Rebane's Ruminations
September 2014
S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930  

ARCHIVES


OUR LINKS


YubaNet
White House Blog
Watts Up With That?
The Union
Sierra Thread
RL “Bob” Crabb
Barry Pruett Blog

'My Uncle Frank in Chicago was a staunch Conservative, and voted straight Republican until the day he died.  Since then he has voted Democrat.'  (H/T to reader)

George Rebane

Measure S proponents have an ex parte court hearing tomorrow to change the wording on the ballot that has been known to all since last April.  These progressives have taken a page from their eco-nut brethren who know how to time lawsuits on projects they oppose so as to drain the cash out of the enterprise no matter the merit of the suits or how they are settled.  Now it seems that the pro-S crowd is after the county’s coffers, which, of course, duns us all.

Moonbeam will allow police drones to search your property without a warrant.  So don’t get all excited when you see a quadcopter with a sheriff’s star on it hovering outside your window.  That will inject a new dynamic into the dialogue with (fancy wording for ‘frost the balls of’) our marijuana growers.  How many ways does Big Brother need to watch us?

Giving new meaning to Teflon President, Obama just threw Team Clapper under the bus, claiming that our intelligence community didn’t have a clue about the rise of the ISIS ragheads.  The public truth is quite the opposite.  The Great Golfer was warned all last year in confidential briefings and publicly (by LTG Flynn, DIA) last February in a taped congressional hearing.  Flynn nailed it, Obama ignored it (no doubt on advice of ValerieJ).

Our progressive readers may feel their undies getting into a knot since for years they have accused Bush2 of a perfidious 2003 invasion of Iraq.  The only difference is that Bush2, along with leaders worldwide, did listen to his intelligence services and acted accordingly, while Obama did not, and instead acted to bring on the Third Gulf War (here Gulf3) in a quarter century.  Let’s hope that he knows how to fight and button up Gulf3 better than Bush2 performed in Gulf2.  (Sure would like to see some high ranking brass resign when the CinC ignores the advice and alarums that they are paid to deliver.  That would start some interesting national dialogue.)

AG Eric Holder has been another worthy on Team Obama who has wreaked his share of havoc in the public forums.  Over the years we have noted and commented on his long list of sins which have in many ways made him an historical standout in that post.  His last contribution to Obama’s fundamental transformation of America will be to deprive our constabularies and national security services of the legal use of Bayesian decision tools (more commonly known as ‘profiling’) in their pursuit of bad guys and bad things about to happen.  Yep, ol’ Eric will end his ravaging forays across this land with a swift kick in the pants of the Rev Bayes.  To cover this significant shortfall we will pray for God’s expanded mercy on us all.

For a more proper and consistent view of the intruder who illegally climbed the fence at 1600 Pennsylvania and made it into the depths of the executive mansion before being collared by the Secret Service, the politically correct appellation for the man should be ‘undocumented White House visitor’ as suggested by Sen Ted Cruz.  This would put a different pall over the whole case, and be consistent with the pernicious wordplay that characterizes liberal blather.  Don’t hold your breath 😉

A new Stanford report (here) claims to definitively connect California’s recent drought to climate change – with the strong implication being AGW.  But you knew that.  NPR this morning was making sure that everyone knew without really saying anything – even a couple of words – on how that causal chain was forged by the investigators.  Well, dear reader, your faithful commentator has plumbed the depths of their work, it is all based on the application of “advanced statistical techniques to a large suite of climate model simulations.”  There, aren’t you glad you asked.  The fact that there does not yet exist a reliable general circulation model (GCM) of earth’s atmosphere should make no never mind, since we all know ‘the debate is over’.  All we now need to do is pile on a bunch of such studies using GCMs, and before you know it, national carbon taxes will drive energy prices through the roof.  Isn’t science wonderful? 

Everyone catch Prime Minister Netanyahu’s UN speech (here)?  It was a noteworthy presentation to a world audience.  He clearly linked the motivations and purpose of the Nazis’ horrific implementation of ‘racial purity’ in their sought after Lebensraum with Islam’s scriptural, now existential, goal of global religious purity using even more horrific methods (in which light we see the beheading in Oklahoma).  To that we may add the collectivists’ (Marxists, socialists, communists) fevered goal of attaining global ideological purity best characterized by the collection of social goals under the rubric of the UN’s Agenda 21.

At this point one is prompted to conclude with ‘… other than that, how did you like the play?’

Posted in , , , , ,

65 responses to “Ruminations – 30sep14”

  1. Dave Smith Avatar
    Dave Smith

    I bet that Brad has been told by his lawyer to stay off the blogs and not say anything until the court dates have been set Don…
    Meds issue?

