Rebane's Ruminations

About

April 2026
S M T W T F S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930  

ARCHIVES

OUR LINKS

YubaNet
White House Blog
Watts Up With That?
The Union
Sierra Thread
RL “Bob” Crabb
Barry Pruett Blog

  • Our Chinese Communist benefactors

    George Rebane

    [This post appears in the 9jul25 edition of The Union’s op-ed pages, retitled with the atrocious and confusing word salad ‘US political factions push socialism to achieve Chinese Communist Party levels of control?’ (Note the question mark.)  The newspaper also refused to include the accompanying figure which makes clear to the layman an otherwise obtuse discussion of population distribution bell curves.  In the 20 years I have been publishing in The Union as contributor and regular columnist, I’ve never had my title changed nor any included figure omitted.  To add insult to injury, I usually append my PhD in the signature block only under articles with some technical content – certain other authors always append and have their PhD appellations included.   For reasons unknown, for this article my PhD was stripped, another first.  gjr]

    Led by states like California, New York, and Illinois, America’s cognitive decline now has a fifty-year history as documented by government reports on student test scores, adult numeracy, and population literacy in general (e.g. from the National Center for Educational Statistics).  Our public education system, already on the rocks, is now in an epochal turmoil with the advent of AI-based writing and thinking tools for students.  The impact of AI on systemic unemployment is also beginning to make itself felt as white-collar jobs ranging from manufacturing through middle management to computer programmers are being eliminated by the thousands.  Job growth in our hospitality industry sustains our current 4.2% unemployment rate – for now.  But even there the nation’s increasing minimum wages are impelling the adoption of AI to reduce the expensive labor headcount.

    The great benefactor of our degradation is Communist China – our geo-strategic enemy and dedicated adversary in global commerce.  Their hundred-year plan – now at the half-way point – calls for them to replace the United States as the world’s military and economic hegemon.  In the process they are gaining on us in the important categories ranging from overall GDP, manufacturing, military build-up, and technology development, especially in AI.

    Almost all of this can be explained by our two countries’ populations, their cultural make-up, and cognitive capabilities.  China is culturally cohesive; their population is over 85% ethnically Han.  America is a proudly unassimilated hodgepodge of cultures.  (Recall the German and other EU countries’ experience – “Multi-kulti does not work.”)  In the cognitive arena, Chinese are smarter than we are.  According to international agencies that measure such metrics, Americans’ average IQ is 98 compared to the Chinese average of 108.  Cognitive tests of all kinds (including standardized IQ) are designed so that the scores of a broad population of test takers scale to an average of 100 with a standard deviation of 15.  This results in the familiar bell curve-shaped population distributions.  Various population cohorts will, of course, vary from this standard as noted above for the US and China.

    The nearby figure – based on data from government sources and academia, e.g. social scientists like Charles Murray (2021) – illustrates this variation graphically while illuminating a disturbing difference between our two countries.  There we see the two bell curves appropriately placed on the cognitive IQ scale.  The areas under the bell curves are proportional to the countries’ populations.  The average or mean IQ values for each population are shown as dotted lines at 98 and 108.

    USvChinaIQ

    (Consider a specific stat that also highlights the meritocracy v equity based Chinese educational system which pumps out 3.57M STEM graduates annually compared to America’s 820K output.  “China produces roughly 6 times more STEM graduates annually than the U.S.”)

    To get a comparative measure of the populations, consider a broad category of jobs that require workers of above average intellect, say, IQs above 120 as shown – these may include professions such as medicine, science, engineering, and institutional management.  As presented in the figure, China’s current population of over 1.4 billion includes almost 300M citizens with IQs above 120, while the similar US cohort numbers about 25M out of a population of almost 350M.  China has over 12 times as many such smart people as do we.

    So why haven’t they eaten our lunch yet on the world stage?  The historically obvious reason is simple – the Chinese live under the repressive and stifling dictatorship of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).  It is that form of central control by collectivist governance that is keeping the Chinese from dominating us in commerce, science, and technology, areas in which they already have and continue to demonstrate their hobbled prowess.

    Meantime in the US there is a large political faction embracing socialism that has been doing its best to achieve similar collectivist control of our population, all in the name of social justice beginning with perverse definitions and applications of diversity, equity, and inclusion.  So it is clear that our current diminishing advantage over the cynically named People’s Republic of China is entirely due to our benefactors (friends?) in the CCP.  To argue otherwise would be an appeal to blatant racism that maligns the ethnic population of China and its Han culture.

