Rebane's Ruminations
July 2019
S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031  

ARCHIVES


OUR LINKS


YubaNet
White House Blog
Watts Up With That?
The Union
Sierra Thread
RL “Bob” Crabb
Barry Pruett Blog

George Rebane

Independence4jul2108

This patriotic graphic was posted on last year’s 4th of July.  Continuing our national trend, this year’s celebration has gotten a bit more tense.  We now have invented and baked in the country’s psyche the national notion that everything ante-bellum that was part of American history is fair game to be attacked, withdrawn, denied, silenced, or destroyed.  The latest is the very familiar Betsy Ross flag, the first Stars and Stripes to grace our newborn country with its familiar ring of thirteen stars for the original thirteen colonies.  No more.


Athletic products maker Nike released a celebratory model of one of its athletic shoes for the Fourth with the Betsy Ross flag embossed on the back of its heel.  In response, the formerly famous Colin ‘Take a Knee’ Kaepernick protested that the flag was offensive to him because it was from a time and a country that still condoned slavery.  Nike, along with a gaggle of distributors and retailers, immediately caved and withdrew the shoe with some BS message that (seat belts please) it didn’t want to offend America’s patriotic holiday.

Only Arizona’s governor Doug Ducey stood up say that his state no longer would seek to attract Nike, which was planning to build a manufacturing facility outside of Phoenix.  Rebane Doctrine calls for other commercial enterprises with a patriotic backbone to immediately start placing the Betsy Ross flag on appropriate products in their offerings.

And in preparation for this holiday, the anti-American Left is decrying President Trump’s celebration of our Independence Day in our capital with an extraordinary patriotic display of our military and fireworks to remember.  They are telling the country that this is “politicizing the Fourth”.  It’s hard to tell whether their ignorance or cynicism is showing its true colors.  The Fourth has ALWAYS been a political holiday ever since its political birth in 1776 Philadelphia.  Every politician and political faction/party has made its presence known on the Fourth throughout our history, and the more so for politicians who were then in office.

All thinking Americans know that our Left in no way wants to omit politics from the Fourth.  What all of them want is the Fourth to be restricted to express and display only their ideological messages and reinforce their narrative under the guise of being ‘non-partisan’.  The only good thing about today is that they were not able to pull it off under this president.

[update]  Our polarization was upped another notch with the three major networks – ABC, NBC, CBS – refusing to air the ‘Salute to America’ celebration on the National Mall.  Why?  Well, because it was conceived and promoted by President Trump.  The national mood has divided so visibly that lamestream outlets no longer make any pretense of claiming to be non-partisan or hiding their longstanding promotion of all things Left.  We are today two peoples forced to tolerate each other in a common land, with one side attempting to silence the other which simply wants to retain/regain the exceptional goodness of America. (more here)

ObamaInauguration2009

The above prominent and proud display of America’s flags that includes the now proscribed (by the Left) Betsy Ross flag was evident during Obama’s inauguration.  Today’s controversy over the Left’s rejection of America’s first flag underlines how our anti-American Democrats redefine the politically permissible to satisfy their narrative du jour.  To them America and its history are malleable political artifacts that shape the attitudes of their constituents who know no better.  This has been the usual practice under totalitarian communist regimes that Orwell also highlighted in his 1984. (more here).  Meanwhile one of their prominent socialist candidates, Sen Cory Booker, shows his love of America with a political stunt by personally escorting illegal aliens across our southern border. (here)  This is but the latest of the Democrats’ national anti-American policy of undermining our country’s sovereignty with their ongoing invitation to the world’s disaffected to illegally mass migrate through our southern border, thus overwhelming our border security apparatus configured for a much less porous border, and now vilified by the Democrats who created and now acknowledge this ‘humanitarian crisis’ while denying that it is also first and foremost a national security crisis.

Posted in , , , ,

84 responses to “Happy Fourth, if you can (updated)”

  1. Jig Wiggly Avatar
    Jig Wiggly

    George-
    I’m pretty sure free speech includes choosing what NOT so say. Last time I checked, YouTube isn’t Congress. Last time I checked YouTube owns their own platform. Last time I checked YouTube can and does filter content displayed on its platform far from Congressional (or Bill’s) oversight.
    Bill-
    Did YouTube sign a contract with youtube as the players did with their owners?

