Rebane's Ruminations
October 2019
S M T W T F S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

ARCHIVES


OUR LINKS


YubaNet
White House Blog
Watts Up With That?
The Union
Sierra Thread
RL “Bob” Crabb
Barry Pruett Blog

George Rebane

Former Union publisher Jeff Ackerman writes (here) that Californians today pay and average of $4.02/gal for gasoline while the rest of the country averages at $2.64/gal.  And the escapee to Oregon goes on to point out that all of this is self-inflicted pain that the state’s voters are way past having enough between the ears to change course as Sacramento does its best to accelerate dumb laws/regulations and spread our epidemic across the country.

Gun confiscation was again disguised at the Giffords/March for Our Lives “gun safety forum” in Las Vegas. The Dems are having problems coming together on which or whether to back such confiscation schemes as mandatory buybacks.  Even Moms Demand Action have stopped short of buybacks, which leaves Beto (of AR15/AK47 fame) and the klatch of radical socialists more isolated than ever.  Many of us hope Beto will double down on his ‘Damn right, we’ll take your guns!’

No more masks for Hong Kong protesters.  An old British colonial law is to be invoked to threaten protesters with eventual arrest when they reveal their faces to government operated face recognition software that is being installed all over China today.  Here we are considering doing the same, starting with neighborhood watch cameras for recording night time crime (and anyone else who is on the street after dark).  Soon after, we’ll be fighting daytime crime and questioning people who are recorded being out of their own neighborhoods.  Isn’t technology wonderful?

[4oct19 update]  Volker’s House testimony and release of tweets are the first real disclosures that may seriously put Trump’s tit in a wringer in the ongoing impeachment saga.  Trump is by no means the first president to seek and get foreign aid against political opponents for some horse trading.  But back then it was no big deal and a known prerogative of office.  IMHO, if the sought aid concerns a material revelation about the character of a political opponent, then I don’t oppose such information gathering.  However, I do oppose purchasing fabricated ‘evidence’ of an opponent’s bad character from foreign sources.

[6oct19 update]  Harvard on capitalism (here) – whouda thought?

Posted in , , ,

247 responses to “Ruminations – 3oct19 (updated 6oct19)”

  1. Steven Frisch Avatar
    Steven Frisch

    yep, it is 52 USC 30121: Contributions and donations by foreign nationals
    §30121. Contributions and donations by foreign nationals
    (a) Prohibition
    It shall be unlawful for-
    (1) a foreign national, directly or indirectly, to make-
    (A) a contribution or donation of money or other thing of value, or to make an express or implied promise to make a contribution or donation, in connection with a Federal, State, or local election;
    (B) a contribution or donation to a committee of a political party; or
    (C) an expenditure, independent expenditure, or disbursement for an electioneering communication (within the meaning of section 30104(f)(3) of this title); or
    (2) a person to solicit, accept, or receive a contribution or donation described in subparagraph (A) or (B) of paragraph (1) from a foreign national.
    (b) “Foreign national” defined
    As used in this section, the term “foreign national” means-
    (1) a foreign principal, as such term is defined by section 611(b) of title 22, except that the term “foreign national” shall not include any individual who is a citizen of the United States; or
    (2) an individual who is not a citizen of the United States or a national of the United States (as defined in section 1101(a)(22) of title 8) and who is not lawfully admitted for permanent residence, as defined by section 1101(a)(20) of title 8.
    (Pub. L. 92–225, title III, §319, formerly §324, as added Pub. L. 94–283, title I, §112(2), May 11, 1976, 90 Stat. 493 ; renumbered §319, Pub. L. 96–187, title I, §105(5), Jan. 8, 1980, 93 Stat. 1354 ; amended Pub. L. 107–155, title III, §§303, 317, Mar. 27, 2002, 116 Stat. 96 , 109.)

    Like

  2. Walt Avatar

    Where is the law stating a President can’t sell his property?
    It’s not Carter giving away American territory. Did we get a say in that matter?
    Or Clinton giving missile tech to China. Before he did that China couldn’t deliver a nuke across town.
    The Trump Corp. and the Trump Trust can sell assets.
    Sorry to run over your new baby squirrel. Keep the next one out of the road.

