[Sparse postings are due to our being on travel now. We'll report on that later. Am still planning to compile a growing list of liberal/progressive public policies, initiatives, laws, regulations, taxes, tributes, fees, … that should demonstrate to all but the most mentally deficient that Democrats and their various auxiliaries (e.g. BLM, Antifa) are hell-bent on making America into a neo-Marxist state. It was quite a revelation that their grassroots constituents have no idea of this, and, instead, take umbrage at anyone suggesting such as being a rightwing conspiracy theorist. To them, no one is a Marxist, save they wear their hammer & sickle sweater in public. gjr]

ARCHIVES
- January 2026
- December 2025
- November 2025
- October 2025
- September 2025
- August 2025
- July 2025
- June 2025
- May 2025
- April 2025
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
OUR LINKS
YubaNet
White House Blog
Watts Up With That?
The Union
Sierra Thread
RL “Bob” Crabb
Barry Pruett Blog
-
George Rebane
In a democracy it's never the minority, but always the lightly read majority that votes in the tyrant.
“… scientific evidence supporting facemasks’ efficacy is lacking, adverse physiological, psychological and health effects are established.” So reports our NIH here. And it’s federal law that you have to wear a face mask during your entire flight when traveling. Another righthand/lefthand confusion by government that no liberal in the land notices as they back more and more things an ever larger government will do to us. The rest of us see it for what it is – perennially expanding state power and control.
Rebane’s “far right ideology” continues to be a characteristic of my political demeanor that is oft cited, yet unsubstantiated, by local liberals. Now don’t get me wrong, I may have no problem being characterized with that label if I or my detractors knew the tenets of a far right ideology, tenets which I share as demonstrated by my published credo and extensive oeuvre of socio-political commentaries. I am truly interested in getting some liberal of sufficient intellect to offer up a cogent list (it doesn’t have to be long) of evidence that places me in their concept of the far right of our political spectrum.
[1may21 update] Not one of our leftwing worthies would/could? step up to the plate and give even one substantive example of my ‘far right’ attributes. This, of course, speaks to the larger problem shared by our semantically simplistic Left. They have no idea what are the definitions of the everyday words they use, like ‘racist’, ‘white supremacist’, ‘white nationalist’, ‘misogynist’, ‘rightwinger’, …, and now ‘far right’. To them it is all part of the approved narrative passed to them from their thought leaders – it’s completely acceptable in their circles to simply parrot, as long as you parrot the proper words. And speaking of semantically simplistic, to them such terms as ‘socialist’ and ‘socialism’ have binary meanings. If a person or country does not explicitly subscribe to ALL the attributes that define a socialist, then neither he nor the jurisdiction is socialist. The same goes for socialism; it’s all or none – nothing is seen to progress toward socialism until its final attribute is in place and verified.
Posted at
in
173 comments on Scattershots – 21apr21 (updated 1may21) -
[CRT is the most putrid piece of anti-American pedagogy to infect our institutions in at least the last 100 years. Thanks to the Democratic Party, it is now rampant as it metastasizes the minds of our lightly read neighbors, products of schools that for years have focused their students on America’s sins. Today CRT is being rapidly incorporated into California’s public schools, government agencies, and politically compliant corporatist enterprises. Conservative journalist Christopher Rufo recently gave a speech at Hillsdale College on ‘Critical Race Theory: What it Is and How to Fight It’ which was published in the March 2021 Imprimis. It is the most cogent, clear, and concise description of CRT and its current spread across our land. It is reprinted here by permission from Imprimis, a publication of Hillsdale College. gjr]
Christopher F. Rufo
Critical race theory is fast becoming America’s new institutional orthodoxy. Yet most Americans have never heard of it—and of those who have, many don’t understand it. It’s time for this to change. We need to know what it is so we can know how to fight it.