    Like

  2. Jig Wiggly Avatar
    Jig Wiggly

    I’m starting to sound like Todd 🙂 Sorry
    Correction:
    Bill-
    Did YouTube sign a contract with you as the players did with their owners?

    Like

  3. Don Bessee Avatar
    Don Bessee

    Something else to celebrate –
    Nonfarm payrolls rose 224,000 in June, well above market expectations of 165,000, according to the Labor Department.
    https://www.cnbc.com/2019/07/05/jobs-report-june-2019.html
    😉

    Like

  4. Todd Juvinall Avatar

    Oh Jiggly if you sounded like me you would be popular instead of a pariah.

    Like

  5. Don Bessee Avatar
    Don Bessee

    Who knew 0 was a white supremacist? –
    Betsy Ross flag now decried by 2020 Dems, pundits was flown during Obama’s 2nd inauguration
    https://www.foxnews.com/politics/betsy-ross-flag-obama-inauguration
    😉

    Like

  6. Bill Tozer Avatar
    Bill Tozer

    Jigger
    I just related an e-mail Imgot. Do I believe the government has no business in contracts between private parties? Absolutely. Do I think NFL players can say what they want? Depends on the contract. Do I believe that free speech extends to the workplace while on the clock. Absolutely not. Do I believe commercial speech is not the same as free speech? Yes, in most cases. Do I believe Big Bro should regulate free speech on YouTube or social media? Big Bro is the last person to touch speech on social media platforms. Been on a government site lately? It looks like something out of 1995.
    Do I believe that ‘buzz word’ phrases like “threat to the community” or “violates community standards” without citing exactly what words or phrases violated “community standards” and doing so in an arbitrary manner reeks of fascism and it’s evil tendencies? Yes. absolutely yes…….but, we are drifting off topic. The pendulum swings both ways.
    1984 is a novel, not a training manual. But, Happy 4th of July, the day after. Let freedom ring. Sweet land of liberty.

    Like

  7. George Rebane Avatar

    Jig 1052am – You continue to enjoy your error that has now expanded to reasoning. There is NOTHING in the 1A that allows Party2 to determine what Party1 may or not say. On the contrary, the entire purpose of 1A is that it allows Party1 to say what he will without being prohibited by Party2 or any third person. Apparently when you studied your Constitution, the educational system was already corrupted to omit that extremely important bit of information.
    And with your “I’m pretty sure free speech includes choosing what NOT so say.” you totally misunderstand who the ‘sayer’ is – it is NOT YouTube who only provides a conduit or outlet service to its clients whose speech it merely retransmits. But you do get full credit for correctly stating that “YouTube is not Congress”. Unfortunately, that observation has nothing to do with this discussion. Please review the constitutional rights of speakers viz property owners.

    Like

  8. George Rebane Avatar

    DonB 1122am – Apparently you did not take note of this post’s update yesterday 😉 But it’s always good to remind others similarly disposed.

    Like

  9. Don Bessee Avatar
    Don Bessee

    Yahoo is no friend of the administration –
    Washington (AFP) – President Donald Trump sang the praises of the US military and American heroes of the past two and a half centuries Thursday, skirting politics in a rousing Independence Day speech in Washington.
    Trump used the traditionally politics-free holiday to deliver shoutouts to each arm of the military, as well as singling out first responders and the controversial Border Patrol and Immigration and Customs Enforcement agencies that have been criticized for their treatment of migrants.
    But he disappointed critics who had warned that Trump, the first president in decades to make a keynote speech on the July 4 holiday, was hijacking the celebration to bolster his own political standing and attack Democratic rivals.
    Instead, in a trickling rain, he uncharacteristically avoided talking about himself and his political detractors. He repeatedly ascribed a singular greatness to the country, declaring it “the most exceptional nation in the history of the world.”
    “Today, we come together as one nation with this very special Salute to America. We celebrate our history, our people, and the heroes who proudly defend our flag — the brave men and women of the United States military!”
    https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-producer-president-makes-july-4th-own-show-200916773.html
    😉

    Like

  10. Bill Tozer Avatar
    Bill Tozer

    And last time I checked free speech does not descend from Congress or any government agency or branch. It precedes government…..
    Now, here is one woman exercising her free speech on July 4th.
    https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/07/04/gold-star-mom-slams-colin-kaepernick-honors-hero-son-hes-given-more-than-any-athlete-has-ever-given/

