffered from significant and unconstitutional irregularities in those four states” – for example, treating voters in Democratic areas more favorably than in other areas. When taken together, Paxton asserts, these flaws make it impossible to know who “legitimately won the 2020 election and threaten to cloud all future elections.”
There is normally no specific timetable for the court to act in such cases, but Paxton explains that the state will seek expedited consideration of its request. He also urges the justices to resolve the dispute without additional briefing, telling them that the issues presented in the case – involving the outcome of the 2020 presidential election – “are neither fact-bound nor complex.”
Texas is normally represented in the U.S. Supreme Court by its solicitor general, Kyle Hawkins, who argued before the court last month in the challenge to the Affordable Care Act’s individual mandate. However, Hawkins’ name does not appear on the filing.
Officials in the states being challenged described Texas’ filing as an outlandish stunt with no legal basis. “These continued attacks on our fair and free election system are beyond meritless, beyond reckless,” Pennsylvania Attorney General Josh Shapiro (D) wrote on Twitter.
“I feel sorry for Texans that their tax dollars are being wasted on such a genuinely embarrassing lawsuit,” Wisconsin Attorney General Josh Kaul (D) wrote. “Texas is as likely to challenge the outcome of the Ice Bowl as it is to overturn the will of Wisconsin voters in the 2020 presidential election.”
Georgia Attorney General Chris Carr (R), who was recently named the new chair of the Republican Attorneys General Association, also brushed off the lawsuit. “With all due respect, the Texas Attorney General is constitutionally, legally and factually wrong about Georgia,” a spokesperson for Carr said, according to The Dallas Morning News.
The justices also heard on Tuesday from Pennsylvania in another long-shot lawsuit seeking to overturn that state’s election results. The state filed its response to a request by Rep. Mike Kelly (R-Pa.) to block the state from certifying the results of the Nov. 3 election. Kelly challenged the state’s expansion of mail-in voting as unconstitutional, but the Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled that Kelly had waited too long to go to court.
In its filing on Tuesday, Pennsylvania urged the justices to stay out of the dispute, telling them that Kelly was seeking “one of the most dramatic, disruptive invocations of judicial power in the history of the Republic.” Kelly’s claims are “fundamentally frivolous,” Pennsylvania asserted, were not raised or decided below and would ask the court to “constitutionalize huge swaths of state procedural law without any credible basis” to do so.
LikeLike
Let’s think… besides Justice Thomas, who might not have fond memories of Biden.
Ummm… Alito? not fond
Gorsuch? not fond
Kavanaugh? heee heee
Barrett? narf!
Roberts might take the side a’gin it… to be the author of the majority opinion, and blunt it from what a Thomas or a Gorsuch would write.
LikeLike
Release the Kraken!
LikeLike
I call your kracked and raise you, “unleash HELL!”
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/texas-supreme-court-lawsuit-against-states-election-changes
Automatic SCOTUS .
“Paxton is asking the U.S. Supreme Court to “declare that any electoral college votes cast by such presidential electors appointed in Defendant States Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan, and Wisconsin are in violation of the Electors Clause and the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution and cannot be counted.”
Disputes between states are among the few cases of original jurisdiction for the Supreme Court, meaning lower courts cannot first hear the cases. “
LikeLike
Posted by: Walt | 08 December 2020 at 01:35 PM
I call your kracked and raise you, “unleash HELL!”
Todays “D” puppeteer only wants the Kraken released so he can eat it!
NOM NOM NOM NOM NOM NOM………..
LikeLike
Well first Doug, I asked you about standing so I don’t know why you are talking about the 14th amendment. Second and as I looked over the complaint, I am not seeing said 14th Amendment argument. Maybe you can find it and discuss
https://justthenews.com/sites/default/files/2020-12/Texas%20Lawsuit%2012%20-%208-%2020.pdf
LikeLike
And one for the ol’ poll dancer. How bout that????? Even some polled DEMS believe so.
So Emery,, a bipartisan poll says the LIBS are dirty.
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2020/12/08/poll-47-americans-believe-it-is-likely-democrats-stole-votes-destroyed-trump-ballots/
“A significant portion of Americans believe it is “likely” that Democrats stole votes or destroyed ballots intended for President Donald Trump to “ensure that [former Vice President Joe] Biden would win,” a Rasmussen Reports survey released Monday found.
They were virtually split, with 49 percent saying it is either “not very” or “not at all” likely. However, 47 percent expressed the belief that it was “very” or “somewhat” likely. The two groups are within the +/- 3 percent margin of error, indicating a statistical tie. Four percent remain unsure.
