Rebane's Ruminations
May 2026
S M T W T F S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31  

ARCHIVES


OUR LINKS


YubaNet
White House Blog
Watts Up With That?
The Union
Sierra Thread
RL “Bob” Crabb
Barry Pruett Blog

  • [Climate hysteria is subsiding almost everywhere across the world, save California where the double dummies are fully in charge of continuing to wreak maximum damage on the state’s citizens.  Most nations agree that the data so far is insufficient to support predictions of an imminent climate catastrophe, and the hysterical responses over the last decades have done immeasurable damage to the economies in which such draconian policies have been implemented.  Today everyone is trying to undo the damage while trying to avoid political hits for havng been stupid and cynical.  gjr]

  • George Rebane

    Starting with the bottom line, I am very disappointed in the lack of progress, nay, backsliding in how the administration’s apparent policy and visible actions toward Iran are being implemented.  A week or so ago President Trump promised that holy hell would rain down on Iran if the ragheads started firing on our warships.  Well, they’ve done it on two separate occasions now, and all we have done is return “appropriate defensive” fires against their nearby launch points and related command facilities.  And to date no additional strikes against Kargh Island or other strategic targets have been launched.  So, no hell, holy or otherwise, has rained down on them.  The president himself admitted that our response to their attacks was just a “love tap”.  But if they did it again or failed to negotiate, then this time we would really really get mad – yeah!

    The administration keeps forgetting that we are dealing with zealous thugs and murderers who have prevaricated and lied about EVERYTHING for almost a half century.  Their tactic over these decades remains unchanged – keep working hard to develop a nuclear weapon while engaging the west (i.e. US and Israel) in negotiations whose only purpose is to delay any meaningful response to their military development and terror support activities in the region.  President Trump with Prime Minister Netanyahu finally broke this ropa-dope last summer with the massive strike against their nuclear development facilities.

    But this year’s follow-on campaign to destroy Iran’s military and destabilize its murderous regime has had limited success, no matter how much it is celebrated by the White House and Fox News.  Our own intelligence apparatus has stated that Iran retains most of its missile inventory and launch capabilities, and that the president’s blockade of Iranian ports will not cause significant economic damage for another two to three months.  In the meantime the president and Republicans are volubly taking it in the shorts from Democrats, the lamestream media, and, of course, America’s main street voters.  Iran is betting that Trump will cave under that political pressure before any serious hurt falls on the regime (the Iranian public be damned).

    And so far that tactic is working in spades.  We hear daily of ‘negotiating points’ being exchanged and ‘studied’ with no visible progress toward any resolution.  The only things happening is that we’re turning around all maritime traffic that involves Iranian ports, and Iran continues to keep Hormuz bottled up with its own ‘love taps’ against anyone in the strait that they don’t like.  The trickle of commercial traffic through the strait, after all the braggadocio from the White House, is just plain embarrassing.

    Elsewhere in these pages I have gone into detail as to what we should be doing militarily while waiting for the ragheads to unconditionally surrender.  The fact that we are trading negotiating points with them is an admission that we are on the road to an effective capitulation which leaves the regime in control and able to pursue their goals unchanged.  There should only be one negotiating point – one of two boxes they get to check – the regime is allowed to go into exile with their families, or we kill them.  Full stop.

    So where are we now?  My assessment is that we are at a draw militarily, since they still control Hormuz with ample weaponry (which is the best they could ever hope for), and we are losing politically – losing badly with little promise of getting a better result while continuing to do the same thing (i.e. insane participation in delaying negotiations).

    [9may26 update] Much of the world is counseling President Trump to hold off attacking Iran’s strategic targets such as transportation arteries, oil pipelines, storage facilities, refineries, and power generation and distribution centers.  Their advice is to yet again give diplomacy a chance to resolve the ongoing conflict.  They recommend that we respond with ‘patience’.

    Not all of these advisors have the best interest of the US, Israel, or the west in mind.  Most would like to see authoritarian states, including all of Islam, prevail in the world order.  Nevertheless, there also exists a cohort of good-hearted naifs, in addition to the cynical and the less well-read, who counsel patience in dealing with Iran.