    Like

  11. Don Bessee Avatar
    Don Bessee

    There is still hope for our youth! –
    A kid hopped into a Fourth of July parade to help an Honor Guard tie his shoelaces in a viral moment that’s awarded him a police medal.
    During Thursday’s Fourth of July festivities in Arlington, Texas, a two-mile march downtown, Officer Jarrick Wilson saw that his shoelace was untied. The DWI enforcement unit officer who works nights signaled the other guards to slow down and while the group was deciding how to juggle their American flags or shotgun, a boy named Josh raced over to help.
    A spectator named Wendy Collins Smith snapped a photo and posted it on social media. “We need more of his type in the world!” she wrote about the boy’s patriotism.
    Chief Will Johnson of the Arlington Police Department tweeted the photo writing, “Thank you Josh! We should all be so kind. I have a Chief Challenge coin for you.”
    https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/heartwarming-photo-shows-little-boy-jumping-into-fourth-of-july-parade-to-tie-soldiers-shoelace-182324668.html
    😉

    Like

  12. Bill Tozer Avatar
    Bill Tozer

    How many times have I repeated the saying, “My rights do not stop where your feeling begin”? I gotta hand it to the USA, USA, USA! chant haters. Their usually retort to flag waving is “Patriotism is the last refugee of scoundrels.
    Learned something new. A Congress critter can slander and lie about and libel anyone from the floor of Congress with impunity. Think of Harry Reid spreading false rumors about Mitt’s tax returns (with witnesses that did not exist) from the Hallowed Chambers of the US Senate. But, that is not new to us. What I did learn is when those empty barrels with AOC went to a detainment camp and accused a Border Patrol agent of threatening them (what, with his retinas?’, at that point the agent could have sued the crap out of them. They were not on the floor of Congress, this not covered. Interesting. Nothing with happen like that, but another bit of useful information to put in the ammo box….just in case.
    —————————-
    Man, ole Rafael ain’t going to let the race baiter get away with that, no siree.
    https://www.dailywire.com/news/49182/kaepernick-quotes-frederick-douglass-bash-july-4th-hank-berrien?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=benshapiro
    ————————————————-
    Re: update
    Well, well, well. Now that CNN & the Resistance News Networks had to admit their days long hyperventilated prediction that POTUS is going to abuse the Capital Mall parade as a political event to feed his overinflated ego……now, that they admitted it was not a political speech, they all agreed that they hated it anyway.

    Like

  13. Bill Tozer Avatar
    Bill Tozer

    Come on Buck, let’s not pile on. Buck sez:
    https://www.facebook.com/BuckSexton/photos/a.568156706588519/2721175784619923/?type=3&theater
    He used to work at CNN. Go figure.

    Like

  14. Bill Tozer Avatar
    Bill Tozer

    I can’t resist piling on. I am such a bully. Me bad. Trump has new name. Mad King. Nice touch for the 4th.
    Let’s roll the tape, shall we?
    https://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/bill-dagostino/2019/07/05/video-all-tv-medias-false-doomsday-predictions-salute-america

    Like

  15. Gregory Avatar
    Gregory

    The text of the 1A: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”
    George Rebane “…the entire purpose of 1A is that it allows Party1 to say what he will without being prohibited by Party2 or any third person. Apparently when you studied your Constitution, the educational system was already corrupted to omit that extremely important bit of information”.
    No George, it only forbids state actors from abridging free speech. Others, like Google, are completely free on 1A grounds, for example, to fire engineers who speak truth to their power if they don’t like the truth.
    If someone is speaking over you because they don’t want you to be heard, you have to talk louder or give up, not cry 1A, unless there are some more minor civil laws they are breaking. Or criminal assault and battery violations like the fascisti “Antifa” are known to use against conservative gay asian journalists.

