Rebane's Ruminations
January 2020
S M T W T F S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031  

ARCHIVES


OUR LINKS


YubaNet
White House Blog
Watts Up With That?
The Union
Sierra Thread
RL “Bob” Crabb
Barry Pruett Blog

George Rebane

RL Crabb is prominent in today’s (21jan20) Union lambasting AB5, the latest socialist outrage from Sacramento. (more here)  This piece of dreadful anti-work legislation has finally caught enough of our liberal artsy-fartsy crowd to also get them squawking – less known, AB5 impacts at least as many of California’s high-tech STEM consultants and freelancers.  Our cartoonist friend Bob Crabb’s distress (here) puts paid on what most of us have known about his true ideological colors – for shur he ain’t no middle-roader.  Regardless of his ire against the state’s Democrats – it’s akin to my ire against the state’s Republicans, but I don’t pretend to be a mid-roader – he cannot countenance the other side, even in the face of AB5.  “I also do not agree with those who want to steer clear of partisan politics. This bill is 100% Democrat. It was written by an assemblywoman who curses like a sailor and dismisses us as whiners who are too dense to understand how fortunate we are to have her party looking out for our well-being.  It passed on a straight party line vote. It was signed by a governor who just dedicated millions of dollars to enforcing it.  California Democrats believe they have little to fear from the riffraff at the bottom tier of workers. We are, after all, musicians, journalists, community theaters, and cartoonists. What are we going to do? Vote for Republicans? Ha ha ha!”  As you can see, regardless of the years of collectivist crap flowing from our Democrat legislature, Bob would not change his vote to give us bottom tier riffraff a chance to sell our services as we choose – a few eggs have yet to be cracked and sacrifices have to be made.

GreenKoolAidCalifornia leavin’ should be the title of a new musical lament for all those folks heading out of state.  But there’s enough of us disgruntled Golden Staters to take and remake the places where we land and put down new stakes.  An example is Star, Idaho, a small town near where one of our dear departed California expats and RR readers now lives.  Star’s population has more than doubled in the last ten years as couples like JT and Mary Jo Turnipseed (their real name, honest!) left SoCal and moved in to experience small town living at its best.  Well, no more.  “Now Star is grappling with some of the same problems the Turnipseeds left California to escape. The town’s main drag, where ranchers once drove their cattle, is clogged with traffic during rush-hour commutes. Sprawling subdivisions have sprouted up around farmland, as have new chain stores. The median home price has more than doubled to nearly $400,000 since 2010.” (more here)  The most amazing thing to me is still the utter blindness of our states overwhelming population of leftwing loonies who deny that any of this exodus is going on.  It mirrors exactly their grossly distorted perception of the realworld which is their daily drink from the lamestream.  For them, another sip of that Kool-Aid, and all’s right with the world.


[22jan20 update]  Today at lunch with a longtime friend of, shall we say, a different socio-political persuasion, we discussed the “overwhelming” evidence which the Dems proclaimed to the nation in support of their case to convict President Trump of ‘high crimes and misdemeanors’, and get him out of 1600 Pennsylvania before he trounces them at the polls this November.  My friend strongly argued the prosecution’s call for additional witnesses and documents, with which to catalyze the evidence developed during the weeks of House impeachment hearings that, it now appears, did not overwhelm anyone and will not overwhelm anyone in the Senate chamber.  The Dems’ evidence is essentially limp and ludicrous on arrival, and needs at least another fishing expedition launched to prop it up and give it some, any, substance before the president is summarily acquitted.  But calling for witnesses is really a bluff by the Dems on which Majority Leader McConnell may well call Team Nancy and lead to a sanitary problem in multiple shorts.  My prognosis is that the Dems will do nothing which results in any Biden taking the witness stand, let alone requiring Mr Lead Prosecutor Adam Schiff to also raise his hand and swear to tell the truth for a change.

[23jan20 update]  The unmitigated hatred of Trump by our Left is on full display in ‘Time for Trump to go’ by local leftwinger Nancy Eubanks in the 23jan20 Union.  There the newspaper gives the lady the entire prime-spot left panel to lambaste the president.  And she does not hold back, spewing unsupported allegation after allegation and obvious lie after lie, all the while calling Trump the nation’s consummate liar whose lies average “over 10 times every day according to several nonpartisan fact checkers.”  Has anyone ever asked how many lies about Trump come out daily from Team Nancy, the multitude of lamestream news outlets, the countless campuses across the country, the Dems’ impeachment brigade (Schiff’s speech yesterday on the Senate floor was a doozy – more here), and the entertainment media’s daily dose of films and TV programs??