    Like

  3. Walt Avatar

    Hummmm Steve may be violating his non profit status.
    Since he IS the voice of SBC.. Just what’s the non profit code you dodge taxes under? 501C3? I could be wrong…Maybe…..
    501(c)(3) organizations may not:
    Endorse candidates and publicize the endorsement
    Publish voter guides that compare or rank candidates
    Engage in politically targeted voter registration or mobilization efforts designed to help specific candidates
    Post partisan political messages on Facebook, Twitter, & other social media
    Pay for advertising supporting or opposing candidates
    Establish and pay for administrative and fundraising costs of an affiliated political organization
    Ask candidates to sign a pledge
    Slamming Trump just may be a violation.
    I’m sure you can find plenty of excuses to say how your exempt. Will the IRS agree?

    Like

  4. Paul Emery Avatar

    George
    The evidence will or will not reveal itself after a thorough investigation. That must involve Trump releasing all requested evidence and documents and not blocking any testimony. I doubt if he’ll do that like he blocked most testimony in the Mueller investigation and refused to release his taxes when requested to do so by the legitimate legal process in New York State and the House of Representatives.

    Like

  5. Gregory Avatar
    Gregory

    Golly, Steve, what national election is Hunter Biden running for, and when does Joe Biden actually become the Democratic Party candidate for President, if ever?
    Trump was asking for them to sort out the Biden family actions when, July? What, 13 months or so before the 2020 Dem Convention? Plenty of time for them to get it sorted out…
    The bigger the stink the Democratic Party faithful make about Quid Pro Joe, the more folk will become interested in just how Hunter got a $600k a year job he had no qualifications for whatsoever in Ukraine after Dad got involved with Ukraine, and how a company Hunter had formed with the fruit of John Kerry’s loins got $1.5 billon dollars to play with from the Chinese gov’t on a trip he took to China with dear old Dad on Air Force Two.
    Somehow, all the stink being raised is almost as if the Party faithful expect bad news to come from any investigation by Ukraine.

    Like

  6. George Rebane Avatar

    JigW 450pm – If you ever accuse me of deleting one of your comments because it doesn’t fit my ideology, you are history on RR. I don’t do that, and have never done that in the long history of this blog, so stow that shit. Don’t elevate yourself to some height of hubris where you think you can post some counter that I cannot handle; only liberal blogs do that kind of censoring. I did find a comment of yours that TypePad had put into the spam folder and immediately posted it. You could have the courtesy to tell me if your comment disappears instead of reverting to a crapload of snark. Capice?
    PaulE 539pm – OK Paul, so that’s it. You have nothing beyond the allegation talking points of the radical progressive Left. Get back to me on this when you have some evidence.

    Like

  7. Jig Wiggly Avatar
    Jig Wiggly

    George, I still don’t see it. It is basically the same quotes from my 4:59. When I preview then post, and the pop up tells me my comment has been posted, there isn’t a whole lot of room for me to consider an alternative of the idea someone made it go missing.

    Like

  8. Gregory Avatar
    Gregory

    GR 603pm part doh!
    But of course, it’s the seriousness of the allegations that demands action NOW!

    Like

  9. Don Bessee Avatar
    Don Bessee

    Reality check for the TDS troll set –
    But in a new campaign ad on Facebook, the Kentucky Republican claims that any impeachment attempt will fail as long as he remains in charge of the Senate.
    “Nancy Pelosi’s in the clutches of a left wing mob. They finally convinced her to impeach the president,” McConnell says directly to the camera in a 17-second video. “All of you know your Constitution. The way that impeachment stops is a Senate majority with me as majority leader.
    https://www.yahoo.com/news/mcconnell-fundraises-off-impeachment-says-205928480.html
    😉

    Like

  10. L Avatar
    L

    Walt @ 5:12 and 5:32, nicely done.

    Like

  11. Walt Avatar

    Thanks L, Just some of that useless knowledge one picks up from time to time.

    Like

  12. Paul Emery Avatar

    What more do you need George. Trump confessed to holding funding for defense till they agreed to investigate the Bidens. What more do you need? More will come in for sure because Trump is too sloppy not slick like Obama in his dealings.
    Once again Here’s a definition of the law Trump apparently has violated according to Ellen Weintraub, chairwoman of the Federal Election Commission:
    “It is illegal for any person to solicit, accept or receive anything of value from a foreign national in connection with a U.S. election. Anyone who solicits or accepts foreign assistance risks being on the wrong end of a federal investigation.”
    What more do you need George? Do you deny Trump was pursuing information to assist in his campaign against Biden? If he was he broke the law and should be impeached. Pure and simple. Do you believe he was not trying to gather that information to assist his campaign?

