George Rebane
‘America was born of dissent. It shall perish when dissent is forbidden.’ I used this anonymous aphorism as a tagline for a recent post, and upon reflection, it rings more true with each passing day. Today loud voices are heard mostly from the Left, but also some from the Right, exhorting us to set our beliefs aside and be compliantly silent. The underlying principle that is being hoisted like a banner in the public square is ‘politics has no place for violence.’
That is also the title of a piece by Rep Steve Scalise (R-LA) in the 13jan21 WSJ (here). Unfortunately, the congressman could not be more wrong, both historically and existentially. Going back to the days of historian Thucydides of ancient Greece, violence has always been one of the extremes and frequently practiced bookends of politics. The other extreme of political behavior is silent compliance, the rigidly enforced favorite of tyrants. To get a deeper understanding of this, I recommend to you Graham Allison’s Destined for War: Can America and China escape Thucydides’s Trap (2017). (Kissinger’s plaudit of the book included, “Thucydides’ Trap identifies the cardinal challenge to world order.”)
Allison and other historians have long made it clear that almost every military action, including partisan uprisings, were spawned for political reasons. Nevertheless, most of us believe that a social order succumbing to either of these extremes represents a failure of practicing prudent politics. An oft-accepted definition of politics is ‘the art of the possible’, which is still valid with its noted bookends withstanding.
In this light, I maintain that current arguments, exhortations, and platitudes from our national leaders do nothing to calm the angry sea that today defines social order. None of these politicians can point to a common ground where we may meet to forge a mutually acceptable future. What each offers in place of such a political meeting is simply another version of ‘my way or the highway’. And the diagnosis is appropriate to those of us minor ideologues making our voices heard on the grassroots hustings. For me as a conservetarian, the Left offers little to nothing that would give rise to a world in which I would want my progeny to live. And collectivists feel equally strong about their ideals.
Political peace has been achieved in the past mostly by both (all) sides stumbling into a de facto compromise that is to no one’s complete liking, and one that motivates everyone to continue working for their political goals with plausible hope in their hearts. And that is the important point. The discovered compromise must be such that neither side loses hope of still being able to push the policy peanuts in their desired direction. When that hope vanishes or is quashed, then one of the political bookends is all that remains, and the one chosen depends on the people’s means, culture, and their historical narrative.
Today President Trump was impeached again by the House, this time being accused of “encouraging a mob to storm Congress as part of an effort to overturn Joe Biden’s election win." For millions of us across the land this most certainly was the most scurrilous political act we have witnessed during our lifetime. There is no need to rehash all the ethical, constitutional, and simply principled criteria that were violated in performing probably the most vindictive act by Congress in its long history. There was no opportunity, nor desire by the Democrats, to permit a reasoned defense by the opposition; it was simply a hastily assembled and railroaded political lynching. What it underlined for all who pay attention is that this abortion on the floor of the House did nothing but cement in place an implacable division between polarized Americans that continues to grow in its scope and girth.
And we learned more about the stout political underpinnings of the ten so-called Republicans who decided to pile on to this judicial charade. All the while more Republicans quake in their boots as the Dems and their lamestream continue to broadcast accusations of ‘acts of sedition’ and ‘insurrection’, none of which was intended or took place. What did take place, as the record shows, is the President’s exhortation for his supporters to go to the Capitol and protest the scheduled proceedings to certify the electoral votes. There is nothing illegal about a call for such action by citizens who do feel aggrieved that the November election was fraught with irregularities and fraud. But today our liberties retreated another step as last Wednesday’s speech by the president was deemed both illegal and impeachable. Besides cementing our breach, this second impeachment has now put a serious rip into the fabric of what once were the normative affairs of governance.
[15jan21 update] 'Assault on the Capitol Has Let Loose the Electronic Octopus' argues Victor Davis Hanson in a convincing piece apropos to these dark days. And reader posts a link with a DoJ official declaring there is "no direct evidence" of plot to kill, kidnap lawmakers in Capitol assault (here).
rebanesruminations.com 