Rebane's Ruminations
October 2017
S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031  

ARCHIVES


OUR LINKS


YubaNet
White House Blog
Watts Up With That?
The Union
Sierra Thread
RL “Bob” Crabb
Barry Pruett Blog

George Rebane

[This is the addended transcript of my regular KVMR commentary broadcast on 25 October 2017.  A slightly edited version of this appeared as an op-ed in the 4nov17 Union (here). gjr]

In these commentaries we have chronicled the long decline of America’s K-12 education, a decline that has now been joined by our very politicized higher education system.  The race toward the bottom continues, and is very apparent from the aggregate performance of our local public schools.  Today we have major news outlets confirming that “Internationally, US Students are Failing”, prominent technocrats like Bill Gates tell all that “schools are failing America’s kids”, and the government’s own National Center for Educational Statistics states flatly that “everything is just going down.”

Where America is most in trouble is in the critical science, technology, engineering, and math, or STEM, subjects which provide students the necessary expertise to ultimately enter the workforce into careers ranging from researcher, through electrician and carpenter, to assembler in our new roboticized factories.  The underlying rot in the system exists at several levels, but today I want to highlight some new and unbelievable insanity from our universities that recently came to my attention.  But first, let’s review some background that provides context and perspective for what you are about to hear.

When all is said and done, America has been the world’s leading high-tech nation, providing our citizens an enviable quality of life through our ability to develop, consume, and export products, all of which depend on a constant stream of advances in STEM.  In recent years other developed nations have been catching up and even surpassing us in certain fields, while our schools have “stagnated” and are now “just going down”.  Internationally, American students are “outperformed by their counterparts in 36 countries in math; 18 countries in science, and 14 countries in reading.”  In all categories we rank below developed country averages.  Some startling statistics include 30% of military applicants failing their entrance exams because of poor STEM preparation, and that 2/3 of our 8th graders already perform below grade level in math.

The language basic to all fields of science, technology, and engineering is mathematics.  And while education at all levels has come under attack by ideologues with agendas that have successfully already politicized almost every subject taught in schools, in recent years these have come to include classes in engineering and the sciences.  Mathematics has remained the last redoubt – untainted, until now.  Today math instruction is also under assault by academics from university schools of education seeking to de-emphasize and dumb down the subject in order to provide social justice for some minorities and students in general who, for a variety of reasons, have difficulty with math.  To put a face on it, let’s take a look at an academic who is a prominent leader of this destructive assault.


Gutierrez_RochelleProfessor Rochelle Gutierrez (pictured here) at the University of Illinois School of Education is a Latina educator with a resume as long as your arm, albeit one which gives no evidence that she understands, let alone claims proficiency in mathematics.  Yet she is on a tear with her publications, presented papers, and speeches decrying today’s already deficient math instruction as being racist, and part of a continuing conspiracy to promote white supremacy to the detriment of the nation’s Hispanic and black students with a lamentable record in scholastics overall, and especially in mathematics.

Time prevents my citing the numerous atrocious claims about math education made by Dr Gutierrez, so let me leave you with just a couple.  She says, “mathematics itself operates as Whiteness” because whites get credit for developing mathematics, are more capable in math, and form the bigger part of the math community.  And that “the importance of math skills in the real world also places what she calls an ‘unearned privilege’ for those who are good at it.”  Most importantly, “minorities have experienced microaggressions from participating in math classrooms… (where people are) judged by whether they can reason abstractly.”

And her solution? it is to revamp the teaching of mathematics by evicting its overwhelming European heritage, and present it with “a sense of political knowledge for teaching.”  Because “all knowledge is relative and ‘things cannot be known objectively; they must be known subjectively.’”  Really?

My name is Rebane, and I also expand on this and related themes on Rebane’s Ruminations where the addended transcript of this commentary is expanded and posted with relevant links, and where such issues are debated extensively.  However, my views are not necessarily shared by KVMR.  Thank you for listening.

[Addendum]  Let me continue reporting Dr Gutierrez’s assault by first sharing some of her more remarkable and preposterous tenets about the subject at hand.  She believes “algebra and geometry perpetuate white privilege because Greek terms give Caucasians unearned credit for the subject. … (and) evaluations for math proficiency perpetuate discrimination against minority students if they perform poorly.”  In the end she asks, “Are we really that smart just because we do mathematics?”