    Like

  13. George Rebane Avatar

    Jig 632pm – You got two comments here that seem to be alike – 916am and 459pm. Search on ‘Jig’ – Ctrl F.

    Like

  14. Walt Avatar

    Your full of it Emery, your trying to mix the facts. The whistleblower claims Trump was withholding funds. The transcript of that says a different story.
    So show exactly where Trump “admitted” that, and which Proggy press.
    A search of what you claim doesn’t pan out.
    “Trump confessed” is a figment of your hate.

    Like

  15. Walt Avatar

    Yes, funds were withheld, but for other reasons, and from a different time.
    “President Donald Trump has said he withheld nearly $400 million in military aid from Ukraine because of corruption in the country”
    It’s your Proggys contending that Trump did it to screw Biden.
    No proof.

    Like

  16. George Rebane Avatar

    PaulE 946pm – Trump didn’t “confess” and Weintraub just gave her opinion.

    Like

  17. Bill Tozer Avatar
    Bill Tozer

    So, no Democrat can be investigated for an LE matter if they are running for Prez? Makes sense to me, rightttt. Got it.
    Trump was investigated 6 ways to Sunday by the previous Administration and The Hillary Campaign/DNC paid a foreign national to come up with the bogus Golden Shower unverified rag and asked Ukrainians to dig up dirt on Trump….which is considered something of value. Got it. There is no Democrat nominee for the 2020 election, but this violates campaign finance law? Got it. All the 20 something Democrats still in the primary race are off limits to any LE investigation. Glad you made it clear. Last I heard, Hunter Biden has not declared his candidacy. It’s between Hunter and the Ukrainian government. It’s out of our hands.
    1) Off topic, but the fired prosecutor was also investigating a Soros funded group for violations of the Uranian law. “Shut it down now,” says VP Biden or no billion dollars for you. “Son of a bitch, they did!” bragged Joe. Joe says the darnest things.
    2) The Lefties consider Biden as collateral damage in their quest for any reason, manufactured or not, by any means imaginable, to impeach Trump. Joe is expendable.
    3) Trump will be impeached and still will win 2020. Changes nothing.
    4) Son of a bitch, it is about Biden. 🙂

    Like

  18. fish Avatar
    fish

    Yeah George……what more do you need?
    Order “What more do you need…” the hottest new bestseller from Punch Emery where he explains the debating techniques that have made him such a formidable presence in political discourse!
    Learn the following:
    Shame – “So you think its OK that Trump did something…something….”
    Projection – “So, in you view, its OK that Trump did something…something….”
    Obsessive Compulsive Behavior – “For your reading pleasure…….”
    Evasion – “I didn’t vote for Obama….the second time….second time….”
    These any many more!
    Available at Amazon and fine booksellers everywhere!

    Like

  19. Bill Tozer Avatar
    Bill Tozer

    Like AOC, I am getting bored by this. Good thoughts by someone who always does everything by the book; Andrew McCarthy.
    “If the House Won’t Vote, Impeachment Inquiry Is Just a Democratic Stunt”
    “The House acts by voting. It has never voted to conduct an inquiry into whether President Trump should be impeached. Consequently, there is no House impeachment inquiry. There is a partisan exhibition of synchronized dyspepsia.
    “This exhibition includes strident letters from a cabal of committee chairs, all Democrats, falsely claiming that a refusal by Trump-administration officials to comply with their demands for information and testimony “shall constitute evidence of obstruction of the House’s impeachment inquiry.”
    “In point of fact, the House has no impeachment inquiry; congressional Democrats have an impeachment political campaign.
    “Under federal law, the offense of obstructing Congress applies when “any inquiry or investigation is being had by either House, or any committee of either House.” Again, neither the House nor any of its committees has voted to conduct an impeachment inquiry. There is no formal impeachment proceeding to obstruct. Furthermore, the letters in question are not actually demands carrying the compulsory force of law; technically, they are just informal requests. No one is required to comply with a mere request, and refusing to do so is not evidence of anything, let alone obstruction.“
    https://www.nationalreview.com/2019/10/impeachment-inquiry-house-must-vote-or-its-just-democratic-stunt/

    Like

  20. Paul Emery Avatar

    So George you disagree with Weintraub’s opinion that: “It is illegal for any person to solicit, accept or receive anything of value from a foreign national in connection with a U.S. election.”

