Rebane's Ruminations
January 2020
S M T W T F S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031  

ARCHIVES


OUR LINKS


YubaNet
White House Blog
Watts Up With That?
The Union
Sierra Thread
RL “Bob” Crabb
Barry Pruett Blog

George Rebane

In the affairs of Man ignorance trumps plenty every time.

After hearing the Republicans expose all the exculpatory evidence the Dems withheld, their position now is 1) well OK, maybe our evidence against Trump is really not all that “overwhelming”, but 2) the real overwhelming evidence exists and will come out if we can continue the investigation and hear from our list of witnesses.  The president’s defense team’s position is 1) let’s use that overwhelming evidence of yours that took three years to develop, then 2) there’s no need to continue this investigation in the Senate, but if required, we have our own list of witnesses to be called.  Wanna play?

The lamestream media coverage has been all one-sided.  Last week they hung on every word from Schiff, Nadler, et al as they spun out their allegations, presumptions, beliefs, … without a shred of evidence that any of it constituted “high crimes and misdemeanors” or for that matter, any acts historically unique to this president in carrying out his duties.  When the Republican defense took the podium, the major lamestream outlets gave those arguments short shrift, and focused entirely on their new great hope, the presumed testimony of former national security adviser John Bolton.  (Attentive readers know that FN is the only voice of balance and reason against the phalanx of leftwing propaganda continually spewed by ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, and MSNBC.  National news is not a level playing field.)

To give credit where due, the lamestream has perfectly performed as the public communications arm of Team Schiff and his House managers.  Nowhere do they inform their viewers that it was not Donald Trump but Joe Biden who pulled off the quid pro quo with Ukraine by threatening to withhold aid if they did not immediately (within six hours) fire the prosecutor investigating Ukraine’s Burisma on whose board sat energy naïf Hunter Biden raking in cartloads of cash.  That Obama-launched corruption was a ripe target for investigation to understand how our aid monies were spent.  But that was a politically incorrect endeavor, and therefore not considered by anyone outside the administration, most certainly not by Team Schiff.

Circling back to John Bolton, it interests me no end to follow the career of the former Trump staffer after he publishes his ‘kiss and tell’ memoir that claims to out at a most inconvenient time the confidential Oval Office conversations between him and the president of the United States, the man he was sworn to serve in a professional manner.  Who in hell would now engage Bolton in any kind of consulting or advisory capacity knowing that he has demonstrably defected in positions that demand confidence and trust?

Posted in ,

262 responses to “Meanwhile back at the Senate”

  1. odlaw Avatar
    odlaw

    ,,,Bolton might not need a job if the book sells like crazy…

    Like

  2. odlaw Avatar
    odlaw

    ,,,Bolton could always be invited to the Burisma BOD…;)

    Like

  3. George Rebane Avatar

    odlaw 502pm – he appears to be betting on it. 504pm – Not likely since he doesn’t have a big daddy in the deep state able to pull levers favorable to Burisma.

    Like

  4. hot cross buns Avatar
    hot cross buns

    Not likely since he doesn’t have a big daddy in the deep state able to pull levers like those that are pulled for Jared and Invanka.. I would mention donnie jr. and Eric but they are both too stupid to be of any note or threat to our democracy.
    Alan Dershowitz, who don’t forget defended child sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein which makes him the perfect guy for trumpler’s defense team, is now claiming that a president who manipulates foreign policy to aid his reelection cannot be impeached. In other words, using the power of the office of president to extort or bribe (using tax payer money by the way) officials of a foreign government to interfere in our elections is now an acceptable part of our electoral system, so get over it. Is this acceptable to you?
    I assume that you favor a Senate trial without further testimony or documents. A sham of a trial that will provide an outcome that will soothe your brain and reinforce your wisdom…. It was all those nasty dems and evil journalists who just made all this crap up..right.. trying to brainwash the public and take away your vote for trump, that didn’t count anyway because of the electoral college. But Moscow Mitch and the trumplican cult will save you and yours from total embarrassment while ending the ‘great experiment in democracy’ as we plummet toward authoritarianism. Just drink the trump-aide and it will all turn out fine.