What the education professor totally misses is the key teaching of Sapir-Whorf (q.v.) that a person’s available thoughts are circumscribed by the language(s) he knows.  This does not also imply that simply because you know a specific language, you can then think all thoughts that that language supports – that takes another dimension of cognition/intellect.  It does mean, however, that if none of your languages support a given thought or domain of thought, those thoughts are not accessible to you as you go about your daily round, reason about your experiences, and otherwise interrogate and/or expand your ontology.

The closest the good professor comes to such notions is in the enigmatic and potentially disputable tagline that decorates her website – “We act ourselves into new ways of thinking, not the reverse.”

Mathematics is possibly the most profound, dynamic, and powerful language (lingua franca) that Man has developed, and which continues to expand for its own sake as a discipline of intellectual beauty, but most importantly as an empirical tool that allows us to understand, explain, and utilize the universe in which we find ourselves.  It has become the bedrock foundation of all domains of human knowledge; things become universally useful when they can finally be expressed as and manipulated in terms of mathematical forms – in short, things then become computable.

Those who have acquired some useful body of mathematical language (knowledge) can not only think thoughts that the pre/sans-math people cannot, but they also know and can readily demonstrate for themselves and other mathematically versed people that this indeed is the case.  It is like the proverbial Eskimo, studying a bleak frozen field of sea ice, who sees a wealth of detail in the broken and piled crags, to which I, looking at the same scene, am blind.  Why? Because his language is rich in labels for the different types of ice, their piled configurations, the processes that generated them, their likely future evolution, … , and it permits their recall and manipulation to support planning and control.

And considering evolution into possible futures, mathematics is the only language which opens up new domains of knowledge, and even allows us to precisely predict what will most likely happen by ‘simply’ manipulating symbols of its syntax and grammar with a pencil on a blank sheet of paper.  None of this is possible for persons who can claim no mathematical accomplishments.  As the era of super-intelligent machines approaches, those who cannot even traverse the foothills of the magnificent mathematical mountain range, will also not be able to understand the important workings of their environment, the society which surrounds them, and the issues that face us as a planet, a nation, or even our local community.

Finally, mathematics is a cosmic language.  It is the same for the sapients who live in a galaxy a billion light-years distant as it is for us.  Mathematics is not dependent on the race, or culture, or ethnicity, (remember Jaime Escalante?) or sexual orientation, or … of the sorry little species of H. Sapiens that has crawled out of the muck of this obscure planet.  Mathematics is already out there; it came into being in the first explosion that coagulated into our marvelous expanding universe.  But looking inward, from here on, mathematics education has become fundamental for an informed citizenry, and doubly so for people who want to become smart enough to remain free, at least free enough to keep reaching for the stars.

Coda:  It is not a far-fetched future in which, due to the power of ideas it grants receptive minds, mathematics may someday become a tightly state-regulated discipline approved for study only to those of a suitable political pedigree.  For more reading about the Ilk of Gutierrez – their ideas and current initiatives – here are some links that will get you started. 

Posted in , , , ,

12 responses to “Introducing Politically Correct Mathematics”

  1. fish Avatar
    fish

    Finally, mathematics is a cosmic language. It is the same for the sapients who live in a galaxy a billion light-years distant as it is for us. Mathematics is not dependent on the race, or culture, or ethnicity, (remember Jaime Escalante?) or sexual orientation, or … of the sorry little species of H. Sapiens that has crawled out of the muck of this obscure planet. Mathematics is already out there; it came into being in the first explosion that coagulated into our marvelous expanding universe.

    I had half hoped that the “Eye of the Anointed” would recognize this and continue to politicize other areas of study! Guess not!
    ….stay tuned for a large flap and squawk for the “Largest Little Virtue Signaler in Nevada County”…..it’s coming up after Game 2 of the World Series!

    Like

  2. Scott Obermuller Avatar

    Because “all knowledge is relative and ‘things cannot be known objectively; they must be known subjectively.’”
    Yep – 2 plus 2 is only 4 if you are a racist. Woke people know it can be several different things. Say – can I remind her of this when she wants a raise?
    I told you the left is insane. Maybe not every single one, but the rest are enablers.
    Has she explained as to how non-whites are currently besting the whites world wide in math?

    Like

  3. fish Avatar
    fish

    Posted by: Scott Obermuller | 25 October 2017 at 05:16 PM
    ‘things cannot be known objectively; they must be known subjectively.’

    Another trite slogan suitable for bold font on her departments website!