    Posted at

    in

    , , ,
    19 comments on Our Chinese Communist benefactors

  • Sandbox – 28jun25

    [Where is the eternal debate going on politicians lying?  It seems that our leftwing readers gleefully highlight every Trump pronouncement that is in any, even minute, way flawed as an intended lie.  But they totally ignore the daily pronouncements of Democrats as members of the greatest perennial lying machine in the country. gjr]

    Posted at

    in

  • B-2s over Iran (partially restored)

    George Rebane

    [This 23jun25 blog post was mysteriously deleted by Typepad which they cannot recover.  I fished out a partial draft version of the post from the Recycle Bin and am reposting it here.  It does not include the two updates and graphics of the original of which I don’t have copies.]

    Don’t let an unknown perfect be the enemy of the known good.

    At this writing (23jun25 1300) Iran has impotently attacked US bases in Qatar and Iraq in response to Midnight Hammer.  Team Trump is huddling in the White House with his national security mavens to determine what the appropriate follow-on attacks might now be carried out on Iran’s energy and transport infrastructure.  It is clear that the country’s raghead rulers are desperate and properly scared.  Apparently they are convinced that any further diplomatic efforts sans a military response will assuredly result in regime change with their individual heads on the block.  They can easily picture their lifeless bodies dangling from construction cranes in Tehran.  Their alternative is to buy time with some attacks on our regional assets that may cause a US response to sway worldwide sentiments in their favor – e.g. Putin’s call for unconditional cease fire.

    Since the B-2s flew, what I’ve found interesting, but not unexpected, are the responses by those who think that Midnight Hammer was unlawful and/or a mistake to insert the US into the Israeli/Iran war.  And here I’m referring only to those who do believe that Iran should not be able to develop or possess nuclear weapons, and has now been in the process of such development for years.  Those who do not believe that Iran is well on its way to having a deliverable nuclear bomb are not worth wasting time with.

    The remainder of Midnight Hammer critics gather under the beliefs that 1) diplomacy would work and should be given another chance, and/or 2) this was not the right time nor the best way to take out Iran’s nuclear facilities.  When I ask them on what evidence do they pin their hopes on diplomacy, they can cite none but only repeat the hope that this would work and Iran would verifiably destroy its nuclear development capacity and surrender its 60+% uranium stores.  All the deep thinkers in this group ignore both recent history, experience, and the commonly accepted definition of insanity.  They simply remain wrapped in their comforting blind faith.

    The second group simply asserts their gut feel.  These consist of those who believe that Midnight Hammer was a faulty response and/or badly timed.  When pressed for the evidence that supports those assertions, they come up empty.  They cannot recommend a better way nor a better time for taking out Iran’s nuclear capability.  They can present no better set of alternatives simply because they can neither list them nor present any evidence why a possible Plan B would have been better to serve American and Israeli security interests.  They simply reiterate their strong gut feel and hold that up as their gold standard for reasoning about such geo-strategic matters.

    A lot of the world debates under such frayed principles, always generating much heat and little light in the process.  I was trained in professions that required critics of Plan A to come ready to also present a Plan B along with its reasonable basis.

    Posted at

    in

    , , ,
    2 comments on B-2s over Iran (partially restored)

  • Typepad has gone insane

    George Rebane

    I'm sorry to report that Typepad literally blew up on me as I was posting a new commentary.  It wouldn't complete the post, and when I tried to delete it, Typepad also deleted the most recent post on B-2s over Iran.  Am attempting to get Typepad to restore the latter and get their act together.  Apologies.

    Posted at

    in

    3 comments on Typepad has gone insane

  • Polling, polling, and more polling!

    [This post will host the comment stream for readers who are forever interpreting and debating the most recent Trump polling results.  gjr]

    Posted at

    in

    111 comments on Polling, polling, and more polling!

  • Sandbox – 16jun25

    [“Five-minute EV charging, while ambitious, is being actively developed by companies like BYD and CATL. BYD's "Super e-Platform" promises 400 km of range in 5 minutes. CATL, with its battery technology, aims for even greater range gains in the same timeframe. This is achieved through megawatt charging and advanced battery chemistry.”  This will completely change the EV landscape.  I wonder why it’s not getting more press.  gjr]

    Posted at

    in

  • Hyperbiased Media

    George Rebane

    For years my conservative friends and I have shared a common experience when talking to a leftwinger about current events.  They all have massive blind spots in what they know of what’s going on.  The explanation is simple.  They only get their news from leftwing lamestream media which simply omits, minimizes, or hides happenings that do not conform to the Left’s worldview.

