[Today the ongoing jeans/genes dustup shows how depraved is the progressive mind. I wonder if there are any local liberals who would care to stand up for the idiot commentators on lamestream media who have again proudly discovered that Republicans really are racists and white supremacists now soaked in the Left's promoted eugenics of yesteryear. Here’s a little video that summarizes their madness. gjr]

ARCHIVES
- January 2026
- December 2025
- November 2025
- October 2025
- September 2025
- August 2025
- July 2025
- June 2025
- May 2025
- April 2025
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
OUR LINKS
YubaNet
White House Blog
Watts Up With That?
The Union
Sierra Thread
RL “Bob” Crabb
Barry Pruett Blog
RR FUNDAMENTALS
RECENT POSTS
- Father forgive them for they know not …
- Democrats Ascendant
- Scattershots – 4jan26 (updated 8jan26)
- Sandbox – 4jan26
- Venezuela on path to freedom and prosperity
RECENT COMMENTS
CATEGORIES
- Agenda 21 (490)
- All Things Trump (32)
- Books & Media (34)
- Budget (2)
- California (385)
- Comment Sandbox (488)
- Critical Thinking & Numeracy (1,312)
- Culture Comments (750)
- Current Affairs (1,858)
- Film (7)
- Food and Drink (9)
- Games (5)
- General (215)
- Glossary & Semantics (25)
- Great Divide (208)
- Growth (1)
- Happenings (679)
- Investing (43)
- Music (2)
- My Story (62)
- Nevada County (733)
- Our Country (2,430)
- Our World (629)
- Rebane Doctrine (130)
- Religion (38)
- sandbox (2)
- Science (33)
- Science Snippets (165)
- Singularity Signposts (144)
- Sports (3)
- The Liberal Mind (644)
- The Rear View (74)
- Travel (8)
- Trump (3)
- Uncategorized (45)
- We the iSheeple (620)
- Web/Tech (176)

136 responses to “Sandbox – 3aug25”
NY has truly gone crazy even pre commie –
https://www.breitbart.com/pre-viral/2025/08/07/nyc-to-spend-65m-on-homeless-shelter-for-transgender-people/
😉
LikeLike
Not putting up with their shit anymore –
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/carville-apologizes-pulls-youtube-video-after-letter-from-melania-trump-s-lawyer/ar-AA1K77PH?ocid=msedgntp&pc=U531&cvid=0fa43b8020fc46f2acdd5db7b01972dd&ei=45
😉
LikeLike
Hilarious!
“…and decided to flip out about Sweeney instead”
Amazingly, BeerBelly can’t come up with a single example of Fox news “flipping out” about Sweeney.
Must be fun to just make up stuff – but sorry, BeerBelly – you’ve reduced yourself to a low rank troll full of BS.
What a maroon!
LikeLike
WINNING!
https://www.breitbart.com/economy/2025/08/07/breitbart-business-digest-trumps-new-chip-tariff-push-finds-support-in-surprising-place/
😉
LikeLike
Ya that lizzo morbidly obese reply to Sydney Sweeneys jean commercial says it all. Have fun with that lefties –
https://www.breitbart.com/clips/2025/08/07/were-the-ones-having-fun-with-the-hottest-chicks-why-andrew-breitbart-would-have-loved-this-moment/
😉
LikeLike
Dear Leader upgrades Jizz-Lane’s accommodations to Club Fed
Hmmm? I wonder why?
LikeLike
She’ll help put away a bunch of dems.
LikeLike
But, but, but they hit DEI!
According to the 2024 Annual Performance Report (page 65), the DMV fulfilled its DEI goal entirely. However, it did not achieve full success in four other categories:
“Maintain fiscal responsibility”
“Make transportation safer”
“Improve the reliability and connectivity of the transportation system”
“Deliver and maintain our infrastructure efficiently and effectively”
The report comes as former Gov. Roy Cooper (D), who appointed DMV Commissioner Wayne Goodwin in 2022, has launched a campaign for U.S. Senate in the 2026 race.