[24jan20 update]  Irrefutable proof that stupid is contagious.  The Dems are proposing to make California’s horrendously stupid AB5 the law of the land.  This proposal has now been endorsed by their top presidential candidates Joe Biden, Elizabeth Warren, Bernie Sanders, and Pete Buttigieg.  Talk about a slate of ignorant?cynical anti-Americans wanting to become chief executive – they are all extreme leftwingers.  Today this law is causing chaos in the state’s employment markets, and is even being opposed by liberals whose jobs are in peril or already history.  In desperation the Sacramento stupidos are trying to do a workaround with a growing pile of special interest carve-outs before they accelerate California’s calamitous worker exodus, indigent immigrations, shrinking tax base, economic contraction, and most importantly, voter defections. (more here and here) Perhaps the passage of such destructive legislation, that is finally a shot into our socialists’ shorts, will help Republicans to launch a resurgence of sanity in California.

DemTaxIncreases2020[27jan20 update]  That Democrats are now the anti-American party is confirmed by three things which uniquely identify them – 1) ALL of them are willing to risk the US economy through massive tax increases to buy votes needed to stay in power through directed wealth redistribution – moderate Democrats are a myth, 2) NONE of them have any social policies save to remove President Trump from office before the November election (H/T to reader who posted the latest VDH piece on the topic), 3) ALL are globalists first, prepared and pursuing means to reduce US sovereignty and hegemony in favor of submitting to globalist organizations in economics, trade, governance, and world order.

Posted in , ,

306 responses to “Scattershots – 21jan20 (updated 27jan20)”

  1. scenes Avatar
    scenes

    comma-man
    “Black representation??? WTF…it is about political representation not affirmative action, lol!!!”
    Why not have AA in representation? The alternative is the 50%+1 problem if the population is anywhere near evenly distributed. God didn’t tell Moses that political power is distributed only on geography. A state, after all, is different than a nation….and Moses would know about that.

    Like

  2. scenes Avatar
    scenes

    one last comma-man “who do (you) mean ‘’’we’’’?”
    Us FSB cyber-agents in St. Petersburg. You know, the folks that single-handedly put Trump into office.

    Like

  3. fish Avatar
    fish

    Posted by: George Rebane | 27 January 2020 at 12:37 PM
    A small nit to make it a formal 5-7-5, insert the article ‘a’ into the second line to read ‘Old man conjures a new friend’. BTW, is this cultural appropriation from Japan? We have to watch ourselves these days 😉

    Thanks George…..after additional “counting on fingers” I concur with your findings!

    Like

  4. odlaw Avatar
    odlaw

    Posted by: scenes | 27 January 2020 at 12:51 PM
    ”’Republicans are the masters of unfair (whatever that is) gerrymandering because they are bastards and California does a great job of it because it isn’t run by Republicans.”’
    Not at all. I am trying to supply what I believe to be factual info in an attempt dispel some of the suspicions you all have about the process…
    In my opinion I think Cali is trying to to it the right way…
    Ok, I will drop the redistricting thing by popular demand…but…one more cut and paste if you please….
    In 2011, we were asked again to provide a web-based tool – ReDrawCA.org – in conjunction with the newly-established California Citizens Redistricting Commission (Commission). The Commission brought district line-drawing out of traditional smoky back rooms of political power and into the realm of public participation. We partnered with community organizations up and down California to ensure that low-income communities and people of color actively participated in the redistricting process. Local residents and organizations used the data and mapping tools on ReDrawCA.org to experiment with how Congressional, legislative, county supervisors, city councils, and school boards districts could best reflect the people they serve. They could then print the maps and bring them to Commission meetings as part of the public proceedings. The result was a resounding success. The statewide website hosted nearly 6,000 visitors who used the site nearly 10,000 times. Advancement Project also provided web tools and technical assistance to five locations throughout California. The Commission received public input based on data and from a wide variety of Californians. Residents and community organizations were able to participate in an effective manner. And many of the ways in which political power had been held for decades were overturned, with the result that communities of color have elected representatives that better reflect their values, concerns, and backgrounds.
    https://www.advancementprojectca.org/what-we-do/political-voice/fair-redistricting

    Like

  5. Bill Tozer Avatar
    Bill Tozer

    Dr. Rebane
    Nice Jan 27 update.
    ———————-
    Schiffilis speaks:
    ADAM SCHIFF: MY ‘HEADS ON A PIKE’ COMMENT ABOUT GOP SENATORS WASN’T PERSONAL
    https://news.grabien.com/story-adam-schiff-my-heads-pike-comment-about-gop-senators-wasnt-p
    Ok, Schiffilis, we believe you. Nothing personal to R Senators in the least, beside being a full blown lie….er….”mischaracterization” per usual. Another parody?