    I was reminded of this again when waking up to National Propaganda Radio this morning (yes, like most conservatives, I’m interested in what my liberal neighbors see and hear).  In their weekend news coverage NPR extensively described, among other items, one 600-person anti-Trump demonstration in a remote little town in upper New York state.  This was illustrated as an example of broad grass roots participation in hundreds of such well-organized demonstrations across the country.

    However, another very significant and historical large-scale event was totally ignored, and that was the once-in-a-lifetime, massive military parade down Constitution Avenue in Washington DC celebrating our Army’s 250th birthday – not a word or even a whisper.  To our leftwing friends and neighbors it never happened.  This serves as an example of lamestream’s normal ‘unbiased coverage’ of the news and explains away the ignorance of RR’s leftwing readers as expressed in their contributed comments.  They get a wholly different picture of the country and world from the NYT, WaPo, MSNBC, CNN, ABC, NBC, CBS, … .

    And as such, as I have often reminded readers, leftwingers not only have their own opinions, but also their own facts, history, science, logic, … which are markedly (sometimes totally) different from what those of us on the Right have learned and experience.  The country’s schism is complete simply for the lack of a productive common ground, and to that is added their totally different method of reasoning, even if some vestiges of common beliefs were to be found.

    Then we come to the overall intellectual deficit from which today’s journalism suffers; and here I include the right-leaning outlets like Fox News and Fox Business.  While they do a very good job covering the waterfront of the world’s happenings, their correspondents (and/or news scribes) more often than not omit the critical follow-on questions (to interviewees) or inclusion of crucial points that are fundamental to their reports.  And with these omissions they surrender the field to the country’s socialist cadres and their interpretations which these outlets air lavishly.

    Here's a timely example from reporting on today’s grossly misnamed ‘immigration’ issue  involving the ongoing deportation of illegal aliens.  The Left points out how our agriculture industry would be massively crippled if its current workforce of 40% illegals were to be deported.  In covering this no correspondent of the Right is smart enough to include in their report that, were it to be undertaken, it would take a considerable period of time to deport the thousands of illegals who make up the 40%.  Over this period there would be a natural process (of replacement workers and technology) accompanied by policy changes (e.g. reinitiation of the bracero program) that would minimally affect the industry, if at all.  But by not including this important reality leaves the Left’s misleading point of an instantaneous removal of thousands by ICE agents in the minds of our already lightly read audiences.  Other similar examples abound daily.

    And when it comes to the aired interviews which produce either outlandish assertions or questions totally unanswered, the journalist has two revealing remedies.  First, ask the interviewee on what evidence they base their assertion which will quickly expose their (biased?) basis or shows that they don’t have any for their public stance.  Second, never ignore a by-passed question; the reporter must always tell his audience that the question went unanswered and/or provide an opportunity to fill the exposed void.

    Finally, we should all know that outlets like the NPR should not be provided public funding to support spewing their grossly politically-biased views.  They should appeal to their like-minded audiences and sponsors for the means to exercise their First Amendment rights.

    Posted at

    in

    , , ,
    16 comments on Hyperbiased Media

  • Scattershots – 10jun25 (updated 13jun25)

    George Rebane

    Fossil Fuel Use and Human Progress: The Big Picture

    FossilFuelsMore here (H/T to reader).

    The Left’s riot lies are now historically astounding (more here).  And what makes this both sad and dangerous is that your Democrat neighbor completely believes what s/he hears from Maxine Waters, Hakeem Jeffries, Chuck Schumer, and the other leading leftwing liars of the land.

    [13jun25 update]  The countrywide ‘No King’ demonstrations scheduled for this weekend will truly be historic, especially when combined with the concurrent military parade in DC celebrating our Army’s 250th birthday.  The demonstrations illustrate the magnitude of the Left’s frustration over their ineptness in the political arena while at the same time providing ample evidence of a highly organized socialist cabal that forms the real foundation of today’s Democratic party.  My druthers would be to hold the parade on July 4th, a more appropriate date that would not coincide with President Trump’s birthday, which itself plays into the hands of the Left’s assertion that Trump is acting like a king and is seeking dictatorial control of the country.  When was the last time that America held a military parade composed of hundreds of combat vehicles and marching troops that mimic the parades common in dictatorships like China, Russia, Iran, and North Korea?

