Rebane's Ruminations
December 2016
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

ARCHIVES


OUR LINKS


YubaNet
White House Blog
Watts Up With That?
The Union
Sierra Thread
RL “Bob” Crabb
Barry Pruett Blog

Feedback is the virtue that turns democracy with all its vices, into the least-worst political system.  (And) feedback is turning the incalculable Trump into a tractable, potentially successful president.  Holman W. Jenkins Jr.

George Rebane

The latest Muslim terrorist attacks in European cities continue to change the cultural landscape of western civilization.  Ground level attacks in public spaces by fellow pedestrians or vehicular terrorists are becoming the new norm for Islamists.  Western governments, including our own, have not made much progress in preventing such attacks or limiting their carnage after the attack is launched.  During our tour of several central European cities last May we saw that ‘best practices’ still consisted of police and militia with submachine guns patrolling amongst the civilians on streets, squares, and parks popular with both tourists and local citizenry (pictured below).  From a technical and economic standpoint, that kind of a solution is both very expensive and demonstrably ineffective.

PragueSecurity2016

It seems to me that today’s technology offers a better way to perform large area surveillance and terror suppression in urban areas.  To outline the concept for such a Large Area Surveillance and Suppression (LASS) system, think of the thousands of security cameras which already record our every movement once we leave our homes.  A better surveillance network of remotely directed cameras with appropriate optics (e.g. including night vision) and co-axial infrared laser designators can be mounted on appropriate rooftops surrounding the defended public space.  These cameras are remoted to central command and control centers in the city.  Their image outputs are monitored there both manually and by AI algorithms trained to do certain kinds of detection, classification, and tracking of both individuals and vehicles.  When a potentially threatening pedestrian becomes a ‘person of interest’ he is designated with the IR laser and tracked until his behavior either lowers his threat level or until he is neutralized.

The networked surveillance subsystem is integrated with a neutralization subsystem that consists of multiple weapon stations which can project both deadly and disabling force.  Among the inventory of such stations would be remotely operated sniper rifles, 20mm cannon (to rapidly disable rogue vehicles), and various kinds of non-lethal projectiles, riot gases, and visibility denying smoke.  These remotely operated LASS weapon stations would be located so that their overlapping fields of fire completely cover the defended area.  LASS would, of course, be integrated and coordinated with existing ground level patrols which are then comprised of much lower staffing levels, and rely on mobile fast response units (e.g. SWAT and EMR) that deploy once LASS has either identified and/or engaged the bad guy(s).  (That more concrete and steel barriers will be erected to impede high speed vehicular mayhem in pedestrian areas is a given.)

In any event, the idea here is to field a system that uses the latest technology to surveil and suppress large areas of pedestrian traffic in a cost effective manner.  Such a LASS would have the ability to detect, concurrently screen and track tens of people who might pose a risk, while minimizing both the security headcount on the ground and the deadly effects (both intended and collateral) of an attack by a timely and precise engagement that avoids horizon plane suppression fires.  To determine the exact system design and parameters would require some noodling.   But I believe the LASS concept is worth a detailed look because what is there now does not work well, and there is no evidence that we will do anything else to limit the number of radicalized ragheads among us.  Welcome to another step back for western civilization.

(Spoiler Alert: This ought to loosen some more progressive histrionics.  And perhaps some creative alternative solutions to minimize terrorism by, say, removing/covering all visible Christian symbols in our land and having women wear hijabs.  If that is not enough, then revoking all females’ drivers licenses and launch public stoning of those accused of LGBTQ… persuasions can be tried next.)

[22dec16 update]  Given the usual anti-gun, anti-2ndAmend comments for which the above post is progressives’ dog whistle, I thought it relevant to highlight the figure that one of our commenters below again draws our attention – the powerful message it conveys has already been featured in these pages. 