    Like

  6. scenes Avatar
    scenes

    One last districting noise from me.
    It occurs to me that you could understand more about the efficacy of a district by mapping it against political contributions at the state level. A well designed boundary might well have a stronger correlation between the two variables than a poor one.

    Like

  7. George Rebane Avatar

    I too will make a last remark about gerrymandering and redistricting. No one is saying that the district boundaries do not reflect the will of California’s majority; and thereby hangs the tragic Götterdämmerung of democracies – given a weak and faulty structure of incorporating public wants, the majority always has and will take the means to transform themselves into tyrannies. Our Founders knew that.

    Like

  8. Bill Tozer Avatar
    Bill Tozer

    Been waiting for an opening in the thread to post this anecdotal story.
    Re: California Leaving on such a winter’s day.
    I am saddened greatly for a few days now about losing another family to another state. Probably Idaho. Every once in a while, a CA emigrate and their story hits hard.
    The family in question are the greatest ‘neighbors’ one should wish to have. Young couple, maybe 35-40 years old. The couple is in the process of adopting two children. Good folks, friendly, slow to anger, very positive, and rather successful as evidenced by all the equipment and big steel buildings they erected for their business. Very moral as well.
    They just got back from house hunting out of state, which was a shock to moi. The reason? Despite their material success, the husband explained to me that he just cannot make a living in CA any longer. It’s the regulations, pure and simple. Not because of Libs or ideology, just because of excess and intrusive CA regs. No choice, has to move on. They bought their dream home and acreage herein the foothills and loved it. Now, CA has lost another productive member of the middle class. Sad story. These are the kind of people we want to attract, that makes our State special.
    ——————————
    Heard from my buddy who moved to Northern Nevada in the sticks. He built his “cabin in the mountains” here 30 years ago. His life, his CA dreaming.
    He wanted to do an add on and changes to his new abode in Nevada. It took him ONE DAY to get a permit. He could not believe it. So excited he called. I asked him if he had adjusted to the different geography and life and he answered he had, quite well, thank you. He thought he would miss his cabin in the mountains (foothills) but he said no way would he ever go back. It’s the lack of regulations. A feeling of freedom
    He, like others I have stayed in contact with, all describe the same thing: As they look at CA in the rear view mirror (literally), they can feel this invisible weight being lifted from their shoulders. One can blame regs or housing costs or turning too blue, or the price of tea in China… but the feeling of the weight on the shoulders being lifted needs no reason or can be articulated. It says it all.
    The end.

    Like

  9. Bill Tozer Avatar
    Bill Tozer

    Re: Impeachment
    Well, we have debated and done the tit-for-tat six ways to Sunday. I have grown fond of Mark Levin over the past three years. Circling the barn one mo time…until the next time.
    https://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/nb-staff/2020/01/27/mark-levin-touts-mrc-montage-hammer-reporters-are-democrats
    ———————
    Let’s see if any minds are changed.
    ** MSNBC Urges Cancelling State of the Union Amid Impeachment
    ** Nets All But Ignore Second Day of Trump Defense, Gush for Bolton Book. (BillT sez: Yeah, I noticed that all day long. It’s as if the WH defense team could not make the hot sizzling press if they tried)
    ** CNN Goes on WARPATH Against ‘Insulting’ Trump Legal Team from a ‘Different Planet’
    ** Chuck Todd Loses It, Compares Ken Starr to ‘Bank Robber’
    **ABC Mocks ‘Surreal,’ ‘Instigator’ Starr: There to Remind GOP of ‘Hate’
    ** Showtime Cartoon: Trump Must Fight Impeachment, Pence Is Too ‘Dumb’ to Be Prez
    Nope, nothing has changed.
    ——————-
    Side note:
    Digging through obscure archives, I found an interesting foreign article about the ‘former’ spy chief in the Kremlin named as a source related to the Steele Dossier. He was relating his story and said his first assignment was a journalist stationed in India (before serving as the USSR ambassador to India).
    “A journalist?” the surprised interviewer asked the top disinformation chief.
    “Yes” replied the old Russian. “All journalists in India are spies.”
    We seem to have had the same thing going on here during the Russian Hoax. Just saying.