    Like

  16. Bill Tozer Avatar
    Bill Tozer

    The 1A, while not specifically mentioned on July 4, 1776 (or July 2 for the purists and nitpickers) is a good topic. Or, this could go under the topic of Anything to Undermind America. Anyway…..
    Antifa and Richard Spenser.
    “In practice, however, antifa groups tend toward illiberal means to achieve their ends—both historically and at present. In Antifa: The Anti-Fascist Handbook, Mark Bray writes that antifa explicitly rejects “the classical liberal phrase incorrectly ascribed to Voltaire that ‘I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it.’” According to Bray, “Anti-fascism is an illiberal politics of social revolutionism applied to fighting the Far Right, not only literal fascists.”
    “In the antifa view, their enemies started it—by making statements that serve to further marginalize people who languish under some form of oppression. Caring about intersectionality means that an attack on one disadvantaged group is an attack on all. And if it is wise to stop people on the right from speaking against any member of the coalition, then it must occasionally be necessary to silence them when they try to speak. If they will not be silenced willingly, then violence is the only alternative.”
    ———
    “Based on these findings, it’s hardly surprising that Spencer himself isn’t wholly opposed to violence. “The fact that they are excusing violence against [me] inherently means that they believe that there’s a state of exception, where we can use violence,” Spencer told the Atlantic. “I think they’re actually kind of right.” When asked by a fellow traveler, Gregory Conte, whether members of the alt-right should support free speech as a general principle for the long term, Spencer responded, “No, of course not.”
    To drive the point home, I asked Spencer about his attitude toward free speech (and much else; read Chapter Eight of my new book, Panic Attack: Young Radicals in the Age of Trump, for the rest of the interview). He told me he was certainly not for absolute free speech, and he thought the state should have “at least some involvement” in promoting a better society by suppressing dangerous ideas.
    “In any case, the idea that certain people do not deserve free speech protections is now as popular among the far left as it always was among the far right. But it didn’t use to be this way: Leftists were once firm defenders of free speech for all, even for Nazis. Amazingly, in fact, when the Nazis came to campus in the 1960s, they did so at the left’s invitation.”
    https://quillette.com/2019/07/03/how-antifas-apologists-fell-in-love-with-street-violence/
    “Anti-fascism is an illiberal politics of social revolutionism applied to fighting the Far Right, not only literal fascists.” ‘Not only literal fascists.’ Let that sink in. Guess it depends on one’s definition of Alt-Right is. Hmmm. You mean like a Washington Examiner journalist or a Muslim limo driver? Like Milo? Like Ben Weinstein? Like Jordan (gasp!) Peterson?
    “Antifa = Anti-First Amendment”….from the comments below.
    https://www.dailywire.com/news/49172/watch-dave-rubin-warns-liberals-mob-will-come-you-paul-bois

    Like

  17. Bill Tozer Avatar
    Bill Tozer

    Well, when all is said and done……Trump got the idea of a military parade from his visit wirh French President Macron in 2017. Trump was so impressed with the pride the French displayed in their military parade that Trump thought it would be a good idea to bring it to the USA.
    And to think all the Stevies of the world are crying out, “ Why can’t we be more like France!” And they are soooo concerned about what Europe, and France in particular, think of us, roflmao.

    Like

  18. George Rebane Avatar

    Gregory 1225pm – We may have to disagree on that. The state has already passed anti-discrimination laws on private businesses that deal in public accommodation services. A user of such an accommodation is not an employee or paid agent of the service provider, on which point you are correct in non-application of 1A.

    Like

  19. Gregory Avatar
    Gregory

    George 422pm you can disagree all you want… the fact is, the 1st Amendment is not binding on individuals. People can shout you down at will.

    Like

  20. Scott O Avatar

    Gregory – “If someone is speaking over you because they don’t want you to be heard, you have to talk louder or give up, not cry 1A, unless there are some more minor civil laws they are breaking.”
    and
    “People can shout you down at will.”
    Ahem.
    All of us have the right to be heard.
    If the govt (supported by money taken from me at gun point) allows some folk to be freely heard while others are allowed to be shouted down, the govt is, in fact, not following the 1st A.
    Shouting down someone is not civil nor peaceful nor intelligent nor polite.
    Are you saying I have the right to smother your speech?
    Yes – a private company can fire some one if that person doesn’t follow the company party line.
    Good luck applying that to a company that fires a non-white who is a lefty.
    That is different from not allowing that person to speak out on his or her own.
    The left wing social media have the right to boot anyone that doesn’t follow their guidelines.
    If you would trouble yourself with the details of folk banned from social media, you would find those monopolistic companies are not truthful about their practices. They still have to abide by contract law and be open and honest in their dealings. Google, Facebook and Twitter – just to name the worst offenders – have been caught lying about their business practices.
    Employees that expose bad dealings have been fired.
    You would not accept this from your bank or any other financial business, why accept this from these social media companies?