    However, even a cursory examination of what patience entails clearly indicates that it is inimical to western interests, especially as it concerns the political fortunes of the Trump administration and the Republicans.  The US and Israel have practiced patience with Iran’s murderous regime for almost fifty years.  Over the decades this has cost hundreds of thousands of lives at the hand of Iran’s mullahs and their international terrorist proxies.  The oft-neglected ground truth in all these sentiments is Iran’s unwavering goal to become the regional hegemon in the Mideast, which requires it to gain deliverable nuclear weapons, destroy Israel, and weaken the west in resisting the global spread and dominance of Islam.

    The ONLY final solution with Iran is the prompt removal of its theocratic regime with its hegemonic goals, and replacing it with a democratically elected government that eschews nuclear ambitions and is willing to allow snap inspections to demonstrate its compliance as a new member in the community of peaceful and productive nations.  Any negotiations that seek an agreement deviating from this final solution is an existential loss for the west and world peace.  And every additional day of delay to achieve such an end result makes it less likely that such a final solution will be feasible.

    In the US this is doubly true during an election year in which the anti-American Democrats have an excellent chance of neutralizing the Republicans’ advantage in Congress.  And Iran knows that the longer it can delay and retain the status quo in the gulf, the more politically difficult it will be for Trump to resume an effective military campaign to achieve the final solution.  Our continuing to practice patience for an eventually negotiated deal that leaves this murderous criminal regime in power will achieve all these goals.

  • George Rebane

    Republicans continue to miss the boat on understanding the mind of America’s main street.  On the internet and broadcast media Republican mavens are self-assured that Democrats are heading for an election disaster, since they can smugly point out all the failures and follies of leftwing public policies.  But that doesn’t mean a thing when it comes to what a majority of America’s voters believe, think, and how they will most likely vote.  Every poll shows that the Left’s lamestream media have been very successful in convincing people to believe in a state of our nation and economy that simply is not so.  Very few listen to or even understand the esoteria validating open market capitalism and its public policies that Republican pundits so confidently continue to spout to their chorus.

    What comes next and what should come next in Iran?  We don’t know which group of ragheads is in charge in that Islamic republic (hah!), but the effect of their incoherent responses to a negotiated conclusion continues to ropa-dope the administration.  I have laid out in detail (see ‘The 7apr26 Iran Cease-fire?!’) what our ongoing response should be to their obvious prevarications and delay tactics.  Well, finally that part of Rebane Doctrine is being echoed by Victor Davis Hanson (here), a Stanford don and one of our celebrated conservative commentators.  More rightwing puubahs will soon be similarly advising President Trump to not depend only on his blockade of Iranian shipping.

    [5may26 update]  Blurring videos is further evidence that broadcast news programming has taken another step backward in how they present news to consumers.  This is especially egregious at outlets like Fox News (remember “… fair, balanced, and still unafraid”).  They are scared to death of getting sued if they show a face or even a politically incorrect graphic that someone used to make a statement.  This morning New York’s latest anti-semitic vandalism was reported showing extensive pro-Nazi graffiti on temple walls and Jewish homes – only we didn’t get to see the actual messaging since Fox decided to blur every graffiti on the video shown with the news report.  As consumers we are not allowed see such news, why?, apparently because some people might be offended or someone may sue. Modern times.

    Commentators and news reporters should reflect different standards when delivering their verbiage on the air.  When reporting a news item, reporters should always reference their sources that corroborate what is being reported which should be free of the reporters’ opinions.  But opinions are the sum and stuff of a commentator’s commentary and reflects the value of his view of the world.  When a commentator prevaricates with wishy-washy statements that camouflage his opinions, then he is not delivering an honest and robust product.  Overuse of words such as ‘may’ instead of ‘will’, and carefully inserting ‘alleged’ where certainty is required are dead giveaways of commentary gone soft.

    [8may26 update]  Rising Improper Payments.  The latest (April) GAO report estimating improper payments found that those payments increased by more than $24 billion in fiscal year 2025 (which went from Oct. 1, 2024, through Sept. 30, 2025), to $185.8 billion.  In addition to outright fraud and embezzlement, improper payments also include payments made in the incorrect amount or without appropriate documentation. Improper payments involve the lack of attention to detail that allows fraud to fester and grow.

  • George Rebane

    Correlation is the gateway to causality.