    Like

  10. Don Bessee Avatar
    Don Bessee

    Boy you gotta pay your baby momma and not release of those pesky financial documents on your
    ‘good luck gigs especially the chi coms or ukranians or taxpayer funds –
    https://www.foxnews.com/politics/hunter-biden-ordered-to-pay-monthly-child-support-ending-standoff-over-contempt
    😉

    Like

  11. Bill Tozer Avatar
    Bill Tozer

    Oh my. 4 Minutes of Lindsey Graham. Recommended.
    Holy Mackerel. Under the category of Be Careful What You Wish For.
    “There is not a scintilla of evidence that the Biden’s relationship to Ukraine was inappropriate, there is a tsunami of evidence.”…. Hunter used the Ukraine as a ATM machine….need to investigate whether a DNC staffer tried to influence the 2016 election…..and more.
    You want witnesses? I give you a boatload of witnesses! You will get witnesses out the Wazoo.
    https://www.facebook.com/dan.bongino/videos/722060894867946/?
    I tried to warn the Dems. I truly did. I asked if they really wanted to go there. I asked it they really really wanted to open up the Ukrainian can of worms. I asked (being in the know), if they wanted to kick that hornets nest. Apparently, the answer was ‘Yes!’

    Like

  12. odlaw Avatar
    odlaw

    ,,, Former White House chief of staff John Kelly says he believes John Bolton’s allegation that President Donald Trump told the former national security adviser that US security aid to Ukraine was conditioned on an investigation of the President’s political rivals, adding that Bolton should be heard from.
    Trump attorney Jay Sekulow argued that the revelations from Bolton’s manuscript would not be admissible during a typical trial, dismissing their importance to the impeachment proceedings,,,
    ,,,Ok, Jay,,,but this is not a typical trial…
    Lindsey Graham said he agrees with Oklahoma GOP Sen. JAMES LANKFORD’S idea that senators should be able to read JOHN BOLTON’S new book in a secure facility.
    HERE’S THE WEAKNESS IN THAT PLAN: This isn’t a book club. It’s a trial to remove the president of the United States.
    ,,,I guess that means we are not in a big rush to end the not-a-trial…

    Like

  13. Bill Tozer Avatar
    Bill Tozer

    Not one of his best articles, but I always learn something for Pat’s columns from the historical perspective.
    Impeachment: The Left’s Ultimate Weapon
    “To save “our democracy,” to which they pay tireless tribute, the impeachers want to ensure that the people, in a supposedly free election in 2020, are not allowed to make the same mistake they
    made in 2016.”
    Harry Truman dropped atomic bombs on defenseless cities and sent 2 million POWs back to the tender mercies of Stalin in Operation Keelhaul after World War II.
    JFK greenlighted the overthrow of an ally, President Ngo Dinh Diem in South Vietnam, in a coup that ended in the murder of Diem.
    LBJ ordered the wiretapping of Martin Luther King, and his White House shared the fruits of that FBI surveillance with a friendly press.
    No one was impeached.
    Why? Because Truman, JFK and LBJ were establishment favorites.
    For Trump, a phone call with a Ukrainian president saying, “Send us your Biden file and we will have a meeting,” is a political capital crime justifying democracy’s version of a death penalty.“
    https://buchanan.org/blog/impeachment-the-lefts-ultimate-weapon-138085

    Like

  14. Don Bessee Avatar
    Don Bessee

    The dems line cracks and what happens when you don’t have to run for office again –
    Feinstein leans toward acquitting Trump as his defense team ends impeachment arguments
    https://www.latimes.com/politics/story/2020-01-28/trump-team-wraps-impeachment-defense-with-an-elephant-in-the-senate-john-Bolton
    😉

    Like

  15. odlaw Avatar
    odlaw

    [27jan20 update] That Democrats are now the anti-American party…
    Here we go again…another sweeping generalization…

    Like

  16. George Rebane Avatar

    What am I missing on the Bolton expose? We have a he said/she said, and now others are coming forward with their beliefs, suppositions, presumptions, … of what Bolton claims he heard Trump say. Of course, to a progressive all this is more solid evidence of the kind that they already had an “overwhelming” amount, but to many other more sober souls …

