Rebane's Ruminations
December 2020
S M T W T F S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

ARCHIVES


OUR LINKS


YubaNet
White House Blog
Watts Up With That?
The Union
Sierra Thread
RL “Bob” Crabb
Barry Pruett Blog

"Come now, let us reason together, says the Lord."  Isaiah 1:18

George Rebane

There’s an ‘open letter to the President’ going around the email circuit beseeching him to invoke the Insurrection Act, activate National Guard and the military to seize ballots and vote computers across the nation, publish all the secret evidence of alleged voting fraud, and essentially proceed toward a redo of the national election under newly prescribed and strict supervision.  The letter was written by two lawyers – Stewart Rhodes and Kellye SoRelle.

Regardless of what we think about the legitimacy of the November election, at this stage of the game I don’t think that carrying out the open letter’s prescriptions is a good idea.  If tried, it will not occur peacefully, and will most certainly give rise to massive civil disturbances that could lead to a civil war.  The problem is that the US has a 250-year history of elections – admittedly some more contended than others – that have in the end been accepted by our citizens with relatively minimal turbulence (e.g. ‘Battle of Athens’).  Because of this, our country has not put in place mechanisms to peacefully contend and correct both statewide and national elections.

Now I believe there’s an 80% chance that nationwide incidents of election fraud, ranging from petty to massive, occurred.  And I also believe that there’s a 50% chance that such fraud, as supported by presented and rejected evidence, would overturn significant election results (e.g. the presidency) if allowed its day in court and found to be true.  But today, we are where we are, and there remain only a few low probability opportunities to change the overwhelmingly accepted election outcomes using in-place processes and procedures.  The enduring problem we shoulder going forward is that, given the polls, there is a significant fraction of Americans who no longer have faith in the manner our elections are conducted (I am one of them.)  So, what to do?

My recommendation is that we join in a bipartisan effort to put in place a comprehensive and transparent set of processes and procedures under which future national (and perhaps also statewide) elections may be contended and corrected in an orderly and peaceful manner.  This would be launched and supervised by a congressional commission with a staffed working group of people with appropriate legal and information systems expertise to devise, develop, and test the resulting federal System for Contending and Correcting Elections (SCCE).

The bipartisan SCCE would prescribe the required legal underpinnings for its field operations, and recommend to Congress any additional supporting legislation needed.  Its working group would publish the how/when/who functions that define such things as SCCE election monitoring mechanisms, election scheduling, means of voting, vetting of franchised voters, accepting and processing reported irregularities, ballot chains of custody, isolating voting machines, standards of identifying and adjudicating fraud, procedures for holding re-elections, and so on.

In the latter case when a re-election is warranted, the SCCE's procedures for the uninterrupted continuance of government in the interval would already be laid out, specifying which elected and appointed officials remain with what duties and powers.  It is not yet clear whether all this can be accomplished through legislation, or will the Constitution need to be amended to handle such interregnum matters.

In any case, this approach of commissioning a SCCE during the relative political quietude between elections would serve our country much better than today’s calls for tanks in the intersections and attack helicopters flying overhead.  And in the worst case, the attempt to launch such an initiative would be very revealing of which organs of the Deep State, which private sector institutions, which corporatists, and which political parties rise to oppose such approaches to restore public confidence in the elections which sustain our democratic republic.

These are my preliminary thoughts on the matter, and I'm sure readers have their own ideas to offer on what, if any, preparations need be made to avoid the now existential travails we continue to suffer from the elections of 2016 and 2020.

Posted in , ,

113 responses to “Contending and Correcting Elections”

  1. Walt Avatar

    The Frisco kid asks if I have ever had a job. Now that’s a good one. I even know how to make shit run downhill!(I’ll just give you a push) Where have you been? beards are in style. size 60 waist is not.

    Like

  2. Walt Avatar

    Note to FUE… The “F” does not stand for “fantastic”.
    Salon?,, Really?? No wonder you got kicked to the curb.

    Like

  3. Scott O Avatar

    Paul 2:46 – So much for the worry about the deficit. Gotta love Paul’s deeply held beliefs.
    As I pointed out, Paul – the fault for the deficit lies with most of the American citizenry.

    Like

  4. Barry Pruett Avatar
    Barry Pruett

    Faith, hope and love. Merry Christmas Jeff.

    Like

  5. Barry Pruett Avatar
    Barry Pruett

    Grampa. Beads. Didn’t this whole nonsense start with the master in journalism bitching about spelling? Lol.

    Like

  6. Paul Emery Avatar
    Paul Emery

    Just going along with your guy Trump Scott. You don’t seem to have a worry cause you support him and haven’t spoken out against him.

