337 responses to “Sandbox – 25mar19”

1. 

   Walt

   28 March 2019

   Adam Schiff is all pissed off.
   https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/03/28/adam-schiff-defiant-after-house-intel-republicans-demand-resignation/
   ““My colleagues may think it is okay the president’s son was offered dirt as part of an effort to help Trump,” an agitated Schiff said. “You might think it is okay. I don’t.”
   Well now… What about the “dirt” that Schiff was offered by the “Russians”? Does Adam forget that? It was even RECORDED.
   ” We have photos of Trump and hookers….”
   I guess that don’t count. It’s OK when Russians try and help LIBS.

   LikeLike

2. 

   Ozz

   28 March 2019

   Bill 9:53-
   “The Special Olympics is not a government program.”
   “…the United States Department of Education, in partnership with state Departments of Education and local education authorities, have contracted with Special Olympics to provide critical educational services in schools, supporting the development of children with special needs,”
   “But, that’s not the issue now, is it?” Neither is the 17 million. Trump is making a personal jab out of spite. It’s his third try. Fortunately the Democrats have waylaid his sociopathic efforts.
   -Special Olympic

   LikeLike

3. 

   Walt

   28 March 2019

   Poor OOOzzzz Better change the Depends. You said Trump got no “bounce”. LOL!!! SUCKS TO BE YOU!
   http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/trump_administration/prez_track_mar28
   “The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Thursday shows that 50% of Likely U.S. Voters approve of President Trump’s job performance. Forty-nine percent (49%) disapprove.”
   Emery won’t be happy either.

   LikeLike

4. 

   Walt

   28 March 2019

   Tell the whole story OZZhole.
   “But despite the outrage, the Trump administration is right: the federal government should cut its funding for the Special Olympics.
   Consider the role of the federal government. Everything it funds should have good answers to these questions: What does the program do, and is it absolutely vital to the country? If the answer is that it’s not vital, but it just seems like a nice thing to do, then it’s hard to justify it forcing people to spend their money on something they could voluntarily donate to.
   The Special Olympics does not need federal funding. Thankfully, they do a great job generating revenue on their own. During the 2016 fiscal year, they earned $111.7 million in revenue (with only about $11.5 million, or 10 percent, coming from the federal government) and had $109.9 million in expenses, meaning they had a $1.8 million surplus — plus, $61.3 million in net assets. Corporate sponsorships and direct mail contributions comprised more than 80 percent of its revenue stream, while investments and other fundraising comprised about another 10 percent.”

   LikeLike

5. 

   Ozz

   28 March 2019

   Walt 8:36
   I guess in the same vein, you believe the government should stop contributing to school shooting sports and hunter safety classes (I got my hunter safety training and certificate in 7th grade PE).
   Of course, West Point is an okay way to spend tax dollars – we even give football scholarships over more talented students. I don’t see Trump trying unfund military academies.
   Trump has never hidden his disdain for “inferior” people. He doesn’t like short people. He mocks the physically disabled in public.

   LikeLike

6. 

   scenes

   28 March 2019

   I wouldn’t sweat it Walt, it’s just Trump Whac-A-Mole (Whac-A-Trump?).
   1. Wake up
   2. Browse to ‘progressive’ news aggregator
   3. Find the Trump crime o’ the day (Trump State Department removes LGBTQLMNOP coffee cups from gift shop!!!)
   4. Type it here
   5. Get confused and somewhat peeved response from Orange Hitler followers
   6. go to 2
   You gotta do something to keep going.

   LikeLike

7. 

   George Rebane

   28 March 2019

   scenes 821am – “Perhaps it’s just a natural side effect of a country in it’s dotage. We are feeling around for a new and stable system that resembles the Soviet troika of party/army/KGB.” You have nailed it Mr scenes. Yes, when a country (or any large scale organization) starts to lose it dash and verve, and seeks to just conserve what it thinks it has, then the collectivist worthies ooze (Ozz?) out of the woodwork to put in place guardian institutions (judicial, police) to preserve and redistribute what the formerly bright-eyed and bushy-tailed entrepreneurs and workers have put in place.
   These people are a country’s real stultifiers and stagnators, and their Big Lie has always been to wrap themselves in the ‘progressive’ mantle as if that label actually ever achieved or even denoted existential progress that improved the aggregate quality of life, instead of creating their usual aftermath of equal opportunity despair. Historically, they are the emergent grim reapers of all social orders that have lost the courage to face the risks and responsibilities that grow and advance civilizations.