    Like

  17. scenes Avatar
    scenes

    GeorgeR@3:52PM
    Worst case scenario: Trump got on the phone and said to the King of the Ukraine, Dammit! Investigate Biden using political influence to keep his grifting boy out of trouble or I’ll hold off on some payment or the other.
    A good reason to impeach? Of course not. It’ll always degenerate into a perjury trap in any case. Running a coup is a tricky thing, although you do have to wonder how the country is actually benefiting from all this.
    comma-man: “That Democrats are now the anti-American party…”
    ‘Now’ is as good a word as any, although it seems to have ramped up during the Obama regime. Not so much before that. My preferred phrase is ‘enemies of Western Civilization’ since the craziness appears to be transnational.

    Like

  18. Paul Emery Avatar
    Paul Emery

    George
    what Bolton is attributed as saying is consistent to what many others have already concluded. Do you think the Bolton claim is fake news? Do you think he is lying? Seems to me pretty clear that Trump is lying in this matter which makes me ask why would he lie if he believes he did nothing wrong.

    Like

  19. Gregory Avatar
    Gregory

    punchy 415pm
    “Seems to me pretty clear that Trump is lying in this matter”
    Of course it is, Punch. To you.
    What is in the Bolton book? Have you read it? Would it be admissible in a court of law?

    Like

  20. Paul Emery Avatar
    Paul Emery

    Bolton’s testimony would Gregory. That’s why the Pubs don’t want him to testify. This is a losing matter for the Pubbers and Trump.

    Like

  21. Paul Emery Avatar
    Paul Emery

    Sorry the questions are difficult for you scenes. Pretty simple to me
    Do you think this is fake news-yes or no.
    Do you think Bolton is lying yes or no.
    Why would Trump lie if he thinks he did nothing wrong-short sentence would do.

    Like

  22. Gregory Avatar
    Gregory

    punchy 434/443pm
    Everything is pretty simple to you… and you’ve turned out to be wrong 99 44/100% of the time.
    Virtually every bloody time.

    Like

  23. Don Bessee Avatar
    Don Bessee

    The po’ ol fakenewsman needs to direct his litany of questions to botox Nancy, schiff for brains and jerry the nads about their failure to issue a sepbonea! They are the prosecutors, memba that don’t you? HAHA!!
    😉

    Like

  24. Paul Emery Avatar
    Paul Emery

    Gregory
    Do you think this is fake news-yes or no.
    Do you think Bolton is lying yes or no.
    Why would Trump lie if he thinks he did nothing wrong-short sentence would do.

    Like

  25. Don Bessee Avatar
    Don Bessee

    Its soooo funny to watch the pony tail of ignorance stop his little feet and hold his breath, yes or no, yes or no, yes or no squawk!
    😉

    Like

  26. Bill Tozer Avatar
    Bill Tozer

    Well, looks like the WH defense counsel wrapped up the case in a rather unique way.
    White House Counsel Concludes Argument By Playing Video of Democrats Attacking Impeachment
    https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2020/01/28/white-house-counsel-concludes-argument-by-playing-video-of-democrats-attacking-impeachment-1998/?
    Quote: Chris Wallace says Nadler probably wants 1998 Clinton clip ‘expunged from the Earth‘

    Like

  27. Gregory Avatar
    Gregory

    punchy 514pm
    I think you keep focusing on the latest bright shiny object that has a chance to make the bad orange man go away.

    Like

  28. Paul Emery Avatar
    Paul Emery

    What so good about that Bill? They are going after Nadler rather than focusing on trying to defend Trump.

    Like

  29. Gregory Avatar
    Gregory

    Maybe Nadler needs “going after”, Paul.

    Like

  30. Todd Juvinall Avatar

    I think Paul Emery has a logic problem. Trump cannot be impeached on articles that are not in the Constitution. This will be tossed. Bolton will not testify because of Executive privilege. And since his manuscript was vetted by people in the White House and Intellingence, nothing was found. But since PE has TDS nothing short of execution of a Rpublican is acceptable.

    Like

  31. George Rebane Avatar

    The NYT’s blind reports on Bolton’s book are fake news. So are third parties stating they “believe” what Bolton might have said in his book. No one who has read the book is talking yet. And your 514pm question – “Why would Trump lie if he thinks he did nothing wrong-short sentence would do.(?)” – is a supremely simplistic red herring. What is your evidence that Trump lied? Yet you take that as God’s given truth. Is that your best debate format?