    Like

  7. Barry Pruett Avatar
    Barry Pruett

    That is true news Scott. We did this. We made this mess by electing who we did. The only way to fix the mess that we created is to no longer vote for fools. 🇺🇸

    Like

  8. Bill Tozer Avatar
    Bill Tozer

    Barry @ 8:50 pm
    Yep, the irony is too rich. Thst is why some folks are lost without their copy editors…and a fee shots cheapo White Port.
    New study: Beads
    ‘Study finds a manly beard may help drive sales’
    “The next time you are considering purchasing a big-ticket item, it might be worth paying attention to the salesperson’s facial hair.
    The beard seems to be a subtle but consistent clue used in evaluating the knowledge and trustworthiness of the sales/service personnel you interact with. If the salesperson is sporting a beard, you may be more likely to pull out your wallet. And if you work in a sales or service role, you might consider the power of donning a beard before no-shave November rolls around.
    Sarah Mittal, assistant professor of Marketing at St. Edward’s University and the paper’s lead researcher, and David H. Silvera, associate professor of Business at University of Texas at San Antonio, conducted five studies to test the “power of the beard,” predicting that the beard would be an advantage in sales and service roles. The studies examined the beard’s effect on perception of expertise, trustworthiness, likelihood of sales and service satisfaction. Their findings are published online in the Journal of Business Research in their article titled, “It Grows on You: Perceptions of sales/service personnel with facial hair.”
    In the competitive world of sales and service personnel, expertise and trustworthiness are critical for relationship building and closing sales. They found that regardless of the sales industry or context (online), or the salesperson’s race or ethnicity, attractiveness or likability, potential buyers view bearded sales personnel as having greater expertise and trustworthiness than their clean-shaven, stubbled and mustached counterparts.
    “Our research suggests that those in a sales or service role, where expertise and trust are crucial to converting sales, would be well-served to grow a beard. Your LinkedIn profile and marketing materials may even benefit from the subtle cue conveyed by donning a beard,” Mittal said.
    https://phys.org/news/2020-12-manly-beard-sales.html

    Like

  9. Barry Pruett Avatar
    Barry Pruett

    But Bill what if I just wear a bunch of beads. Wouldn’t that do the trick as well?

    Like

  10. Bill Tozer Avatar
    Bill Tozer

    Last comment before getting back on target.
    Barry, no worries. Hair don’t grow on steel. 😉
    ‘Are Women Attracted to Men with Beards?’
    “Research by Tessa R. Clarkson et al. (2020)[i] discovered that women find men with facial hair to be attractive and dominant, both socially and physically.”
    The researchers opined that the results could be because masculine faces indicate a man who is socially dominant and physically stronger, and facial hair enhances masculine traits while masking less attractive facial areas.
    “Regarding perceptions of masculinity, the authors acknowledged the positive association between facial masculinity and physical strength, fighting ability, and social assertiveness. Experimentally enhancing facial masculinity also increases perceptions of age and dominance. The authors note that facial masculinity may influence women’s mating preferences by providing insight into a man’s strength and health.”
    https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/why-bad-looks-good/202001/are-women-attracted-men-beards

    Like

  11. Bill Tozer Avatar
    Bill Tozer

    The theme of Dr. Rebane’s post: restoring trust and where we go from here. Hint: trust will not be restored in a bipartisan manner, IMHO.
    ‘America Under Biden—Thoughts From an Old Hand at Propaganda’
    https://www.intellectualtakeout.org/america-under-biden-thoughts-from-an-old-hand-at-propaganda/

    Like

  12. L Avatar
    L

    Restoring trust is going to be difficult. The ‘tres amigos’ hanging around keep reminding us that the election was ‘honest’, so often that guilty knowledge becomes obvious.
    Quit wasting your time- the half of America that can still reason, doesn’t think the election was stolen, we know it. How do we know?
    The same way we know OJ was the killer- overwhelming circumstantial evidence and the impossibility of any other answer. The so-called anecdotes are far too numerous for any other conclusion.
    You might flip a coin a hundred times and get a hundred ‘heads’, but I’ll give you some good odds that you won’t accomplish it in a lifetime. Some people will get this, some won’t and they can’t be persuaded. Innumeracy is forever.
    In any case, Merry Christmas to all, even including the opposition without whou things wouldn’t be as much fun.

    Like

  13. Scott O Avatar

    Paul 8:59 – “You don’t seem to have a worry cause you support him and haven’t spoken out against him.”
    Where to start?
    I don’t seem to have a worry about the debt?
    Paul, you either don’t bother to read much of what is posted here or your memory is rotted to nothing.
    Haven’t spoken against Trump?
    Well – it’s Christmas.
    Have a nice day, Paul.
    Let me just say the world would be a nicer place if Paul Emery would stop showing up here with factually untrue statements.

    Like

Leave a comment