George Rebane
In a democracy it's never the minority, but always the lightly read majority that votes in the tyrant.
“… scientific evidence supporting facemasks’ efficacy is lacking, adverse physiological, psychological and health effects are established.” So reports our NIH here. And it’s federal law that you have to wear a face mask during your entire flight when traveling. Another righthand/lefthand confusion by government that no liberal in the land notices as they back more and more things an ever larger government will do to us. The rest of us see it for what it is – perennially expanding state power and control.
Rebane’s “far right ideology” continues to be a characteristic of my political demeanor that is oft cited, yet unsubstantiated, by local liberals. Now don’t get me wrong, I may have no problem being characterized with that label if I or my detractors knew the tenets of a far right ideology, tenets which I share as demonstrated by my published credo and extensive oeuvre of socio-political commentaries. I am truly interested in getting some liberal of sufficient intellect to offer up a cogent list (it doesn’t have to be long) of evidence that places me in their concept of the far right of our political spectrum.
[1may21 update] Not one of our leftwing worthies would/could? step up to the plate and give even one substantive example of my ‘far right’ attributes. This, of course, speaks to the larger problem shared by our semantically simplistic Left. They have no idea what are the definitions of the everyday words they use, like ‘racist’, ‘white supremacist’, ‘white nationalist’, ‘misogynist’, ‘rightwinger’, …, and now ‘far right’. To them it is all part of the approved narrative passed to them from their thought leaders – it’s completely acceptable in their circles to simply parrot, as long as you parrot the proper words. And speaking of semantically simplistic, to them such terms as ‘socialist’ and ‘socialism’ have binary meanings. If a person or country does not explicitly subscribe to ALL the attributes that define a socialist, then neither he nor the jurisdiction is socialist. The same goes for socialism; it’s all or none – nothing is seen to progress toward socialism until its final attribute is in place and verified.
rebanesruminations.com 
Leave a comment