GunViolence

Posted in , , ,

72 responses to “Large Area Surveillance and Suppression System (updated 22dec16)”

  1. Todd Juvinall Avatar
    Todd Juvinall

    Paul Emery does not understand blogs it appears.

    Like

  2. Walt Avatar

    Kinda one sided there Paul. It’s a little frustrating to “debate” (and disingenuous on your part) someone who 90% of the time ends every last sentence with a ” ? ” . Then promptly changes the subject when hopelessly cornered.(which is often.)

    Like

  3. Gregory Avatar
    Gregory

    Paul, you made it clear you have a fan club that reads this blog and doesn’t comment. It should do them some good to see what questions you avoid and what arguments you lose. Perhaps, if they exist, they’ll join in, though they would have to get over the fact that the hard left can’t be seen talking to libertarians or conservatives.

    Like

  4. Todd Juvinall Avatar
    Todd Juvinall

    Most pople come read and look but don’t post. My blog surprised me when I see so many looks yet few posts. Don’t judge a book by its cover I was taught.

    Like

  5. Paul Emery Avatar
    Paul Emery

    Not exactly a fan club more like curious onlookers.

    Like

  6. Don Bessee Avatar
    Don Bessee

    Try a hot toddy with some hash oil to help your sleep PE, tis the season. 😉

    Like

  7. George Rebane Avatar

    PaulE 842pm – Paul, my readership and blog related correspondence are more than I ever hoped for. And I have to believe that neither is due to the barn circling and snark that unfortunately persists in these comment streams. I am overjoyed when commenters post thoughtful repartees and mini-essays to reveal something new they have read or thought, or bring forth an argument that moves the peanut ahead in our discussions. Mine and every commenter’s full record is available through RR search or Google (just include ‘Rebane’s Ruminations’ with your keywords). We respect each other when we build on an exchange, we don’t when we ignore what the other has already said (often repeatedly).

    Like

  8. fish Avatar
    fish

    Posted by: George Rebane | 23 December 2016 at 06:38 AM
    Ah but George….the snark is so much more fun!
    You’ve been putting for reasoned arguments for certainly longer than I’ve been here and as you yourself say the “opposition” is wholly incapable of engaging (Okay ….maybe Frisch…a little). This thread about what to do in situations where a large vehicle is used as a weapon prompted the the two comments I left here yesterday and later a hijacking of the thread (yes…I’m guilty too) by Uncle Paul to fixate on something dear to his heart but completely off topic.
    I didn’t start out as an online jerk……I devolved into one after repeated exposure to smug lefty dimwits.

    Like

  9. Todd Juvinall Avatar
    Todd Juvinall

    To top it off. I m on FB both as a public person and in some “closed groups”. I even formed one called “Nevada County Debates”. Keachie has some as well. Anyway, when you look at the membership numbers in the closed groups versus the number of commenters it is fascinating. Less than one percent leave a comment. Mst are readers. These blogs are no different.

    Like

  10. Paul Emery Avatar
    Paul Emery

    George your ideas are already obsolete According to trump all we need to do is have more nukes
    “The United States must greatly strengthen and expand its nuclear capability until such time as the world comes to its senses regarding nukes”‘

    Like

  11. fish Avatar
    fish

    Posted by: Paul Emery | 23 December 2016 at 08:40 AM
    ……sigh

    Like

  12. Paul Emery Avatar
    Paul Emery

    Fish in your view what do you think Trump meant by the world coming to its senses? Help me here I might have missed some profound wisdom from our next president

    Like

  13. fish Avatar
    fish

    Posted by: Paul Emery | 23 December 2016 at 09:15 AM
    Sorry Paul….I’m excusing myself from the Uncle Paul Ask sThe Questions Rope-a-Dope until there is a little more back and forth. Oh yeah….staying on topic will probably benefit both of us (I’ll try harder too) immensely!

