[Still no internet, and ATT can’t figure out why. Three tech teams have worked on the problem to date, and one is here now. Bear with me, and spare prayers gratefully accepted. gjr

ARCHIVES
- January 2026
- December 2025
- November 2025
- October 2025
- September 2025
- August 2025
- July 2025
- June 2025
- May 2025
- April 2025
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
OUR LINKS
YubaNet
White House Blog
Watts Up With That?
The Union
Sierra Thread
RL “Bob” Crabb
Barry Pruett Blog
-
George Rebane
A dear friend of more than half century who insists he is a middle-roader and considers both sides before coming to conclusions had an extremely revealing but unsurprising email exchange with me minutes ago. We had just finished watching the news, a great part of which was the coverage of Durham’s announcement and court filing last Friday concerning the Clinton Russiagate scandal. Now my friend is very well educated and seeks not to be identified as a polarized American. He is even an active member of No Labels as confirmation of his claim of being politically independent. (No Labels is patently leftwing.)
For any conservetarian and most right-leaning readers of my many years’ experience who might examine the writings and opinions of my friend, they would immediately identify him as a dyed-in-the-wool leftist cum progressive. One who is even insular along with run-of-the-mill Democrats who drastically limit themselves only to lamestream sources – all others are considered suspect political propaganda from the Right. So here is our little email exchange less than an hour ago.
George: What's your take on the latest Durham finding and court filing that came out last Friday?
Friend: Durham as in NC? I have followed that. Is it on gerrymandering or something else?
More conservative outlets such as the WSJ, FN, Washington Times, Newsmax, … have had wall-to-wall coverage of this latest revelation which in itself is much more devastating and sheds light on the illegal subterfuge in our corrupt government than Watergate ever was. And from the reports this evening on media coverage, we find that more than half of the country is totally ignorant of Durham’s latest findings and filings. (more here)
Someone out there with a keener mind than mine, please find us some hope.
As a coda to this bleeding artery, consider conservative pundits like FN’s Brit Hume sonorously informing us that with this latest finding the lamestream cannot help avoiding an ample helping of egg on their face. Unfortunately, nothing could be further from the truth. The lamestream doesn’t give a big rat’s ass about what rightwing journalists, pundits, and commentators know or think. Their focus is on the great unwashed. As long as they know that they control what that cohort of Americans knows and believes, the rest makes no never mind. We confirm that at every election
Posted at
in
54 comments on Reunification? Fuhgettaboudit! -
George Rebane
The source of any problem you encounter in the public forum is more than likely due to some institution, agency, or bureau of government; bet on it.
Political commentator Kim Iverson writes ‘Disagree with government policy? Homeland security says you’re a ‘terrorist’ if you speak out’. The Dept of Homeland Security is on the lookout for people, including unconnected individuals, who spread “misinformation, disinformation or malinformation (MDM)”. Of course, there is no rigorous, let alone broadly accepted, definitions of MDM; they are to be used to proscribe speech unacceptable to government bureaucrats in the manner of Carroll’s Humpty Dumpty – ‘When I use a word, it means just what I choose it to mean – neither more nor less.’
Your iniquities of government convenience are spelled out in the just released 7feb22 Bulletin of the National Terrorism Advisory System. According to this document, you are guilty of such domestic terrorism, if according to the DHS or any of its cooperating agencies, your communications “sow discord or undermine public trust in US Government institutions.” The internet and blogosphere is therefore chock full of MDM and an easy picking for any progressive politician or bureaucrat.
And Iverson reports that it doesn’t matter if things change. “It was originally a conspiracy theory that there would be vaccine mandates. It was misinformation to say the vaccine doesn’t prevent spread.” Tomorrow Humpty Dumpty can change its federal mind and get you coming or going. “By issuing this bulletin they’ve effectively given themselves the freedom to halt any dissent they don’t like under the guise of ‘it could lead to violence.’”