Three-quarters of Republicans believe it is likely that Democrats either stole votes or destroyed Trump ballots to assist Biden, compared to 25 percent of Democrats who feel the same way.”
LikeLike
You can get a three pack of ballots on Amazon for $14.99
LikeLike
“breitbart is moderately reputable.” that has got to be the joke of the day..
In other news the SCOTUS has rejected without comment the GOP’s frivolous lawsuit seeking to reverse the Pennsylvania election. Go figure.
classic GOP strategy: using the slogan “stop the steal” when, in fact, that is exactly what trumpler is trying to do. One can always tell what the latest republican scam is by taking notice of what they are accusing their enemies of doing. Classic Karl Rove, attack your opponents from your greatest weakness to deflect attention away from yourselves.
LikeLike
What’s next Barry?
T%hose of you that have dumped bucks to Trump are seeing you money being thrown away. Supreme Court today tossed his losing case:
CNN)The Supreme Court on Tuesday denied a request from Pennsylvania Republicans to block certification of the commonwealth’s election results, delivering a near fatal blow to the GOP’s long-shot bid to invalidate President-elect Joe Biden’s victory.
The Supreme Court’s action is a crushing loss for Trump, who suggested as late as Tuesday that he thought the justices — including three of his nominees — might step in and take his side as he has continually and falsely suggested there was massive voter fraud during the election.
The one-line order was issued with no noted dissents. The court is made up of six conservative justices and three liberals.
Trump appeals to legislatures and Supreme Court in attempt to overturn the election he lost
The justices acted quickly, just after the final brief in the court was filed Tuesday afternoon.
https://www.cnn.com/2020/12/08/politics/supreme-court-pennsylvania-trump-biden/index.html
LikeLike
RxBobby The Proggy Press isn’t called fake news for nothing.
The court system has a “food chain”.
Now what was YOUR position when ALgore was doing the same damned thing?
What did your Queen of the DAMNED say what Biden should do if HE was the one behind in the votes? HummmmMMM?????
Trump is only following Proggy advice. Deal with it.
LikeLike
CNNLOL Emery?,,, Really? No comment to your beloved POLL outfit? Most of the nation believe the election was RIGGED.
Your Rasmussen says so.
LikeLike
rxc 249pm
“”breitbart is moderately reputable.” that has got to be the joke of the day..”
No joke… Breitbart, unlike rawstory, doesn’t make stuff up and ignore reality. You don’t like them because of their POV, not their accuracy or honesty.
LikeLike
Posted by: Bill Tozer | 08 December 2020 at 02:33 PM
You can get a three pack of ballots on Amazon for $14.99
How many in each pack? Cuz I wants to dooze lots o votin next we has a lection.
PS – Walt was right….the article he linked to sounded just like you!
LikeLike
Posted by: RXCross | 08 December 2020 at 02:49 PM
I never tire of your thoughtful and incisive commentary.
/tard
LikeLike
Bar, you’re the lawyer, you tell me.
Where is the federal hook that would make this a case that SCOTUS would bother to look at?
All I see is a bunch of state related stuff that Texas is whining about.
LikeLike
WalDoH!is bad at math.
The Biden/Trump votes were split about the same way as the poll numbers believing the election was rigged.
To splain it so you can understand it, A minority of people voted for Trump and a minority of people believe the vote was rigged.
So much for your breaking news, Bozo!
LikeLike
Listen Doug. You are the person here making all these prognostications. You said Texas doesn’t have standing to bring this lawsuit. Back it up and tell me why.
LikeLike
LOL!! Douchey picking a legal fight with a lawyer.
Let me guess… You represent yourself in court too…..
LikeLike
Keach @ 1:18 et al- if it helps you understand, by all means continue typing out the 14th Amendment every time you reference it. Equal protection, however, is fairly easy to understand. Texas says its voters are being deprived of their right for their choice to prevail because the defendant states permitted electors to be wrongfully chosen. You can argue all day about that proposition, but you can hardly claim that, if true, it doesn’t deprive Texas citizens of their proper say in the outcome of the election. Hope that saves you some typing next time you don’t understand a constitutional provision.
LikeLike
Sorry Doug, I know thinking is hard…
LikeLike
And what does it say that one in seven democrats also believes the election was rigged for Biden? And that doesn’t, obviously, include the additional one in seven who, disguised as deep state employees, did the actual thieving.