    Like

  5. Bill Tozer Avatar
    Bill Tozer

    Sham? Sham, Roberta says. I agree. The House impeachment hearings were a sham and the sham continues.
    John Bolton went to see the judge. The House Dem lawyers where there. Bolton says, “Hey Judge, if you want me to testify to Schiffilis’s gang, I need you to order me. The House lawyers said, “Nah, your honor, we don’t need Ambassador Bolton’s testimony. We got all we need.” Case dropped.
    So, what happens next? As soon as the House Dems did their ceremonial march over to the Senate (after holding the Articles of Impeachment for weeks), the very FIRST thing they shriek is “We Need witnesses. We need Bolton to testify!!!!” And that was before Sunday night’s Bolton Red Herring book ‘bombshell’
    Talk about a sham. The lying sack of schiffs tell a court they don’t need no stinkin’ Bolton testimony, then cry “Unfair! Coverup, unfair, coverup” the second their case leaves the House.
    Sham. Sham. Sham. Lying sacks of schiffs

    Like

  6. odlaw Avatar
    odlaw

    Posted by: hot cross buns | 29 January 2020 at 08:33 PM
    ,,,is now claiming that a president who manipulates foreign policy to aid his reelection cannot be impeached,,,
    I heard that also and I thought it was bizzare…
    That goes along with McConnell deciding no Scotus picks during election years if it comes from Dems…
    ,,,Russia, if you’re listening…get me dirt on Hillary
    ,,,Ukraine do me a favor and get me dirt on Biden
    ,,,China, do you have any dirt on Bidens???
    ,,,But now Trump can just say… Iran, I will let you have nukes if you do me a favor…kill Biden…

    Like

  7. George Rebane Avatar

    Did we just touch a nerve?

    Like

  8. Bill Tozer Avatar
    Bill Tozer

    Sham! It’s making a mockery of our Constitution…..and the Dems.
    I never thought that the Executive Branch doing its due diligence by investigating corruption would be an impeachable offense. Silly me, I thunk that went with the President’s job title.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NhmnBPK-APM
    Remember Punchy saying if the President just turns over the docs and allows Bolton and POTUS’s chief of staff and some drunk dude testify, it will all go away, lol. Sure, we believe you and I have some beachfront property to sell ya in Arizona.
    I wonder what the next ‘bombshell’ will be, to be dropped between now and Saturday. Cocaine Mitch has that shit eating grin coming back on his mug.

    Like

  9. L Avatar
    L

    Keach @(:31 Hate to keep correcting you, but “kill (ing) Biden” is redundant.

    Like

  10. Bill Tozer Avatar
    Bill Tozer

    Highly recommended.
    Topping My Impeachment Witness List: Adam Schiff
    Schiff and his so-called “whistleblower” have scripted this entire inquisition.
    “That happened while Schiff’s co-conspirator, Ciaramella, was the Ukraine adviser to Biden.
    Democrats are even more concerned about exposing Ciaramella’s motives now that investigative journalist Paul Sperry has revealed this inconvenient tidbit: “Barely two weeks after Donald Trump took office, Eric Ciaramella … was overheard in the White House discussing with another staffer how to remove the newly elected president from office, according to former colleagues.”
    And Fox News’s Laura Ingraham reported that the whistleblower also has some extremely inconvenient connections to both the Bidens and Burisma.“
    https://patriotpost.us/alexander/68226-topping-my-impeachment-witness-list-adam-schiff-2020-01-29?