In explaining critical race theory, it helps to begin with a brief history of Marxism. Originally, the Marxist Left built its political program on the theory of class conflict. Marx believed that the primary characteristic of industrial societies was the imbalance of power between capitalists and workers. The solution to that imbalance, according to Marx, was revolution: the workers would eventually gain consciousness of their plight, seize the means of production, overthrow the capitalist class, and usher in a new socialist society.
-
George Rebane
[My ‘Farewell Unity’ commentary was also published in the 3apr21 Union (here). Its lengthy comment stream made clear again that most liberals had trouble understanding my proposition for finding common ground. Nevertheless, the piece has since then garnered considerable interest. This week the newspaper printed on separate days not one, not two, but three op-ed columns by liberals delivering most revealing critiques of the future Americas desired by both sides – ‘Path to unity in America’(13apr21) by Elliot Schneiderman, ‘A point of near unity’(15apr21) by Paul Hauck, and ‘Finding Unity in America’(16apr21) by Nory Fussel. When “retired scientist” Schneiderman took me to task, I responded with the piece below, prematurely, it turned out, since I was not aware of the subsequent op-eds by Hauck and Fussel. I address the latter two in the addendum to this post. Perhaps all this interest provides hope that the conversation toward unity, which I outline below, will start here or elsewhere. 20apr21 update – an edited form of this commentary was published here in the 20apr21 Union. More here.]
I was halfway heartened to read ‘left-leaning neighbor’ Elliot Schneiderman’s 12apr21 ‘Path to unity in America’ response to my 3ap21 ‘Farewell Unity’ column. It appears both of us support a future America that is persistently hailed by our Right, and seldom if ever described by our Left. In fact, Elliot takes exception to the neo-Marxist future that I describe, and the one to which the current administration and the Democrat leadership publicly subscribe. These disparate visions of America are well documented by the commentariats of both sides. Elliot writes –
George quite wrongly states that “our neighbors on the left work feverishly for” this Marxist global government world view. I’m on our country’s left and will have none of it, I don’t personally know a single American that would ascribe (sic) to it, and I am convinced that the vast majority of our country’s left do not ascribe (sic) to it.
This remarkable view from the Left is easily explained by the recorded half-century decline of our progressive schools that have assiduously omitted any mention of such historic realities. And it is easily confirmed through conversations with a sampling of your left-leaning neighbors, especially the ones cited by Elliot.
-
George Rebane
The attack on Georgia’s new voter law is turning out to be a national disgrace. The evidence is clear – it is not the launch of Jim Crow 2.0, neither does is suppress black voter turnout. As many have shown, in the 40 states that have similar election laws, the ratios of black voter turnouts have been higher than those of white voters. Yet the Biden administration is doubling down on their Big Lie about Georgia, with all of it being picked up and echoed by the lamestream. Most revealing is how the corporatist CEOs are falling in line to support the leftwing narrative. As always, the Democrats’ African-American constituents don’t have a clue about any of this, and continue their plantation lives blaming the whole thing on ‘racism’ and ‘white supremacy’.
JFK was elected on an historical Big Lie – the non-existent 1960 “missile gap”. In fact, the missile gap did exist, as subsequent post-USSR revelations attest, but was definitely in favor of the US. Nikita Khrushchev had very few long-range ballistic missiles that could hit North American targets, and for that reason he got Castro to permit him to secretly station Soviet mid-range nuclear missiles in Cuba. As history has shown, it was basically dumb luck that kept the world from a global nuclear exchange, and not anything that Kennedy and his military planners did back in October 1962. (more here) LBJ followed suit four years later with his own Big Lie about the Gulf of Tonkin ‘attack’ that got us bigtime into Vietnam. The upshot of Vietnam was Jimmy Carter’s military standdown that invited Brezhnev into starting WW3 in Europe. The Soviet leaders knew that the USSR economy was on its last legs in being able to maintain par force with America and NATO; for the communists in 1980 it was now or never. And it was Reagan who convinced Brezhnev and then Gorbachev that ‘never’ was their best option.