    Like

  4. Bonnie McGuire Avatar

    Sorry, but those who keep harping about racism are racists. Tunnel vision.

    Like

  5. Gregory Avatar
    Gregory

    For years I’ve been corresponding with Wayne Bishop, a math professor emeritus from CSU Los Angeles who was introduced by Jaime Escalante to attendees of the premiere of “Stand and Deliver” as “my math teeecher”… Wayne was an honored guest of Escalante’s.
    Wayne and I have been labeled as the Syphilis and Gonorrhea of math education by a Math Ed “expert” of the NCTM, but I’m not sure if I am the Syphilis. He is the Walrus. Goo goo goo joob.
    Yes, it is true that in mathematics, one is judged by how well you reason abstractly. Just as Musicians are judged by the quality of their music. Ms.Gutierrez has no math background to speak of (a BA in biology has minimal math content) but the ability to “do math” is not a hindrance to reach the pinnacles of math education in the US. After all, Jo Boaler of Stanford has no math degrees but she’s a rock star in Math Ed now, and Phil Daro was hired to WRITE the Common Core math standards despite his only degree being a BA in English.
    The world has become as queer as a clockwork orange.

    Like

  6. Russ Avatar

    First Math and Now All Science
    A feminist professor at the University of California-Davis has vowed to “challenge the authority of Science” by “rewriting knowledge” through a feminist lens.
    Sara Giordano argues that “traditional science” relies on “a colonial and racialized form of power,” and must be replaced with an “anti-science, antiracist, feminist approach to knowledge production.”
    https://www.campusreform.org/?ID=10021

    Like

  7. fish Avatar
    fish

    Posted by: Russ | 26 October 2017 at 06:41 AM
    I hear she’ll be collaborating with professors Dunning and Kruger.

    Like

  8. fish Avatar
    fish

    …..Why am I not surprised?
    https://giordanosara.files.wordpress.com/2015/07/imag2844.jpg
    ….straight….(wait can I say that?)…from Central Casting!

    Like

  9. Scott Obermuller Avatar

    ‘Further, she concludes by expressing hope that people will soon come to “embrace an irreverent disdain for traditional science and instead practice feminist science,” adding that this is time for a “much needed anti-science, antiracist, feminist approach to knowledge production.”’
    Ooooh – I can hardly wait for actual examples of feminist science.
    They will, of course, be anti-science.
    Who hires these quacks?

    Like

  10. Bill Tozer Avatar
    Bill Tozer

    @ 7:38 AM
    Straight from Central Casting: Biologly is sexist in and off itself. DNA research is not science, it’s colonialism. 2 plus 2 equals male privilege. Well, if science says every cell contained within Sara Giordano’s body is male, the solution is simple: Science must become anti-science and knowledge must be rewritten.
    Sorry, Sara. You were born male without a uterus or womb and have never menstruated and never will. Plus, you were born with a stem on the apple. So, yeah, from your perspective, science MUST be rewritten, you freak of nature.
    Sara looks exactly like my friend’s son who is attending a college in Seattle. Spitting image. A very handsome young man of Phillpino decent. Everytime my friend posts a pic of his son, everybody comments how handsome he is.
    The young man’s grandmother read to me word for word one paragraph out of her grandson’s textbook has he was visiting and studying for a test. She called and read the paragraph to me twice. Made her more concerned that upset. The chapter listed the general attributes to what is known as “human thought” as opposed to the rest of the Animal Kingdom. In the paragraph was tucked away a neat sentence that said “Repubcans are sub-human”, then continued on with the categories of human thought and philosophies. Hmmm.
    So yeah, if the good professor thinks science is grounded in Male Chauvinistic Pig Conquest, by all mean cut off her dong. I will even send her a knife. |

    Like

  11. fish Avatar
    fish

    Posted by: Scott Obermuller | 26 October 2017 at 08:22 AM
    Who hires these quacks?

    Fellow quacks! All backed up by the most useless creature living on this ball of dirt……the university president.

    Like

  12. Scott Obermuller Avatar

    I had thought perhaps Mr Boardman would chime in as he seems to consider himself quite the expert on the subject. This new kind of math and science seems to be quite the thing these days. All of us grumpy old conservatives just don’t dig the new way!
    Mayhaps Mr Boardman could give examples of this new high tech? He seems to be jiggy with it. Mr Boardman?

    Like

Leave a comment