Rebane's Ruminations
May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

ARCHIVES


OUR LINKS


YubaNet
White House Blog
Watts Up With That?
The Union
Sierra Thread
RL “Bob” Crabb
Barry Pruett Blog

George Rebane

With most of the state’s refineries already gone, and two more packing up to leave, and with more planned refinery exits in the works, the state is heading for a transportation disaster.  The oil companies are uncertain about the reality of CA’s 2035 ban on internal combustion engines now being litigated.  Other states like Texas have much more friendly business environments than the draconian landscape created here by Sacramento’s idiots led by chief imbecile Newsom.

Columnist Terry McLaughlin spells out more details (here) in the 29may25 Union.  The definitive analysis of the next California tragedy is documented in ‘Ensuring California’s Gasoline Security for the 21st Century’ by Professor Michael Mische of USC’s Marshall School of Business.  From the report’s introduction we read –

California can ill afford the loss of one refinery, let alone two. The pending shutdown of the Phillips 66 refining complex in Los Angeles will reduce daily refining capacity by 8.9%. The loss, although painful in terms of its impact on consumer prices, is absorbable and the deficit in production and gasoline levels will be compensated by imports of finished fuels from Washington State and perhaps Gulf Coast refineries.

The collective consequence of the pending refinery exits to the Golden State is potentially devastating to California’s economic growth and status as the fourth largest economy, in nominal terms, in the world. With the announced shutdown of Valero’s Benicia refinery complex accompanied by its $1.1 billion charge-off, California is confronting a potential 21% reduction in collective refining capacity from 2023 to April 2026.

In 1982 California had about 45 refineries, with the exit of the next two the refinery count will be eleven.  There is no foreseeable end to the ongoing destruction caused by our voters ensconcing the state's socialist one-party monopoly.

Posted in , , , ,

7 responses to “California’s $8 gasoline”

  1. Scott O Avatar

    from the article:
    “…including the possibility of de facto state-owned refineries.”
    Sure – maybe get the same crew that run the California High Speed Rail to operate the refineries!
    Since the refineries are regulated by the state, the state operators of the refineries will be regulating them selves!
    Sounds totally legit.

    Like

  2. Randy Avatar
    Randy

    New York State hasn’t decided to jump THIS shark (yet.) They do refuse to do any fracking despite the awesome deposits of shale gas and have instituted laws to ban installs of new natural gas appliances. Just a matter of time before “Bucky Beaver” says “Hold my beer” to her liberal progressive cronies. CA we feel your pain!

    Like

  3. scenes Avatar
    scenes

    Naturally, killing off refineries is just one more attempt to remove ICE powered vehicles from the road.
    “ban installs of new natural gas appliances”
    That’s one of my very favorite things from the giant lists of ‘progressive’ demands to produce a utopia on Earth.
    Rather than multiple energy sources (diesel, LPG, natgas, gasoline) with dampened responses to shortages due to storage, we’ll base the whole modern world on a few wires hooked to your house with energy from a day’s worth of batteries hooked to sketchy renewable sources.
    We’ll run it all on the ragged edge to save money to boot.
    lol. The disaster possibilities there from unusual circumstances and/or cascading failures is just amazing.
    From local city councils up to the Great Men in Sacramento, California is run by impractical fools.

    Like

  4. Gregory Avatar
    Gregory

    I think shutting the refineries is an attempt to lose the Gubernatorship election. Some legislative seats, too…

    Like

  5. scenes Avatar
    scenes

    re: Gregory@11:30AM
    To me, things like that always smell like lifetime government employees pushing through a policy.
    Honestly, given a meeting room full of opinionated ambitious people, just about anything can get cooked up. It’s all government by PowerPoint.

    Like

  6. Gregory Avatar
    Gregory

    The opinionated ambitious people in Excremento are all allergic to gasoline.
    And there are two tides flowing in and out…
    One is globull warming, an inexorable path towards being HOT.
    A second, a global cooling starting right about NOW. A slow progression of perhaps five years, and then a cool period of about 20 years.
    There is no room for both to be true.

    Like

Leave a comment