LikeLike
From the complaint Doug
“Through that interest, Plaintiff State suffers an Article III injury when another State violates federal law to affect the outcome of a presidential election.”
LikeLike
L and Barry P
Why do you think Trumps efforts to flip the election have been such a flop in the Courts? Also why don’t have the support of the DOJ or FBI. Any thoughts?
LikeLike
Paul. I do have some thoughts on the matter but I am getting ready to watch a movie with my wife and daughter. I will provide a detailed response tonight at some point. Your question is a very good one.
LikeLike
No rush Barry
Thanks
LikeLike
Texas jumps the first hurdle. SCOTUS didn’t outright dismiss.
The states have till Thurs. to respond,, says SCOTUS.
When states don’t follow their own damned law, it will come back to bite.
LikeLike
Link Walt for 6:03?
LikeLike
Do your own homework Emery. You don’t answer any questions as payment for my work.
If you watched REAL news,, you would have gotten the news.
LikeLike
How soon you Proggys forget. Al Gore took his fight all the way to SCOTUS. Yet you complain when Trump does.
Now how bout those 12 uncounted ballots) just “found” in a drawer?
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/officials-find-12-uncounted-ballots-in-a-drawer-in-race-where-gop-challenger-leads-by-a-dozen-votes
“A New York Supreme Court justice said that election officials have found 12 uncounted ballots in a drawer that could affect a race where the GOP congressional candidate holds a slim 12-vote lead.
“WOW: Justice DelConte casually mentions an additional 12 ballots were found in Chenango County in a drawer last week,” said local CBS reporter Josh Rosenblatt on Twitter. “This is on top of the 55 ballots I reported were found last week, now making it 67 found ballots.””
So LIBS will “keep finding” ballots till they have enough to win.
Just like a few years ago down in our Central Valley.
LikeLike
We should all note that the courts are turning down the fraud filings, not because they give substantive reasons or counter-evidence, but simply on the technicalities involved because they can. And at least half the people in the land know this – and the pressure builds.
LikeLike
George
You say courts turn down fraud filings “simply on the technicalities “.
Where do you get that information? The appeal to the supreme court was simply turned down with no details expressed. Here is their total statement:
“TUESDAY, DECEMBER 8, 2020ORDER IN PENDING CASE 20 A98 KELLY, MIKE, ET AL. V. PENNSYLVANIA, ET AL.The application for injunctive relief presented to Justice Alito and by him referred to the Court is denied.”
So where do you get the idea it was turned down because of “technicalities” when there are no details cited?
https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/120820zr_bq7d.pdf
LikeLike
The real game is in play oh great pony tail of ignorance , SCOTUS has given the 4 states sued by Texas a Thursday deadline to respond.
😉
LikeLike
Lar, sorry, equal protection won’t fly. Some states gerrymander differently – it’s a state issue.
But according to you, SCOTUS should invalidate those votes.
States have different requirements for how to vote: days, hours, numbers of voting locations – state’s rights again.
Sorry Lar, you are all washed up.
LikeLike
Don…. Come’on man!!!,, Emery needs a LINK! He can’t do his own look’n.
His hero Gore got shot down through the court system as well to get to SCOTUS.. (just to get shot down.)
Funny,, Emery won’t even acknowledge the games of Gore.
Poor Emery.. Trump is only following The Queen of the DAMNED playbook.
Remember Emery? Puglosi wanted Biden to “never coincide” if he was behind.. so what’s the issue Emery? LIBs sure seem they have something to hide. Plenty of canned excuses in play, No names to the conspirators in that video. Are Ballots always stashed under a table? Stored in drawers and forgotten about? Delivered in the dead of night when the doors are closed? Oh.. And “lost” memory sticks… That turn up when the count ain’t in Biden’s favor.
Still waiting for your factual proof of “no voter fraud”.
Your the one who kept saying it doesn’t exist.
Yet a good portion of the nation say otherwise.
So tell us just how your all for “free and fair” elections.
Our state Dept would never buy this election if it were in Venezuela or Cuba.
Funny,, it was vote in person in Iraq and get a purple finger to show you voted.. But not here…. WHY EMERY WHY?????
LikeLike
D- needs to present his law degree. You get it from a Lucky Charms box or Fruit Loops?
LikeLike
OK D-,, care to give us a list of which states the Constitution is just a set of guidelines? To be ignored at will?
I guess you missed the part where SCOTUS didn’t kick it to the curb outright.