    Like

  32. Bill Tozer Avatar
    Bill Tozer

    Punchy.
    Let’s stop right there. The House sent over Articles of Impeachment that are half-ass, incomplete, and do not claim anything close to the level of treason, bribery, and other high crimes. Notice the Constitution says Bribery, Treason, AND other high crimes and misdemeanors. Notice the wording says AND other high crimes, not Treason, Bribery OR other high crimes and misdemeanors. Says and, not or. Show me the high crimes. Show me an impeachable offense.
    Why was/is the prosecution NOT ready to go to trial or have a case they can successfully prosecute? They have already made their case. No ‘there’ there. Send it back or kill it. When the prosecution has a good case, send it back to the Senate.
    Why? Why? Why o Why? Why did the House send over a weak laughable case? What, did the prosecutors send over Articles of Impeachment and now their excuse is the dog ate their homework or their crayons broke in half?
    As far as your new Bolton Golden Shower complete with a Pearl Necklace and Hot Lunch to fingerpaint with, I would not put all my hopes in Bolton’s manuscript. I would not put much faith in a rough draft sent over to his publisher to be edited, but that is just me.
    I know, I know. The Dems DID NOT want to subpoena Bolton. It’s sat for months in the House and an expedited case to the courts on Separation of Powers/Executive Priveledge would have been resolved by now.
    But, noooooo. The Dems want Bolton just to waltz right in and testify. Just waltz right in and not go through the normal Constitutional protections or picking up a 🖊 filing one little subpoena.
    The Dems are always seeking the easier softer way. The lazy man’s “The Idiot’s Guide to the Universe.”
    So, stop right there and tell me why the incomplete work in the House had to finished by Christmas. Why did Schiffilis and the Botox Queen and AOC and Nadler put a deadline on such a grave serious manner? It’s a very very high bar.
    Impeach Trump for obstruction of Punchy’s demands.
    BTW, Trump asks why fund NPR. Radio Stations are cheap and a dime a dozen. Why should the taxpayers give a radio station one dime. It’s not like a real media outlet. Impeach him!
    “Trump questions why NPR exists”
    https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/479977-trump-questions-why-npr-exists-after-pompeo-clashes-with-reporter

    Like

  33. scenes Avatar
    scenes

    Paule: “Sorry the questions are difficult for you scenes. Pretty simple to me”
    Questions are a burden to others; answers are a prison for oneself.
    P. McGoohan

    Like

  34. Paul Emery Avatar
    Paul Emery

    Fair enough George
    You are clinging to some kind of hope that the verbage attributed to Bolton is not real. I am assuming it is. Is that a fair assessment of the differences we find ourselves in with this matter?
    By the way here’s a quote from John Kelly, former chief of staff to Trump on the veracity of Bolton in this matter:
    “Former White House chief of staff John Kelly on Monday evening said that if media accounts of former national security adviser John Bolton’s forthcoming book are accurate, then he trusts the explosive claims made by his former colleague.
    “If John Bolton says that in the book, I believe John Bolton,” Kelly told a crowd in Sarasota, Fla., speaking as part of the Ringling College Library Association Town Hall lecture series. ”
    https://www.politico.com/news/2020/01/28/john-kelly-believe-john-bolton-107739

    Like

  35. Bill Tozer Avatar
    Bill Tozer

    Paule: “Sorry the questions are difficult for you scenes. Pretty simple to me.”
    Paule want a cracker? Ok, here is a bone: Trump has no friends. The R’s will turn on Trump and he will have to resign within 60 days. Happy now? Opps, Trump resigning within 60 days was penned by a simple man in late January, 2017. And Michael Cohen will deliver the goods and turn on Trump and he will get busted for campaign finance laws!
    And Michael ‘the creepy banjo boy’ Avenatti will bring Trump down. And Trump demanded Ukraine to make up dirt on former VP Joe Biden (in charge of Ukraine corruption at the time, roflmao) or else Ukraine will not get military aide and people are dying because of Trump. Opps, strike that. Trump demanded Ukraine manufacture dirt on Hunter or no meeting in the WH.
    And let’s not forget the antiquated Emoluments Clause designed to prevent corrupting foreign influences and that Müller did not exonerate Trump, but did not have a prosecutable case, and Obama caged children in concentration camps at the border, and the Russians did influence the outcome of the election (the reason HRC lost) and Trump is a illegitimate POTUS….and he still has no friends and Bolton will flip and say he disagrees with Trump’s foreign policy, and I can’t afford my suppositories and it’s all Trump’s fault and the final straw is he likes breasts!! Too much, just impeach the Orange Man Bad. He is crazy!
    https://i1.wp.com/www.powerlineblog.com/ed-assets/2020/01/82769306_2325787110856254_7492080413578362880_n.jpg?w=718&ssl=1
    https://i2.wp.com/www.powerlineblog.com/ed-assets/2020/01/Bacon-and-Firearms.jpg?w=527&ssl=1