   LikeLike

8. 

   Paul Emery

   28 March 2019

   Rasmussen is not a credible poll Walt. They were dismally off the mark in the last election predicting the Re- Pubs would carry the House. They lost 40 seats. No credibility.

   LikeLike

9. 

   Paul Emery

   28 March 2019

   George
   Can you refer us RR readers to a half dozen or so contemporary Countries that are following the prescriptions that match your Conservatarian values?

   LikeLike

10. 

    Walt

    28 March 2019

    There there Emery,,, your aged mind forgets that under “O”,, Your side lost MORE. From sea to shining sea.
    But whatever keeps what little hair you have left from falling out…

    LikeLike

11. 

    Todd Juvinall

    28 March 2019

    Dunny how Paul Emery uses the Rasmussen poll when it is showing Trump down and now he says it is not credible. The man is absurd.

    LikeLike

12. 

    Paul Emery

    28 March 2019

    Your changing the topic Walt. I was referring to the last elections and the predictions made by your favorite poll-Rasmussen and how wrong they were.

    LikeLike

13. 

    George Rebane

    28 March 2019

    PaulE 1015am – No.

    LikeLike

14. 

    Todd Juvinall

    28 March 2019

    Now Paul Emery is asking whar other countries are following the conservatarian ideology. I suggest that Paul Emery tell us the countries he thinks are equal or superior to GeorgeR’s views.

    LikeLike

15. 

    Paul Emery

    28 March 2019

    Apparently that’s all countries Todd since George has stated that there are no Countries today following his ideology.
    George let me expand my question to you to include countries from the past that might have followed your Conservatarian values.

    LikeLike

16. 

    George Rebane

    28 March 2019

    PaulE 1003am – You seem to have a very refined if not terminally obtuse sense of ‘poll credibility’. Can you share with us that sense, preferably with accessible metrics, so that we may properly appreciate the high level of confidence you have in certain polls and not in others – a confidence that I’m sure transcends just affinity to certain polls’ results and includes also their longer term performance?

    LikeLike

17. 

    George Rebane

    28 March 2019

    PaulE 1029am – “… that’s all countries”??!! By what measure to you come to such an astounding conclusion (other than not having a clue as to my conservetarian prescriptions for organizing society and governance)?

    LikeLike

18. 

    Walt

    28 March 2019

    Only the polls that say what Paul likes are deemed “credible”.
    Sorry Emery,, your not the “credibility” referee.

    LikeLike

19. 

    Paul Emery

    28 March 2019

    George
    I support consensus polls-usually RCP- that average all the credible polls including Rasmussen. Rasmussen was way out of line in the last election being 9% off the mark with the final results. We’ve been through this before.
    Stay tune folks for the predictable response from Gregory.

    LikeLike

20. 

    Don Bessee

    28 March 2019

    Now that’s rich, the disgraced po’ ol’ fakenewsman who has been consistently wrong for over 2 years has ZERO credibility when it comes to challenging anything’s credibility. LOL
    😉

    LikeLike

21. 

    Paul Emery

    28 March 2019

    George
    I did not express myself clearly in my 1029. Lets try this instead:
    Since George claims there are no countries following his Conservatarian values it is not possible to make a comparison. There is no point of reference without comparable examples which were not provided by George. In fact he states there are none which makes the question moot.
    George
    If you can suggest some historical examples I will be glad to make comparisons.

    LikeLike

22. 

    Walt

    28 March 2019

    LOL!! And just the other day Emery sites Rasmussen.(When the numbers were what “he” liked.) Keep digging Emery. The unicorn is under that pile of 💩 somewhere.

    LikeLike

23. 

    Paul Emery

    28 March 2019

    Don
    You say I have no credibility yet you predicted a red wave in the last election. What happened Don?

    LikeLike

24. 

    Paul Emery

    28 March 2019

    Also Don any credibility you might have had locally disappeared with your active support as the spokesperson for Measure W which of course lost in a landslide in the elections.

    LikeLike

25. 