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2025/08/07/north-carolina-dmv-hits-all-dei-targets-misses-road-safety-goals/
😉
LikeLike
Gonna be a good day Tater…..
https://www.breitbart.com/the-media/2025/08/06/nolte-msnbc-cnnlol-lose-40-of-viewers-compared-to-last-year/
LikeLike
I can see where BeerBelly and Paul get their cues:
“Jayapal added, “Then the third thing is just corruption. I really do think that people are sick and tired of the corruption, the greed that the Trump administration is showing on every level.”
Unfortunately she couldn’t cite a single example of this “corruption”.
Just make up some BS and throw it at Trump.
Like monkeys in the zoo throwing their crap.
LikeLike
Here you go So&So, MAGA Bros
American Nazis: The Aryan Freedom Network is riding high in Trump era – https://www.reuters.com/investigations/american-nazis-aryan-freedom-network-is-riding-high-trump-era-2025-08-08/
LikeLike
Local MAGAloon critique,
Yet again, I’m reminded to put the garbage bin up on the street when reading Terry McLaughlin’s recent Old News. Curious at the amount of copy & paste italics, I see the piece leads, after some jiu jitsu about “fake news” (only criminals and the delusional use that term), she leads with I guess, Her Conclusion from a June 26 CIA “lessons learned” report. But what is this report? So looking beneath the superficial cherry picking, I find it was instigated by CIA Director John Ratcliffe. Bells ring. History begins to disinfect. I don’t have more time to joust with this windmill of deformed context, so I will suggest interested readers consult John Sipher of The Bulwark (a center right publication), and his “The CIA Director Didn’t Read His Own Report.” Trash truck has arrived.
Rick Wilkinson, Grass Valley
LikeLike
George R. gets fact checked,
There is one line in George Rebane’s letter in rebuttal to Keith Porter’s Opinion piece with which I might agree. “…the common ground from which we can begin healing (left and right I presume) is an utter wasteland.” Not sure what he means but believe there’s an impenetrable wall between much of the right and less from the left which has no easy solution. Time?
Rebane’s attack on Keith is sad. Those who know Keith understand that Keith is a man who commands immense respect in our community.
Keith Porter did NOT say China was an altruistic nation. Rebane misinterpreted the piece? That happens from the right often these days. Porter said the opposite. Read it again, Mr. Rebane, or call Keith and discuss it with him as you were friends or at least close acquaintances once and do have something in common. You were big supporters of KVMR. There is a room at the progressive station with a plaque with the Rebane name which shows that the Rebanes donated a very large sum to get that room named after them. Keith Porter has been a KVMR DJ on The Sages Among Us and Classics Declassified for many years. Both Porter and Rebane are important supporters of InConcert Sierra. Have a glass of wine together, listen to some Mozart or Ravel, find more common ground. I will sponsor the meeting and buy the wine and provide the music.
Rodney King said it succinctly.
Ralph Henson, Nevada City
LikeLike
More fact checking of the locals,
https://www.theunion.com/news/community/ideas-opinions-paul-d-hauck-terry-mclaughlins-totally-imagined-conspiracy/article_8cdf8829-152a-4f85-b2cc-15e5d53e6d2b.html?utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter&utm_campaign=user-share via @TheUnion
LikeLike
Sound familiar? MAGA Republicans are bending over backwards for Jizz Lane.
Why?
“In 2007, the FBI had prepared a 53-page federal indictment charging Epstein with sex crimes that could have put him in federal prison for life. But then-Miami U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta signed off on a non-prosecution agreement, which was negotiated, signed and sealed so that no one would know the full scope of Epstein’s crimes. The indictment was shelved, never to be seen again. Epstein instead pleaded guilty to lesser charges in state court, and was required to register as a sex offender. He was sentenced to 18 months incarceration. But Epstein — who had a long list of powerful, politically connected friends — didn’t go to state prison like most sex offenders in Florida. Instead, the multimillionaire was assigned to a private wing of the Palm Beach County stockade, where he was able to hire his own security detail. Even then, he didn’t spend much time in a cell. He was allowed to go to his downtown West Palm Beach office for work release, up to 12 hours a day, six days a week, records show.”