    Like

  11. odlaw Avatar
    odlaw

    ,,, Douchowitz speaks…
    The public elects its representatives and elections are in the public interest…
    So what ever a political candidate does in the self-serving interest of his election is in the public good…
    …whatever Douchowitz…I think he is losing it à la BatBoy Giuliani and Dear Leader…

    Like

  12. fish Avatar
    fish

    Were countin em down……..

    5. When Obama illegally fired an Inspector General to protect a sex predator


    Also in 2009, Barack Obama illegally fired Gerald Walpin, the Inspector General for the Corporation for National and Community Service. Walpin’s only crime was that he was investigating Obama’s friend and donor, Kevin Johnson. Johnson had misused federal grant money for AmeriCorps by funneling it to his personal nonprofit group, paying for political activity, and using it to pay hush money to underage girls he’d sexually abused. When Walpin recommended charges against Johnson, Obama, in violation of federal law, fired him. An investigation by Congress into the illegal firing was met with stonewalling by the Obama White House, and the withholding of documents. The Obama White House also deliberately misled Congress about the reasons for the firing.
    How do Democrats justify not impeaching Obama after he broke the law by firing an Inspector General to protect someone who sexually abused underage girls just because he was a friend and supporter?

    Because…..shut up….that’s why!

    4. When Obama illegally offered Joe Sestak an administration job to not run for Congress


    Barack Obama violated at least four federal laws back in 2010 by offering then-Congressman Joe Sestak (D-PA) a job in his administration for not challenging Arlen Specter for the Democratic nomination for U.S. Senate. Specter had recently switched from the GOP to the Democratic Party, and that switch was contingent on support from Obama. Obama’s then-spokesman Robert Gibbs wouldn’t confirm or deny that they made any offer. It wasn’t until after Sestak defeated Specter in the primary that the Obama White House finally admitted that Obama offered Sestak a federal job to stay out of the election. The media was quick to accept the White House version of events, including the “everybody does it” excuse, and they accepted the White House claim that nothing improper happened. Even Republicans lost interest in pursuing the story after Sestak was defeated in the general election by Republican Pat Toomey.

    3. When Obama illegally changed immigration law via executive order


    Obama spent most of his presidency with a divided Congress or a GOP-controlled Congress. His radical left-wing agenda was mostly DOA because rather than work toward compromise legislation, his default position was to act on his own, assuming the executive authority to change laws via executive fiat. Anyone who’s familiar with the Constitution knows he had no such authority.
    Still, when the DREAM Act failed to pass, Obama issued an executive order creating DACA, an executive-branch version of the DREAM Act. Obama literally bypassed Congress, changing U.S. immigration law via executive pen to appease his pro-open-borders base.
    What makes Obama’s abuse of power here even worse is that he’d previously acknowledged that he didn’t have the power to unilaterally create immigration law. But, when that pesky Constitution impeded his radical agenda, suddenly he decided that he did have that power. How many times have we heard Democrats claim that “no president is above the law” when talking about Trump? So far, they’ve failed to make a case that Trump has acted above the law because polls haven’t changed since they started the impeachment process. But, when Obama repeatedly acted above the law, they were nowhere to be found.