    Bill Tozer

    28 March 2019

    10:59 am
    Irony alert #1). Yep, it takes some brass balls combined with zero self awareness to talk about credibility….from none other that the totally discredited one. Sure, a blind squirrel finds a nut on occasion, but I got tired of waiting. Incredible.
    ——-
    2) Irony Alert #2)
    “The irony could not be richer. Within days of Mueller’s report exposing the mainstream media as highly paid scandalmongers, a USA Today editor branded The Federalist ‘not reliable.’ And they said we can’t trust Andrew McCathy or National Review either, ROFLMAO
    ———-
    Scenes @9:53 am
    “I wouldn’t sweat it Walt, it’s just Trump Whac-A-Mole (Whac-A-Trump?).
    Score one for Scenes. I rather like the idea. Whack-a-Mole…like Brennan, or Clapper or Susan Rice, or Comey, or The Discredited Popinjay or…….
    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=9P5qytK2x8k
    ———————————————
    Guess budget concerns and spending is back in vogue. One particular talking head Enemy of the People was rather upset that tax payer dollars were spent when Sarah Sanders tweeted out the faces of Peddlers of Fake News 64 bracket, lol. March Madness. Who will make it to the sweet sixteen…er……dirty dozen.
    Have those people have no shame? How can they ever show their faces in public again? Oppps, forgot. No self awareness….or deeply seeded narcissism….or both.

    LikeLike

26. 

    Paul Emery

    28 March 2019

    Bill writes
    ” Within days of Mueller’s report exposing the mainstream media as highly paid scandalmongers”
    Huh??? Do you have access to Muellers Report? What are the facts behind your assertion?

    LikeLike

27. 

    Don Bessee

    28 March 2019

    Been right more than not which is way more than all you lyin’ sacks in the fakenews biz can say. Face it you guzzled the koolaide in 2016 and never looked back. Keep selling it to the trolls who are fellow TDS sufferers. Its a sad show to folks who didn’t drink the koolaide!
    😉

    LikeLike

28. 

    Bill Tozer

    28 March 2019

    Link for Irony Alert #2)
    https://thefederalist.com/2019/03/28/usa-today-blacklists-federalist-crime-getting-trump-russia-story-right/
    You know, if I listened to Dougski, Bobbie Sue, john smith, Swallows, or the AVMan, I would have the sticky brown stuff all over my face as well.

    LikeLike

29. 

    Don Bessee

    28 March 2019

    See anything wrong with this headline?
    https://www.onlineathens.com/nationworld/20190328/only-black-reporters-allowed-in-georgia-mayoral-race-event
    😉

    LikeLike

30. 

    Don Bessee

    28 March 2019

    For the koolaide drinkers –
    https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/03/28/poll-donald-trump-approval-rating-jumps-five-points-after-mueller-verdict/
    😉

    LikeLike

31. 

    Bill Tozer

    28 March 2019

    Daily Quotes :
    For the record: “Keep in mind that Mueller was not simply investigating Trump; he was also investigation the Russian government. He exonerated Trump but not Vladimir Putin. Mueller indicted 13 Russian nationals and three Russian companies on charges of conspiracy and identity theft. There was a conspiracy to influence the 2016 elections. Trump just wasn’t a part of it.” —Marc A. Thiessen
    Notice a pattern here? “Democrats in 2015: Everyone must accept results of the election. Democrats day after the election 2016: We do not accept the results of the election. Democrats 2017: Everyone must accept findings of the Mueller report. Democrats 2019: We do not accept findings of Mueller report.” —Charlie Kirk
    Observations: “There are many things Democrats do not do well. But the thing they do least well is lose.” —Star Parker
    Demo-gogues: “I opposed Clarence Thomas’ nomination. I voted against him. But I also realized there was a real and perceived problem the committee faced. There were a bunch of white guys. … So when Anita Hill … came to testify, she faced a committee that didn’t fully understand what the hell it was all about. To this day I regret I couldn’t come up with a way to get her the kind of hearing she deserved.” —Joe Biden
    Braying Jenny: “I, firmly, believe that the House Committee on Judiciary should seek out whether President Trump has committed ‘High crimes and Misdemeanors’ as designated by the U.S. Constitution and if the facts support those findings, that Congress begin impeachment proceedings.” —Rep. Rashida Tlaib
    Non sequitur: “We’ve got to do away with the Electoral College. We have a system now that was — it’s a defect in our democracy.” —Eric Holder (Actually, the Electoral College is meant to correct a defect prevalent in pure democracies.)
    Non Compos Mentis: “We may never really know what happened on the street that night in Chicago.” —CNN’s Brian Stelter regarding Jussie Smollett (On the contrary, we know exactly what happened.)
    And last… “Imagine if a white male actor faked a hate crime against himself by pretending black men attacked him in the middle of the night — then was subsequently acquitted of all charges. #JussieSmollett is an utter perversion of justice who just DESTROYED the myth of white privilege.” —Candace Owens
    Bonus:
    “Not everyone was happy that the clock received this recognition. Some reporters, who wish to remain anonymous, say the clock sets an unrealistic standard for news accuracy.”
    https://babylonbee.com/news/stopped-clock-named-cnns-most-accurate-reporter?%3Futm_source=facebook&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=benshapiro