    Like

  21. George Rebane Avatar

    Gregory 740pm – you missed my 422pm argument, I wasn’t talking about “individuals”.

    Like

  22. Gregory Avatar
    Gregory

    ” All of us have the right to be heard” Scott O
    No, none of us have a right to be heard… we just can’t be shut up by state actors. And the folks who might want to shut us up generally must pull their punches more than the so-called Antifa do… there’s a reason they wear masks. They’re willing to fight dirty.

    Like

  23. Gregory Avatar
    Gregory

    George Rebane “…the entire purpose of 1A is that it allows Party1 to say what he will without being prohibited by Party2 or any third person”
    This is patently untrue but is a widely held delusion.

    Like

  24. Scott O Avatar

    Greg – “No, none of us have a right to be heard… we just can’t be shut up by state actors.”
    True to a point. I don’t have the right to make anyone listen to me. But I have the same right as anyone else to get my point out at my expense. (I have to buy my own soap box) If we allow the ‘right’ of some one else to jump in front of me with a bull horn to drown me out, then what follows? Why would not I then have the right to buy a bigger speaker and amp to drown that person out? Where does that lead? This is a downward spiral that descends ultimately into violence.
    When the govt uses its authority and muscle to allow the left to shut down the conservative voices (and it does) then the state is now, in fact, censoring and shutting down conservatives.
    We do have the right to peaceably assemble and conduct our affairs by the existing laws. The folks engaged in political discourse on social media all have the same rights according to the terms and conditions set forth by the companies running the platforms.
    I don’t like the idea of the govt being able to tell the private companies who to allow and who to restrict or boot off their platforms. But the govt must be able to monitor those companies to the extent of forcing them to follow their own rules. We must have govt enforcement of all contracts or we fall apart as a nation.
    This debate goes even further than free speech. I can’t get on a plane to travel unless I pay with a credit card. Some banks are now acting as political agents restricting who they do business with and who they don’t based on ideas. If they are allowed that freedom, where does that lead? The banks are federally chartered. We will end up with the govt allowing private parties to shut down all commerce of anyone they don’t politically like. If the arm of the govt is going to extend down to all levels of speech and commerce, it must maintain the same rights of all citizens in those areas.

    Like

  25. Scott O Avatar

    Just to be clear – I hope we never have this sort of crap in our country:
    https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2019/07/05/macrons-france-to-force-social-media-and-search-engines-to-censor-hate-speech/
    It takes a complete idiot to not see the problem.
    Unfortunately, we have no shortage of complete idiots.
    Just how this French law works with an international information system (the internet) remains to be seen.

    Like

  26. George Rebane Avatar

    ScottO 852am – Could you please be our spearchucker on the development of this issue in France, and report back to us? Thanks.

    Like

  27. Scott O Avatar

    Final vote on the proposed French law is anticipated this Tuesday.
    Meanwhile Germany leads the way already.
    https://www.cnbc.com/2018/03/08/germany-looks-to-revise-social-media-law-as-europe-watches.html
    Interesting quote about the German law –
    ““We will add a provision so that users have a legal possibility to have unjustly deleted content restored,” said Johannes Ferchner, spokesman on justice and consumer protection for the Social Democrats and one of the architects of the law. He did not elaborate on how such a mechanism might work. At present, there is no formal mechanism for people to get content restored, beyond complaining to the social media firm involved.”
    Oh goody! A legal ‘possibility’.
    How very civil of them. One wonders why this was not baked into the law in the first place. So, maybe they will add a provision that will ‘allow’ you to grovel before a committee or tribunal of some kind so you can ‘prove’ your innocence.
    As far as I can tell, both the current German law and the proposed French law would hold any internet platform that hosts any sort of content liable for complaints from within their own countries without respect to the nation of origin of the platform or the nationality of the poster of the alleged objectionable content.
    One final interesting tidbit for now – “The European Commission keeps under lock and key documents on the Network Enforcement Act which examine the compatibility of the law with EU law with regard to the European Convention on Human Rights and the European legal requirements in the area of “Information Society Services” (e-commerce directive). An inquiry by the business magazine Wirtschaftswoche was rejected, stating that “the publication of the documents… would affect the climate of mutual trust between the member state and the Commission”. According to a regulation issued in 2001, the EU Commission is obliged to make internal documents available on request. Wirtschaftswoche writes: “This confirms the suspicion that the law violates EU law, but Brussels does not want to offend Germany”.
    EU Justice Commissioner Věra Jourová has also criticised the Network Enforcement Act as a source of annoyance to the German government.”
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netzwerkdurchsetzungsgesetz
    More after this Tuesday’s vote in France.

