[This commentary appeared as an Other Voices column here in the 27nov21 edition of The Union.]
‘It ain’t what you know that gets you into trouble; it’s what you know that ain’t so.’ Will Rogers and others.
George Rebane
Herding ideological cats is a job Union editor Alan Riquelmy is tasked with as the chair of the newspaper’s Editorial Board. On the whole he does a commendable job in composing the EB’s weekly debate into a cohesive Our View column that appears in its Saturday edition. Today’s topic (here) is a particularly hairy one – Critical Race Theory as taught in our K-12 schools.
The recent public forum on CRT was held at the high school board meeting with most attending being CRT’s ideological devotees, while denying that it is taught to Nevada County kids. Their opposition was a group calling itself Protecting American Ideals whose members presented evidence that indeed the tenets of CRT are taught in our schools, and that such teachings are destructive to the kids’ learning and practicing American ideals. As Riquelmy points out, neither side was there “to listen to the presentation”, but instead to “participate in the pageant” of people with made-up minds. Moreover, our editor reveals that even the EB “couldn’t reach consensus on an issue this contentious”.
As Riquelmy sought to pour oil on the column’s troubled waters, he ran into a couple of items with which I have a nit or two. First, our editor is of the common understanding that there exists only one history. Serious students of history are the first to point out that there are countless histories, each of which aims to present a cohesive narrative of a period’s chronicled events. The job of historians is to identify the causal basins and beams (sequences of ‘this caused that’, etc) of every notable milestone that they explicate. And as we know, causality is both slippery and many-headed. To every gathering of causal sequences, one can quickly come up with yet another one that tells a different plausible story of the times.
Another popular error embedded in our society can be laid at the feet of the late Sen Daniel Patrick Moynihan – ‘you can have your own opinion, but you can’t have your own facts.’ Wrong! It is easy to see in this age of the internet, 500 plus media channels, and facile international communications, that there are many disparate sets of ‘facts’ that attend and characterize any issue or notion. It is only the voluble talking heads and media pundits who each purvey their own facts as the gospel upon which their narrative finds footing and reflects their biases. We consumers of history and facts have more than an ample smorgasbord from which to choose what suits our fancy or yields to our grasp.
Finally, CRT does have a widely accepted definition composed of tenets considered to be true. These are collected and displayed on various websites – e.g. britannica.com/topic/critical-race-theory. The tenets presented generally agree; they are not a mystery. But here is the meat of the argument about CRT being taught in our schools – ‘Critical Race Theory’ does not have to appear in a school’s syllabus in order to have its tenets be taught to students. The tenets of any body of thought can be marbled piecemeal into any of a number of different courses to communicate its desired ideological perspective – today there are even handbooks to show teachers how to inject CRT into all STEM(!) subjects. And that is demonstrably what students tell their parents what is happening, and that is what the parents are up in arms about here in Nevada County and across the country.
Our editor admirably concludes, “Sure, we want our children to learn about history without the politics of the day tainting it. We don’t want our kids saddled with the sins of the past. We want a vibrant new generation to leave school armed with knowledge and critical thinking skills, questioning a country they love when needed and fighting for it when required.”
And then he adds the kicker, “But we also want people who think like us going to the polls.” It was ever thus.
rebanesruminations.com 
Leave a comment