361 responses to “Sandbox – 6aug19”

1. 

   Todd Juvinall

   11 August 2019

   Gregory, I sent the link to Susan. The woman had glasses and I am not sure about what she looks like.

   LikeLike

2. 

   Bill Tozer

   11 August 2019

   Todd, was it Heidi Hall? She built her resume working for the State of California’s Mean Green Tax Payer Funded Machine. Government worker.
   Remember, the car crusher is a green job (which will save the Planet and make it a safe place) if the car was for Cash for Clunkers.
   —————————
   Well, looks like Jigger is pulling a Ozzie Rock Hunter and is back to stalking Walt with an arrogant swagger and, of course, Todd Derangement Syndrome. Guess that means Sybill is out ammo. or, maybe he/his figured out that the collective sigh he/his heard was a giant sigh of relief from the Democrats that Epstein hanged himself. And to think it had all the markings of the biggest story of the year. One day of dispositions is all it took. Lincoln went to the play…….and a Democrat whacked him.
   ————————
   “sounds like Palooka Emery in Jiggly drag”…..”what are you going to do”?
   I was thinking more like Palooka at Drag Queen Story Hour.

   LikeLike

3. 

   Bill Tozer

   11 August 2019

   Good report, Todd.
   You should not have triggered the fragile one. After they are triggered, they are not responsible for their words, behavior, or actions because you triggered her and thus it’s ALL your fault. Personal responsibility goes out the window. “Because you made me mad, I burned your house down.” Makes sense to them.
   The new acid test is “Did your kid come home from college a nicer person?” Most (the honest ones) are saying their darling sweet offspring went off to college and came home a petty indicative nasty person. No fun to be around.

   LikeLike

4. 

   Don Bessee

   11 August 2019

   The real problem with the talking points for lefties, facts don’t support the hair on fire narrative –
   Breitbart News reported the most recent numbers–those for 2017–on September 26, 2018. Those figures showed that 467 people were killed with “blunt objects (hammers, clubs, etc.),” while 403 were killed with rifles.
   And it must be noted that the category of “rifles” used by the FBI includes bolt action, pump action, single shot, and semi-automatic, as well as those the left describes as “assault weapons.” This means only a percentage of the 403 deaths attributed to “rifles” would have been carried out with an “assault weapon.” So the gap between the number of persons beaten to death with hammers and clubs verses those killed with “assault weapons” would be even greater than the gap between those who died in a hammer/club attack versus those who died being shot with “rifles” of any kind.
   Breitbart News also reported that the 2017 crime figures showed 1,591 people were killed with “knives or cutting instruments” while 403 were killed with “rifles.” This means nearly four times as many people were stabbed to death as were killed with any kind of rifle. (The gap between the number stabbed to death and the number of persons explicitly killed with an “assault weapon” would be even greater.)
   https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/08/11/fbi-more-people-killed-hammers-clubs-rifles-kind/
   😉

   LikeLike

5. 

   Todd Juvinall

   11 August 2019

   Thanks BillT. I sent a link to my report to the President of Stanford. But guess what? He has a hyphenated name! Metrosexual probably. I don’t expect anything.

   LikeLike

6. 

   J. Barron

   11 August 2019

   I sent a link to my report to the President of Stanford.
   Did you tell Marc who you are?

   LikeLike

7. 

   Walt

   11 August 2019

   jigger crawls under his rock, and J. TROLL shows up.
   Yup,, the sock puppet change was way overdue. jigger kept digging after burying itself in that hole.

   LikeLike

8. 

   George Rebane

   11 August 2019

   Jig 843am – It clearly sounds like you’re out of your depth again with those conclusions. Unless you really have point to make that illustrates your understanding of the differences in the applicable utilities of personal medical care and those for assessing aggregate policies for maintaining the republic, there is no profit in this discussion.

   LikeLike

9. 

   Bill Tozer

   11 August 2019

   @1:21
   She will probably get a big “atta girl” from the Dean for giving you the big what for and her prestige among the students and faculty just shot up ten notches. Grievance Studies. Who is the victim today?
   Remember that Mr. U-Lock down at Berkeley smashing heads and ripping faces apart? He was an associate professor at Fresno State or thereabout. The facial recognition boys hunted the guy down and he went to trial for assault. Aggravated assault I believe. Attacking unarmed peaceful folks. Got the charges dismissed, not even charged with a misdemeanor. Think it was reduced to some misdemeanor, but no penalty. Talk about a jury of your peers. The whole place down there is one big jury of your peers.
   Well, she have nice legs? Inquiring minds would like to know.:) She will visit this area again, the Stink-Ass.

   LikeLike

10. 

    Gregory

    11 August 2019

    Todd 121pm
    I can’t imagine a more useless gesture than to sen a link to your informationless screed to the President of Stanfurd (the way my kid spells it) University.

    LikeLike

11. 

    George Rebane

    11 August 2019

    Apologies to Mr Barron for missing his repartees; here’s my make-up.
    Barron 317pm – Yes definitely, Obama was nominated by the Dems ONLY because he was ‘black’ (well, half&half). No white man with his resume would have gotten a second look. And I didn’t vote for him because of that (lack of) record. His color, good looks, and ability to speak well all spoke in his favor as far as I was concerned. But the bottom line is that he was an obvious socialist naif.
    Barron 857pm – You didn’t say anything about Obama’s policy – listing things that were accomplished during his administration is not a policy per se, but could belong to a check list for a number of different policies. As I stated, Trump’s list of accomplishments can be treated equally, save that his actions finally got the nation off the dime and has put up some historical numbers.
    A policy is an overarching statement which gathers or subsumes a coherent set of governance actions (laws, regulations, agreements, diplomatic initiatives, military deployments, submitted budget priorities, lobbying efforts, …). You may be having a problem here similar to your candidates who cannot tell the difference between an objective and the means/steps to achieve that objective. Only the lightly-read will accept shouting into a mic a series of ‘I’m gonnas’ and ‘We’re gonnas’ as statement of a plan.
    Politicians seldom state their plans to achieve their objectives (aka campaign promises) because, even if they had one, they wouldn’t want to show their hand to allow the opposition to prepare its counter.

    LikeLike