    Like

  21. Paul Emery Avatar

    More fun on the horizon:
    “A second whistleblower who’s said to have firsthand knowledge of allegations of misconduct involving President Donald Trump and Ukraine has come forward to speak with the intelligence community’s inspector general, two attorneys representing the whistleblowers have said.
    Attorney Mark Zaid told ABC News Sunday that this intelligence official, whom his firm is also now representing, is able to speak directly about the details cited in a first whistleblower’s complaint against Trump regarding his July 25 phone call with Ukraine’s president.”
    https://www.huffpost.com/entry/second-whistleblower-trump-ukraine_n_5d99e2cce4b03b475f9ae5ed

    Like

  22. fish Avatar
    fish

    Putting those powerful techniques to work….

    So George you disagree with Weintraub’s opinion that: “It is illegal for any person to solicit, accept or receive anything of value from a foreign national in connection with a U.S. election.”

    When does the updated edition come out Punch?

    Like

  23. Todd Juvinall Avatar

    Second whistleblower? No, second traitor. The left would allow our countries secrets to be released and put our country at risk just so they could get rid of Trump. If the person truly is “first hand with the phone call, he will look as stupid as the first traitor since the transcript has been released. The democrats will produce as many traitors as necessary until the cows come home.

    Like

  24. Paul Emery Avatar

    So Fish do you disagree with Weintraub’s opinion that: “It is illegal for any person to solicit, accept or receive anything of value from a foreign national in connection with a U.S. election.”

    Like

  25. George Rebane Avatar

    PaulE 927am – Paul, I think you have a few of my questions to answer before we get back to yours.

    Like

  26. fish Avatar
    fish

    Posted by: Paul Emery | 06 October 2019 at 09:30 AM
    C’mon……declare it formally and vote on it! At this point I’ll gladly trade Trump to take down a big chunk of the Democrat Old Guard with him!
    …..let see some of that sweet, sweet subpoena power!!!

    Like

  27. fish Avatar
    fish

    Posted by: Paul Emery | 06 October 2019 at 09:45 AM
    So Fish do you disagree with Weintraub’s opinion that: “It is illegal for any person to solicit, accept or receive anything of value from a foreign national in connection with a U.S. election.”

    So in your view is it unethical for the interviewer to ask a long open ended question that allows him enough time to sneak out to the station parking lot for a smoke?

    Like

  28. Paul Emery Avatar

    I believe I did answer your questions George. Example you write:
    ” are you able to make a case for his impeachment that appeals to evidence beyond allegations? Give it a try.”
    I respond:
    “The evidence will or will not reveal itself after a thorough investigation. That must involve Trump releasing all requested evidence and documents and not blocking any testimony. I doubt if he’ll do that like he blocked most testimony in the Mueller investigation and refused to release his taxes when requested to do so by the legitimate legal process in New York State and the House of Representatives. “

    Like

  29. fish Avatar
    fish

    Posted by: Paul Emery | 06 October 2019 at 10:00 AM
    Then start working those phones Punch and have Pelosi call a vote and get the process started formally…..no more clumsily fucking around like you with the Viagra™ bottle!

    Like

  30. Walt Avatar

    So Emery can’t prove his “confession” crapola.
    Your Alzheimer’s is showing again. Same damned question repeated over and over and over and……
    For the love of Christ and all things holy,, just when does opinion become evidence O buzzad of Broad St.?

    Like

  31. George Rebane Avatar

    PaulE 1000am – So that confirms that you have nothing but allegations and a witch hunt investigation that “will or will not reveal” evidence to back up the allegations. And that’s all I claimed that you had. IMHO, that is NOT sufficient to start impeaching a president through an “official inquiry” kabuki dance that is not a formal impeachment investigation launched by a House vote. However, impeachment is a political circus that does not require the House to establish a criminal cause, so it may well come to pass that Trump will be impeached for whatever the Dems can gin up for their public as a sufficient basis to overturn the 2016 election.