Read more at: https://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/article219494920.html#storylink=cpy
LikeLike
Did that make you feel better, Jeff? Got it out of your system?
LikeLike
What’s this….another Governor Isuzu potential “Malfeasance in Office” scandal….
Are You Ready for Yet Another Gavin Newsom Scandal?
Always ready for more news about Californias favorite “Slicky Boy”!
https://pjmedia.com/matt-margolis/2025/08/08/gavin-newsom-has-another-scandal-to-deal-with-now-n4942516
LikeLike
No denials coming from Gregory (The almost Mensa independent mind)…
must be true then…
LikeLike
Posted by: just jeffy | 08 August 2025 at 09:52 AM
No denials coming from Gregory (The almost Mensa independent mind)…
must be true then…
A dazzling display of Paul Raymond Emery logic…..
Who would have thought that Nevada City’s “Man of Letters” would have fallen so far, so fast?
LikeLike
RH 715am – There was nothing “fact checked” in Henson’s letter, only his interpretation of Porter’s description of China’s altruism.
LikeLike
I submitted the following to The Union.
Re: Ralph Henson’s 8aug25 letter. My rebuttal to Keith Porter’s 25jul25 opinion piece continues to draw the attention and ire of liberals. Mr Henson joins other progressives who did not read Mr Porter’s piece carefully, Mr Henson claims that I “misinterpreted” Porter who “did NOT say China was an altruistic nation.” What Porter actually wrote was “… that transfers America’s soft power to China and other less altruistic nations.”
In this statement Porter’s use of “and” and “less” clearly implies that either (1) altruism is also a characteristic of China which some other nations have to a lesser degree, or (2) China is among the cohort of nations that are altruistic, but to a lesser extent than some undefined threshold level of altruism. Were altruism NOT a characteristic possessed by China (or the Chinese regime), then this could have been made clear with a statement like ‘… that transfers America’s soft power to less altruistic nations or even to China’, which now clearly identifies China as being beyond the pale of altruism and not a member of the cohort practicing various degrees of altruism. Better yet, he could have omitted the notion of altruism – it served only to confuse.
Mr Henson’s civil also letter laments a lost friendship between Keith and me. Nothing could be further from the truth – we remain friends who have engaging lunches and continue to work together on community projects. The Rebanes also continue to support KVMR and The Union as our region’s prominent leftwing voices, no matter how infrequently we agree on socio-political matters – it is another of the many right/left asymmetries in our land.
https://www.theunion.com/news/community/ideas-opinions-ralph-henson-response-to-george-rebane-s-recent-letter/article_6645ee87-43be-4f16-8bee-7da86eec8622.html
https://www.theunion.com/news/community/ideas-opinions-keith-porter-what-s-the-worst-thing-that-could-happen/article_92e174fd-cfd7-4868-af84-d4c1c57892df.html
LikeLike
Poor Dog Killer…
https://x.com/harryjsisson/status/1953737244772061508?t=EyRG-mGo_xnxemwNu50ZHQ&s=19
LikeLike
BeerBelly 7:06 – Totally lame. The only big rise in violence is continuing from the left. Fire bombings, murder, and rioting. Often now against innocent Jews egged on by Democrats.
I had to laugh that the supposed “expansion” of this wacko group was taken as gospel by the author without any verification by an independent source. Furthermore, the article conflates all sorts of different groups with different stats and tries to lump them all together with a photograph of people that have nothing to do with any of this.
Trump has never endorsed or encouraged this AN group.
A stupid article written for stupid people with zero critical thinking skills.
So – right up your alley, BeerBelly.
LikeLike
“The only big rise in violence is continuing from the left.”
Why would anyone argue with that. It’s hard to avoid the fact that the Left trends heavily towards younger, more excitable people…plus the additional magic of the non-job holding urban class.