    Like

  36. Don Bessee Avatar
    Don Bessee

    The dems dump on the deplorables at their own expense then you have the winning minority numbers –
    Working-class Americans who have been betrayed by globalization of the United States’ economy are turning to President Trump’s economic nationalist Republican Party for support.
    A report by the New York Times details the shift among U.S. voters. Trump’s GOP is increasingly made up of the working and lower-middle-class devastated by the free trade policies of 30 years, while Democrats represent affluent suburbia and major cities that have bounced back since the Great Recession.
    https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2020/01/28/working-class-voters-betrayed-by-globalization-turn-to-trumps-gop-democrats-werent-looking-out-for-me/
    😉

    Like

  37. George Rebane Avatar

    Re ToddJ 634pm – Donald Trump has already been impeached (which is an indictment by the House for removal of a president who is to be tried by the Senate). If the Senate convicts an impeached president, then the Constitution calls for his removal from office. Claiming now that Trump “can’t be impeached” is a moot point and false.

    Like

  38. Don Bessee Avatar
    Don Bessee

    Brad Parscale released some demographic data on tonight’s NJ rally using the attendees event registration data it was just reported – Very interesting demographics.
    Comparing it to data bases reveled 2 very interesting numbers that should give the socialist dems clown car indigestion.
    10% of the attendees had not voted in the 2016 election.
    24% of the audience were registered democrats.
    😉

    Like

  39. Todd Juvinall Avatar

    George Rebane | 28 January 2020 at 08:12 PM
    Actually it is not a moot point. If the Senate dismisses the case I heard from a scholar that the impeachment is moot. Thereby removing it from the record.
    If you have the information I am not privy too I am all ears. Is there a precedent for your position or for the scholar who told me?

    Like

  40. George Rebane Avatar

    ToddJ 953pm – Never heard of that interpretation; has anyone else?

    Like

  41. Bill Tozer Avatar
    Bill Tozer

    Interesting comment from Paul. Reminds me again it’s all Kavanaugh now.
    “Fair enough George
    You are clinging to some kind of hope that the verbage attributed to Bolton is not real. I am assuming it is. Is that a fair assessment of the differences we find ourselves in with this matter?”
    I have no need to bash Bolton. The quickness (faster than knee jerk reaction) to assign validity to a NYT report baffles me. What we have at this moment in time is that a NYT reporter “heard” that Bolton’s rough draft says Trump wanted Ukrainian aid withheld. So, we have no hard evidence, no reporting on what the reporter read or see. with her/his eyes, no eye witness, no nothing. Just the game of telephone. In fact, to date all the 17 witnesses the Dems called to testify in the House could not verify the story of Quid pro Quo, even the single witness to the call. Just their opinions, not one eye witness, save the one who did hear and he heard no Quid Pro Quo.
    That is exactly what Kavanaugh was all about. Getting ready to take a vote, but Hold Your Horses, we have reports of a sexual attempted assault Kavanaugh did in high school. A report Di-Fi held onto for months and dropped it on the table as it looked like Kavanaugh would be confirmed.Hold Yer Horses again, we have reports of a pattern of gang rapes at parties and the witness was in college yet managed to come home and hang out with high school boys.
    Everyone the star accuser named to verify her story (some life long girl friends could not verify the story, some saying they have never been at any party with Brett K there or anywhere or others saying they cannot verify the accuser ever being there in the first place…or tenth place.
    And the mantra was “I believe her.”
    I would submit to the record that it is Paul who is actually clinging to some kind of hope, if not boldly going out on the limb to say it is darn near a
    You are clinging to some kind of hope that the verbage attributed to Bolton is not real. I am assuming it is fact. To support such an argument from mere hearsay as factually true, a character reference is given (John Kelley.). Like I said, I have no reason to bash Bolton and nobody here has read his published book. Neither did the NYT reporter.
    “You are clinging to some kind of hope that the verbage attributed to Bolton is not real. I am assuming it is”
    Benefit of the doubt goes to hearsay from the NYT. Ok. It could be true, it could be false. I assume…..benefit of doubt goes to Steele Dossier. Ok.
    ———————-
    To be continued…