    Senator Padilla (D-CA) is a nationally ignored, desperate leftwing low-life jerk who staged yesterday’s rude interruption of Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem’s press conference.  His anonymous entrance and shouting harangue under the guise of “just trying to ask a question” fooled no one even after his identity became known.  Well, that’s not entirely correct – it did fool a good half of the nation (also represented by the No King demonstrations), those who immediately fell in line with the contrived outrages by the Democratic leadership and promptly echoed by their lapdog lamestream media.  On their part the conservative media – e.g. Fox News – has not been smart enough in their reporting to include the fact that even if Padilla had identified himself, it still would have been impolite, insolent, and illegal to burst into a scheduled presser by a senior administration official, demand its peremptory interruption, and then dominate the proceeding with his own agenda.  Even though US senators are above the social norms of good behavior, they are not above the law.

    Posted at

    in

    ,
    12 comments on Scattershots – 10jun25 (updated 13jun25)

  • Sandbox – 2jun25

    [Low cost vs affordable housing is available in the re-introduction of ‘carriage houses’.  The folks in Noblesville, Indiana are discovering that “these units cost considerably less than single-family dwellings and create accessible points into and out of homeownership while preserving neighborhood character. They also have the potential to provide rental income to help property owners afford their mortgages.  Few cities and towns are immune from rising material costs and expensive land. But we control zoning and permitting. We should expand housing options without compromising community character.” gjr]

    Posted at

    in

  • America’s Millionaires

    George Rebane

    [This post appeared (here) in the op-ed pages of the 4jun25 Union.]

    On average, all of us in America are millionaires.  In 2022 the average household net worth – assets minus debts – hit $1.06 million.  But that hopeful number is skewed by the ultra-wealthy.  The more accurate net worth of $192,900 is provided by the median where half of households have more than that, and the other half less. (more here)

    Unfortunately, many households are also living close to their paychecks because most of their net worth is unspendable – locked up in assets like their homes, 401Ks, cars, etc.  The further problem is that while wage growth is real – up 4.8% last year with inflation at 2.7% during the same period – the prices of things from real estate, appliances, vehicles, and other stuff also increased enough to pretty much eat up real wage growth.

    The problem with all this is still government at all levels with its taxes, fees, laws, regulations, …, not counting its ongoing waste, fraud, and abuse, that continue to slow our economy’s growth and impede our makers from producing things at costs that people can more easily afford.  And the ONLY way out of this financial morass is to promote vigorous economic growth that raises all boats – taxing our way to wealth has never worked and is not a reasonable option.

    The road to vigorous economic growth is not a secret.  Non-socialist economists have taught and demonstrated for years that nations’ sustainable growth is based on maximizing free market capitalism and minimizing governments’ role in their economies.  Most students of economics know that any program is unsustainable which continues to consume an increasing fraction of the GDP of a nation, state, or local jurisdiction.  Our governments at all levels are riddled with unsustainable spending which is ‘solved’ by ever greater borrowing.

    And wealth redistribution is not the answer.  First, because the rich don’t have enough of it, and second, because wealth is mobile – it escapes to where it is not confiscated.  A current example of this in America is the mass movement of the makers from high to low tax states; these not only by the rich, but also from the middle class (enough to cause some avaricious states to lose congressional representation) .  A more serious problem arises when a nation’s makers emigrate to distant lands, leaving behind countries with growing fractions of takers.  Recent examples of this can be drawn from the mostly socialist Europe.

    We are now witnessing ‘London’s Great Wealth Exodus’.  After Moscow, the biggest loss of millionaires are those leaving the UK, which amount to 30,000+ over the last ten years, with 11,000 of these emigrating in the last year.  For generations London has been one of the best places in the world for the rich – not any more.  Due to its restrictive financial landscape it has not recovered from the 2008 recession and continues to maintain a risky environment for financial and commercial growth through ever increasing taxes piled on by both Conservative and Labour governments.  New financial centers in Asia and the Middle East are now the new favorite places for the world’s rich. (more here)

    All is not yet lost in the US.  Here a new resurgence of hope has enabled all levels of our economy to grow, and that includes the number of millionaires which increased by 12%, albeit at one of the world's lowest rates.  In the last years we’ve shown ourselves to be very inviting for millions of the world’s financially impoverished. But we also continue to be the land of opportunity for the makers, both homegrown and imported who are investing new billions in our country on the promise of economic security and profits.  These are people who will grow the pie for all of us, and hopefully put to shame those who, according to their lights, only seek to forcibly redistribute the current pie more ‘equitably’.

    Posted at

    in

    , ,
    5 comments on America’s Millionaires

RR FUNDAMENTALS

About the Bastiat Triangle

Glossary & Semantics

A Conservetarian Credo

Commenting Rules

RECENT POSTS

RECENT COMMENTS

CATEGORIES

19 comments on Our Chinese Communist benefactors