    Like

  32. Gregory Avatar
    Gregory

    “Tomorrow, tomorrow, I love ya, tomorrow, you’re only a day away”
    -Punchy

    Like

  33. Walt Avatar

    This guy could be Emery’s Son!
    “Missing from the avalanche of news media coverage about Zaid’s two anonymous clients rocking the nation’s capital is that at the beginning of Trump’s presidency Zaid co-founded Whistleblower Aid, a small nonprofit that blasted advertisements around D.C. actively seeking whistleblowers during the Trump administration.”
    And it gets BETTER!!
    “In his twitter profile, Zaid describes himself as a “non-partisan” attorney “handling cases involving national security, security clearances, govt investigations, media, Freedom of Information Act, & whistleblowing.” Missing from his twitter profile and from much of the the news media coverage about Zaid’s role representing the so-called whistleblowers in the impeachment scandal is that he co-founded Whistleblower Aid. That detail is also not mentioned in Zaid’s bio on his attorney website.”
    A guy who from day one who has been out to get Trump claims to be “non partisan”???🤣👍 Sure thing..
    So he found another Balsy Ford to come forward . Any bets on another fabricated story?

    Like

  34. Jig Wiggly Avatar
    Jig Wiggly

    Walt, wake up and smell the fetid dust. LOTS and LOTS of non partisans would love to kick Trump’s ass. As would lots of Pubbers.

    Like

  35. Walt Avatar

    LOL jiggered boob. That list keeps getting shorter and shorter.
    The ‘Never Trump’ Coalition That Decided Eh, Nevermind, He’s Fine
    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/the-never-trump-coalition-that-decided-eh-nevermind-hes-fine/ar-AAIjNMw
    Has that for a swift kick to the lizard sized Proggy testis?

    Like

  36. Gregory Avatar
    Gregory

    Where is Michael Avenatti when Jiggy really need him?

    Like

  37. Bill Tozer Avatar
    Bill Tozer

    What difference, at this point, does it make?
    Second whistleblower “may” come out from the shadows; does it even matter?
    “At this point, though, I’m not sure it matters much how many whistleblower complaints will be filed. The whistle has been blown and the second whistleblower has been interviewed by the intelligence community IG. I assume that he (or she) eventually will also be interviewed by House Democrats whether he “comes forward” or not. So will other key players in the intelligence community and the State Department.
    “The inquiry into President Trump’s dealings with Ukraine now has a life of its own, to say the least. It will be investigated the same way it would be if the allegations of wrongdoing originated from a source other than a whistleblower.
    “Thus, it no longer really matters, for purposes of figuring out what happened, whether the original whistleblower had first hand knowledge of events, whether he got certain things wrong, whether he actually has official whistleblower status, or what his motive was.
    “Chuck Ross of the Daily Caller points out that “an additional whistleblower is also likely to fuel Trump allies’ criticism that the complaints are part of an orchestrated attack on the president.” I assume this whole thing is an orchestrated attack on the president.
    Hmmm. Shades of the Kavanaugh hearings. Only thing missing is the honorable Michael Avenatti and his 130 appearance on MSPMS and CNN. The Swamp Cretans are running scared.

    Like

  38. Jig Wiggly Avatar
    Jig Wiggly

    Sorry Bill- The second whistleblower HAS come forward with first hand information. That does make a difference.

    Like

  39. L Avatar
    L

    PE @ 10:00 Your brand of dem hypocrisy is particularly dishonest and irritating. Please furnish a list of the episodes known to you of Trump “block(ing) most testimony in the Mueller investigation.”
    Had he done any such thing, your current wet dream of impeachment would be real instead of a subject of universal ridicule. So put up or STFU.

    Like

  40. Bill Tozer Avatar
    Bill Tozer

    @ 11:16 am
    You beat me to it. At least we are on the same page. What about that airport in Scotland? What about……..
    https://m.facebook.com/PatriotPost/photos/a.82108390913/10156694593230914/?

    Like

  41. George Rebane Avatar

    IMHO, the second whistleblower’s contribution should be to provide evidence that the Trump/Levensky telecon transcript is fallacious. Piling on with other unsupported allegations like the first one actually weakens the Dems’ case when they start parading such sans evidence discontents. But then who knows the liberal mind, maybe there’s a case to be made that N allegations = evidence when N is large enough.