    Like

  42. Bill Tozer Avatar
    Bill Tozer

    Continued without typos hopefully.
    I do not have to apologize nor feel the need to be skeptical of the latest 11 hour “bombshell”. My skepticism is well founded based on the last 3 years plus.
    The WH finally got the chance to present their case last Saturday. They basically destroyed the argument and ‘evidence’ submitted to the Senate in 2 and a half hours. Did not look good for Schiff or the Dems. Then the weekend. Day two approached and the vote was anticipated by week’s end.
    Then, suddenly out of the blue, comes another Hail Mary bombshell with zero direct quotes from Bolton’s book. Zero. Not one direct quote, but the hearsay did it’s intended job.
    That intended hit was to distract from the WH defense and distract from the hearings ASAP.
    Bolton is no novice as there is no way he would release classified information.
    . John Bolton and his lawyer Chuck Cooper submitted the book manuscript to the NSC for review, which is notoriously known for leaking, on the eve of the impeachment trial, and they’re now surprised about a cherry-picked leak? We are left with a politically-motivated, last-minute, cherry-picked leak from anonymous sources to the Trump-hating New York Times. And now the media attention is focused on the Democrat demands, in hopes of turning a handful of Republicans susceptible to these tactics to join the Democrats in a call for witnesses — which, of course, the House Democrats opposed during their impeachment inquiry.
    It’s Kavanaugh all over again. And the NYT refused to return the Pulitzer Prize given to their reporters for doing the heavy lifting for the Dems and publishing/pushing the Russian-Trump collusion delusion from the SAME anonymous sources used in this latest Red Herring Bolton “bombshell”. One would think the NYT would return the Pulitzers after ending up with so much egg on the face after their reporting proved false. Fake. A fraud.
    But, I guess I thunk wrong and gave the press too much credit for decency. I certainly do not give any of the NSC moles or whistleblower any credit or expectation of decency, not to mention the truth.

    Like

  43. scenes Avatar
    scenes

    re: BillT@7:17AM
    You’ve essentially described something that’s just a political event rather than a bonafide trial/judgement for a crime. This jury, of course, has less common sense than the average 12 members of the public. The power of wishful thinking in the Blue Mob has gotten tiring over the last few years, you do have to wonder how their personal lives have changed in any way since Saint Obama was in office. Their ability to see faces in clouds is wondrous to behold.
    One successful part of this high stakes game is that the notion is being advanced that a President should be removed from office for tying funding to personal political advantage. If that were the case, I’d strongly guess that no administration (or congressman) would have held office beyond it’s first few weeks.
    The practical answer is for full transparency combined with the ability of the public to handle seeing the sausage being made. Yes, the Clintons and Uncle Joe used political influence to make themselves rich. Yes, Trump is using his office to make that public via funding pressure. I think I can handle both of those ideas at once and if the actions weren’t out and out illegal, solve it at the ballot box.
    Instead, in a bid for power, the Blue Mob is willing to tear the country apart for decades. Generally, I’d say that the actions surrounding Nixon, Clinton, and now Trump have done far more harm than good, but as usual, the interests of a few outweigh those of the many.
    As a recently invented concept, Representative Democracy’s main selling point is not economic, not ‘fairness’, but that it deals with succession of rule. That is the single biggest sticking point in other large scale political systems. The Blue Mob wants to throw that away in a fit of pique.

    Like

  44. odlaw Avatar
    odlaw

    Posted by: Todd Juvinall | 28 January 2020 at 09:53 PM
    Todd paraphrases
    unnamed scholar knows it all
    What are his creds Todd?

    Like

  45. Todd Juvinall Avatar

    If the articles are deemed unconstitutional and the impeachment is defeated on that basis in the Senate, the whole process is moot as I heard the scholar.
    Texas special election results. Looks like a Republican took it 58-42. And this was Beto’s district~ Paul Emery, give us
    https://thehill.com/homenews/state-watch/480434-republican-wins-texas-special-electionyour analysis on this rejection of your democrat ideology.

    Like

  46. Todd Juvinall Avatar

    Opps, it was demorat Cuellar’s District.

    Like

  47. Paul Emery Avatar
    Paul Emery

    Who is the “scholar” you refer to Todd?

    Like

Leave a comment