    LikeLike

32. 

    Todd Juvinall

    28 March 2019

    It appears that the Mueller report exonerates Trump and it says NO Americans colluded. The summary is accurate and Bill Barr, the most trusted man in the country did the summary. We have the faith in the people that tell the truth. That is not afforded to the lamestream media purveyors of fake news. Even the local KNVR is fake news.

    LikeLike

33. 

    Don Bessee

    28 March 2019

    It now very clear that team 0 hates America –
    I hear these things about ‘let’s make America great again’ and I think to myself, exactly ‘when did you think America was great’?
    — Former Attorney General Eric Holder on MSNBC’s “The Beat with Ari Melber”
    https://www.foxnews.com/politics/eric-holder-when-did-you-think-america-was-great
    😉

    LikeLike

34. 

    Ozz

    28 March 2019

    Todd 12:13-
    “It appears that the Mueller report exonerates Trump”
    It appears that you are full of shit.
    “…the Special Counsel’s report states that “while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.””

    LikeLike

35. 

    Bill Tozer

    28 March 2019

    Todd @ 12:53 pm
    Yep, they are all reading from the same e-mail script. The talking points have been sent out. Just listened to another montage of the FakesNews saying, “No exoneration , no exoneration, no exoneration, no exoneration., no….”. Wow. They stop there at ‘no exoneration’ and not read to the viewer the next paragraph, lol. They are setting themselves up for a fall. Oh, let the children have their fun. Like Zucker just said, “It’s not the journalists’ job to investigate, ROFLMAO. . At least they are literally all on the same page. Second verse same as the first. Patience grasshoppers, patience. I love how they get their hopes sky high thinking they be experts….then the deflation. Wily E Coyote falling from the ledge to the desert floor with the puff of dust.
    —————————————————————-
    Boy, Carl Bernstein was once young, but it’s sad to see him turn into a bloated drunk hacking up loogies on himself. Sad like what has become of John Lewis. Oh well.
    Glad to see Carl make the list.
    Carl Bernstein / Jim Sciutto (CNN)
    Bernstein and Sciutto reported in August 2018 that Michael Cohen was prepared to tell Congress that Trump knew about his son meeting with Russians in Trump Tower before the meeting occurred.
    The story flew in the face of Cohen’s prior testimony that he did not know about the meeting in advance. Cohen’s attorney at the time, Lanny Davis, later said that he was a source for CNN’s story and made a mistake by claiming Cohen had any information regarding the Trump Tower meeting.
    CNN has refused to retract the story
    https://dailycaller.com/2019/03/27/reporters-pundits-list-russian-collusion/
    https://thefederalist.com/2019/03/27/61-hacks-peddled-russian-collusion-never-trusted/

    LikeLike

36. 

    Don Bessee

    28 March 2019

    The fix is in –
    Marlow and Cernovich also discussed how the mainstream media holds the right, including non-journalists, to standards far higher than what they hold themselves to.
    “Here’s a great example,” said Cernovich. “Mehdi Hasan, who’s big at Al Jazeera — which is owned by Qatar — and [who’s] now a CNN golden child … He goes around [saying] everybody’s a bigot, everybody’s a homophobe … This guy’s said some really bad stuff, way worse than Tucker Carlson, way worse than anything conservative media personalities say.”
    Footage recently surfaced of Hasan, who regularly appears on mainstream media channels, comparing non-Muslims to animals, atheists to “cattle,” and gays to sexual deviants and pedophiles.
    “The media’s not going to bring that up every time they talk about him” explained Cernovich. “They’re not going to say ‘Mehdi Hasan, comma, who works for a Qatari propaganda outlet and also compared people to animals, comma, said the following…’”
    “They’ll just treat him as a straight-laced journalist, and pretend as if all of this stuff that he’s said, the fact that he works for state-owned media is not relevant at all.”
    https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2019/03/28/mike-cernovich-there-is-a-new-hoax-every-day-with-corporate-media/
    😉

    LikeLike

37. 

