Rebane's Ruminations
November 2019
S M T W T F S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930

ARCHIVES


OUR LINKS


YubaNet
White House Blog
Watts Up With That?
The Union
Sierra Thread
RL “Bob” Crabb
Barry Pruett Blog

[From the comment stream under 'America Askew' it's interesting to note that no one cares much about how California's electorate is composed.  California is not the only state that both invites and enables voting by the disenfranchised among us.  Please post your belated concerns under the referenced commentary, and your 'here's why I don't give a crap' hereunder.  gjr]

Posted in

307 responses to “Sandbox – 15nov19”

  1. Bill Tozer Avatar
    Bill Tozer

    “Was there a quid pro quo?” he asked near the start of the seven-hour hearing. “The answer is yes.”
    A day late on that one. The operative words are “ near the start of the seven-hour hearing.” Important words. Perhaps a look over at Scattershots starting with Bobbie Sue creaming her jeans in glee @7:35 am yesterday (Nov 20) and you might see the story changed by 11:30am our time…..and you might even save yourself some embarrassment. Might. I won’t bet on it. Hope springs eternal.
    And yes, I still deny that 17 intel agencies all agreed.

    Like

  2. Paul Emery Avatar
    Paul Emery

    Thanks for agreeing with me Bill that Soundland stated that there was quid pro quo.

    Like

  3. Bill Tozer Avatar
    Bill Tozer

    Me no know no Soundland. Is that a band or maker of sound machines? Is it a mixer brand?

    Like

  4. Paul Emery Avatar
    Paul Emery

    Thanks for the correction Bill. Sorry it was confusing for you. this is for Bill
    Thanks for agreeing with me Bill that Sondland stated that there was quid pro quo.

    Like

  5. Bill Tozer Avatar
    Bill Tozer

    Oh, Sondland said a lot of things, including denying he was a witness to any such things as a quid pro quo. Go figure.
    “No one on this planet told you that aid was tyed to investigations….”
    “As the exchange was taking place, the chyron on CNN stated: “SONDLAND: ‘YES’ THERE WAS QUID PRO QUO IN UKRAINE SCANDAL.”
    “No one on this planet told you that President Trump was tying aid to investigations, yes or no?”
    “Yes,” Sondland responded
    http://dlvr.it/RJjrB2
    ———
    Really Puncky, we are way off topic. You really should take all the impeachment observations and comments on such matters over to Scattershots or Ruminations where it can be debated viciously. This is the Sandbox for OTHER topics.
    Heck, even Bobbie dropped it like a hot potato by noon
    Hope Springs Eternal.

    Like

  6. Paul emery Avatar
    Paul emery

    Gosh Bill it was in his written statement. I heard him say it. Are you denying he said it??

    Like

  7. George Rebane Avatar

    Sondland “perceived” the quid pro quo – no direct evidence. Please continue under ‘Ruminations’.

    Like