    2. Obama’s illegal prisoner swap for Bowe Bergdahl
    Back in 2014, the GAO ruled that Obama’s prisoner swap of five detainees at Guantanamo Bay prison in exchange for deserter Bowe Bergdahl violated federal law. “The Department of Defense violated section 8111 of the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2014 when it transferred five individuals detained at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to the nation of Qatar without providing at least 30-days notice to certain congressional committees,” the GAO explained.
    Obama’s swap violated another law, the Antideficiency Act, which prohibits federal employees from spending money not authorized by Congress.
    “In this case, the duty to inform Congress could have been easily satisfied and it was not even necessary to violate the law in order to carry out the exchange,” wrote George Washington Law Professor Jonathan Turley at the time the ruling was made. “It seems more likely that this was done for political purposes to avoid opposition in Congress.”
    Did Democrats care that the GAO had concluded Obama broke the law? Nope, In fact, Senator Debbie Stabenow completely forgot that it happened during a recent interview with Neil Cavuto.
    1. Obama’s illegal Iran ransom payment
    A few short months after Obama had completed negotiations for the Iran Nuclear Deal was official, the Obama administration made a shady payment to Iran of $400 million that coincided with the release of four hostages and was done completely in secret. The payment was made with foreign currency and done under the cover of night. Obama kept this so well under wraps that not even Congress knew about the payments or the hostage exchange. Why didn’t he at least tell Democrats in Congress? Probably because Obama knew the cash payment was illegal.
    Anti-terrorism sanctions with Iran, which were still in place at the time of the payment. Obama claimed the reason they made the payment with foreign currency was that those sanctions prevented Iran from having access to America’s financial system. But, as Andrew McCarthy noted, “the sanctions prohibit transactions with Iran that touch the U.S. financial system, whether they are carried out in dollars or foreign currencies.”
    “By his own account, President Obama engaged in the complex cash transfer in order to end-run sanctions that prohibit the U.S. from having ‘a banking relationship with Iran,’” explained McCarthy. “The point of the sanctions is not to prevent banking with Iran; it is to prevent Iran from getting value from or through our financial system — the banking prohibition is a corollary.”
    McCarthy continued, “And the point of sanctions, if you happen to be the president of the United States sworn to execute the laws faithfully, is to follow them — not pat yourself on the back for keeping them in place while you willfully evade them. … Oh, and there is also Section 560.701, which makes clear that willful violations of the regulations constitute serious felony offenses under federal criminal law — punishable by up to 20 years’ imprisonment.”
    Since Barack Obama broke the by violating sanctions that were still in place in order to make a ransom payment, Congress launched an investigation, only to be met with obstruction by the Obama administration.

    Bleat dugsKKKi bleat! Bleat like Roberta bleats! Even better bleat like Punchmaster Flash….the bleatiest bleater of all!
    Bleeeeeeeeat!
    https://pjmedia.com/trending/5-times-obama-broke-the-law-but-democrats-didnt-impeach-him/

    Like

  13. L Avatar
    L

    Right, Keach. Everybody’s crazy except you.

    Like

  14. odlaw Avatar
    odlaw

    Posted by: fish | 30 January 2020 at 07:27 AM
    ,,,Look over there…it’s Obama!!!
    pay no attention to impeached Orange Man!!!

    Like

  15. Todd Juvinall Avatar

    I have tweeted numerous times for the R’s to stick together and vote this travesty into the dustbin. You all should too. And George’s summation is spot on here as we see the lefty propaganda lemmings of the media do their mass’s bidding. But the truth is spreading and they will be defeated. The Rally in NJ was a small example of the people’s rejection of the media and the left’s attempts to take over. 150,000 people at the rally inside and out. And the aerial shots prove it. In a blue state! So in my opinion most Americans are fair minded and this will coalese in November to a huge win for the R’s.

    Like

  16. fish Avatar
    fish

    Posted by: odlaw | 30 January 2020 at 08:50 AM

    Weak sauce Keachie Chan…….no complaints from the “Good Government” contingent when O’Dummy was playing fast and loose with the law!
    Bleeeeeat!
    Qanon told me to post this!

    Like

  17. odlaw Avatar
    odlaw

    ,,,Prognosticators
    Syncopating deniers
    Losers gonna lose…

    Like

  18. fish Avatar
    fish

    Posted by: odlaw | 30 January 2020 at 09:00 AM
    Losers gonna lose…

    Wonderful……you’ve come to terms with a Sanders nomination then!
    This is real personal growth for you dugsKKKi!

    Like

  19. crosstops Avatar
    crosstops

    Obama obama obama hillary hillary Hilary Benghazi Benghazi Benghazi ….witch hunt witch hunt.. bullshit bullshit bullshit –speaking of bleating
    This is all you folks do is bleat about the synthetic history conjured up by Fox News that you can not prove and has been widely debunked. OH yeah it was all lamestream media lies to bring down trumpler. yes you R’s better stick together birds of a feather and ignore the cover-up that is so obvious to anyone who hasn’t consumed trump-aide. talk about gullible and stupid..