And for those who want to confirm which political side is ALWAYS in favor of more autocracy, keep an eye on the sound of silence emanating on this from our progressives and their lamestream media. (H/T to reader)
[Addendum] One of our astute readers notified us of the latest bombshell in our president’s rush to destroy America and relegate it into a second-world socialist country (here) compliant to the establishment of the new global world order. The Heritage Foundation publishes the much read and respected ‘Index of Economic Freedom’. This year the US has descended to a new low on the index. In the categorical rankings ‘Free’ consists of the top seven countries. The next category is ‘Mostly Free’ in which the US resides at rank 25. (more here)
The more backward nations that would benefit most from increasing their economic freedoms do exactly the opposite. Their populations, ruled by autocrats and tyrants, are composed of overwhelmingly ignorant and under-educated people who have never had the opportunity to bloom and make their way in the world. It is a foreboding picture of what America will become as our electorate becomes increasingly ignorant and votes for politicians and policies that demonstrably lower our country’s quality of life – and the doofuses have no clue where they are taking the country. California, of course, is the poster child.
-
George Rebane
Readers know that I am a longtime admirer and student of Victor Davis Hanson. I have met him and spent time talking with him (here). But when he writes ‘Why Ideology is the Ancient Enemy of Civilization’, I have to pick a nit with him because there he uses a too narrow of a semantical brush to condemn a perfectly good and useful word. Most dictionaries define –
Ideology – “a system of ideas and ideals, especially one which forms the basis of economic or political theory and policy – e.g. "the ideology of democracy". The science of ideas; the study of their origin and nature.” (dictionary.com)
Here on RR I have refined the definition somewhat to ‘A structured and communicable belief system that in its best expression is composed of tenets defendable by and malleable to reason. Ideologue – a person who is willing to communicate and defend his ideology.’
In his referenced essay VDH goes through a litany of current ideologues and historical ideologies, the practice of which devastated the populations under which they were forced to live. But limiting the definition to only those dark ideologies and their hypocritical ideologues does a disservice to the correct and comprehensive semantics for which these terms were originally fashioned, and have correctly been used over the years. Peremptorily cutting off the good parts of both is another example of amputating the language and thereby reducing its ability to efficiently convey information.
There is no need for this kind of surgery. Learning to live with such disabled terms, how then would one describe salutary and beneficial belief systems along with their adherents and practitioners?
-
George Rebane
Berkeley professor, cognitive linguist, and progressive philosopher extraordinaire George Lakoff is the celebrated author of Don’t think of an Elephant (2014), which in its first (2004) edition became the best selling definitive bible of neo-Marxist thought, policy, and communication. He is the intellectual darling of the Left who has spelled out the belief systems of today’s progressives and conservatives, and how to communicate these to the masses. One of his strong theses is that the difference between the Ps and Cs is organic and can be traced to the basic way each cohorts’ brains are wired. Readers may recall my introduction of this notion by citing a University College London clinical study (here). And he confirms the existence of totally different worldviews of both sides, including understanding of logic and perception of truth. In short, as these pages have asserted over the years, we see and understand very little in common even when we are looking at the same thing.
Lakoff educates his readers on both the mores and values of Ps and Cs. He, as I, don’t give much credence to the claimed existence of the middle-road ideologues, their belief system is a muddle of tenets cobbled together from both sides that result in a mutually incoherent amalgam which really doesn’t work. Both sides do their best to convert these ‘independents’ and attract them into their respective camps. But in the larger context of Lakoff’s message to his congregants, he really has no idea what conservatives believe and practice. Nevertheless, his strong construction of current progressive beliefs – mores and values – is an illuminating compendium of neo-Marxist tenets that we conservetarians and others of the Right hold foreign to human nature.
An example of Lakoff’s broad-brush of P and C distinguishing characteristics is that P families are “nurturing” environments in which to bring up children, and C families hew to the “strict father model” wherein children are taught “absolute” rights and wrongs. The bottom line of such up-bringing environments is that Ps produce good people, and Cs produce bad people with all kinds of social deficits. Today from what we observe being reported in the media and taught in our public schools, it is clear that Lakoff’s strict differentiation between Ps and Cs is taken as ground truth by our national leftwing. Again, I recommend Lakoff’s Elephants … as an illuminating read to all my right-leaning and mid-road compatriots.