    Like

  2. Laura Rose McLeod Avatar
    Laura Rose McLeod

    I personally have watched the effects of cannabis as a healing substance. I believe that if you want to use it as an alternative to addictive drugs, you should have that right. If you want to grow it for yourself and others, you should have that right. If you want pot you can either get it from a legal source or get it from an illegal source. So I guess you need to decide if you want the criminal element that comes along with the illegal source, or want to see it regulated in a way where people who need it for medicine can have it, and the people who use it for recreation will obtain it through regulated sources. Measure S is not the perfect solution, but it’s by far better than what we have in place at the moment as the regulations in this county make it ridiculously hard to grow and who knows when the Sherif and his Posse will wake you up in the middle of the night and raid your property. It’s not just about growing pot people, it’s about your rights as a property owner and tax payer as well.
    I’m a property owner here in Nevada County, and I feel it is my right as such that I should be able to do with my property what I want. That is not to say that I should create a nuisance in the eye of our Sheriff, because if I did, I might be awakened in the middle of the night with a bang on the door – ordering me to get up and comply ( to who’s rules?). I have giving and loving neighbors that I have cultivated by being the same. I live with many inconveniences as a result of other neighbors rights, but in the bigger scheme of things, I have learned to be tolerant.
    What I really find so seriously wrong is that someone with a public record of arrests and restraining orders is someone the Sheriff parades in front of the people as credible. This guy has bullied his way into numerous agendas, and has been asked (politely at first) to stop speaking on behalf of those associations. I know, because I was in attendance of two of the meetings where he was admonished. The local property owners association he is a board member of is endorsing a ballot measure which is in total violation of a 501 3c – and could face IRS ramifications. But yet he stands ( or thinks he does) at the right hand of Royalty.
    The Sheriff and his Posse have stomped their way into the lives of many. Arresting, criminalizing and defacing descent and law abiding people. • The Sheriff claims that the majority of homicides occurring in Nevada County in the past five years have been all directly related to marijuana, but when pressed for specifics gives only general percentages. • Just like Besse, when asked how many people polled by his silly neighborhood club makes up 70% – he won’t give the answer. • The wording on the ballot is so biased as is the statement on BOS Letterhead calling for a No Vote on this important measure. • They backed out of a debate that might have shed light for many on how a Yes Vote on Measure S is a step in the right direction. • Now they face a law suit and potentially thousands of dollars to correct language on the ballot when all they needed to do was to send it along to Patty Smith as they managed to do by certified mail for every other step of the process.
    Now I realize George by answering your question that I’m opening myself up to the rants of ol’ D. Bessee, and to tell you the truth I can’t even follow much of what he writes because it is so dis-jointed ( he admits to being disabled by the way ). I’m serious about just letting him go on and on just so he can show his lack of intelligence and or ethics and morals. So have at it Don, but I must point out that you are sliding down a very slippery slope. I notice DB is not involved in the next debate with the League of Women Voters either, but then again I know first hand that Women are a lot better about sniffing out crap!

    Like

  3. Patricia Smith Avatar

    Just got back from the court hearing on the ballot text language issue. Judge Dowling found that the county “missed the mark” at writing an impartial statement. No surprise there. It comes down to what kind of government do we want in NC?
    Do we want tyrants that will stoop to any level to stifle the voice of constituents who do not agree with them? Or do we want our elected officials to play by the rules? Someone has to hold them accountable when they step over the line – and they clearly have done so on numerous occasions when dealing with the Medical Marijuana Cultivation Ordinance.
    I have tried to be fair with the elections Office, but they have been wrong about so many issues that they are either incompetent or unethical. If I was in charge of that office, I would have studied the election code dealing with voter initiatives, special elections, and election code, but every time I asked a question, I was given conflicting information or they just didn’t know the answer. Now they are saying it was my fault for not discovering the ballot text earlier when they did not notify me as required. They clearly tried to sneak this past the voters and now they have been called out by Judge Dowling.
    We’ll have to wait a few hours to hear Judge Dowling’s verdict, but I believe he will rule that we were right in our belief that the words on the ballot text were purposefuly misleading to provoke a NO vote on S, but there may not be enough time for a practical remedy (even though there is precedence from the Primary election when the ballots went out late due to a printing error).

    Like

  4. Todd Juvinall Avatar

    You have criticized the good friend and the recipient of his $500 donation to Mr. Diaz. Jeff Pelline, the former Union Editor will not be pleased with your taking Mr. Diaz to task. Anyway, when I did the Measure F Initiative we had to stay on top of the process real tight to make sure there were no shenanigans at elections.

    Like

  5. Paul Emery Avatar

    Yes Todd. I believe it’s referred to as “due diligence” Essential when you’re in an unfriendly atmosphere.

    Like

  6. Barry Pruett Avatar
    Barry Pruett

    Paul: I think the delay and slight lack of due diligence may be the deciding factor.

    Like

  7. Barry Pruett Avatar
    Barry Pruett

    I do not know of a law that requires the election office to provide the ballot language to the proponents, but communicating with proponents and candidates (going above and beyond what is required) is required of our elected officials.

    Like

  8. A. Patriot Avatar
    A. Patriot

    If this suit had been brought by a citizen (or perhaps class) instead of ASA / Patti Smith, would that be different? The Measure was placed on the ballot by the voters. If either ASA or the County failed to handle things properly, should the people’s right to an unbiased ballot process be sacrificed? Does this right trump a slight lack of due diligence? Has there been a pattern of obstructionism in the development of either 2349 and/or Measure S? I think the proper decision is clear, once the language has been found to fall short.

    Like

  9. Don Bessee Avatar
    Don Bessee

    Dowling Rules the ballots go out as scheduled with no changes.

    Like

  10. Walt Avatar

    Sanity prevails. No “dumbshit” votes this time. A few words stating exactly what the proposed law actually does is far from “bias”.

    Like

  11. A. Patriot Avatar
    A. Patriot

    Walt didn’t read the decision. The judge said the question was indeed biased but the plaintiff didn’t prevail on the second requirement. Basically – too late.

    Like

  12. Walt Avatar

    Nice try.. If the wording was so damned bad, the judge would have ruled against.
    But spit those hairs. Funny how telling the truth is considered a bias statement.
    But do tell how “S” would reduce pot grows…

    Like

  13. Walt Avatar

    Here is a “bias” statement: “Unemployment is now at 5.6%!” ( In reality it’s 12.4%)
    These are real numbers. No fabrications.
    It’s bias because of playing with numbers that don’t tell the whole story,, that is disingenuous.

    Like

Leave a comment