Rebane's Ruminations
September 2020
S M T W T F S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930  

ARCHIVES


OUR LINKS


YubaNet
White House Blog
Watts Up With That?
The Union
Sierra Thread
RL “Bob” Crabb
Barry Pruett Blog

George Rebane

Justice Ginsburg was a great lady and a great jurist.  Her record speaks for itself.  The paeans to her accomplished career have already started, and deservedly so.  As most readers know, I did not share her social and political orientation.  Nevertheless, I can say that she was from the age when Democrats and Republicans still believed whoever the American electorate voted into office, that they were then the legitimate holders of that office and deserved to serve without the other party launching a campaign of subterfuge to sabotage their term and malign their character.

So with 46 days until the election, now starts a whole new political battle over her successor.  The choice and timely empanelment of the new appointee to fill Justice Ginsburg’s seat will be a critical requirement, since it is almost certain that SCOTUS will have a hand in determining November’s outcome at more than one level.  And for those rulings we need a full court that cannot be irresolute.

My own preference is that President Trump immediately puts forth an appropriately vetted and qualified conservative jurist, and that Majority Leader McConnell gets the Senate to hold hearings and give its imprimatur to the new justice with all prudent haste.  

Posted in , , ,

97 responses to “Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg – RIP”

  1. Todd Juvinall Avatar

    paul emery | 21 September 2020 at 09:29 AM
    RGB never siad that and you know it. All fabricated by partisan liberals. Hey, I have this bridge in Arizona so get your money ready.

    Like

  2. Walt Avatar

    Emery will believe anything anti Trump.
    Sorry Emery, RBG has no say in this. If she didn’t want Trump to pick her successor, she should not have died.
    Back to
    “trump lied” again? But Biden LIED.. Funny you give the lies a pass at every turn. The ponytail of hypocrisy rides off again on his little rackle…” HIGH HOE Gaunga!!! AWAY!!(up until the extension cord snaps.)

    Like

  3. scenes Avatar
    scenes

    ToddJ: “RGB never siad that and you know it.”
    I tend to agree with that.
    Here’s the non-partisan supposed source..
    https://www.equaljusticeworks.org/fellows/clara-spera/
    the story is probably bullshit.
    In any case, I can’t say that it’s for a judge to choose their successor, although you know they try. It’s just that it’s bad form.
    I suppose we can all agree that the following people said that you can nominate and appoint a Supreme Court justice near the end of a Presidential term….
    Ginsburg, Biden, Obama
    The following people said that they wouldn’t vote for a judge near the end of a Presidential term.
    McConnell, Graham
    There’s video of all of this. People are going to persist in re-posting it over and over of course as if it’s something new.
    Paul should probably work on convincing Trump that pushing a judge through will hurt his own prospects. If Trump doesn’t do it, will Paul vote for him?
    It seems to me that if Trump is 100% sure to lose, as the KVMR action news team persists in posting, that putting in a justice is exactly the thing to do. Maybe we could hold off the end of the world by a year or two.

    Like

  4. scenes Avatar
    scenes

    As Paul breathlessly quotes a thing we’ve all heard repeatedly:
    ““most fervent wish is that I will not be replaced until a new president is installed.” ”
    Notice the word ‘new’. So I guess they were supposed to wait until Jan 2021 or Jan 2025 depending on whether Trump wins or loses.
    Paul, isn’t 4.5 years a bit too long for this?

    Like

  5. paul emery Avatar
    paul emery

    So Todd you claim He Granddaughter lied ?
    Ginsburg herself was aware about the coming tempest; she dictated this statement to granddaughter Clara Spera in the days before her death: “My most fervent wish is that I will not be replaced until a new president is installed.”
    https://www.npr.org/sections/death-of-ruth-bader-ginsburg/2020/09/18/914643289/granddaughter-presages-battle-royale-when-will-new-justice-be-confirmed

    Like

  6. scenes Avatar
    scenes

    “So Todd you claim the Granddaughter lied ?”
    I think there’s a decent chance of that, or that she milked a statement out of a dying woman. Whatever it takes, after all.
    In any case, please explain how Trump is worse off for installing a new Justice. We’ve love to know.

    Like

  7. Barry Pruett Avatar
    Barry Pruett

    Paul. Who cares?

    Like

  8. Walt Avatar

    Give us proof she didn’t Emery.😂
    Just where the hell you get this idea a LIB won’t lie?
    Your full of shit on a daily basis.