Moving on to Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, we see that he has succumbed to the Left’s framing of the 6jan21 Capitol riot as a “violent insurrection”. We have covered the use of such language 20 ways from Sunday in these pages, and witness his use of such language with great disappointment, and also surprise. There definitely is a growing faction of Republican leadership that is not clear on the concept of what the Democrats want to achieve in molding the pre-election public mind. I don’t know whether Mitch is losing it or he really has a rationale for starting to adopt the Left’s lexicon. It all started with seemingly innocent sounding malaprops such as ‘illegal immigrant’ and ‘climate change’. What makes it all the more destructive is that our ability to communicate in the public forum is diminished daily by such degradations of our language. In any event, Sen McConnell appears as the able leader of the politically silent majority Republicans who have so much to tell our electorate, but only make a peep now and then.
Finally, I have to give a pseudo-kudo to ol’ Bumblebrain, our president. He is finally acting a bit like the leader of the world’s white hat hegemon with his agonizingly belated aid to Ukraine, sending them armaments and moving more American military into trip-wire positions in Russia’s near-abroad NATO neighbors. (more here) Rebane Doctrine has backed and promoted America’s role as the powerful hegemon sheriff of the post-WW2 world order. Ever since George Kennan laid out our cold war strategy of containment in his 1946 Long Telegram, the US has been doing mankind an enormous good by selectively holding back the spread of totalitarianism in its many forms. As Kennan warned us, this job is neither cheap nor easy, but it beats hell out of having a nuclear WW3 or a global autocracy a la Orwell or Red China. And America has been the only player on the world stage qualified in means and mindset for the job – long may it wave.
-
[Now that we are an inflation nation, anyone care to predict how much of the dollar will be destroyed this year? gjr]
-
George Rebane
Numbers never speak for themselves. Instead, they always deliver the substance of adroitly framed messages by astute spokespeople.
‘Climate Scientists Encounter Limits of Computer Models, Bedeviling Policy’ is the title of a comprehensive survey article in the 6feb22 WSJ, that echoes and confirms most of the points made in these pages about general circulation models (GCMs) that have been used to predict Earth’s temperatures in the long-term. Over the past decades the number of competing (and some complementing) GCMs have grown to several hundred. Almost all of them tell their own stories about the future. And all of them gain ‘credibility’ in the eyes of science-free politicians and activists by being meticulously tuned through adjusting their myriads of ‘knobs’ (constants) so that they can take past data and generate today’s climate as their outputs. As those trained in data analysis and estimation will tell you, perfecting past performance to predict the present is no guarantee that predictions of the future will then be on the mark. (Kinda sounds like the copy delivered by your financial advisor.) The current big bugaboo is the impact of clouds, which no one really knows how to model their impact on radiation reflection and/or heat retention. One thing that GCMs have in common is the prediction of higher temps in the out-years. These numbers continue to be embraced by all true believers in the coming climate catastrophe, and will be used to justify even more draconian policies to combat what they devoutly embrace as preventable man-made global warming.
[7feb22 update] Picking up on the reparations thread in the last Sandbox, I’d like to throw my native Estonia’s hat into the ring for its due in the ‘past-due payments to make up for historical bad behaviors’ gambit. The Ests (large Viking tribe of oak tree worshippers) lost their independence in the 1200s when German Teutonic Knights conquered the entire Baltic region extending north to Estonia. Since then, Estonia has been a ‘bailiwick’ ruled in turn over the centuries by Germans, Russians, and Swedes. The culturally insular and obdurate Estonians were always kept as serfs cum slaves to work the land for their foreign masters. They never acclimated to their forced last-class social status and rebelled every couple of generations (here), only to be put down ruthlessly by the established ruling order du jour. This ended with the revolution of 1918 in which Estonia finally freed itself from the most recent centuries of rule by Russia. Independence lasted until the start of WW2 in 1939 when the Soviets overran the country and once more made it a Slavic satrapy, this time under the communists. Estonia again became free in 1991 with the fall of the USSR. So, for all those centuries of languishing under the brutal heels of the Germans, Swedes, and Russians, doesn’t Estonia belong somewhere at the head of the reparations equity line that many think should now start extracting social justice checks from all kinds of historical bad actors? But then again, do we really want to open that Pandora’s Box?