    Nationally and locally the corps of our loyal Lenin’s lads and ladies continue their anti-American drumbeat.  Locally we read a stream of revisionist lies and TDS-powered diatribes in The Union.  An example is the vituperation heaped on Barry Pruett for his recent piece illustrating the parallels in student indoctrination practiced in Nazi Germany with what has been going on in America’s public schools under the heel of our radical left teachers’ unions.

    All of this decidedly woke curriculum is flatly denied by everyone with even a tinge of Democrat Party affinity.  Re Pruett’s disclosure, they claimed that he presented no documented evidence for pointing out the obvious in the skill sets and behaviors of students blessed with a socialist education.  In each case, nationally and in Nevada County, a dismally inadequate percentage of students are able to exhibit grade level literacy and numeracy.  Approximately 35% of U.S. high school seniors demonstrate grade-level proficiency in reading/literacy, and about 22% do so in mathematics/numeracy, according to the most recent 2024 National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) results for 12th graders.  These percentages are replicated in Nevada County.

    The correlation between this downward spiral and the ever greater inclusion of woke DEI indoctrination in classrooms is undeniable.  The causal link is established through elementary reasoning given the data and observable behavior of our young people.  They come out of school spouting Marxist dogma and overwhelmingly believe that America should give socialism a chance.

    Today is May Day, and it serves to illustrate the above observation.  Modern May Day observances focus on collectivist themes.  The day highlights group interests (the working class) over individual ones, international solidarity across borders, and organized labor as a counter to market-driven individualism. Demonstrations often feature calls for social equality, wealth redistribution, and collective bargaining—core tenets of collectivist thought.  It remains an important national holiday in communist countries.

    With America’s recent leftward lurch led by the Democrat Party, there are hundreds (thousands?) of May Day celebrations planned and ongoing.  Many schools across the country are letting students take the day off to attend local May Day demonstrations.  In Chicago the city’s school district has even provided buses to gather students and take them to the various celebration and demonstration venues.  The students have all been taught the significance of May Day.  To argue that leftwing indoctrination does not take place in our schools ranges between socialist perfidy and plain ignorance.

    As a codicil to the proposition of the Left’s onslaught on America’s culture and governance, we consider the whole fiasco of catastrophic climate change and global warming that has been thoroughly foisted on world populations, and most fervently embraced in the EU countries and the US.  One of the prime falsehoods output by its propaganda factories is the catastrophic economic impact that will result from unmitigated and/or ignored climate change.

    A recent report on this predicted effect was published in the April 2024 issue of the prestigious Nature.  It was titled ‘The Economic Commitment of Climate Change’ and authored by Maximilian Kotz and colleagues from the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research.  The report projected severe global economic damages from climate change. It estimated substantial losses, including a roughly 19% drop in global income by 2050 and up to 62% by 2100 under high-emissions scenarios, with annual costs reaching trillions of dollars. The paper gained significant attention and influenced policy discussions.

    After people began a more detailed look at the report, they found “substantial errors in the underlying data and analysis” to the extent that it could not be readily corrected and maintain its claimed economic impact in tens of trillions of dollars by 2050.  So, in December 2025 Nature retracted the paper.

    But the damage had already been done on its effect on adoption of public policies in the interval and its use and further corroboration of the Big Lie of climate change.  But the story doesn’t end there.  We now ask, how was the retraction of this major scientific publication reported in the lamestream media and acknowledged in the legislative halls across the country?  The simple answer is that the error has been totally ignored and swept under the rug, while allowing its erroneous conclusions to echo in our ‘public knowledge’ and beliefs in the drastic effects of climate change.

    And with little response from the feckless rightwing and Republicans, our Left marches on toward a brave new world of compassionate collectivism while rejecting the cold rugged individualism of the free market capitalists.

  • [Was glad to see that our government can still put on a respectable pomp and circumstance for King Charles. On cue the Dems made assholes of themselves with their iconical petty criticisms. I wondered what they called each other when they retired for their one-on-one meeting – was it ‘Chuck’ and ‘Don’? Can’t imagine their continuing to address each other as ‘Mr President’ and ‘Your Majesty’. gar]

    Posted at

    in

  • George Rebane

    The Dems path to power is to expand their voter base by taking, say, $500 from a maker and giving $100 to each of five takers, thereby losing one vote while gaining five.  In its various forms this paradigm defines the Democrats’ only reliable route to election victories since they have no other public policies that the voters will accept.