    Like

  42. Paul Emery Avatar

    L
    Here’s a start L on what information and individuals Trump has not allowed to be presented:
    “Begin with President Donald Trump’s tax returns, which federal law requires must be turned over at the request of Congress. Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin refused to obey the statute, based on his own judgment that the request lacked “legislative purpose.”
    This was the first of nearly a dozen refusals by the administration to provide information that lies far outside the contours of executive privilege as previously asserted. Beyond tax returns, the administration has refused to turn over, or sought to block the release of, documents related to the president’s pre-presidential accountants and bankers, the White House security-clearance process, the decision to add a citizenship question to the 2020 census form (which has since been blocked by the Supreme Court), and the House Judiciary Committee’s inquiry into obstruction of justice. It has blocked testimony by former White House Counsel Don McGahn about Trump’s efforts to derail the special-counsel investigation. It has sought to shield grand-jury testimony heard during the Robert Mueller probe from Congress’s eyes. It has directed Corey Lewandowski, who was never a federal employee, not to discuss his conversations as a private citizen with Trump.
    https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2019/10/executive-privilege-cant-protect-trump-forever/599200/

    Like

  43. Paul Emery Avatar

    Here it comes-leaks and whistle blowers galore coming tight up. Stay tuned
    Just remember, Trump has NO friends and they will start to pile on.
    Attorneys representing the intelligence official who filed the formal complaint about President Donald Trump’s call with Ukraine’s leader confirmed Sunday that they now represent “multiple whistleblowers” who have decided to come forward to detail potential misconduct by the U.S. president.
    “I can confirm that my firm and my team represent multiple whistleblowers,” Andrew Bakaj, the lead attorney for the original whistleblower, tweeted Saturday. “No further comment at this time.”

    Like

  44. Jig Wiggly Avatar
    Jig Wiggly

    In the continuing saga of “Donald Trump is a Swell Human Being”, he throws Rick Perry under the bus without so much as wiping his brow. Perry denies he ever talked with Trump about the Bidens. Next Rudi is going to get the heave ho. Draining the swamp one rat at a time until it has nothing but friends and family left. Then they’ll feed on one another. Donner Trumps.

    Like

  45. George Rebane Avatar

    PaulE 1213pm – That’s quite a litany. Is any of it patently illegal? Not at all; not even the tax return gambit. Were any of it illegal and/or an established act of criminality, then these would have by their priority been used by the Dems to vote for and launch a formal impeachment investigation. Since none satisfied these requirements, they had to wait for or instigate a whistle blower on a dodgy complaint about a phone call which now seems to be falling apart (requiring more whistleblowers, none of whom have dunned the telecon’s transcript). Ever ask yourself why Team Nancy doesn’t just pick one or more of those listed grievances, and impeach on the basis of those?

    Like

  46. Walt Avatar

    “Desperation” Emery. No law stating he must turn over tax returns. Again.. NOT obstruction. Someone find that fainting couch…QUICK!!!

    Like

  47. Paul Emery Avatar

    George
    Trump was being investigated for obstruction of Justice. Do you consider that a crime? He then used his power of being President to keep relevant information from investigators they needed in order to determine if there was evidence to support the allegations.
    You had no problem with the impeachment of Clinton and what was that for? Guess what lying under oath and obstruction of justice, so according to the Repubs obstruction is indeed an impeachable crime. .

    Like

  48. Don Bessee Avatar
    Don Bessee

    This is all going sideways for botox Nancy and schiff for brains –
    Page said, “Yes, it’s going to hurt him. It’s hurting him already, fairly or not. You start any discussion by saying there is no evidence that Joe Biden did anything illegal or anything improper. That said, on this show, we saw a commercial paid for by the Trump campaign making the case against Biden. We had a USA Today poll this week that showed by 2-1, by 42-21%, Americans say it would be legitimate, there are valid reasons to investigate Biden’s behavior when it came to Ukraine.”
    https://www.breitbart.com/clips/2019/10/06/susan-page-by-2-to-1-margin-americans-say-investigating-bidens-unseemly-behavior-legitimate/
    😉

    Like

  49. fish Avatar
    fish

    Posted by: Jig Wiggly | 06 October 2019 at 11:45 AM
    Sorry Bill- The second whistleblower HAS come forward with first hand information. That does make a difference.

    Not until Pelosi makes it official it doesn’t.

    Like

Leave a comment