[8feb22 update] DHS’s domestic terrorist watch is now in full swing as described in the 7feb22 DHS National Terrorism Advisory System Bulletin. We are again on a WW2 keep-an-eye-on-your-neighbor footing – remember ‘If you see something, say something’. Report suspicious stuff to your local FBI field office or Fusion Center. And this includes anyone who still has doubts about the 2020 election, or thinks the government hasn’t been straight with us about fighting the Covid-19 pandemic. Personally, I’m waiting for the posting of cash rewards, at which time I plan to turn all of you in. Guilty as alleged and/or until proven innocent. H/T to reader for the heads up on this.
Masks for Covid are butt stupid is the blunt conclusion of a compendium of studies, citing verifiable sources, from Swiss Policy Research – ‘Are Face Masks Effective? The Evidence’ – that one of our astute readers posted in a RR comment stream. Rather than let it languish there, I’m giving it more prominence here. This is another important document that blows the cover off the political corruption that continues to pander this pandemic, and that is made worse by the cohort of compliant ignorance that pervades the land.
[11feb22 update] The Left is rapidly discovering that there is no ‘settled science’ on which they can hang their political hat. All Covid response policies and the formerly immutable truths of ‘followed science’ they were based on are rapidly changing as the November mid-term election approaches. What you will never see out of a leftwinger or their lamestream lackies is recognition that they have been wrong and their mistakes have led to thousands of avoidable deaths, irretrievable educational losses to our youth, and tens of thousands of businesses and livelihoods destroyed. Hopefully now these functional idiots will realize that we have an endemic virus, like so many others that we have learned to live with. But no premature rejoicing, these same worthies have plenty of opportunities to harm us and the country with their ongoing work on border security, climate change, the economy, K-12 education, … .
For all you racists out there who want to hide your racism from black folks, here is a little how-to piece that will serve you well. It is written by a black lady who has given the problem a lot of thought. She has a list of attributes that racist white folks cannot help but exhibit sooner or later. Of course, them racist white people can use the same list to practice hiding their inevitable racism, or, if so motivated, attempt to purify themselves from that societal stain.
-
George Rebane
Time for little respite from matters political and geo-strategic. Years ago I came up with a TechTest problem that asked if there were an optimal speed that minimized the amount of rain coming through the area of a car’s missing windshield. A few days ago I ran into another form of this problem in one of my techie subscriptions. The question this time was whether you would get more wet or less wet if you ran or walked some distance to get to shelter. These are essentially the same problem, and I learned that the problem has a long history and debated solutions among techies versed in quantitative STEM.
Well, if you frame the problem correctly, the solution readily reveals itself along with an interesting twist. So, I decided to re-solve it using the missing windshield version because that makes all the variables and resulting math unambiguous and intuitively clear. We start with an area A, at angle φ to the vertical, moving horizontally at speed vA through a steady rainfall in which the drops fall at speed vR at an angle θ off vertical as shown in the figure below. When you add these two velocities (speeds with angles), you get vRA at angle α, the windshield-relative velocity of rain coming down. We need one more parameter to characterize the problem, and that is the water density ρ that characterizes the intensity of the falling rain. Important to note here is that no matter the resulting vRA speed and direction, the water density (e.g. gals/ft^3) in the volume that A, the hole of the missing windshield, sweeps out remains unchanged.
The problem then becomes twofold – as a function of the vehicle speed vA, what is the rate that water comes in through the hole, and if you had a distance D to travel to shelter, how much water will have come through the hole.
Solving this problem requires a bit of trigonometry and some straightforward squiggly pushing that I include in the box below. Out of this comes the formula for the rate rR (through the area that is perpendicular to vRA), and the formula for VR(D, vA), the volume of water through the hole until distance D is covered at speed vA.
To illustrate the answer to the stated problem, I’ve put together a little scenario with actual numerical values as indicated in the figure, and programmed it up in MS Excel™. The quick answers are shown in the graphs. The blue line shows how rR (gals/sec) increases linearly with vehicle speed vA as expected. The faster you go, the more water comes pouring through the whole. As vA goes to infinity, so does rR as long as the hole’s orientation φ presents some frontal area to vRA which approaches vA as the vehicle’s speed gets very large. Note that if we make the hole face parallel to vRA (i.e. – φ = α) then rR goes to zero, again as expected.