    Paul Emery

    28 March 2019

    Todd
    read this from Barrs report 10 times then explain to us what it means.
    ” “while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.”

    LikeLike

38. 

    Paul Emery

    28 March 2019

    From Fox News:
    “Shep Smith refuses to fall for GOP whitewash on Mueller report: ‘They want us to think this is over — it is not
    Smith pointed out that Attorney General William Barr has only provided Congress with a four-page summary of the report, which is said to be more than 300 pages.
    “They want us to think this is over. It is not,” the Fox News host said. “We still have not seen the Mueller report and have only a four-page summary from the attorney general.”
    Watch the video below from Fox News.
    https://www.rawstory.com/2019/03/shep-smith-refuses-fall-gop-whitewash-mueller-report-want-us-think-not/

    LikeLike

39. 

    George Rebane

    28 March 2019

    PaulE 1056am – Paul, I believe that even if there are none makes the question anything but moot. I respond more fully here –
    https://rebaneruminations.typepad.com/rebanes_ruminations/2019/03/responding-to-the-staid-and-fearful.html

    LikeLike

40. 

    Don Bessee

    28 March 2019

    China blinks in the wake of the Muller report and today offers major new concessions unlike anything offered previously was just NEWS Flashed on the business channel. SWEEET!
    😉

    LikeLike

41. 

    Don Bessee

    28 March 2019

    @1252 oh great pony tail of ignorance. It means no crime and prosecutors are not in the business of exonerating since you continue to be confused on all things that are clear. Keep clinging to the nevertrumpers you all still are covered in rancid Russian dressing. LOL
    😉

    LikeLike

42. 

    Don Bessee

    28 March 2019

    We can do this to the local po’ ol’ fakenewsman too!
    Trump allies see Barr’s letter as a kind of Swiss Army knife—a tool useful in all kinds of situations. Not only is it exculpatory, they say, but it also implicitly rebukes the press for its coverage of the Russia investigation, inoculating Trump from any future scandal that reporters might unearth. According to a source familiar with internal discussions at the Republican National Committee and the pro-Trump super PAC America First, both organizations are “geared up for any nonsense to come.”
    They’re already prepared to attack reporters. “Any reporter who tries that will be hit with 30-second spots of all their ridiculous claims about collusion,” said the source, who, like others interviewed for this story, requested anonymity to describe private conversations. “Their tweets have all been screencapped. It’s all ready to go.”
    https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2019/03/trump-wants-campaign-mueller-report-2020/585967/
    😉

    LikeLike

43. 

    Todd Juvinall

    28 March 2019

    Ozz | 28 March 2019 at 12:30 PM
    Sorry you are parsing. That is on the issue of “obstruction” and Barr and Rosenstein then actually did exonerate Trump. So once again you libs are making fake news.

    LikeLike

44. 

    Todd Juvinall

    28 March 2019

    Here is the link to the full document and you read page four OOZE, I expect yuopu to disrobe, take a willow switch and beat yourself about the back and face. You are a moron and you and Paul Emery are birds of a feather.
    https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/03/24/us/politics/barr-letter-mueller-report.html

    LikeLike

45. 