    Like

  9. Paul Emery Avatar
    Paul Emery

    Barry
    So you don’t care if Trump falsely accuses Ginsberg’s Granddaughter of lying? As an attorney don’t you place a value on truth?

    Like

  10. Don Bessee Avatar
    Don Bessee

    That ‘last wish’ is at odds with Ginsbergs documented statement –
    In her own words –
    Flashback: In 2016, Ginsburg said Senate should hold SCOTUS confirmation hearing during election year
    Ginsburg remarked in 2016 that ‘nothing in the Constitution’ precludes 11th hour nomination.
    https://www.foxnews.com/politics/flashback-in-2016-ginsburg-senate-election-year-vacancy
    😉
    Posted by: Don Bessee | 20 September 2020 at 03:06 PM

    Like

  11. Bill Tozer Avatar
    Bill Tozer

    Oh, so we have to follow RBG’s wishes? Until when? Are you nuts?
    WTF, that statement is ridiculous. RBG acted like she owns the SCOTUS seat, not rented and appointed to her by the electorate. RBG has no say in the matter. Whether it [her statements] is reflects her wishes or not, they have zero bearing on the process. The American electorate put in place a majority of Republican Senators to confirm or deny the President’s nominees for SCOTUS. Blame the American voter for turning the US Senate red, not blue. “We the people” have spoken by choosing senators in each of the 50 states. It’s not ‘We the RBG Wishes’.
    RBG’s wish was to make it to and through to Jan 2017 by saving “her seat”. Didn’t wish and plan didn’t work out either.

    Like

  12. Barry Pruett Avatar
    Barry Pruett

    “So you don’t care if Trump falsely accuses Ginsberg’s Granddaughter of lying? As an attorney don’t you place a value on truth?” I do value the truth. In fact, I practice trust and probate litigation. And for the most part in death situations, if it’s not in writing, it didn’t happen. That’s the truth.

    Like

  13. Paul Emery Avatar
    Paul Emery

    Barry
    So you support Trumps statement that
    “I don’t know that she said that. Or was that written out by Adam Schiff, and Schumer, and Pelosi?” Trump asked. “That came out of the wind. It sounds so beautiful but that sounds like a Schumer deal,”

    Like

  14. Don Bessee Avatar
    Don Bessee

    He has that right –
    CNN’s Jeffery Toobin: Democrats ‘wimps,’ might not have ‘guts’ to battle GOP over Supreme Court vacancy
    ‘There is a difference to how Democrats and Republicans go about these fights,’ Toobin said
    “Democrats are great about talking big, but we’ll see if he has the… if he and the other Democrats have the guts to do anything,” Toobin said, indicating he’s skeptical Democrats would expand the court if needed. “If they retake control of the Senate, will they really add the two seats on the Supreme Court?”
    CNN’s Alisyn Camerota chimed in, “Why wouldn’t they?”
    “Because they’re weak,” Tobin said. “And they’re wimps and they’re afraid.”
    https://www.foxnews.com/media/cnn-jeffery-toobin-democrats-wimps-weak-suprme-court
    😉

    Like

  15. walt Avatar
    walt

    Tough shit Emery. Libs lie.Thats what you do.

    Like

  16. walt Avatar
    walt

    Come to think of it, how many lies did you push with the rest of your LIB tribe during the Kavinaugh hearings?
    Dare go there Emery? Or will you just open the cricket cage?

    Like

  17. Todd Juvinall Avatar

    paul emery | 21 September 2020 at 09:53 AM
    Yes, she lied and your sources are all untrustworthy. I recall that you were breathless in defending the Trump niece in her crapass book on Trump. Turns out it was lies. So it appears you are not a good judge of character and of those that lie.

    Like

  18. Bill Tozer Avatar
    Bill Tozer

    Let’s take a moment to go back to the future with Lyndsey Graham. John McCain would have been more furious.
    https://streamable.com/owzwf2
    This is the ghost of Christmas future. Last Christmas was impeachment.

    Like

  19. Barry Pruett Avatar
    Barry Pruett

    If it was so important to RBG that her replacement not be made until after the presidential election, and being not only a lawyer but one of the preeminent lawyers in the entire country, don’t you think she would’ve had a written down her wishes somewhere? Lol. Your assertions, Paul, do not pass the smell test.

    Like

  20. Gregory Avatar
    Gregory

    And RBG should have known that once dead, her ability to negotiate terms would end.
    If it was so important to her to not be the cause of a 6-3 slant towards conservatives on the court, she should have resigned when there was a Democrat president.