But if you only have a certain distance D to go to reach shelter, the orange curve shows that the faster you go (i.e. the higher the vA) the less water VR you take through the hole. The limiting value is just the volume of rain at density ρ swept out when your speed reaches infinity. In the illustrated scenario this volume of rain VR (D,∞) = 3,733.5 gallons. So the answer for ‘should you run to get out of the rain?’ is a definite YES; however, if you want to minimize the rate of water coming through the hole, then don’t move (i.e. vA = 0). As the rR equation shows, setting vA = 0 reduces the gals/sec to just the volume to the area perpendicular to and increasing at the rate of vR. And its easy to also see that VR will go to infinity since you will be standing still and making no progress to the shelter at distance D. (Isn’t math wonderful?) Bottom line – run, don’t walk to get out of the rain.
-
George Rebane
Litmus test for autocracy – ALL autocracies actively proscribe ideas that are fringe to what the state prescribes as mainstream thinking. Rebane Doctrine
The recent study from Johns Hopkins University unequivocally shows that lockdowns don’t work in reducing Covid-19 death rates. (here, here, and here) The mortality rate data for this also comes from around the world. In the developed world state-imposed lockdowns have devastated economies, families, and individuals of all ages. This pandemic will be studied for generations by historians, political scientists, and autocrats.
The impact of lockdowns has so many dimensions in the realms of their implementation and causal effects. Most independent (i.e. not on the government tit) epidemiologists, economists, and other science-savvy analysts decried the lockdown policies from the start. Only the central planning/control elites and ignorantly compliant local jurisdictions promoted the months of insane mandates handed down from on high that began in the spring of 2020.
Half the country is populated by those reliably labeled sheeple. To the ruling elite these are the recipients of received wisdom known as ‘mainstream thought’, which is comprised of an ever-changing roll of diktats a la Orwell. These people have been taught since grade school to unquestioningly accept and put to practice whatever and whenever Big Brother mandates. No critical thought needed nor tolerated – such thought, being constituted of ‘fringe ideas’, is to be rejected as anti-social and dangerous, polluting the purity of state mandated groupthink. To witness them, one need only go to the local shopping mall or read The Union.
The trained progressive has had excised from his education any notion that all benefits to mankind over the millennia have always been introduced as fringe ideas. Mainstream thought has always been the home of thought-free compliant stasis and stagnation. At no time in the last hundred years have we witnessed in the developed world a more complete practice of such mainstream thought than over the last two years – and the beat goes on.
So now we have the latest from Johns Hopkins that once more confirms what the greatly denigrated Barrington Declaration already told us back in the fall of 2020 (here). That piece of work was endorsed by thousands of accredited scientists and medicos, and ruthlessly put down by our federal government and their lamestream lackies. Hundreds of thousands more died needlessly and/or went bankrupt.
No recognition of, let alone apologies for the Big Lies were forthcoming, and no one today is holding their breath. The dead and financially destitute are a price the leftwing elites were willing to pay for their great experiment in the fundamental transformation of America into a satrapy under a global government. And you can bet that there’s more to come from the same team, still fully in control and totally insulated from any legal or public repercussions by a corrupt DoJ and judiciary. According to those propagandists and their local true believers, Joe Biden has had a banner year since he was inaugurated. And the Democrat devotees across the land still revere and believe in the gospel according to Saint Anthony of Fauci, the Beatified – “The fact that we shut down when we did, and the rest of the world did, has saved hundreds of millions of infections and millions of lives.” (17 June 2020)
The tactic of ‘accuse them of what you do’ is a tried-and-true formula for shutting down any real opposition from the recumbent Republicans. (Does anyone know on what are they spending their political capital?) No better example of that can be had than the established fact that Russian appeasement has been a leftwing monopoly as once again illustrated by Victor Davis Hanson (here). To this day lamestream outlets trumpet that Trump was the Great Colluder.
-
[More than three-quarters (76%) of Americans want President Joe Biden to consider all potential nominees to replace outgoing Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer, according to a recent ABC News-Ipsos poll. (more here)]
George Rebane
Bumblebrain joins the short list of known presidents who have chosen their SCOTUS nominees based on race and gender, and, of course, their proper ideological orientation. We all know that, along with the other government branches, SCOTUS is a political organization. It attempts to distinguish itself by claiming otherwise. Reagan limited one of his choices to (white?) women only, and Bush1 limited his choice to black men only.