Naturally, if you put up pics of burning shopping malls, attacked courthouses, general marcher mayhem, the response will always be a combination of WELL, THEY’RE NOT REALLY DEMOCRATS or WHAT ABOUT THOSE J6 PEOPLE THAT TRIED TO TAKE OVER THE GOVERNMENT AND TORTURE AND MURDER CONGRESS!!!
Bleh.
The moment the political Right becomes even slightly as kinetic as the Left, everyone is going to know it.
LikeLike
WINNING –
Peace treaty between Armenia and Azerbaijan just signed at the WH!
😉
LikeLike
Pathetic polls for Trump. He only leads in two of fifteen polls and in those he’s only ahead by two and one percent.
https://www.realclearpolling.com/polls/approval/donald-trump/approval-rating
LikeLike
If not for double standards they would have none at all –
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2025/08/08/zohran-mamdani-hires-private-security-after-calling-defund-police/
😉
LikeLike
So sorry scum bag Irishman pretending to be mexican and then this humiliation =
Beto O’Rourke
Judge blocks Beto O’Rourke from funding Texas Dems who fled to stop GOP redistricting vote
Ruling blocks O’Rourke and his nonprofit from funding Texas Democrats who fled state to break legislative quorum
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/judge-blocks-beto-orourke-from-funding-texas-dems-who-fled-stop-gop-redistricting-vote
😉
LikeLike
About an 8.5 hour drive from Trump Tower to the Nakhchivan Autonomous Republic, Azerbaijan.
More quid pro quos by the self-serving money grubbing President?
LikeLike
Trump quotes. This is sleazy:
“In a recent interview, President Donald Trump lavished unusually personal praise on his White House Press Secretary, Karoline Leavitt. During a Friday night sit-down with Newsmax host Rob Finnerty, Trump singled out Leavitt’s appearance and demeanor, saying, “It’s that face. It’s that brain. It’s those lips, the way they move. They move like she’s a machine gun.”
He added, “She’s become a star. She’s a great person, actually. I don’t think anybody has ever had a better press secretary than Karoline. She’s been amazing.”
https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/international/us/who-is-karoline-leavitt-27-year-old-white-house-press-secretary-who-trump-says-has-has-lips-like-a-machine-gun/articleshow/123109341.cms?from=mdr#google_vignette
LikeLike
Sleazy comment for a President to say:
In a recent interview, President Donald Trump lavished unusually personal praise on his White House Press Secretary, Karoline Leavitt. During a Friday night sit-down with Newsmax host Rob Finnerty, Trump singled out Leavitt’s appearance and demeanor, saying, “It’s that face. It’s that brain. It’s those lips, the way they move. They move like she’s a machine gun.”
Read more at:
https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/international/us/who-is-karoline-leavitt-27-year-old-white-house-press-secretary-who-trump-says-has-has-lips-like-a-machine-gun/articleshow/123109341.cms?utm_source=contentofinterest&utm_medium=text&utm_campaign=cppst
LikeLike
For some reason my posts are not showing up. Perhaps this one will.
Sleazy comment for a President to say:
In a recent interview, President Donald Trump lavished unusually personal praise on his White House Press Secretary, Karoline Leavitt. During a Friday night sit-down with Newsmax host Rob Finnerty, Trump singled out Leavitt’s appearance and demeanor, saying, “It’s that face. It’s that brain. It’s those lips, the way they move. They move like she’s a machine gun.”
Read more at:
https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/international/us/who-is-karoline-leavitt-27-year-old-white-house-press-secretary-who-trump-says-has-has-lips-like-a-machine-gun/articleshow/123109341.cms?utm_source=contentofinterest&utm_medium=text&utm_campaign=cppst
LikeLike
@223
Must be the terminal TDS filter kicking in! LOL
😉
LikeLike
So now thay all showed up at once…whatever
LikeLike
Spoken just like a 13-year-old girl. WAAAATEVA! LOL
😉
LikeLike
Here is something for the po ol ponytail of ignorance to moisturize his Metamucil in the morning with liberal tears –
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/mark-halperin-warns-democrats-key-states-like-florida-new-york-could-spell-midterm-disaster/ar-AA1Ke33z?ocid=msedgntp&pc=U531&cvid=6897ae874aca40f69bda898acc84acae&ei=103
😉
LikeLike
Congratulations you empty headed progressive dipshits……you brought this on yourselves!
