Rebane's Ruminations
June 2025
S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930  

ARCHIVES


OUR LINKS


YubaNet
White House Blog
Watts Up With That?
The Union
Sierra Thread
RL “Bob” Crabb
Barry Pruett Blog

George Rebane

[This post appeared (here) in the op-ed pages of the 4jun25 Union.]

On average, all of us in America are millionaires.  In 2022 the average household net worth – assets minus debts – hit $1.06 million.  But that hopeful number is skewed by the ultra-wealthy.  The more accurate net worth of $192,900 is provided by the median where half of households have more than that, and the other half less. (more here)

Unfortunately, many households are also living close to their paychecks because most of their net worth is unspendable – locked up in assets like their homes, 401Ks, cars, etc.  The further problem is that while wage growth is real – up 4.8% last year with inflation at 2.7% during the same period – the prices of things from real estate, appliances, vehicles, and other stuff also increased enough to pretty much eat up real wage growth.

The problem with all this is still government at all levels with its taxes, fees, laws, regulations, …, not counting its ongoing waste, fraud, and abuse, that continue to slow our economy’s growth and impede our makers from producing things at costs that people can more easily afford.  And the ONLY way out of this financial morass is to promote vigorous economic growth that raises all boats – taxing our way to wealth has never worked and is not a reasonable option.

The road to vigorous economic growth is not a secret.  Non-socialist economists have taught and demonstrated for years that nations’ sustainable growth is based on maximizing free market capitalism and minimizing governments’ role in their economies.  Most students of economics know that any program is unsustainable which continues to consume an increasing fraction of the GDP of a nation, state, or local jurisdiction.  Our governments at all levels are riddled with unsustainable spending which is ‘solved’ by ever greater borrowing.

And wealth redistribution is not the answer.  First, because the rich don’t have enough of it, and second, because wealth is mobile – it escapes to where it is not confiscated.  A current example of this in America is the mass movement of the makers from high to low tax states; these not only by the rich, but also from the middle class (enough to cause some avaricious states to lose congressional representation) .  A more serious problem arises when a nation’s makers emigrate to distant lands, leaving behind countries with growing fractions of takers.  Recent examples of this can be drawn from the mostly socialist Europe.

We are now witnessing ‘London’s Great Wealth Exodus’.  After Moscow, the biggest loss of millionaires are those leaving the UK, which amount to 30,000+ over the last ten years, with 11,000 of these emigrating in the last year.  For generations London has been one of the best places in the world for the rich – not any more.  Due to its restrictive financial landscape it has not recovered from the 2008 recession and continues to maintain a risky environment for financial and commercial growth through ever increasing taxes piled on by both Conservative and Labour governments.  New financial centers in Asia and the Middle East are now the new favorite places for the world’s rich. (more here)

All is not yet lost in the US.  Here a new resurgence of hope has enabled all levels of our economy to grow, and that includes the number of millionaires which increased by 12%, albeit at one of the world's lowest rates.  In the last years we’ve shown ourselves to be very inviting for millions of the world’s financially impoverished. But we also continue to be the land of opportunity for the makers, both homegrown and imported who are investing new billions in our country on the promise of economic security and profits.  These are people who will grow the pie for all of us, and hopefully put to shame those who, according to their lights, only seek to forcibly redistribute the current pie more ‘equitably’.

Posted in , ,

5 responses to “America’s Millionaires”

  1. The Estonian Fox Avatar
    The Estonian Fox

    Never stay in a place that doesn’t appreciate you, or recognize your value.

    Like

  2. Resurrected Hillbilly Avatar
    Resurrected Hillbilly

    Re: London taxation,
    In 1971 the top rate of income tax on earned income was cut to 75%. A surcharge of 15% kept the top rate on investment income at 90%. In 1974 the cut was partly reversed and the top rate on earned income was raised to 83%. With the investment income surcharge, this raised the top rate on investment income to 98% – the highest permanent rate since the war.[citation needed] This applied to incomes over £20,000 (equivalent to £263,269 in 2023).[8]
    The government of Margaret Thatcher, who favoured taxation on consumption, reduced personal income tax rates during the 1980s in favour of indirect taxation.[19] In the first budget after her election victory in 1979, the top rate was reduced from 83% to 60% and the basic rate from 33% to 30%.[20] The basic rate was also cut for three successive budgets – to 29% in the 1986 budget, 27% in 1987 and to 25% in 1988; The top rate of income tax was cut to 40%.[21] The investment income surcharge was abolished in 1985.
    Under the government of John Major the basic rate was reduced in stages to 23% by 1997.
    -Wiki

    Like

  3. gjrebane Avatar

    RH 506pm – And in response to the tax hikes the US economy went into the 1970s doldrums (“stagflation”) and stayed there for a decade until Reagan and Volker fixed it and started our biggest post-war boom. And under Thatcher’s enlightened policies of tax reduction and denationalization of industries, the UK economy finally pulled out of its 30-year post-war stagnation. Our Democrats are still ignorant of this history.

    Like

  4. gjrebane Avatar

    From the 5jun25 Union ‘Hits & Misses’ I had another contribution from a leading loud socialist cum communist of Nevada County. “Miss (from Richard Howell): To George Rebane, who wrote: “…taxing our way to economic growth has never worked…” I disagree. Post-war America taxed the rich at twice the level that the Republicans have set now. The rich still got richer, but unlike under the “trickle down” philosophy of Reagan and his followers, the middle class grew. Free market capitalism creates wealth for those who control markets, production, and political leverage. It doesn’t work for wage earners, the first cost that free market capitalists seek to manage by union busting, low wages, and layoffs.”
    I would give Mr Howell a miss for having missed learning economics and history. As most diehard socialists, he believes that government can tax the economy to growth by citing the high post-war tax rates for the rich. What he missed is that a negligible number of rich in those years actually paid these taxes since there were so many legal loopholes for avoiding those high rates that are perennially celebrated by the lightly read Left. And free market capitalism is the ONLY economic structure that has worked best for the middle classes, lifting them from poverty worldwide and most certainly here in America.

    Like

  5. Barry Pruett Avatar
    Barry Pruett

    “No amount of evidence will ever persuade an idiot.” – Mark Twain.
    George, and no amount of rationality or evidence will dissuade them of their collectivist ideological foundations. Only worldview matters to these zealots. If we have learned anything from history and specifically the 20th century, collectivist ideological zealots with political power who are religiously convinced of the superiority of their ideological foundation often times end up killing a lot of people.

    Like

Leave a comment