Black Americans make up about 13.4% of our population of 332M, and of those 50.8% or 22.6M are women. Given a chance, candidate Bumblebrain promised to put a black woman on the bench, to bring the court’s black contingent up to three or 33% of its justices. (Actually, the racist Dems don’t recognize Justice Thomas as a black because he votes mostly conservative, and therefore the lamestream lackies ignore him and his work.)
So after bragging to his base that now he’ll seat a black woman, he got massive pushback some of which even included his own propaganda organs who correctly feared that such naked criteria, left to themselves, would really be politically damaging. That got the WH team with room temp IQs busy trying to get that horse back into the barn. Bumblebrain himself got in front of mic to assure everyone that he really was interested in the candidate’s lawyering credentials, but then slipped and admitted that the interest was limited to qualified black females.
I’m not sure how the Dems are going to handle Bumblebrain going forward. The man definitely did not help himself by voting against Clarence Thomas, and today his woke supporters are not even sure what defines a person as a ‘woman’. So here is the way I see it shaping up.
Bottom line, the Bumblebrain is a hypocritical, politics-first, racist when the Left argues that he just continued in the established tradition of Presidents Reagan and H.W. Bush . A little thought reveals this. Reagan appointed Sandra Day O’Connor as part of the nation’s awakening to the long-suppressed role of women. His appointment of the first female justice was lauded by all, and rightfully so. Bush1 appointed Clarence Thomas in order to maintain the multiracial composition of the court with the retirement of its first black justice Thurgood Marshall.
Bumblebrain will appoint a black woman because he wants to retain as much of the black and progressive vote as possible during the next two national elections – it’s a matter of retaining Democrat power in our national and state governments. Before his nominating a black woman, SCOTUS already has two blacks, 22.2% of the court and more than the black share (13.4%) of our population. Biden wants to pump the court’s black share up to 33%. And the court already has three women justices, so he’s not breaking any new ground by increasing that to four or 45% of its sitting members. The argument would be different if he simply wanted to bring female membership up to par.
His apparent real criteria in order of importance are 1) woman, 2) black, 3) demonstrated leftwing ideology, 4) has some demonstrated knowledge of law. The population of such politically qualifying and credible candidates is relatively small. If being a member of some accredited bar is a requirement, then there are only 107,000 (8% of all lawyers) black women, out of over 497,000 practicing female lawyers, who make it past that hurdle. Women make up 37.4% of the total number of 1,330,000 lawyers in the US. Given that identical proportions hold for lawyers of all races and genders, and since legal qualifications are not a high requirement for the new justice, Biden is then peremptorily excluding 92% of equally and/or better qualified lawyers from being considered for the job. Our society’s high price for bespoke progressive ‘equity’.
Correction – As pointed out in a comment below by reader Steven Frisch, Justice Sotomayor is not black. Mea culpa.
RR FUNDAMENTALS
RECENT POSTS
- Greenland’s Realities
- Father forgive them for they know not …
- Democrats Ascendant
- Scattershots – 4jan26 (updated 8jan26)
- Sandbox – 4jan26
RECENT COMMENTS
CATEGORIES
- Agenda 21 (490)
- All Things Trump (32)
- Books & Media (34)
- Budget (2)
- California (385)
- Comment Sandbox (488)
- Critical Thinking & Numeracy (1,312)
- Culture Comments (750)
- Current Affairs (1,859)
- Film (7)
- Food and Drink (9)
- Games (5)
- General (215)
- Glossary & Semantics (25)
- Great Divide (208)
- Growth (1)
- Happenings (679)
- Investing (43)
- Music (2)
- My Story (62)
- Nevada County (733)
- Our Country (2,431)
- Our World (630)
- Rebane Doctrine (131)
- Religion (38)
- sandbox (2)
- Science (33)
- Science Snippets (165)
- Singularity Signposts (144)
- Sports (3)
- The Liberal Mind (644)
- The Rear View (74)
- Travel (8)
- Trump (3)
- Uncategorized (45)
- We the iSheeple (620)
- Web/Tech (176)