    Like

  14. John Avatar
    John

    What Paul does not comprehend about the increase in guns and decrease in homicide rate chart is the fact that there are 300 million +/- guns in private hands in the U.S. and only a tiny fraction, .0004% of those +/-, are used in a homicide. The remaining 299,988,000 +/- are in the hands of responsible, law abiding gun owners. More guns = less crime, on a crime per gun basis. Pretty simple concept.

    Like

  15. Bill Tozer Avatar
    Bill Tozer

    Fish @ 9:25
    I agree 100% with your two points: I am also excusing myself from Rope A Dope with Strawmen and vowing to stay on topic henceforth. Off to the Sandbox.

    Like

  16. Todd Juvinall Avatar
    Todd Juvinall

    Me too. I’ll try not to engage but it is tough having lived by the Socratic all my life.

    Like

  17. Walt Avatar

    In Kalif.,, the LIBS are a little late.
    http://www.infowars.com/trumpocalypse-suddenly-liberals-are-the-ones-stockpiling-food-guns-and-emergency-supplies/
    Yet it’s those with Lefty leanings that commit the majority of gun crimes.

    Like

  18. Todd Juvinall Avatar
    Todd Juvinall

    We know the left is filled with criminals. Why else would the democrat governors want them to have voting rights in jail?

    Like

  19. Bill Tozer Avatar
    Bill Tozer

    Dr. Rebane.
    Upon further consideration, nothing wrong incorporating new technogy into public safety. It’s going to happen with or without my input. LE always fights to get the newest and best technology to protect d serve. It’s on their wish list, whether they get it our not. The details will be worked out, but if less law enforcement are needed with better protection of fellow citizens going about their lives, go for it.
    When I think of the unprecedented security needed to cover the latest Gay Pride Parade in W. Hollywood….mind blowing and a budget crusher for the city and when I think of the last and next New Years Ball Drop in NYC, well……..it takes an army of police officers with the latest technology already.
    What has happened here?? The Gay Pride parades never needed so much security and crowd protection before! Same with any good fun major event….in every big city in our Nation. What caused this? Oh yeah, Ragheads are the biggest thread to our countrymen and visitors alike, gay or not.
    Stopping a good sized truck racing toward a crowd in its tracks is a different challenge. Sure, we do it around the White House with barricades and we close off streets around things like the DNC Convention in Philly…..to keep the bad guys out…like terrorists and other Bernie types, and suicide trucks, of course.
    Technology can disable newer vehicles remotely and through using “ray guns”, but disabling the ole Betsy truck needs some thought and new technology, IMHO.

    Like

  20. Scott Obermuller Avatar

    “More about Dylan Roof. What recommendations do you have to prevent these types of gun deaths?”
    Yes – more and more. endlessly.
    Isn’t the question about how we will try to prevent nut jobs from killing innocent people?
    No – Paul is only concerned with a white man using a gun to kill blacks.
    If it were a black killing whites, Paul would not be the least bit concerned.
    If it was someone killing blacks using a vehicle or gasoline, Paul wouldn’t be concerned.
    I had always thought we should be concerned with innocents being killed no matter what the color of the perp or the victim and the means of slaughter.
    But that’s boring.
    And doesn’t fit the left’s real intention of depriving Americans of their Constitutional rights.

    Like

  21. Scott Obermuller Avatar

    Forgot the link
    http://www.redding.com/story/news/local/2016/12/22/horrific-attack-leaves-burney-area-residents-reeling/95776678/
    How does Paul propose to end this sort of violence?
    Bicycles clearly need to be banned – or gasoline.
    Or hoodies.
    Where are Paul’s solutions?
    Nowhere to be found.
    The question clearly has nothing to do with violence and mayhem.
    The question Paul is asking is how can we get rid of American citizens’ rights.
    The answer is – you’re not. Because of the 2nd amendment.
    And don’t worry, Paul. We’ll die for your right to ALL of the rights.
    Unlike your hand wringing about icky human stuff.
    Jerk.

    Like

Leave a comment