    Like

  20. fish Avatar
    fish

    Posted by: crossflops | 30 January 2020 at 09:16 AM
    #midolmidolmidol

    Like

  21. George Rebane Avatar

    It sure appears that Prof Dershowitz’s Senate tutorial about politicians’ self-assessment of concordance between their own and public interests was way beyond the ken of our progressive commenters. That little piece of needed tutelage was almost tautological to most people who heard it – well, most people not marching to Democrat drums.

    Like

  22. Bill Tozer Avatar
    Bill Tozer

    Quotes: A day old, but still tasty.
    Grand delusions: “I understand why Leader McConnell and President Trump wanted a very short, incredibly rushed trial. Because the longer it goes on, the more likely that new evidence and more new evidence will come out that further implicates the president.” —Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, who didn’t complain when House Democrats rushed their inquiry
    And who’s controlling the drip? “There’s been a steady drip, drip, drip of information… In that sense, this is reminiscent of Watergate.” —Chuck Schumer
    The BIG Lie: “Hunter Biden has nothing to do with the facts of this trial.” —Chuck Schumer
    And last… “Last month: The case is made, it’s not important to fight over witnesses, we need to rush this to the Senate, no time for court. This month: The fate of the Republic hinges on witnesses, and this should drag on in the Senate for as long as it takes because it’s just like court.” —Twitter satirist @hale_razor
    ———————————-
    Bonus! A day old, put still tasty: meanwhile back at the Senate….Those Dregs of Society are sticking together.
    https://twitter.com/mad_liberals/status/1221124556557033473?

    Like

  23. crosshatch Avatar
    crosshatch

    #midolmidolmidol –this coming from a phylum lower on the evolutionary tree than snakes and lizards. It’s all about evolution you know.. you people are the Neanderthals of the 21st century .. without the necessary cranial capacity to understand the changing world, so you voraciously cling to the old ways of doing and thinking. History is full of examples of civilizations that destroyed their environment and themselves in the process without understanding how it all happened…the 3rd Reich comes to mind. I’m sure future generations will equate trumplican rule in the same way we equate lead poisoning with the Romans.

    Like

  24. Gregory Avatar
    Gregory

    “…the 3rd Reich comes to mind.”
    Godwin forfeit. Thanks for playing.

    Like

  25. Bill Tozer Avatar
    Bill Tozer

    @ 10:04 am
    Snakes and lizards, crappatch?
    https://www.facebook.com/PatriotPost/photos/pb.51560645913.-2207520000../10157035249980914/?type=3&theater

    Like

  26. odlaw Avatar
    odlaw

    Posted by: George Rebane | 30 January 2020 at 09:35 AM
    ”’politicians’ self-assessment of concordance between their own and public interests”’
    You mean like Trump’s inability to understand that BidenDirtGate investigations by BatBoy Giuliani are in his self-interest and not the public interests???

    Like

  27. George Rebane Avatar

    odlaw 1017am – missed it again, but try, try again – you never know, there’s always a chance of a hit.

    Like

  28. fish Avatar
    fish

    Posted by: oldaw | 30 January 2020 at 10:17 AM
    You mean like Trump’s inability to understand that BidenDirtGate investigations by BatBoy Giuliani are in his self-interest and not the public interests???

    If breaking the law is not “in the public interest” than again you clearly don’t care for anything but your partisan interests. Not a single complaint when Obama was acting “against the public interest” by breaking the law the instances mentioned. Really……the protection of the child molester didn’t even peak your curiosity?
    I guess some will have to suffer these crimes in order for you to make your progressive omelet!