    Democrats have long been the party that actively promotes government fraud, waste, and abuse.  Today they are focusing on defending frauds of various kind perpetrated by foreigners (e.g. Chinese nationals) and unassimilating foreign-born residents (e.g. Somalis).  Such fraudulent practices have been exposed by a few remaining investigative reporters, most visibly by Nick Shirley who has documented his work with videos.  In order to maintain such fraudulent schemes, California will now pass a law (AB2624, the ‘Stop Nick Shirley Act’) making it illegal for reporters to expose such practices.  Every day more evidence pours in that the Democrats are both anti-American and evil in their manner and methods.

    The Trump administration may well have been duped again in their negotiations with Iran.  Today Iran’s regime is once more attacking commercial vessels in the Strait of Hormuz, claiming that it is retaliating for America’s violating the terms negotiated so far by maintaining the embargo on Iranian shipping.  It is clear we don’t know with whom we are negotiating – which faction of ragheads have the power and the pencil.  The negotiating faction has agreed to open the strait while the cease fire holds, the guys with guns and missiles state that the strait remains closed until we lift the embargo.  All this continues to demonstrate that the only language Iran will understand is the naked use of force.  Trump would be well advised to launch the B-52s and start taking out the country’s transport and power infrastructure in the sequence I have described before.

    [update] The media and administration are not paying much attention to the reclosing of Hormuz.  What’s odd is that all the other news they reported were on negotiations and global economics which depend on the open access of that strait.  So now we have the obvious situation that the administration does not know with whom it is negotiating, and it has again let Iran cross one of its ‘red lines’ unimpeded.  In this case IRGC fast gunboats approached in open water and fired at commercial vessels in the strait.  Fearless Leader assured us that such boats would be blown out of the water a la Venezuelan drug boats.  In reality – NOTHING.  You can determine yourself what kind of message this sends to international players.

    [19apr26 update]  Systemic unemployment has already started.  Companies are laying off thousands of employees due to reconfigured operations based on AI.  For years these pages have predicted a 70% reduction in the required workforce due to the advent of the Singularity, which is happening now.  Confirming reports of this arrive daily.  As an informative example of the national dialogue on current job losses, see the 19apr26 WSJ article reporting CEOs’ “straight talk about AI and job losses”.  Those who pooh-pooh systemic unemployment also preach retraining workers for new jobs that they believe AI will give rise to as did the advent of previous new technologies.  But the new problem with this old shibboleth is that no one can think of what these laid off workers should be retrained to do in order to get back into the workforce.

  • [From the 14apr26 WSJ – “When government rewards failure, the result is usually more failure. That’s been the story in Los Angeles, where the teachers unions on Sunday secured a rich new contract, notwithstanding lousy student performance and declining enrollment.”  For example – “Only 18% of Los Angeles eighth-graders scored proficient in math on the National Assessment of Educational Progress, compared to 27% nationwide. Then again, the district’s catawampus finances suggest its leaders are no better at math.” gjr]

    Posted at

    in

  • George Rebane

    President Trump, as is his wont, has again been sending a bevy of mixed signals on the disposition of the Strait of Hormuz.  First it’s sealed to all traffic, and then it’s going to be open to traffic not benefiting Iran.  First, it’s mined and we have to clear it, and then it’s not mined and we are transiting it with our warships.  All of that confusion is self-inflicted (on purpose?).  Here I want to discuss a couple of approaches for resolving the mine issue in the strait so that we can again have a free flow of commercial traffic.  All the information below is in the public domain if you know where to look for it.

    Longtime RR readers may remember that I was CEO of a small black studies company in the 1970s doing classified research for the DoD.  One of our major multi-year contracts was to provide analytical services to the Navy’s marine mammal program.  This is where Flipper was trained to detect and intercept combat swimmers, and to hunt the modern ‘undetectable’ bottom mines among other tasks that we still can’t talk about.  The swimmer defense systems have been used to protect assets in and adjoining critical harbors, the mine hunting systems were initially designed to search for, detect, and destroy bottom mines.