Going to be interesting to see if he goes full FDR and hangs around in office until he hits the century mark!
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/08/08/us/politics/trump-presidential-power.html?unlocked_article_code=1.c08.JSye.eDco5D6NMrZC&smid=url-share
LikeLike
When the dem brand is less popular than herpes and they keep asking each other WHY!? WHY!? WHY!? –
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/nyc-to-shut-down-last-migrant-hotel-after-shelling-out-170-million-to-crime-ridden-shelter/ar-AA1KdFta?ocid=msedgntp&pc=U531&cvid=8dca76c158d24dfdf08399a17b5fdb64&ei=214
😉
LikeLike
re fish 4:19 –
Dems: “Hey! That’s what only we get to do!”
“Since Monday, the Trump administration has moved to assert new power over institutions like colleges and banks. He has ordered a surge of law enforcement in Washington, D.C., a city that ostensibly has home rule.”
What ‘new’ power? Total BS.
And – gasp! law enforcement!!!!
LikeLike
Its awfully funny watching the lefties scream we will retaliate! How violating the state constitutions? Too many blue states have already jerrymandered R’s in no mans land. –
“No, I think they don’t have the moral authority, and there’s a lot of pearl-clutching going on,” he said.
Several blue states, including Massachusetts, Connecticut and New Mexico, have no Republicans in their House delegations. And many feature oddly-drawn districts, seemingly crafted to limit GOP representation.
“The Democrats don’t have clean hands here. You look at states like Massachusetts, New Jersey[…] Illinois, California, and Democrats have effectively gerrymandered Republicans out of existence,” Epstein added.
Epstein cautioned that the nationwide redistricting battle could create a “race to the bottom,” and that leaving Republicans and Democrats in states led by the opposite parties could lead to people feeling left out of the democratic process. Epstein cited New Jersey, in which Trump garnered 46% of the vote in 2024, but Republicans only have three out of the 12 congressional seats.
Meanwhile, Texas state Rep. Brian Harrison, a Republican, told Fox News Digital on Saturday that Democrats are guilty of “total hypocrisy and faux outrage.”
“The dirty little secret is Democrats have no problem whatsoever with states redrawing their congressional maps to maximize partisan political advantage. They’re just furious that Republican states are starting to redraw their maps,”
“It’s because Democrat state after Democrat state, for a decade, has been gerrymandering the hell out of their congressional maps,” he said.
“Massachusetts, Connecticut, Vermont, Rhode Island, Delaware, all of these states have zero. If you’re a Republican in those Democrat states, you don’t have any voice in Congress,” he added. “And [there are] many, many more that have given you just one seat, Oregon, I think Maine and Maryland.”
Harrison explained that Texas’s redistricting push has numerous reasons behind it, including the population growth in the Lone Star state since the last census.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/democratic-strategist-says-party-lacks-moral-authority-texas-redistricting-fight
😉
LikeLike
Don B. – is California gerrymandered?
Have you bought into the MAGA propaganda?
LikeLike
Re gerrymandering – A quantitative and correct metric of the extent of a state’s gerrymandering is to compare the percent who voted, say, Republican to the fraction of Republicans in the state’s House representation. If you use a ratio of percent voters divided by percent representatives of the same party, then any ratio significantly more than one indicates aggressive gerrymandering in favor of the other party.
LikeLike
GR 903 AM
Just for fun, I posed the following question to Grok:
Is the following a correct analysis? A quantitative and correct metric of the extent of a state’s gerrymandering is to compare the percent who voted, say, Republican to the fraction of Republicans in the state’s House representation. If you use a ratio of percent voters divided by percent representatives of the same party, then any ratio significantly more than one indicates aggressive gerrymandering in favor of the other party.
