Rebane's Ruminations
January 2026
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

ARCHIVES


OUR LINKS


YubaNet
White House Blog
Watts Up With That?
The Union
Sierra Thread
RL “Bob” Crabb
Barry Pruett Blog

  • AOC answers her critics: “If I’m so dumb, then how come it took me only three months to complete a puzzle that on its box was printed ‘4-6 years’?”

    George Rebane

    In these tense times, a faux normalcy cloaks the serious troubles afflicting our nation and the world. As I’ve long argued in these pages, the concurrence of geopolitical missteps, cognitive biases, and the quiet creep of collectivism demands more than passive tolerance of the Left—it requires active containment. Drawing from paradigms I’ve learned from minds far sharper than mine, I’ll unpack the folly of cozying up to autocrats cum tyrants, the psychology of beliefs, the dangers of unchecked socialism, and the Left’s mangling of science and political ideology. My aim is to revisit why merely tolerating the Left is a recipe for societal decay.

    We’re living in a moment where surface calm hides a storm of ideological threats that left unchecked will restructure our society.  With many others I’ve been sounding the alarm on this danger for years, not because I’m some oracle, but because I’ve paid attention to the lessons of history and human nature.

    Geopolitics: No “Good Relationships” with Tyrants

    Let’s start with the global stage. Trump’s claim of having “good relationships” with Putin and Xi is a pipe dream. You can’t pal around with leaders whose national strategies hinge on America’s decline—China and Russia chief among them. The best you get is a civil handshake, not a bromance. Autocracies only respect force; they see diplomacy as a stalling tactic until they hold the upper hand. Trump’s instinct for win-win deals, honed in the boardroom, doesn’t translate to communist regimes that view every negotiation as zero-sum. They’ll string you along until you’re weak or they’re desperate.

    Case in point: Ukraine. The fastest way to end Putin’s war is to arm Ukraine with long-range missiles—Tomahawks, specifically—and greenlight their use against deep Russian targets. That’s not warmongering; it’s the language of power that dictators understand. It would also put China on notice about Taiwan, delaying Xi’s expansionist dreams. Anything less is just kicking the can down the road, inviting more aggression. History shows appeasement only emboldens tyrants—think Munich 1938. Force, not flattery, brings them to the table.

    The Psychology of Belief: Facts Don’t Matter

    Shifting gears, let’s talk about why bad ideas persist. It’s easier to sell people on nonsense that fits their tribal beliefs than to persuade them with reasoned truths. (Plato learned this from Socrates 2,500 years ago.)  Humans crave group membership over rational thought—always have. That’s why the old saying about having your own opinions but not your own facts is bunk. Every day, the public square proves people can and do have their own facts, histories, and logics, cobbling together personal realities that defy evidence. Social media echo chambers and partisan media only amplify this.

    This cognitive quirk explains why collectivism—socialism, communism, you name it—keeps rearing its head. Its simplistic pitch of “diversity, equity, inclusion” through redistribution hooks the gullible, promising fairness while delivering shackles. If you just tolerate this ideology in a free-market capitalist society, it spreads like cancer. You can’t sit back and hope it fizzles out. It takes active containment—educating the young on the failures of collectivism, from the Soviet Union to Venezuela, and keeping the debate alive in public forums. Without that, the left’s feel-good slogans will continue eroding the foundations of liberty.

    The Rebane Doctrine: Fooling All, Always

    I’ve long held in what I call the Rebane Doctrine that not only can you fool some people all the time and all people some of the time, but you can also fool all people all the time. Look at the Bolsheviks or Nazis—entire nations bought into catastrophic lies about the promises of collectivism. Today’s “No Kings” rallies, with tens of millions railing against Trump as some wannabe dictator, are a case study. They ignore his administration’s unmatched transparency in policy and action. Agree or disagree with his methods, albeit somewhat haphazardly applied.  -The record speaks for itself: tax cuts, deregulation, peace through strength. Yet the left’s narrative paints him as a cartoon villain, and the sheeple lap it up, proving my doctrine’s grim truth.

