“nothing should be done by the state which can be better or as well done by voluntary effort”, William Ewart Gladstone (1809 – 1898)
George Rebane
I’m old enough to remember when TVs were the big new whizbang thing. We common folks were then told of all the wonders that a live screen with sound would be bringing into our living rooms. And then came computers, and the news was full of how businesses were doing this and that with those new-fangled number crunchers. After that it was the internet, and we learned to expect all of its wonders, and now we read the breathless reports of AI starting to do all things good and also its (biased, gasp!) dark side. All of those technologies quickly faded into commonplace roles in our lives. The next big thing will be personal AGI (artificial general intelligence) companions whom we will demand and trust more than fellow humans. And this will scare the crap out of autocratic governments – keep your eye on Sacramento and DC.
Meritocracy is a bad thing in modern society, so points out a recent article in The (leftwing) Atlantic. (H/T to Sandbox commenter) It causes all kinds of bad psychological problems and promotes inequality – kids from richer homes are smarter than those from poorer homes (Stop the presses!). Therefore, they wind up working ridiculously hard in school and the workplace, and get stressed out as they dominate the 1% class. The solution, force universities to admit a certain percentage of the dumber students. Or maybe in the future the smarter ones must have a noise making chip implanted into their skulls to disrupt longer thinking processes, or maybe the too smart ones will just be culled by the state like shown on a Twilight Zone episode long ago (here).
A Pence/Harris VP debate next year is anticipated with some glee by our liberals. They can just see Harris taking down VP Pence in a one-on-one encounter. I would counsel a little trimming of such hopes because Mike Pence is not a Joe Biden, and Kamala Harris is definitely not the brightest bulb on an otherwise dimly lit Democrat tree. Harris commands little to no basis for arguing substantive issues; all she can do is attempt to sway the lightly read with emotional anecdotes. These the VP can easily dispatch by pointing out the aggregate impacts that such radical leftwing policies have delivered elsewhere, and now portend for the country.
Preventable man-made global warming (PMGW) ascendant. Notice the increased hysterics in the media about all the disastrous effects caused by PMGW. Time after time the warming data is shown to be politically motivated hokum, but that makes no never mind to the fear mongers (the lamestream does not air that side). The new level of hysteria is being ramped up by the Dems for 2020 as a back-up argument for their policies that promise to deliver the country's new socialist sunrise. The message – capitalism causes PMGW that will kill the planet, socialism is the only hope to save mankind. A good fraction of our electorate has been carefully cultured to uncritically embrace such arguments.
[21aug19 update] “… the clicking of jack boots and rifle bolts.” As witnessed on RR over the years, this is the form of governance legions of leftists have convinced themselves that conservative America seeks. They ignore that it is and has been only the goose-stepping collectivists that have constructed leviathans in which citizens are kept in line by such displays and applications of state power. But true to Lenin and Alinsky, they were taught early to counter political opponents by loudly accusing them of one’s own worst practices. And as history has shown, you can fool enough of the people all the time to bring down somnambulant republics.
[22aug19 update] ‘Americans Are Richer Than We Think’ write economists Phil Gramm and John Early. The Democrats and their lamestream lapdogs have done all they can to convince America that we live in a bad economy that doesn’t benefit anyone but the rich, and (go figger) they turn around and tell us that our good economy is about to take a dive. And all will be well again once we fundamentally transform the country and put it on a firm socialist track. Such reasoning fits well with the liberal mindset. Gramm and Early present loads of data that debunk the leftwing's advertised misery of the middle class.
Russ Steele has an excellent idea on how to take a census of rural folks who don’t have access to broadband. Everyone has been trying to get their hands around that problem in order to come up with good public policies that enable government and the private sector to work together in correcting this deficit. Russ suggests that we use the upcoming census to gather this data. The details are in his 22aug19 ‘Overwhelmed and Under-counted’ letter to The Union.
US acquiring Greenland. Trump’s recent proposal to Denmark on the reprise of this idea (first proposed under President Truman) has been peremptorily identified as looney by the Left (and a few on the Right), and offered in the lamestream as further evidence that The Donald’s elevator doesn’t go to the top floor. Now I don’t particularly agree with the way that our president again introduced this proposal; it should have been done quietly at lower levels of diplomatic contact. But on the overall concept, I think that there exist several approaches in which that piece of strategically located and resource rich real estate can benefit both us and the Danes if the US got or shared sovereignty over Greenland. The Left in their mirth appear to have put as much thought into the matter as do hyenas before beginning their bouts of ‘laughter’. (Here is a more sober discussion of this in Politico, and here is Sen Tom Cotton's overture last year.)
[23aug19 update] Union publisher Don Rogers writes an enticing, yet in the end disappointing, meditation on the meaning of life in today’s paper. In his ‘The Meaning of Life?’ he takes us on a short journey of futility while keeping hope alive, and then (trigger warning) summarily drops us off with “Life is what life does”? -86- OK, but then why bother to lead us “befuddled pilgrims” by the nose to ‘It is what it is.’? Actually, I’m just exposing my naivete here. One should always temper one’s expectations when reading our beloved Union. 😉


Leave a comment