    Like

  29. Don Bessee Avatar
    Don Bessee

    The impacts of the socialist dems jihad –
    AP-NORC poll: GOP more fired up for 2020, Democrats anxious
    https://apnews.com/4daf1b154eeff75b97b886e2fe8c1d29
    😉

    Like

  30. crossword Avatar
    crossword

    Greggy — same old lame excuse — Goodwin even said himself that if the shoe fits with regard to nazi comparisons, then wear it.

    Like

  31. fish Avatar
    fish

    Posted by: odlaw | 30 January 2020 at 10:36 AM
    ….and you didn’t. You don’t care about any of these thing you claim to care about when there’s a democrat in the White House.
    #hypocrites

    Like

  32. odlaw Avatar
    odlaw

    ,,,back at ya Fishy!!!

    Like

  33. Bill Tozer Avatar
    Bill Tozer

    Fresh quotes
    “Stunning that Adam Schiff lies to millions of Americans when he says he doesn’t know the identity of the whistleblower. He absolutely knows the identity of the whistleblower b/c he coordinated with the individual before the whistleblower’s complaint! His staff helped write it!” —Rep. Elise Stefanik
    Insight: “The first duty of a newspaper is to be accurate. If it is accurate, it follows that it is fair.” —Herbert B. Swope (1882-1958)
    For the record: “[Hunter Biden] is why we are where we are.” —Sen. Joe Manchin
    Fightin’ words: “We need to send a message that if you indulge this kind of politics, you’re not just going to get beat, you’re going to get beaten so bad you can never run or show your face again in public, because we have had enough, absolutely enough, of what we are getting from Donald Trump and his fellow travelers right now.” —Georgia Senate candidate Jon Ossoff
    And he’s absolutely right! “All quid pros are not the same. Some are legitimate and some are corrupt and you don’t need to be a mind reader to figure out which is which.” —Rep. Adam Schiff
    You hear that, dimwitted voters? “[Impeachment] is not voiding the last election; it is protecting the next election.” —Adam Schiff
    Hypocrisy: “Presidents should not be in the business of asking even their own Justice Department to investigate their rivals.” —Adam Schiff
    The BIG Lie: “The president is a danger to the United States. He’s tried to rig the next election. He’s abused his power and he must be brought to heel and the country must be saved from his continuing efforts to rig our elections.” —Rep. Jerry Nadler
    Braying jackass: “This is un-American. This is what you hear from Stalin. This is what you hear from Mussolini, what you hear from authoritarians, from Hitler, from all the authoritarian people who rationalized, in some cases genocide, based what was in the public interest.” —CNN contributor and former Clinton administration official Joe Lockhart on Alan Dershowitz’s defense of Trump
    Where have we heard this before? “If young people come out and vote in high numbers, we can fundamentally transform this country.” —Sen. Bernie Sanders
    Braying jenny: “The GOP is now the pro-totalitarian party. It is a clear and present danger.” —faux conservative Jennifer Rubin

    Like

  34. odlaw Avatar
    odlaw

    ,,,Sadsack Evangelical attorney Sekulo would not answer the question…all they can do is try to withhold evidence…
    Democratic senators asked the House managers and Trump’s legal team who is paying Rudolph W. Giuliani in his capacity as the president’s personal attorney.
    Neither side could say.
    Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), the lead impeachment manager, said he doesn’t know, but that it “raises profound questions.”
    “I don’t know who’s directly paying the freight for it, but I can tell you the whole country is paying the freight for it because there are leaders around the world who are watching this, and they’re saying the American presidency is open for business,” Schiff said.
    Trump attorney Jay Sekulow ignored the question and instead repeated talking points about the Bidens and their dealings in Ukraine.”’
    https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/impeachment-trial-live-updates/2020/01/30/3aa505ba-434f-11ea-b5fc-eefa848cde99_story.html#link-NDPOTF4YJQZNXIUXNQ37GJQG5Q