    Misreading the Political Spectrum

    The left’s ignorance of political ideology is another sore spot. They embrace socialism and communism as harmless alternatives to capitalism, blind to their track record of misery. Worse, they mislabel fascism as right-wing to tar conservatives as evil. Let’s set the record straight: fascism is big-government collectivism, a leftist ideology. The Right, at its core, minimizes government’s role, if anything, trending toward anarchy in its extreme. The left’s spectrum runs from autocratic collectivism—socialism, communism, fascism—to totalitarianism. The right’s extreme is no government at all. Calling fascism “right-wing” is a deliberate distortion, and it’s why the left’s moral posturing falls apart under scrutiny – minimally practiced today.

    Science as Consensus: The Left’s Anti-Science Stance

    Finally, the Democrat Party’s approach to science is anything but scientific. Bypassing evidence, they treat consensus as truth.  Their obsession with catastrophic global warming is the poster child for this narrative. Science isn’t a popularity contest; it thrives on skepticism, testing, and falsification. Yet Democrats push policies based on apocalyptic models, not hard data, shouting down dissenters as heretics. This isn’t science—it’s propagandizing dogma dressed up in lab coats. Real scientific practice demands constant questioning, not blind allegiance to a majority vote.  (A prime example – the whole field of control and estimation theory falsifies the hubris of centrally controlled large governments embraced by collectivists.)

    The Path Forward: Containment, Not Tolerance

    So, what’s the answer? Just tolerating the Left won’t cut it.  As history warns, their ideas, left unchecked, metastasize into autocracy,. We need a multi-pronged defense: arm allies like Ukraine to deter global autocrats, educate our young on the virtues of free markets and the perils of collectivism, and keep the public square buzzing with debate to expose leftist fallacies. My geo-strategic model, built on lessons from smarter minds, has held up over the years. It’s not about silencing the Left but containing their influence before their redistributionist utopian policies beggar us all.

    The stakes are high. From geopolitical miscalculations to domestic ideological drift, the threats are real. We can’t afford to sit idly by, lulled by a false sense of normalcy. The Rebane Doctrine reminds us that mass delusion is always possible, and the left’s current trajectory—embracing collectivism while mangling science and history—is a clear and present danger. It’s time to act, not just tolerate. Let’s teach, debate, and deter, or risk losing the liberal and free-market capitalistic society we’ve built.

  • George Rebane

    The Turing test is dead, we are told.  There’s a reasonable basis for this assertion, because today’s AIs already convince humans, on a regular basis, that they are talking with another human.  So the new goal is AGI (Artificial General Intelligence) that is defined as AIs that are ‘smarter’ than all humans in every endeavor.  But no one yet knows how to measure ‘smarter’ (i.e. intelligence) for machines since we are still not sure of how to measure it for humans.  To me the whole enterprise of searching for the litmus test for measuring the intelligence of rapidly evolving AIs is moot.  For all we know, the Singularity has already been achieved, and we will only be able to confirm it in the rearview mirror.  Here’s an essay on current efforts to measure machine intelligence – https://spectrum.ieee.org/agi-benchmark .

    Peace in Gaza is celebrated by happy dancing in the streets of major Israeli cities.  Nothing has happened yet but President Trump is already getting his tux cleaned and pressed for the trip to Stockholm.  The line in the sand that Trump drew for all to see was that Hamas would return all the hostages, lay down their guns, and get the hell out of Gaza.  And this was to happen by 6pm GMT Sunday 5 October 2025.  We are now told that the hostage release will occur in the next few days and begin a long process of negotiating the remaining points of the president’s 20-point peace deal.  Given how Trump has handled (i.e. been bamboozled by) Putin over the last months, terminating with the embarrassment in Anchorage, I won’t hold my breath any time soon.  Putin was supposed to sit down with Zelinsky to end the Ukraine war, or we would slap ‘secondary sanctions’ on Russia and give Ukraine weaponry to include long-range missiles with the  blessing to use them against strategic targets, including cities, deep in Russia.  That was the line in the sand for the 15aug25 Alaska summit – so far, nothing.  Meanwhile Putin continues to bomb the crap out of Ukraine’s cities, fly drones and fighters over Europe’s NATO countries, while selling its oil and gas all over the world.