    Like

  21. Todd Juvinall Avatar

    Only two requirements in the Constitution dealing with a vacancy. Only two. One, President nominates, Two, Senate advises and consent/vote. That’s all folks. So how silly do the demoncrats look when telling th country Trump is doing something unconstitutional? Cracks me up. And John Paul Stevens was confirmed in 19 days. RGB in 42!

    Like

  22. George Rebane Avatar

    ToddJ 423pm – For the Democrats to tell the country that installing RBG’s successor before the election is unconsitutional vies for the biggest Big Lie they have told this year, and given the Big Lies already in the archive, this is a real big one because it fools the mentally disabled who are more prone to believe the Dems imitation of authority.

    Like

  23. Walt Avatar

    Todd and George.. But Emery takes the bait and thinks it’s gospel.

    Like

  24. Don Bessee Avatar
    Don Bessee

    I will bet a nickel that good ol Mit will tow the line because if he blew a massive chance of a young conservative jurist it would be his head in Utah.
    They will tell him not to let his TDS screw up this epic strategic win opportunity. –
    Romney faces another crossroads on Trump’s Supreme Court push
    He was the sole GOP senator to vote to oust the president. Now he must decide whether to stand with his party on an explosive fight for the high court.
    https://www.politico.com/news/2020/09/21/romney-scotus-rbg-419696
    😉

    Like

  25. scenes Avatar
    scenes

    re: DonB@7:07PM
    That plus some other stuff I read makes the votes sound like a lock.
    Add this in:
    https://twitter.com/WDRBNews/status/1308129517035282434
    and you’ll see some excitement.

    Like

  26. scenes Avatar
  27. Barry Pruett Avatar
    Barry Pruett

    Hey Paul. Where is Biden’s list of future Supreme Court nominees? Instead of demanding from trump anything, maybe Slow Joe should tell us who’d he nominate?

    Like

  28. scenes Avatar
    scenes

    There we go.
    https://twitter.com/SenatorRomney/status/1308403638897958914
    All that remains are the crazy distortions, lies, and outright nonsense that the Blue Senators cook up in the hearing. Let ‘er rip. All hands on deck for the character assassination.
    Anyone who makes it through that deserves the gig. Expect thousands of articles on the ‘People of Praise’ as long as Barrett is in the running. Can’t be havin’ any Christians on the court after all.

    Like

  29. scenes Avatar
    scenes

    lol. Nice. It must be the kuru kicking in.
    “Former CNN Host Who Once Ate Human Brains: ‘If They Even TRY to Replace RBG We Burn the Entire F-cking Thing Down’”
    https://twitter.com/CassandraRules/status/1307133437183131649

    Like

  30. scenes Avatar
    scenes

    Gregory: “If it was so important to her to not be the cause of a 6-3 slant towards conservatives on the court, she should have resigned when there was a Democrat president. ”
    Well, that might make sense. Of course you wouldn’t get the fun of her granddaughter the hyperliberal lawyer getting to be on TV. Anything for a million hits on that post after all.
    The funny thing about all the fuss is that you’d think that the Supreme Court is where you’d actually want the conservatives, assuming that they be given a voice at all. The House can make up a nutty law that violates the Constitution, the Supremes can reel it in. The country staggers along to the next ’emergency’, accreting an ever-larger rule set bit by bit.
    Of course we are living in crazy times. The US Democratic party has been taken over by mentally ill college students, thrown away the working class, is in bed with the part of large business that doesn’t actually make things of value. Until that bunch worms it’s way down the alimentary tract of the political class and pops out the other end, all bets are off

    Like

  31. Scott O Avatar

    An excellent essay on RGB’s behavior as a SCOTUS judge and the proper role of a SCOTUS judge.
    https://www.nationalreview.com/the-tuesday/ruth-bader-ginsburg-didnt-understand-her-job/
    He absolutely nails the problem with some judges. Sometimes even conservative ones.

    Like

  32. Bill Tozer Avatar
    Bill Tozer

    Mitt Romney’s statement:
    My decision regarding a Supreme Court nomination is not the result of a subjective test of ‘fairness’ which, like beauty, is in the eye of the beholder. It is based on the immutable fairness of following the law, which in this case is the Constitution and precedent. The historical precedent of election year nominations is that the Senate generally does not confirm an opposing party’s nominee but does confirm a nominee of its own.
    The Constitution gives the President the power to nominate and the Senate the authority to provide advice and consent on Supreme Court nominees. Accordingly, I intend to follow the Constitution and precedent in considering the President’s nominee. If the nominee reaches the Senate floor, I intend to vote based upon their qualifications.