    Like

  35. Paul Emery Avatar
    Paul Emery

    Incredible that the Republicans were so lame as to allow the Dems such a campaign issue that they will have if the do not allow Bolton and others to testify in the impeachment trial. Allowing witnesses is supported by 75% in a poll this week. Not allowing was only supported by 20%. The Dems knew they would not have the votes for removing Trump so their strategy was to hopefully have them deny witnesses which they will likely do. DUMB DUMB DUMB
    “On week two of the Senate impeachment trial of President Donald Trump, registered voters say 75 – 20 percent that witnesses should be allowed to testify in the impeachment trial, according to a Quinnipiac (KWIN- uh-pea-ack) University national poll released today. Support for witness testimony includes 49 percent of Republicans, 95 percent of Democrats, and 75 percent of independents.
    “There may be heated debate among lawmakers about whether witnesses should testify at the impeachment trial of President Trump, but it’s a different story outside the Beltway. Three-quarters of American voters say witnesses should be allowed to testify, and that includes nearly half of Republican voters,” said Quinnipiac University Poll Analyst Mary Snow. ”
    https://www.cnn.com/2020/01/28/politics/quinnipiac-impeachment-poll-witnesses/index.html

    Like

  36. George Rebane Avatar

    PaulE 227pm – Paul, so many celebratory events have happened to you since Trump became president (and they continue to pour in daily), I am at a loss to explain how you can contain yourself. The pressure to let it all out must be overwhelming; I understand that dancing in the street with the like-minded is an excellent purgative for pent up joy. Since the Repubs give me and mine so little to brag about, is there a time and place where we can bring chairs and watch the happy dancing? It might also be good therapy for us unrequited freedom-loving capitalists.

    Like

  37. Bill Tozer Avatar
    Bill Tozer

    Looks like someone opened up their lemonade stand with fresh squeezed lemons. That’s the spirit.
    No worries. The voters will crush Trump and the R’s. There, all better now.

    Like

  38. Paul Emery Avatar
    Paul Emery

    I just can’t believe they are doing this George? The concept has only 20% support. Are you actually applauding the Repubs move as if it was smart and intelligent move?

    Like

  39. Paul Emery Avatar
    Paul Emery

    I mean even Fox New’s paid legal analyst speaks against the move
    ““If the Senate is faithful to the Constitution, then Trump’s trial will be a search for the truth,” he concludes. “And those offering to tell the truth should be welcomed, not pilloried. How can the Senate be faithful to the Constitution if it suppresses the truth?””
    https://www.rawstory.com/2020/01/fox-news-legal-analyst-senate-republicans-are-suppressing-the-truth-if-they-dont-call-john-bolton/

    Like

  40. Todd Juvinall Avatar

    Looks like Gallup just came out with a poll that will make Pau;l Emery cry.
    Witnesses? We don’t need any stinking witnesses. As far as a campaign issue later? No problem defending the vote on that. It is the democrats that will be pilloried for their vote and their failure to get more witnesses and their constituency will punish them for failing and allowing the R’s to kick their ass. Just can hardly wait for all this. And next are the caucuses and we will see who the dems get. Trump is there in Des Moines right now and the rally will be huge,.

    Like

  41. Paul Emery Avatar
    Paul Emery

    Can you send me a link to the Poll Todd. Much appreciated

    Like

  42. fish Avatar
    fish

    Posted by: Paul Emery | 30 January 2020 at 04:04 PM
    Another Punch Emery special……..Jeez George, all the popular kids think it’s a mistake! I can’t believe that you don’t think so too!
    The argument of the teenaged girl!