The Left's response to the above Big Lies is to point at Bush2 getting us to invade Iraq after 9/11 because Saddam had weapons of mass destruction. That was true because Saddam used his Soviet-era WMDs on his own people. There are a number of explanations as to why none were found when the Americans finally got to search the country. (e.g. where did Syria subsequently and suddenly get the WMDs to use on its people?) But Bush2 didn't tell a Big Lie, because both our and EU intelligence sources confirmed the existence of Iraq's WMDs, and all western leaders accepted that report even if they all didn't agree on how to respond. This debate continues to this day.
[12apr21 update] Biden one-ups Obama’s “fundamental transformation” with his insane program to erase America as we know it. Kevin McCullough writes (here) – “He’s attempting to undo American accountability in elections through his support of HR1. He’s attempting to undo our economic foundations with massive printing (read that: devaluing) of our currency. He’s attempting to destroy free enterprise and job growth with coming massive tax increases. He’s attempting to take away individual liberties with proposed mask mandates, and desired lockdowns. He supports any attempt to end the Senate filibuster—in order to push through horrific laws by the thinnest margins ever attempted. He’s attempting to overwhelm our security at our borders by encouraging 100’s of 1000’s of unverifiable persons of unknown origins to cross our borders without scrutiny nor penalty. He wants the police weakened. He is pledging to take guns away from law abiding owners. And he wants to pervert the justice system so dramatically that the Constitution becomes unrecognizable.”
[14apr21 update] The typo in my ‘Farewell Unity’ column in the 2apr21 Union continues to draw the ire of local liberals, most recently today’s letter from a Ms Rachel Howard (here). I had already posted the correction in these pages and on Union’s online edition, but that has made no never mind to our progressive neighbors. What really needs pointing out repeatedly and often is how the Left responds to analyses like mine regarding the tragic condition of our national unity – Ex uno pluria. For most of them, understanding that the first step toward a common ground that can launch a productive conversation requires understanding each other’s desiderata for our country’s future, this is an intellectual bridge too far. Anyone who posits such a requirement by identifying potential targets of a transformed America is immediately vilified for, of all things, seeking to sow the seeds of disunity.
[17apr21 update] Here’s a hit to The Union for bending over backward to tolerate broad-based bullshit, no matter how off-the-wall it is. ‘Cancel culture and voting rights’ by Richard Stormsgaard gives us this sample – “Reagan ridiculed the concept of good government as advocated by Lincoln and Eisenhower. Gingrich wanted to flush government down the tub. Steve Bannon, Trump’s senior adviser, advocated blowing up all of society. And by 2018, Donald Trump regularly attacked national security and military leaders for resisting his efforts to subdue all branches of government to his personal whims. … In all other Western liberal democracies, conservatives, liberals and laborites generally pursued the common good from their different perspectives, as was the case in the United States prior to the Reagan revolution.” The remainder of his outpouring is an equal barrage of partisan allegation free of a single supporting statement that would give some substance to his naked claims. And then there’s the revelation by another leftwing worthy, Jon Schwarz, telling his followers (here) that we’ve had it all wrong about which side enforces political correctness. All along it’s really been the Republican Party and the Right. I guess we’ve had a hard time seeing it through the lying lens of their lamestream media that continues denying the daily proto-Marxist machinations of the Democratic Party whose constiuents pull down historical statues, riot, loot and burn, and erase the names and history that don’t measure up to their narrative – i.e. political correctness. Examples from the Right seem to be missing.
Corrupt climate change calamities. Working separately, two prominent climate scientists have again assembled a considerable amount of science to expose the history of global warming hysteria, and its current expansion on steroids promoted and pushed by Biden Big Lie Machine. I’m cobbling together the recent writings of Drs Steven Koonin of Caltech and Richard Lindzen of MIT. Climate change was becoming a bit long of tooth as the raison d’etre for fundamentally transforming America into a socialist autocracy. Along came Covid, a godsend on steroids for the Left’s command/control central planners. But now those damn vaccines are making the people have wrong ideas again about risk and their freedoms, so it’s time to crank up the global warming catastrophe again. The works of Koonin and Lindzen are timely calmatives that will be fiercely attacked in the lamestream and by every Democrat politician who can find a mic.