    Like

  28. Scott O Avatar

    BT – Great video until the end. We’re supposed to ‘take back’ our rights with group hugs? Good luck with that.
    The fact that there are people in positions of power in govt and the news media that allow or even encourage violence by the left to shut down speech they don’t like was completely ignored. An ‘A’ for effort but an ‘F’ for lack of a realistic solution.

    Like

  29. Bill Tozer Avatar
    Bill Tozer

    Scott O. @2:55 pm
    Agreed. Taking back our rights is a topic for another day.
    I just liked the parts about the LBGTQ leader getting in hot water for using the term ‘homophobe” in Europe, the pro-Palestine students getting axed for targeting a single group of people (Jews), and the ACLU speaker who got run off campus because her group’s history of defending neo-Nazis. I assume the Nazi coddler meltdown was in reference the ACLU defending the right of neo-Nazis in Skokie, Illinois in 1978, home to many Holocaust survivors…or Charlottesville. Too funny, yet very sad. And troublesome, to put it kindly.
    But, this is now, that was then. The times they are a’changing.
    “For decades, the ACLU has defended the speech rights of far-right groups like neo-Nazis and the Ku Klux Klan on the principle that if those groups’ rights are not upheld, the government will try to restrict the free-speech rights of other groups as well..
    “In response to the deadly violence at a rally in Charlottesville, Va., last weekend, the ACLU’s three California affiliates released a statement Wednesday declaring that “white supremacist violence is not free speech.”
    “But some emerging factions of the left do not share the ACLU’s values on free speech and assembly. Surveys have shown that young people are more likely than older Americans to support a government ban on hate speech, which is constitutionally protected.
    “Though his (Milo’s) ability to speak is protected by the 1st Amendment, I don’t believe in protecting principle for the sake of principle in all cases,” wrote Chase Strangio, who stressed he was speaking in a private capacity. “His actions have consequences for people that I care about and for me.”
    https://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-aclu-tensions-20170817-story.html
    ——
    Time to buy some Betsy Ross flags and tee shirts
    “But here’s the thing: When evil people acquire symbols for their own ends, the only guarantee of success is when everyone else validates the acquisition.
    “If Nike had gone ahead with the special-edition sneakers, it would have been, in marketing terms, the equivalent of Godzilla versus Bambi. A few neo-Nazis and a few more social-justice warriors would have complained, and everyone else would have gone about their day totally unconcerned.
    “Instead, Nike followed the advice of a man whose business model is to stir grievance and controversy for its own sake. Suddenly, millions of people who once thought the Betsy Ross flag was just an admirable bit of Americana now associate it with hate groups. Worse, other entirely decent and patriotic Americans will now likely start brandishing the flag to offend people who, until recently, had no idea some hate groups adopted the flag in the first place.
    “The ranks of the perpetually offended will misread this trolling-to-own-the-libs effort as an endorsement of hate speech, and the culture war will have yet another idiotic fight on its hands, and a symbol of the country’s founding that should be a uniting image for all Americans will now be reduced to a weapon in that war..
    https://www.nationalreview.com/2019/07/nike-betsy-ross-sneakers-colin-kaepernick-culture-war/
    Happy 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th, 8th, 9th if you can

    Like

  30. keith Avatar
    keith

    Robert Cross @ 7:00 PM
    A little rain, which washes away all the mud, crap, lies and garbage that you and your ilk continually toss out. Just a cleansing by mother nature.

    Like

  31. Scott O Avatar

    The proposed French govt internet censorship law passed the lower house on Tuesday and has been referred to the upper house.
    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/french-lower-parliament-passes-online-hate-speech-law/ar-AAE5arU

    Like

Leave a comment