    The critter of choice for Flipper is the Atlantic bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops Truncatus).  Flippers enjoy working with humans and the Navy has had an ongoing training and maintenance program for such critter military systems for over fifty years now, currently operating out of Point Loma in San Diego.  What makes Flipper ideal for mine hunting is its sonar, both active and passive.  By employing a specially evolved pulse shape (which we have measured and reverse engineered) and a signal processing capacity (about which we have no clue), Flipper remains our only reliable means of neutralizing bottom mines.  In the field of mine hunting it is known as the “gold standard” yet to be matched by manmade hardware.

    The problem with bottom mines (think of a water heater sized cylinder) is that they get buried under silt that sea currents stir up.  Some of them wind up several feet under the soggy stuff and are invisible to manmade sonars.  But Flipper’s sonar penetrates the silt with no problem.  Mine hunting is carried out by a couple of sailors in a Z-boat with Flipper swimming alongside.  They stop at precisely calculated search points where Flipper is queried if he can see a mine, to which he answers yes or no.  When the answer is yes, Flipper is given a sonar marker (transducer) which he goes down and places next to the mine.  The marker is later interrogated and a swimmer or a drone goes down and places an explosive next to the mine which is later remotely detonated after the hunting phase ends.

    So that’s the drill of hunting for modern bottom mines which can be programmed to detonate by  sensing a target ship’s sound, pressure, or magnetic signatures.  The real sophisticated mines can be programmed to detonate only for a certain vessel or class of vessels for which their characteristic signatures are known.  The tricky math and computer part is figuring out the optimum placement of search points for a given marine environment and assumed mine density.   Developing and doing that was my job.

    Meanwhile, back in the Hormuz.  There’s a good chance that Iran has not mined the strait and is just bluffing.  But even a bluff is enough to scare off commercial traffic and their insurers.  Any mine hunting the Navy undertakes will be to give comfort to the companies who own and operate the tankers and transports.  So how should the administration go about this business to get the strait straightened out as soon as possible?  Here’s my take on two approaches – call them the Channel and Area approaches.

    The Channel approach involves the Navy delineating, say, a two mile wide channel through the 20+ mile wide straight, which it then clears with the above described animal systems.  (Undoubtedly the Navy has available several Flippers ready for the job.)  The Channel approach will take more time since the channel may wind up being about 30 miles long.  But it will result in a ‘safe channel’ through the strait with the lowest probability of a missed mine in the channel. (The US could even serve as a re-insurer for the insurance companies.)

    The Area approach involves estimating the presumably low density of mines that Iran was able to surreptitiously place in the narrowest part of the strait, and then computing the optimum set (location and number) of search points for the critters so that the resulting probability of having missed a mine is a politically acceptable low value.  It is clear that even with the Area approach, ships will tend to follow the paths of successfully transited ships, and traffic will soon turn to normal.

    Having outlined the above solution to opening the strait, nothing prevents our and other navies from lending a hand doing more conventional sweeping for anchored and (ancient) floating mines.  In any event, the administration could clear things up and get traffic moving again as quickly as possible by outlining and executing the above tactics.  Continuing in the current muddle will do nothing but maintain high fuel prices worldwide.

  • George Rebane

    The Mirage of Diplomacy: Why We Keep Falling for the Iranian Negotiation Trap

    The definition of insanity, as the old adage goes, is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result. By that metric, the international community’s approach to the Islamic Republic of Iran has shifted from hopeful diplomacy into a state of clinical delusion. We find ourselves once again standing in the debris of the ‘latest failed negotiation’, staring at the same stubborn reality that has existed for decades. The frustration felt by observers today isn’t just about the lack of a signed document; it is a profound exasperation with the unwarranted expectations that there was ever a ‘feasible outcome’ to be had in the first place.  No one has yet to define even a reasonable example of such an outcome.

    Iran’s Pedigree of Deceit

    To understand the current frustration, we must look at the foundation upon which these negotiations are built. We are not dealing with a standard Westphalian state that plays by the recognized rules of international engagement. Instead, we are attempting to bargain with a thuggish regime with a documented history of lying and systematic non-compliance regarding EVERY previous agreement it has signed.