-
[Apologies. Have no idea where the time went since the 24mar21 Sandbox. Actually, I'm in the middle of presenting a series of seminars on numeracy and critical thinking, and working on the PowerPoints got me a bit absorbed. Mea culpa. gjr]
-
George Rebane
Jeff Hawkins, cofounder of Numenta, is the author of A Thousand Brains – A new theory of intelligence (2021). To many, me included, Hawkins has been a national treasure since his first book On Intelligence (2004). After inventing the Palm Pilot and becoming wealthy, Hawkins has devoted his life to brain research as it impacts our understanding of intelligence, consciousness, and our ability to create machines with these attributes. In this enterprise he and his colleagues have devised a new understanding of how our brain’s architecture, specifically the neocortex, is able to perform all the wondrous functions which we all take for granted.
My son-in-law who is a senior AI researcher at Microsoft Research, sent me the book as part of our ongoing conversation that includes the art of the possible in intelligence studies and, of course, the Singularity. For me Hawkins’ book was an immediate page-turner that jumped to the head of my list of books-in-progress. The 257-page book is divided into three parts: A New Understanding of the Brain, Machine Intelligence, and Human Intelligence.
In the first part Hawkins builds on the work of famed neuroscientist Vernon Mountcastle, who revealed the structure of the neocortex (the new brain) as consisting of hundreds of thousands of cortical columns or cores, each of them with pretty much the same make-up of interconnected neurons which also have very select and important dendritic connections to other cores, often located on the other side of the brain. The important concept here is that the cortical column is itself a tiny brain that is able to learn and retain ‘frames’ of perceived reality which it then assembles with other cores containing complementary frames to result in a voting process from which our experienced reality emerges.These common components that make up the neocortex are ubiquitous in their functioning. When those that get inputs from our visual subsystem, these become visual processors and generate our visual world; when connected to our auditory subsystem, they do auditory processing and create our world of sounds, and so on. Hawkins’ exposition of how these cortical cores connect to our sensors, manipulanda (e.g. hands, feet), and parts of our ‘old brain’ is an absorbing read. On every page, the reader’s brain is coming up with all sorts of alternative AI implementations that have now been introduced into his art of the possible.
And for me the stuff I learned in the first part makes the second part on machine intelligence very exciting. The people at Numenta and other similar AI companies are all experimenting with synthesizing software and hardware structures that can mimic the functions of the cortical core, and then devising ingenious architectures that join thousands of these cores into new kinds of learning machines. The commonly recognized holy grail among these enterprises is AGI – artificial generalized intelligence, of which today not even the most advanced forms of deep learning artificial neural nets are capable. All of the ballyhooed AIs today are still one-tune bands, no matter how sophisticated tunes they are able to recognize and play. None can efficiently construct their surrounding reality and transfer that knowledge (i.e. generalize) to operate in different environments or situations like any year-old human infant, or, for that matter, as can a lot of critters.
-
“When I use a word,' Humpty Dumpty said in rather a scornful tone, 'it means just when and what I choose it to mean — neither more nor less. ' 'The question is,' said Alice, 'whether you can make words mean so many different things. ' 'The question is,' said Humpty Dumpty, 'which is to be master — that's all.” (With apologies to Lewis Carroll.)
George Rebane
We talk past each other because we share no common logic, reasoning, history, facts, …, and yes, no common semantics. One side demands to know what words mean during a dialogue or debate, the other side wants to avoid such revelations at all costs. This has been clear since at least the early days of the Bolshevik Revolution, because for the Left history is in a constant state of political and ideological revision. The role of any given word today may have to change markedly tomorrow when responding to unforeseen events or opportunities.
We recognize socialism as one of the prominent limbs of collectivism, a form of that overarching ideology that readily can morph into communism or one of many less-formalized forms of totalitarianism. The common denominator of all these is that the individual derives value only to the extent that he succumbs to and supports the regime in power, all others are cast into various groups of traitors, seditionists, insurrectionists, and other repressed kinds of ‘counter-revolutionaries’. Today in America we see and already experience harbingers of such class categorizations by the ascendant Left and their lamestream media.