  • George Rebane

    The latest mass shooting in Grand Blanc, Michigan highlights the problems with our totally unarmed civilian population in the public square.  The incident left 5 people dead (including shooter) and eight hospitalized.  The crazed killer was a military veteran who drove his pick-up through the doors of the local LDS church into the sanctuary where hundreds of people were attending a church service.  There he got out and started shooting people randomly and then took the time to set fire to the building which ultimately was totally destroyed with the authorities expecting to find more bodies in the charred rubble.  Law enforcement took about ten minutes to get there and take down the gunman.

    What boggles my mind is that among the hundreds of worshippers, and Mormons no less, there was not a single person legally armed with a CCW who could have engaged the shooter, or diverted him and possibly taken him down, thereby saving lives and the church.  There was apparently more than enough time for such a response while police were on their way.

    Sadly, there was no such self-help available.  We have all been conditioned to be sanguine about personal safety from the criminals and crazies among us – the police will protect us.  But when the need demands seconds, law enforcement is minutes away.  Today’s perpetrators are totally confident that they will encounter no immediate armed resistance, especially if they decide to do their crime in a ‘gun free zone’ or a jurisdiction which enjoins an armed citizenry.

    The progressives and other light thinkers among us will immediately claim that legally vetted armed citizens constitute a public danger.  Nothing could be further from the truth.  When the last data was available, you were six times more likely to be murdered by a rogue LE officer than a citizen with a CCW.  Today the chance of your being murdered in any given year by a CCW carrier is less than one in ten million.  Pew Research Center documented a national gun murder rate of 4.5 per 100,000 people.  Therefore, being a victim of criminal homicide by a non-CCW person is 450 times higher. 

    CCW holders are by far the least dangerous armed people among us, and that includes your local police.  And the lives they save and acts of crime they prevent go unreported by our lamestream media because it doesn’t fit their narrative promoting a disarmed citizenry.  The cost-benefit of having a sufficient share of armed citizens among us to give criminals pause is a no-brainer.

  • George Rebane

    Liberals ignorant of decline in students’ performance.  This was highlighted by local liberals who dismissed my 10sep25 report of the government’s assessed and nationally reported decline in the academic skills of our public schools’ students as a “doctrinaire assessment of lowering test scores in our schools” (see NAEP and NCES reports).  He further considers the yearslong decline being currently highlighted as an “isolated set of scores … heavily salted (by) partisan spin.”  Even leftwing teachers are apparently totally unaware of the recorded impact that their unions have had on academic performance.  These unions continue to promote and defend the jobs of their underperforming members, and repeat claims that we are underfunding our schools – more money applied to the same ‘ol same ‘ol policies will fix the problem.  For reference consider that California spends $23,791 per pupil who rank 37th among states.  Urban areas like LA spend $26,900 per pupil.  And the US average is $16,526 per pupil.

    And closer to home the downtrend continues.  In data from CAASPP scores in the most recent reporting year (2024) Nevada County saw a decrease in students meeting or exceeding state standards for both English Language Arts (ELA) and Math, with 41.18% proficient in ELA and 26.73% in Math.  In our idyllic corner of the state, insulated from the social and educational morass of our urban centers, one would expect our students’ academic performance to rank high among California’s public schools.  But this is not so because the focus is not on providing high classroom performance with a proficient academic staff.  Consider that the Nevada Joint Union High School District’s college/career readiness indicator shows that only 33.3% of our students are prepared for what awaits them after graduation.

    Rightwing riots burning buildings and assaulting police to protest the assassination of Charlie Kirk again have not materialized.  As history shows, had this been the death of drug-addled criminals like George Floyd, or a number of other equally credentialed worthies, the city streets across the country would have been filled with progressive rioters burning buildings and demanding ‘justice’.  Instead, we witnessed Charlie’s widow Erika delivering an emotional speech in front of thousands (millions) forgiving his killer.  In the meantime, the lamestream liars are totally misrepresenting Kirk’s message as calls for racism and white supremacy.  And rightwing media are broadcasting interviews with politicians and other notables again repeating their usual pious pabulum for us to “come together” and “get along” because “we are all Americans” – shades of Rodney King.

