Rebane's Ruminations
September 2021
S M T W T F S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930  

ARCHIVES


OUR LINKS


YubaNet
White House Blog
Watts Up With That?
The Union
Sierra Thread
RL “Bob” Crabb
Barry Pruett Blog

George Rebane

We Americans have been on the road to serfdom since the launch of President Johnson’s Great Society programs in the late 1960s.  Our progress toward an authoritarian social order was an almost imperceptible creep during the early years starting in the 1970s.  With the passing of the decades, our loss of freedoms has now become a gallop, especially highlighted by the state diktats, we quietly succumbed to during the Covid pandemic.  Specifically, I’m really talking about the battering suffered by the Bastiat Triangle of Rights (q.v.) – Liberty, Security, and Property.  These rights form the seminal legal structure upon which ALL other rights are based and secured; none can be weakened without a concomitant weakening of the other two, and, of course, the weakening of the rights deriving from these.

A beguiling danger on the road to serfdom is that its many disarming byways and slowly enlarging chuck holes are not readily noticed by travelers being drawn by descriptions of the promised land at its terminus.  By the time the journey becomes so difficult that even the lightest thinkers notice, it is too late to turn around and go back.  In America, our socialist elites have successfully brought a compliant and undereducated electorate to such a milestone on the road to serfdom and totalitarianism.

FAHayekNoted Austrian economists Ludwig von Mises and F.A. Hayek, along with Milton Friedman of the ‘Chicago school’, each warned us of the ultimate disaster that would result from an embrace of collectivist governance based on central planning and control by elites.  The disasters of practiced fascism and communism highlight pre-woke and pre-CRT history books.  That both arose from initial adoption of various forms of Marxian socialism is today clouded by the Left’s resurgence and its citation of the Scandinavian experience.  Nowhere is mentioned Scandinavia’s actual unsustainable experience with socialism, along with their ongoing attempts to retreat from their extreme flirtations during the 1960s and 70s.

The US, on the other hand, is rushing toward a neo-Marxian socialist future on a disintegrating chariot pulled by global warming, open borders, and critical theories.  The party in charge of this rush to misery are the Democrats dominated by their left-wing zealots.  A socialist future is now openly presented as the objective of the country’s fundamental transformation.  And the road is already littered with authoritarian mandates that would have gathered our forefathers bearing torches and pitchforks in the public square.  With more of us arriving daily.

This week we heard that CDC has expanded from controlling our rental market to overruling relationships between Americans and their physicians.  As relayed by a reader who went to the local Rite-Aid drugstore to fill an Ivermectin prescription by her doctor, the pharmacist told her that they are rejecting such prescriptions because the CDC has deemed Ivermectin to have suddenly become harmful and not to be used as a C19 therapeutic or prophylactic.  So these unelected, politicized bureaucrats have now injected themselves into our country’s doctor/patient relationship starting with using a demonstrated lamestream hoax to prevent physicians from prescribing lawful medicines to their patients.  And no one has made a peep.  The lamestream has, of course, remained mum, but even the so-called rightwing outlets have yet to pick up on this latest rollback of our freedoms.  We have become so inured to having our rights casually cancelled by any politician or bureaucrat at literally any level of governance.  We are already serfs who comply with our master’s voice.  No second thought is given.  We are even enthusiastic enforcers of such mandates, ready, willing, and able to turn on our neighbor when we see noncompliance.

The Nobelist Hayek was most eloquent and clear in the warnings he issued, beginning with The Road to Serfdom (1944) and continuing throughout his life after he went to the University of Chicago and became part of ‘the Chicago School’ which also included Nobelist Milton Friedman.  A perusal of Serfdom yields some of his more important sentiments about socialism, collectivism, and totalitarianism.

  • Western democracies, including the UK and the US, have “progressively abandoned that freedom in economic affairs without which personal and political freedom has never existed in the past”.  Society has mistakenly tried to ensure continuing prosperity by centralized planning, which inevitably leads to totalitarianism.
  • Socialism is a hypocritical system, because its professed humanitarian goals can only be put into practice by brutal methods “of which most socialists disapprove”. Such centralized systems also require effective propaganda, so that the people come to believe that the state’s goals are theirs. As with communism, Hayek argues that the roots of National Socialism lie in socialism.
  • Centralized planning is inherently undemocratic, because it requires “that the will of a small minority be imposed upon the people”.  The power of these minorities to act by taking money or property in pursuit of centralized goals, destroys the Rule of Law and individual freedoms.  Where there is centralized planning, “the individual would more than ever become a mere means, to be used by the authority in the service of such abstractions as ”socialized welfare’ or the ‘good of the community’”.
  • Hayek opposed regulations that restrict the freedom to enter a trade, or to buy and sell at any price, or to control quantities. Nevertheless, he acknowledged the utility of regulations that restrict legal methods of production, so long as these are applied equally to everyone and not used as an indirect way of controlling prices or quantities, and without forgetting the cost of such restrictions.

