Rebane's Ruminations
January 2024
S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031  

ARCHIVES


OUR LINKS


YubaNet
White House Blog
Watts Up With That?
The Union
Sierra Thread
RL “Bob” Crabb
Barry Pruett Blog

George Rebane

We see that SCOTUS has given the feds permission to remove some razor wire barricades from federal land on the Mexican border.  This permission enables the anti-American Biden administration to enable more illegals to easily enter the United States.  No consideration was given to national security in the ruling which included two so-called conservative justices. (more here)

Most of us know that the US Constitution primarily limits the powers of the federal government to those specifically delineated in the document.  Powers absent are reserved for the states and its more local jurisdictions.  The federal government is mandated by law to carry out and implement certain specified powers, among the leading is to provide for and maintain national security.  This definitely includes securing the nation’s borders so that only lawful transit is both authorized and made possible.

Unfortunately, the Constitution is silent when it comes to the enforcement and execution of its provisions and derived laws when the federal government cannot or will not carry out its obligations.  According to Rebane Doctrine, in such cases the natural and rational solution is to expand federalism by authorizing the states to fulfill such obligations and implement the functions of the absent federal government.  A corollary to such a ruling would be to then prohibit the federal government from interfering with the states as they fulfill the constitutional obligations abandoned by the feds.

This new protocol could be implemented by a SCOTUS ruling in response to, say, a suit brought by any state harmed by the feds’ delinquent behavior.  The ruling would then set an enduring precedent like other such SCOTUS rulings.  Of course, if it were deemed sufficiently important, then the ruling could be promoted into a constitutional amendment.  According to my lights, recognizing this clarifying extension has become necessary as our country becomes more fractionated with large numbers of states in frequent disagreement with a federal government that often acts unconstitutionally.

Posted in , , ,

5 responses to “A Worthy Extension of Federalism”

  1. Individual Juan Avatar
    Individual Juan

    “the ruling which included two so-called conservative justices”
    It is dizzying the rate at which conservatives will throw their compatriots under the bus at the slightest deviation from total Trump/MAGA obedience.
    Breaking news – SCOTUS justices are supposed to be non-political.
    But I get that it is just damn embarrassing.

    Like

  2. Barry Pruett Avatar
    Barry Pruett

    Texas is installing more razor wire. Supreme Court can say all it wants but the problem is enforcement. If Texas ignores the Supreme Court, Biden has to enforce by physically stopping Texas. I don’t think that Biden wants to use federal employees to force Texas to allow millions of illegal immigrants into its state. That’s bad optics.

    Like

  3. George Rebane Avatar

    SCOTUS politics – those who remember and also watch real news know that it was the Democrats who dubbed Trump’s SCOTUS appointees as biased ‘conservatives’ not fit for duty on the bench. When these justices don’t march in lockstep with Republican views, then it turns out embarrassing for the Left. We must always remember that the Dems are socialists (see my 22jan24 post) working tirelessly to make the US into a compliant one-party autocracy on the path to globalism.

    Like

  4. Gregory Avatar
    Gregory

    “Breaking news – SCOTUS justices are supposed to be non-political.”
    Breaking news… that isn’t in the Constitution.
    FDR did his damndest to pack the high court.

    Like

  5. scenes Avatar
    scenes

    Yeehaw. Excitin’ times I tell ya. Hopefully nobody makes a loud noise down there.
    https://gov.texas.gov/uploads/files/press/Border_Statement_1.24.2024.pdf
    “The failure of the Biden Administration to fulfill the duties imposed by Article IV, § 4 has triggered Article I,
    § 10, Clause 3, which reserves to this State the right of self-defense. For these reasons, I have already
    declared an invasion under Article I, § 10, Clause 3 to invoke Texas’s constitutional authority to defend and
    protect itself. That authority is the supreme law of the land and supersedes any federal statutes to the
    contrary. The Texas National Guard, the Texas Department of Public Safety, and other Texas personnel are
    acting on that authority, as well as state law, to secure the Texas border.”

    Like

Leave a comment