As examples, none on the Left can or will give the public any stable or even conditionally stable definitions of their workaday pejoratives like ‘racist’, ‘nationalist’, ‘white supremacist’, ‘fascist’, ‘deplorables’, ‘sexist’, ‘misogynist’, … , and terms such as ‘white privilege’, ‘white nationalism’, ‘equality’, ‘equity’, ‘racial preference’, … , and of course ‘sedition’ and ‘insurrection’.
Such use of slippery semantics by the Left occurs at all levels of our society ranging from the federal government all the way down to our local leftwing worthies who comment on RR. Examples of these abound. On one end, we refer you to today’s attempt by Biden to end-run Congress on gun control and the Second Amendment collected under the undefined rubric of ‘gun violence’. Any reasonable view of his “six initial actions” (here) reveals that nowhere does he define or point to definitions of such key terms as ‘ghost guns’ and ‘assault weapon’, or the scope of his proposed nationalized ‘red flag’ law. Everyone on both sides knows that the objective here is to enable another major ratchet on restricting the constructive use and ownership of firearms, therefore definitions always need to be malleable.
On the local level a leftwing worthy continues to echo (here) the Left’s Big Lie that the 6jan21 storming of the Capitol, enabled by an incompetently led and permissive cadre of Capitol Police, was an “insurrection”. I countered with my habitual attempt to uncover the Left’s pernicious use of language by citing the classical definition of insurrection. (See also the RR ‘Glossary & Semantics’ and ‘A Conservetarian Credo’.) The only response that our leftwinger could muster was to accuse me of hiding behind semantics, the correct use of the English language – to wit, “… semantics, the weakest of all responses to be used only when you have nothing else to say.” There was no need for anyone to say anything more in that case than to point out the man’s egregious use of language. Yet, at a loss for a wider access to vocabulary, he then demanded what I would call the 6jan21 event at the Capitol.
Well, since there was no evidence whatsoever of any preparation or execution of actions to overturn our sitting government and replace it with one waiting in the wings, I would call the penetration of the building a spontaneous civil disobedience, a mob action, or even a directionless and chaotic riot by a frustrated crowd. To confirm this, the investigations launched in response have not been able to find evidence for anything more sinister and/or organized that occurred on that day. Yet it was an event which daily our Democrats still attempt to inflame and divide Americans by equating it to the 7dec41 and 11sep01 ‘days of infamy’. Here we see one more subversion of semantics by the Left, as they broadcast propaganda at its best and most effectively against intellectually defenseless people burdened by being educated in progressive public schools.
RR FUNDAMENTALS
RECENT POSTS
- Greenland’s Realities
- Father forgive them for they know not …
- Democrats Ascendant
- Scattershots – 4jan26 (updated 8jan26)
- Sandbox – 4jan26
RECENT COMMENTS
CATEGORIES
- Agenda 21 (490)
- All Things Trump (32)
- Books & Media (34)
- Budget (2)
- California (385)
- Comment Sandbox (488)
- Critical Thinking & Numeracy (1,312)
- Culture Comments (750)
- Current Affairs (1,859)
- Film (7)
- Food and Drink (9)
- Games (5)
- General (215)
- Glossary & Semantics (25)
- Great Divide (208)
- Growth (1)
- Happenings (679)
- Investing (43)
- Music (2)
- My Story (62)
- Nevada County (733)
- Our Country (2,431)
- Our World (630)
- Rebane Doctrine (131)
- Religion (38)
- sandbox (2)
- Science (33)
- Science Snippets (165)
- Singularity Signposts (144)
- Sports (3)
- The Liberal Mind (644)
- The Rear View (74)
- Travel (8)
- Trump (3)
- Uncategorized (45)
- We the iSheeple (620)
- Web/Tech (176)