Seems you never get tired of being wrong.
LikeLike
As far as the FBI and the DOJ go, typically they’re not gonna say anything while they’re investigating. So Bill Barr saying to date they haven’t seen anything really isn’t a big deal, because to date so far no widespread fraud enough to change the election. And frankly, no Trump supporter is gonna trust the FBI or the DOJ as far as they can throw them at this point after the last four years of Russia bullshit.
As far as the cases before the court, there are a lot of them. I think like 53. You have to understand that standing in these cases can be very difficult. I’m not a constitutional expert by any stretch of the imagination but I do know that obtaining standing on some of these cases related to elections is very difficult if you’re not the candidate. And Trump I think only brought like four cases or three. You can’t go to court in any case unless you have standing. Even if you can hurtle the standing issue, now you’re trying to get into factual discrepancies in a very short timeframe. In the civil cases that I try, I have over a year to develop the facts. These people are trying to develop facts in three weeks. The best bet is to have standing and argue that the constitution was violated as a matter of law by these swing states. And that’s what the Texas case is trying to do.
My wife and I have talked about this quite a bit over the last month. What we’ve kind of come up with and what we think is going to happen is as follows.
I think the supreme courts going to hear the Texas versus Pennsylvania case. I think they’re going to find that Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Georgia, and Michigan all had significant problems with their election with fraud and with lack of ballot security. If Texas has standing which is a decent if, I think they’re going to find that in these same states members of the executive branch of government infringed on the legislative plenary power granted to the legislators by the constitution in choosing the electors for president. I don’t think the Supreme Court is going to dictate who won. I don’t think that’s a remedy that the Supreme Court can fashion under the Constitution nor should it. I think the Supreme Court, if they even hear this case, will throw it back to the state legislatures for them to figure it out under article 2 of the constitution. Article 2 of the constitution grants this plenary power to the state legislatures. There are supreme court cases that state that the state legislatures can take back the power at any moment prior to the inauguration of the president even if they had delegated their article 2 authority to the people of their state. The constitution already provides the solution to this issue. Either the state legislatures can choose to exercise their plenary power or they choose not to. And that’s where the rubber meets the road.
LikeLike
Thanks Barry for your thoughtful response. I’ll have some ideas to toss back to you but not tonight.
LikeLike
Doug. Comparing the election to gerrymandering is just weird. Each state can have different election laws so long as they don’t violate the constitution. The Constitution is the supreme law of the land to which nothing can be added or subtracted without an amendment to the same. That said, an executive branch must follow the laws enacted by the state legislature in choosing electors for the president. The plenary power to elect electors who will intern vote for the President of the United States is granted to the state legislatures under article 2 of the constitution. The executive branch in the state cannot usurped this grant of power from the legislatures by expanding on the laws enacted by these legislatures. And that’s the problem. Who knows how it will turn out but it is a very intriguing and novel constitutional argument. It’s definitely a case of first impression.
LikeLike
Ho Hum
Another Trump loss. This is getting boring. This time it’s the Arizona Supreme court.
“IT IS ORDEREDaffirming the trial court decision and confirming the election of the Biden Electors under A.R.S. § 16-676(B).”
https://www.democracydocket.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/45/2020/11/AscDecisionOrder-3939735-0.pdf
LikeLike
Paul, it is beyond absurd. Neither the Supreme Court nor the Congress is never going to disinfranchise 81 million voters, the all time record. Never. It is OVER. Over. Is this clear yet to you and Pruett? OVER. Joe Biden, President of the USA. The American flag can fly once again.
Gregory Goodknight, as for you, you remain that famous ignoramous after your comment about the “evil genius” AG from Texas. Evil, yes. Genius? Hardly. Guy is under indictment for securities fraud and under FBI investigation for corruption. Yes he is on the make for one of those Trump Pardons. Its so obvious and he totally pnked you. But its not the first time. lol. You are on a total roll this year.
I doubt Yeager ever crashed a tiny little plane due to an obvious vapor lock condition. If he did, he never had to look up what it was afterward. Greg you are just not bright. Nothing wrong with that, you would be in fine company here with Walt and Todd.
Over and Out. For now. Always vigilant of Fascists.
LikeLike
“I think the supreme courts going to hear the Texas versus Pennsylvania case. I think they’re going to find that Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Georgia, and Michigan all had significant problems with their election with fraud and with lack of ballot security. ”
LOL. Good one Barry. You and your new wife aren’t too astute are you?
LikeLike