    When a counterparty views ‘negotiation’ not as a path toward compromise, but as a tactical lull used to regroup and advance their own agenda, the very act of sitting at the table becomes a victory for them. There is a fundamental question that continues to be ignored by both our administration and its critics: What is there to actually negotiate with a power that views its survival and its nuclear/hegemonic ambitions as divinely ordained and non-negotiable? The only logical outcomes for a regime with such an ideological bedrock are a fight to the death or an unconditional surrender into exile. Anything in between is merely theater.

    The Reality of the Geo-Strategic Scoreboard

    While Western diplomats return to their capitals to draft press releases about “constructive dialogues” and “narrowing gaps”, the regime in Tehran is looking at a very different scoreboard. By any objective measure, Iran has won the geo-strategic battle. They have successfully projected power throughout the Middle East, creating a ring of fire around their adversaries while accepting the repairable destruction of their military and arms production facilities.

    Their behavior is not that of a nation cowed by sanctions or intimidated by the specter of a ‘united international front’.  On the contrary, Iran’s responses and actions do not sound like those coming from a defeated nation. They continue to project strength through several key measurables:

    • Unabated Counter Attacks: The regime continues to launch missiles and drones against Israel, US bases, and various Gulf states.
    • Economic Chokepoints: They have successfully hindered passage through the Strait of Hormuz, effectively holding global commercial traffic hostage to their political whims.
    • Military Persistence: There are no tangible measurables suggesting that Iran’s military capability has been diminished to a point of irrelevance.

    The Danger of “Braggadocio” and Broken Deadlines

    The current frustration is not directed solely at Tehran, but also at our political leadership that sets expectations it seems unwilling to meet. We are currently facing a two-week deadline for Iranian surrender. In the lead-up to this moment, the rhetoric from the Trump administration has been characterized by politically harmful braggadocio regarding the swift restart of military operations should Iran fail to comply.

    However, the world is watching to see if these words are backed by action or if they are simply more political posturing. The stakes are high. If the two-week deadline passes, if the Strait of Hormuz remains closed to normal traffic, and if the promised military operations fail to materialize, the likely fallout could be catastrophic.

    This isn’t just about a single failed policy; it’s about the erosion of American credibility. The political damage to the current administration and the Republican Party would be significant, but the damage to the country’s standing on the world stage would be truly immeasurable. When a hegemonic superpower draws a line in the sand and then watches it blown away by its own prevarication, it invites further aggression from every corner of the globe.

    Conclusion: A Cycle That Must Break

    The circled barn refers to a repetitive, futile loop apparent to a citizenry tired of being told that ‘peace is just around the corner’ if we only arrange one more negotiation with the apparent willingness to concede the survival of the current regime.

    The harsh truth is that as long as the regime in Tehran perceives that the West lacks the stomach for ousting them, they will continue to play the game. They will continue to lie, they will again disrupt global trade, and they will continue to prevail in the geo-strategic battle while we pat ourselves on the back for giving diplomacy one more chance.

    The time for unwarranted expectations has passed. The only remaining question is whether our leaders have the courage to face reality before the damage to our nation becomes permanent.

  • George Rebane

    Large trucks marked with the Red Crescent and filled with stuff bought and paid for through the American Red Cross are allowed to enter Iran in order to provide relief for the country’s civilian population.  Many of those Iranians, held in eternal ignorance, now spend their days in regime approved street demonstrations shouting ‘Death to America’ etc.  These same ignorant zealots believe that it is their government and its Islamic allies that are providing the needed supplies.  The proper way to distribute American aid and benefit America is to deliver the aid in clearly marked trucks and parcels stating the source of the provided relief, or not at all.  The current method strengthens the country’s murderous regime in the eyes of its citizens.

    Relief and joy for the safe return of Artemis 2 is shared among all Americans who promote our international hegemony.  Our anti-American contingent would have wanted the monies spent on buying more Reconquista votes and promoting amnesty for illegal aliens.  My only nit about the mission was the obviously disorganized affair after splashdown to get the astronauts out and into the raft for helicopter pick-up.  Comic relief was provided by the melee of boats surrounding the Integrity capsule, one of which spent almost half an hour trying to get connected to the spacecraft.  Why no one was able to immediately just hook a line to a provided hard-point and keep the Z-boat tethered to Integrity remains a mystery.

8 comments on Sandbox – 11may26