    Like

  43. Don Bessee Avatar
    Don Bessee

    Getting back to the root of the rancid Russian dressing hoax they finally admit it was their purchase –
    https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2020/01/30/house-democrats-steele-dossier-was-ok-because-we-purchased-it/
    😉

    Like

  44. scenes Avatar
    scenes

    I just have to post that first paragraph from Donb’s 5:34
    “House impeachment manager Rep. Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) told the Senate on Thursday that the so-called “Steele dossier” paid for by Democrats against then-candidate Donald Trump was not improper foreign interference in the 2016 election because they “purchased” it.”
    Sometimes you just have to hold your head at the audacity of Team Blue.
    Even Paul, not voting for Obama the second time and all, should be amazed.

    Like

  45. Walt Avatar

    Does the Buzzard of Broad St. Really think Trump is to be removed? 🤣 Did the Proggys he shine shoes for even make a case?🙄🤷‍♂️ (That would be a big fat NO)
    Seems Emery has been hearing what the Proggy Press has been shilling way too long.
    Since Emery is such an expert on this all of a sudden, then HE can explain in detail how Trump is a supposed dictator. And even a self imposed monarch.( That’s what his hero Nadless claimed)
    Send in the 420TH Cricket deviation to answer those Emery.
    Brace yourself for Trump’s acquittal Emery, I’m sure the Proggy Press is telling you he getting tossed.

    Like

  46. Walt Avatar

    OH Emery!! Your soulmate is really pissed.
    https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2020/01/30/nancy-pelosi-attacks-trumps-lawyers-suggests-they-should-be-disbarred/
    “Despite indications that acquittal is virtually certain at this point, Pelosi has also declared that any Senate vote to acquit the president would be invalid unless new witnesses were called to testify. “He will not be acquitted. You cannot be acquitted if you don’t have a trial; and you don’t have a trial if you don’t have witnesses and documentation,” she claimed.”
    Who died and made her Queen?

    Like

  47. Walt Avatar

    That’s how you do it. Warren pisses off Judge Roberts, and Schiffty has to to make nice and kiss Robert’s behind. And sure used plenty of tongue.
    https://www.foxnews.com/media/sen-elizabeth-warren-john-roberts-impeachment-question-about-legitimacy-of-chief-justice
    “Roberts read her question from the card — which referenced him.
    “At a time when large majorities of Americans have lost faith in government, does the fact that the chief justice is presiding over an impeachment trial in which Republican senators have thus far refused to allow witnesses or evidence contribute to the loss of legitimacy of the chief justice, the Supreme Court, and the Constitution?” Roberts read from the card handed to him by the clerk.
    And now for Schiffty’s ass kissing.
    “When he finished reading the question — explicitly posed to the House Impeachment managers — Roberts pursed his lips and shot a chagrined look.
    After a moment, Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., the lead impeachment manager, appeared at the dais to answer the question — standing mere feet in front of Roberts.
    Schiff appeared to try to distance himself from Warren’s question, offering a short answer to the question before speaking at length about a tangential exchange.”

    Like

  48. Bill Tozer Avatar
    Bill Tozer

    Oh yeah. I love Walt doing his Walt thing with vigor. And I love the angry Ted Cruz. Welcome back Walt. Crabspatch has been going through so many personalities he could pose for the family reunion photo all by his lonesome. Their daddy issues have been breaking out in hives all over themselves. Tragic what they have been reduced to. I heard the gasps from draining swamp. Not a pretty sight to witness.
    MSNBC Pundit: If Acquitted, Trump Will ‘Shut Down Voting’ in California!
    https://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/kyle-drennen/2020/01/30/msnbc-pundit-if-acquitted-trump-will-shut-down-voting-california
    Oh, the drama, the drama. The horror, the horror………

    Like

  49. Don Bessee Avatar
    Don Bessee

    It looks like schiff for brains has disheartened their base. HAHA!! –
    Bloomberg) — Less than half of Democrats are confident their party’s candidate will win the presidency this year, a stark contrast to Republicans who were overwhelmingly positive about President Donald Trump’s chances, a national survey released Thursday found.
    https://www.yahoo.com/news/democrats-fret-over-beating-trump-153459646.html
    😉

    Like

Leave a comment