Grok responds:
Your proposed metric—comparing the percentage of votes a party receives to the percentage of seats it wins in a state’s House representation, using a ratio of percent voters divided by percent representatives—has some intuitive appeal but is not a fully robust or universally accepted measure of gerrymandering. Let’s break it down:
Strengths of the Metric
Simplicity: The metric is straightforward to calculate, requiring only vote shares and seat shares, which are readily available.
Intuitive Signal: A significant deviation between vote share and seat share (e.g., a ratio significantly greater than 1) can indicate a discrepancy that might suggest gerrymandering, as it shows a party’s representation is not proportional to its voter support.
Limitations and Issues
Over-Simplification:
Gerrymandering is not the only factor causing vote-seat discrepancies. Other factors include:
Geographic distribution: Voters of one party may be concentrated in certain areas (e.g., urban vs. rural), leading to “natural” packing that affects seat outcomes without intentional gerrymandering.
Voter turnout: Uneven turnout across districts can skew results.
Competitiveness of districts: Even without gerrymandering, single-member district systems (like the U.S. House) often produce disproportionate outcomes due to winner-takes-all rules.
Your metric doesn’t account for these confounding factors, which can lead to false positives or misattribution of gerrymandering.
Ratio Interpretation:
A ratio significantly greater than 1 (e.g., a party gets 50% of votes but only 20% of seats) could suggest gerrymandering against that party, but the threshold for “significant” is unclear. What counts as “aggressive” gerrymandering? Without a statistical or contextual benchmark, the ratio alone is subjective.
Conversely, a ratio close to 1 doesn’t necessarily mean no gerrymandering. Both parties could be gerrymandered to maintain a balance that doesn’t reflect voter intent (e.g., bipartisan gerrymandering to protect incumbents).
Assumption of Proportional Representation:
The metric implicitly assumes that seat shares should roughly match vote shares, but the U.S. electoral system isn’t designed for strict proportionality. Single-member districts with first-past-the-post voting naturally produce disproportionate outcomes, even in the absence of gerrymandering.
For example, in a state with 10 districts, a party could win 51% of the vote in each district and take 100% of the seats, yielding a ratio of 0.51, which might falsely suggest gerrymandering against the winning party.
Directionality and Bias:
The ratio (percent voters / percent representatives) is asymmetric. A ratio > 1 suggests underrepresentation, potentially due to gerrymandering against the party. But a ratio < 1 (overrepresentation) could also indicate gerrymandering in favor of the party, which your metric doesn’t explicitly address.
It also doesn’t distinguish between gerrymandering by one party against another versus other structural factors.
Ignores District-Level Dynamics:
Gerrymandering involves manipulating district boundaries to achieve specific outcomes (e.g., packing or cracking voters). Your metric looks at aggregate state-level data, which may mask district-level manipulations. For example, a state could have a balanced vote-seat ratio but still have heavily gerrymandered districts that favor incumbents of both parties.
Established Metrics for Gerrymandering
Quantitative political scientists use more sophisticated metrics to detect and measure gerrymandering, which address some of these limitations:
Efficiency Gap: Measures the difference in “wasted votes” (votes that don’t contribute to winning a seat) between parties. A large gap suggests one party is unfairly advantaged.
Partisan Bias: Estimates how many seats one party would win if both parties received equal vote shares. Significant deviations indicate bias.
Mean-Median Difference: Compares the median vote share in districts to the mean vote share. A large difference suggests skewed district design.
Declination: Analyzes the distribution of vote shares across districts to detect packing and cracking.
Monte Carlo Simulations: Generate thousands of random district maps to compare against the actual map, assessing whether the outcome is statistically unusual.
These metrics are often combined with qualitative analysis (e.g., map shapes, historical context) to confirm gerrymandering, as no single metric is definitive.