    (Have yet to figure out how to add color to the bold type. The WP user interface was designed by rank amateurs.)

  • [We’ll start with a Sandbox and see how many commenters have discovered RR on WordPress. gjr]

  • George Rebane

    After some considerably hard work in transferring files and going through the process of developing a new blog, Rebane’s Ruminations has arrived on WordPress and is now ensconced there.  I welcome all of our longtime readers from TypePad to resume their participation in this new home, and learn how to navigate its pathways.  Regarding that, your host is still in the process of learning where all the buttons and levers are on this blog server, and how to get things going again in a new environment.  I am doing my best to replicate the functionality that we had on TypePad. Please be patient with my pilot errors which no doubt you will encounter.  Also, some of the page designs and cosmetics will be changing over time as I communicate my persnickety druthers to my web designer who will continue to do the ‘heavy lifting’ in getting RR bedded down.  Again, welcome.

  • George Rebane

    It seems that Typepad has been on its last legs for at least a couple of years.  They have shown very little competence and professionalism in how they have been operating their blog service.  I received an email from them yesterday announcing that their service would end on 30 September 2025.  With my son-in-law I’m doing all I can to preserve the 18 years of RR content and transfer it over to WordPress.  Regardless of how my future blogging turns out, I am grateful for the years that readers have continued to visit and comment on RR, and I thank you all for your participation and support of the open policy for expressing our opinions and observations that we have been able to enjoy.  As things progress, I will keep you apprised of what is happening.

  • George Rebane

    DC crime rate is low and not impacted by Trump’s federalizing crime suppression in the District – so claim the city's socialist leaders.  Well now.  The long term average DC murder rate is three per week, and since the police were augmented by the feds They’ve gone 11 days without a murder, that kind of hiatus would occur only with probability of 0.009,  Therefore the most likely explanation is that Trump’s actions significantly brought down the city’s murder rate.  The real problem comes when the feds withdraw and DC goes back to business as usual – i.e. it’s all about culture change.

    Have you noticed that all lamestream reporting of weather events – too hot or cold, hurricanes, tornadoes, windblown wildfires, floods, … – strongly implies that it’s all due to preventable manmade climate change?  To make everything peaceful and quiet again all that is needed are more well-funded green programs operating in an environment of ever more economically burdensome regulations and laws.  Never mind, as Bjorn Lomborg continues to point out, that there is no evidence to support that leftwing hysteria.

    [31aug25 update] Does Trump really want to adopt Beijing’s state-directed model?  It sure looks like it.  The administration intends to take a stake in Intel, to nationalize Lockheed Martin, to receive golden shares of Nippon Steel, to claim a piece of the action from Nvidia and AMD, and to garner royalties from research patents.

  • [Latest news on new home building.  It seems that today more and more houses are built without separate dining rooms.  This allows the house to be smaller and cheaper.  But eliminating the dining room also indicates a culture shift in the young buyers.  Fewer people today require a room in which the entire entourage of guests can gather for a meal and conversation that involves everyone.  Such conversations require the participants’ shared knowledge bases, real time critical thinking, and the art of expressing oneself in a civil and sensitive manner that does not put people off and feeds their interest in what you have to say – social skills on the wane among the young.  gjr]

    Posted at

    in

  • [This piece by regular Union columnist Terry McLaughlin was rejected by its editorial mavens for being too politically biased and containing claims that the Left considers patently false and/or unsubstantiated.  I invite RR readers to compare Ms McLaughlin’s op-ed – posted here with permission – with those from leftwing authors that appear daily in the newspaper.   I too have suffered similar rejections.  gjr]

    Terry McLaughlin

    Are we seeing the end of corporate journalism?  Do readers and viewers trust major media sources such as CNN and the New York Times or Washington Post any longer?   

    There are only so many times the public can be lied to or misled before reality starts to set in, leaving everyone wondering what is true, what is bias, what is blatantly false?  Who can we trust?

    Two sensational stories appeared before us in July – and most major media sources cannot seem to admit that they were either completely wrong or complicit in promoting these untruths.