    Like

  33. Scott O Avatar

    BT 10:02 – Does anyone realize how sad it is for a sitting senator to rationalize his actions with an entire paragraph that has nothing more to say than – “I’ll just do what the Constitution says we should do”?
    Does Romney telephone the Utah State Patrol to let them know he intends to drive down the highway at the posted speed limit?
    He is signalling that the left calls the shots and we conservatives need to constantly justify our actions to them.
    What a gutless weenie.
    I’d tell anyone who challenges my actions to prove in court what I’m doing is illegal, immoral or unethical.
    Barring that – shove it up your jumper.

    Like

  34. scenes Avatar
    scenes

    Stop the presses, important news.
    “Bombshell Regarding Donald Trump’s Supreme Court Nominee! ”
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n8Nht7EMd2U&feature=youtu.be

    Like

  35. George Rebane Avatar

    re scenes 325pm – Leftwing thesis: an impeached president should not pick new SCOTUS justices. Well, President Clinton did, even though he was impeached after his pick of RGB. The point is that in the interval between his pick and impeachment, his character did not degrade while in office. He was already a sleazebag from the gitgo, and it just took a bit longer to nail him.

    Like

  36. scenes Avatar
    scenes

    re: GeorgeR@5:36PM
    ..and the Democrats find themselves more ruthless than ever.

    Like

  37. Bill Tozer Avatar
    Bill Tozer

    Good pun, Scenes
    More Ruth-less than ever.

    Like

  38. Don Bessee Avatar
    Don Bessee

    The trend is clear –
    Murkowski loosens stance on Supreme Court nominee, says she may vote for Trump’s pick
    https://www.foxnews.com/politics/murkowski-supreme-court-nominee-may-vote-trumps-pick
    😉

    Like

  39. Bill Tozer Avatar
    Bill Tozer

    Murkowski will listen to what the nominee has to say. Fair enough.
    Romney on board to hear the nominee after Mitt was flooded with “a precedent” containing various examples to choose from. He wanted the Constitution (rule of law) and a precedent. He found both:
    “It [my decision] is based on the immutable fairness of following the law, which in this case is the Constitution and precedent. The historical precedent of election year nominations is that the Senate generally does not confirm an opposing party’s nominee BUT DOES CONFIRM a nominee of its own.
    The Constitution gives the President the power to nominate and the Senate the authority to provide advice and consent on Supreme Court nominees. Accordingly, I intend to follow the Constitution and precedent in considering the President’s nominee. If the nominee reaches the Senate floor, I intend to vote based upon their qualifications.“.
    Pretty cut and dry. The Constitution lays it out. Precedent lays it out. One of the two worse decisions IKE’ made as President, according the the man himself, was filing the vacancy on the court with a recess appointment. Judge William Brennan. Became Chief Justice.
    Exit Question. Do we even have a nominee yet? I hope she is a hottie!
    Minkowski on board to hear the nominee.

    Like

  40. Bill Tozer Avatar
    Bill Tozer

    Exit Question #2
    Long long until they put Jeff Flake in front of the cameras again? They are running out of Republicans in the Senate willing to trash Trump.
    ———
    Nancy was wrong about having arrows in her quiver. First, she has no say in the Senate or the Senate rules. I believe Face Slide Crazy Nancy is a member of the House of Representatives last I looked. Second, we have clear instructions from the Constitution as well as precedent if you must
    On this one issue of appointing nominees and confirming them, Nancy has no arrows in her quiver.
    ——-
    Ruth dies and that savage dictator Trump is already shredding the Constitution. Do something Nancy! Impeach the bastard!
    ‘President Trump Announces ‘Born Alive’ Executive Order Guaranteeing Medical Treatment To Infants That Survive Abortion’
    https://www.dailywire.com/news/president-trump-signs-born-alive-executive-order-guaranteeing-medical-treatment-to-infants-that-survive-abortion?
    Exit Question #3
    Why is anti-Semitism a growing problem in the Democrat Party that keeps getting bigger and bigger?

    Like

  41. Bill Tozer Avatar
    Bill Tozer

    SCHUMER SPOILS BIPARTISAN EFFORT TO HONOR RUTH BADER GINSBURG
    https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2020/09/schumer-spoils-bipartisan-effort-to-honor-ruth-bader-ginsburg.php
    Man, why are the Dems always such a glum lot?

    Like

Leave a comment