So today we have Biden and his CDC stumbling through one science-free policy after another in their misbegotten efforts to curb Covid.  None of them understand that the disease is now endemic and a permanent part of our health landscape.  We will fight it as we have other infectious diseases, by developing herd immunity through exposure and vaccines, but never by lockdowns and economic destruction.  Ignoring history and science while putting politics first, Team Biden now issues illegal and unconstitutional federal mandates to prescribe everything from masks, to vaccinations, to testing, to social distancing.  And again, we as the serfs we have become do not make a peep in opposition.  Half of us have become so compliant that they rush to denounce their neighbors who don’t toe the (Democratic) party line.

Posted in , , ,

5 responses to “On Our Road to Serfdom – 10sep21”

  1. Scott O Avatar

    It may seem to some that the article I link to has nothing to do with the topic, but I assure you it does.
    https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2021/09/13/can-progressives-be-convinced-that-genetics-matters
    I was taught in my social science classes about ‘tabula rasa’ and the need to consider all mentions of genetics ‘NAZI stuff’. The lady featured in the article has the unfortunate need to be a scientist and yet also a child of the times. The article itself is a comic rundown of how ignorant one can be and yet get their items published:
    “Harris was drawn to Murray’s defense after an incident at Middlebury College, the previous month, in which Murray was shouted down by student protesters and his faculty chaperone was injured in a melee.”
    A melee?
    Bullshit. Murray and a woman who was with him were violently assaulted by left-wing goons. The woman was injured. There was no melee, but the author is either an ignorant person repeating left-wing talking points or a liar.
    I digress.
    The salient point here is that the leftist slant in govt that has prevailed for the last 70 years or so is governed by their unshakable belief that everyone ends up middle class and happy as a clam if only we twist the financial dials of govt to effect that end.
    Reality has become a bit too real for some and now some sort of deal must be struck a bit different than the old social contract. Now don’t you get the idea that short white conservative males will be getting fat contracts in the NBA via govt diktats.
    Oh no.
    The article recites all manner of lies and nonsense, but the capper is:
    “Harden argues that an appreciation of the role of simple genetic luck—alongside all the other arbitrary lotteries of birth—will make us, as a society, more inclined to ensure that everyone has the opportunity to enjoy lives of dignity and comfort.”
    I see.
    Society will “ensure” that everyone enjoys a life of ‘dignity and comfort’.
    Pretty sure that describes the animals in a modern, well equipped zoo.
    The article contains a myriad of other laughable slurs of ideas and folks the left don’t like.
    The misstatements about Murray are many.
    Ultimately Hardin tries to put forth the idea she is open to the truth but like too many leftists, if Trump or Hitler think 2+2=4, then by god we will forge a ‘better’ path.
    What that is and when we will hear of it remains to be seen.
    Please remember that policy wonks in all levels of govt are now holding these ‘equity’ views.
    It is poison and will destroy our country.

    Like

  2. George Rebane Avatar

    ScottO 750pm – Good stuff Scott; it belongs here.

    Like

  3. Scott O Avatar

    And now I find this:
    https://www.takimag.com/article/for-whom-the-bell-curve-tolls/
    The last is best: (please – not liberal, ‘leftist’)
    “And do you really think liberals can hold an intelligent discussion of genetic questions like these in the emotional state that they’ve gotten themselves into?
    I’m beginning to fear that our multiple current anti-intelligence moral panics might mean that Dr. Harden’s well-intentioned intervention is too late.

    Like

  4. The Estonian Fox Avatar
    The Estonian Fox

    Toward the end of the New Yorker article:
    As she (Harden) put it to me in an e-mail, “Even if we eliminated all inequalities in educational outcomes between sexes, all inequalities by family socioeconomic status, all inequalities between different schools (which as you know are very confounded with inequalities by race), we’ve only eliminated a bit more than a quarter of the inequalities in educational outcomes.”
    She directed me to a comprehensive World Bank data set, released in 2020, which showed that seventy-two per cent of inequality at the primary-school level in the U.S. is WITHIN demographic groups rather than between them. “Common intuitions about the scale of inequality in our society, and our imaginations about how much progress we would make if we eliminated the visible inequalities by race and class, are PROFOUNDLY wrong,” she wrote.

    Capitals in above are mine. So it looks like genetics may be behind outcome-differences more than we realize. And infinitely more than the liberals even begin to admit. I have not been able to locate her source of the World Bank 2020 data yet.

    Like

  5. George Rebane Avatar

    EFox 744am – Most appropriate, and also belongs in the comment stream under ‘Equity Denies Reality’.
    https://rebaneruminations.typepad.com/rebanes_ruminations/2021/07/equity-denies-reality.html

    Like

Leave a comment