    Steven Colbert was informed that CBS’s “The Late Show with Stephen Colbert” would be ending next May. Major media sources rushed to inform the public that Paramount, which owns CBS, fired Colbert because he publicly expressed criticism for their settlement of a lawsuit with President Trump.  They also promoted the idea that Paramount got rid of Colbert in order to curry favor with the administration’s FCC because of an upcoming merger.

    The reality?  Colbert’s agent publicly explained he was informed of the cancellation of the show two weeks earlier, while Colbert was on vacation.  He opted not to share the bad news with Colbert until his return.  The cancellation occurred prior to Paramount’s settlement of Trump’s lawsuit, or Colbert’s on-camera criticism of CBS and Paramount for that settlement. Once the cancellation was made public, we learned that Colbert’s show cost the company $100 million per year to produce, with a return of around $60 million on that investment.  A $40 million annual loss seems like reasonable motivation for canceling a show with declining viewership.  It’s just simple math.

    Not only Colbert personally, but The Late Show, which has been on the air for 30 years, is being cancelled in its entirety in May.  Since that cancellation was announced, Paramount signed a deal with the creators of South Park to pay them $1.5 billion for their next season.  The fact that one of the first episodes of the new season depicts Donald Trump quite negatively in a homosexual relationship with the devil defies the idea that either censorship or pressure from the Trump administration played any part in Paramount’s decision-making.

     Which brings us to the other big story, which most of the media is either ignoring completely or misrepresenting.  Despite what some local contributors to this newspaper are claiming, actual evidence has now been revealed that former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, former CIA Director John Brennan, and former FBI Director James Comey manipulated intelligence and then disseminated a false story to a compliant media in order to build the case that Donald Trump had conspired with Russia to win the 2016 presidential election.   If you are unaware of this evidence, it is because many in the media, rather than admitting their errors or correcting their previous reporting, are covering themselves by simply not reporting this news.

     What has also been revealed in recent releases of declassified intelligence is that relevant information was actively suppressed. The initial intelligence assessments of any interference by Russia in the 2016 election found no evidence of “collusion” between Trump and Russia, but had concluded that Russia had gotten a hold of internal Democrat communications characterizing Hillary Clinton’s mental state as “intensified psycho-emotional problems, including uncontrolled fits of anger, aggression and cheerfulness,” and other physical and mental health details that had Democrat insiders concerned about how that information might influence the voters.

    The intelligence shows that Russia had this information in October, and whether it was true or not, could have used it to ruin Clinton’s election prospects.  If Putin was “colluding” with Trump and wanted him to be elected, why would it not have been leaked or released in the fall of 2016?

    Even more recently released information discovered from John Durham’s investigation’s “burn bag” (hidden and intended to be destroyed) includes messages sent among DNC and Clinton campaign staffers and operatives prior to any investigation having begun: “HRC (Clinton) approved Julie’s (Clinton Campaign Advisor) idea about Trump and Russian hackers hampering U.S. elections. . .. This should distract people from her own missing email.” “The FBI will put more oil into the fire.”  So much more declassified information is now becoming public that it is hard to keep up with, unless you are intentionally ignoring it.

    So after spending nearly ten years and tens of millions of dollars covering the “Russia collusion” story, now that it has imploded, will any of the major media outlets apologize? Will they give back their Pulitzer Prizes?  The likely answer can be summed up by CNN’s Chief National Affairs Correspondent Jeff Zeleny: “This is hardly information we should be repeating and spending much more time on.”  The truth is not worth reporting.

    Who got these stories right?  While major media sources insisted we look the other way, nearly every story of consequence within the last ten years has been honestly reported by non-celebrity, low-paid journalists at independent outlets.  From the origins of COVID to the legitimacy of Hunter Biden’s laptop, to the “mostly peaceful” protests erupting around the country, to the flood of illegal border crossings, to questions about the health of Joe Biden, it was independent media who asked the questions and persisted in learning and reporting the facts. 

    None of the complicit major media outlets will ever apologize for their role in the incalculable harm wrought upon this country by the destructive storm of misinformation, disinformation, and outright lies presented to a naïve and trusting public. 

3 comments on Just Tolerating the Left is Not Enough