Example to Illustrate
Suppose a state has 10 House seats, and Party A gets 60% of the statewide vote but only 30% of the seats (3 seats). Your ratio would be:
Percent voters / Percent representatives = 60% / 30% = 2. This suggests Party A is underrepresented, possibly due to gerrymandering. However:
If Party A’s voters are concentrated in urban areas, they might win 3 districts by large margins while losing 7 districts narrowly, even with neutral maps.
Without analyzing district-level vote distributions or map shapes, you can’t conclude gerrymandering is the cause.
Conclusion
Your metric can be a useful starting point to flag potential gerrymandering, as significant vote-seat discrepancies often warrant investigation. However, it is not a definitive or fully correct measure because it oversimplifies a complex issue, ignores structural factors, and lacks a clear threshold for “aggressive” gerrymandering. For a rigorous analysis, it should be supplemented with established metrics like the efficiency gap or mean-median difference, alongside district-level data and map analysis. If you’re interested, I can dive deeper into one of these alternative metrics or provide a worked example with hypothetical data!
LikeLike
As usual, BeerBelly completely misses the point.
On purpose.
Both parties will to some extent or another draw lines favorable to the party doing the drawing. In CA, the Dems control the process despite the absurd idea that the citizen commission is “non-partisan”.
When the Dems gerrymander, the Dems call it clever politics or some nice sounding euphemism. When the R’s get to draw lines just as favorable to themselves using the same methods, the Dems run off screaming with their hair on fire that the R’s are “destroying democracy”. And the left wing press and news media play right along by pretending this is something new and evil that only the R’s do.
The Dems thought themselves rather smug and clever when they played the filibuster game never for a moment considering the R’s might some day be in a position to deploy the very same tactic.
It’s just so childish and boring that the Dems always scream “fascism, racism, death of democracy” when ever the R’s do exactly what the Dems taught them.
I believe some guy once said that “elections have consequences”.
The Dems have dug their own grave – stop blaming the R’s.
LikeLike
RH 1132am – In my two-sentence 903am comment, all I intended to present was a simple yet “useful starting point” that everyone would understand. Your AI response going into the gerrymandering literature came up with the usual complexification of plausible factors that prevents any progress in eliminating/reducing gerrymandering. The metric I gave provides high probability detection of gerrymandering and the potential for subsequent useful dialogue to alleviate its deficiencies.
I’ll throw out another metric that is subject to the same lawyering that you provided for my first one. Calculate the ratio of perimeter to the area of a congressional district. The higher the ratio, the more likely that gerrymandering has taken place in determining the location and boundaries of the district.
The most compact such area (district) would be a circle with a perimeter/area ratio of 2/r. When normalized over district areas, this metric again allows a simple and intuitive identification and understanding of likely gerrymandering. Unfortunately circles cannot be used because they don’t tesselate. But squares, triangles, and many other polygons do (c.f. Penrose tiles, kites and darts), so … ?
LikeLike
GR 316 PM
I don’t often use AI but I thought it would be interesting to see if AI could understand the question and see what the response looked like.
Gerrymandering assumes political bias. California tries to minimize the political.
LikeLike
So&So 1237 PM
Confirmation bias much So&So?
“California does not currently gerrymander its congressional districts. Since 2011, the task of drawing congressional and state legislative district maps has been assigned to the California Citizens Redistricting Commission, an independent body created by voter-approved ballot initiatives in 2008 and 2010.
The commission consists of five Democrats, five Republicans, and four unaffiliated members, and is designed to remove partisan influence from the redistricting process.”
https://wedrawthelines.ca.gov/2020commissioners/
LikeLike
RH 355pm – That commission will be gone with the wind if Gavin has his way. And the state was already heavily gerrymandered in 2011 to favor the Dems. The commission’s job was to lock in that advantage.
LikeLike
“is designed to remove partisan influence from the redistricting process.”
I figured BeerBelly would be the type to fall for this BS. It was designed to fool the mouth-breathers and gullible. What naive fool.
LikeLike
Why I feel absolutely zero need to pay any attention whatsoever to old jewish lesbians……
LikeLike