    Bill Tozer

    28 March 2019

    For those who can’t get behind NYT paywall, Page 3 (and 4) of the report is of the topic of discussion: The never ending story of “exoneration. Read the paragraphs after “exoneration” on Page 3.
    https://assets.bwbx.io/documents/users/iqjWHBFdfxIU/r.njjovzDF.E/v0
    Barr did a decent job of summarizing Meuller’s Report. The report itself should contain its own few page summary when released.
    Mueller obviously looked at legal requirements that Barr (along with Rosenstein and the Office Legal Counsel) looked at and all conducted that the Trump did not committ a crime…or for those who want Trump guilty, they all concluded that they could not reach the threshold of burden of proof….or, if you will, the preponderance of evidence. As Comey would say, “No reasonable procesutor would try this case.”
    Mueller consulted the Office of Legal Counsel himself while writing the report. The guideline he is under is the same for anyone in the DOJ: you cannot procesutor someone for a crime you cannot prove, nor can you prosecute a case you cannot win.
    So Mueller kicked the Obstruction of Justice case back to the AG. Wisely, Barr and Rosenstein and the Office of Legal Counsel all sat down together, went over the evidence, and said we cannot prosecute this based on the evidence and threshold. No crime, regardless of whether they cannot indict a sitting POTUS.
    So, we have in the public’s view Barr(R), Rosenstein (Trump hater), and the Office of Legal Counsel (Bureaucracy) all agreeing. Seems fair and balanced and consistent with Mueller’s conclusion of no crime committed. .
    Bottomline: Mueller wrote a report for the impeachment question, not for the legal question. Otherwise he would have pursued the legal avenue and would have lost.

    LikeLike

46. 

    Bill Tozer

    28 March 2019

    Oh my. Rand Paul said he would and he done did. Makes sense. If we are going to appoint a Special Counsel to spend two years looking into Russian Collusion with the Trump Campaign, we must look into what launched the Special Counsel in the first place.
    “Under Senate rules, any one senator can request that any bill or resolution be passed. But because it requires the sign-off of every senator, any one senator can also block their request.”
    I don’t care whether it’s a Democrat president or a Republican president, we should not waste the time of the entire country sending spies into campaigns, making false accusations and tying the country in knots for two years,” Paul said from the Senate floor on Thursday.
    “We will agree to see the Mueller report as long as the other side will agree to show us the communications that took place in deciding to promote this fake allegation against the president and whether there was misuse of their office,” he continued. “We based this investigation on a lie, we should investigate who the liars were.”
    https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/436293-rand-paul-blocks-resolution-calling-for-mueller-report-release
    Agreed. Let’s find out who the liars were.

    LikeLike

47. 

    Don Bessee

    28 March 2019

    It looks like a trend where the leftie shows are loosing a third of their viewers, could those be the coveted middle of the road folks who have waked away in disgust?
    Ratings for the FOX drama Empire crashed to an all-time low on Wednesday following the abrupt decision by the Cook County prosecutor to drop all charges against the show’s embattled star Jussie Smollett.
    According to TVLine, Wednesday night’s episode of Empire dropped to 3.97 million viewers. This all-time low follows last week’s low performance of only 4 million total viewers.
    The ratings for the Fox drama have been in a free fall since Smollett allegedly planned a hoax attack against himself. Two weeks ago, the show’s fifth season debut episode dropped 35 percent in the ratings compared to last year.
    https://www.breitbart.com/entertainment/2019/03/28/empire-ratings-crash-to-all-time-low-after-jussie-smollett-charges-dropped/
    😉

    LikeLike

48. 

    Don Bessee

    28 March 2019

    While Soros and 0 can manipulate the Cook County prosecutor there are other departments that are not under Soros’s thumb and then there is the FBI investigations.
    According to the city law department, the city of Chicago is seeking “immediate payment” of the $130,000 “expended on overtime hours in the investigation of this matter,” adding that if the amount is not paid within 7 days the “Department of Law may prosecute” Smollett “for making a false statement to the City” or “pursue any other legal remedy available at law.”
    https://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/jussie-smollets-attorney-demands-apology-from-mayor-police-chief-jussie-has-paid-enough
    😉

    LikeLike

49. 

    Don Bessee

    28 March 2019

    The fakenewsmen in the wake of the Muller disaster are starting to turn on each other –
    Celebrity attorney Mark Geragos raged against CNN and threatened to tell all after the network dropped him in light of his alleged involvement in the Nike extortion plot.
    https://nypost.com/2019/03/28/celebrity-attorney-mark-geragos-slams-cnn-over-extortion-plot-report/
    😉

    LikeLike

50. 

    Ozz

    28 March 2019

    Walt 8:36
    “But despite the outrage, the Trump administration is right: the federal government should cut its funding for the Special Olympics.”
    It seems that Trump is the one who is (supposedly) outraged now. You going to do another flip flop Walt?

    LikeLike