Rebane's Ruminations
February 2018
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728  

ARCHIVES


OUR LINKS


YubaNet
White House Blog
Watts Up With That?
The Union
Sierra Thread
RL “Bob” Crabb
Barry Pruett Blog

[Don Bessee is a leading opponent of bringing legalized marijuana into Nevada County and specifically into its residential communities.  He is the regional director of Smart Approaches to Marijuana (SAM), and sits on its board.  Project SAM, founded by congressmen Patrick Kennedy and Kevin Sibet, is a national, non-partisan organization that coordinates opposition to the legalization of marijuana.  Recently Mr Bessee sat on Nevada County’s Community Advisory Group (CAG) that was formed by the county to advise its Board of Supervisors on the adoption of a new marijuana ordinance.  This is an invited byline to allow Mr Bessee (pictured below) to openly express his views after CAG was disbanded.  It is posted as received.  gjr]

Don Bessee

DonBesseeWe have been having a long conversation about commercial marijuana’s impacts on communities and neighborhoods.  During the prop 64 lead up and campaign there were some very interesting conversations and warnings.

I set up a press conference in late oct. 2016 in the heart of the financial district in SF where SAM stood with leaders of the medical marijuana community. We were there to put a spotlight on the tricks in prop 64.  That brought a very diverse group together to voice an area of significant agreement.  All of us there took heat for it.

We warned that the supermajority clause made the rest meaningless and that SAM’s long warned Big Tabaco 2.0 would come to Cali. So did UCSF addiction researchers.  We were right. We were right on so many levels.

I warned of the law enforcement street view from states that went commercial medical and commercial party pot before us. The urban and small town homeless magnet issues in CO. The quality of life crime increases and public drug use. Then there was the wanton abuse of the hard rules. As time went on the tax money got gobbled up by administration of the commercial track and tax system. A system that did nothing to decrease the black market. It only empowered it. Take for example the hide in plain sight criminal gang activity where they set up pot shops without licenses. It’s a whack a mole without any real enforcement ability, just like LA now.

We were promised by Newsom et al.  that all the problems would go away when we legalized.

It has been very interesting to watch all the moves since the passage of 64 in Nov. 2016, very interesting.

Let’s look at the facts on the ground right now. As it sits there are all of 17 Counties that are commercial. 1 allows deliveries. That means that all the other  Counties are not commercial. Yes, the vast majority of Cali is non-commercial.

The reality on the ground across the state of California it that things are not better on any level, they are worse and getting worse.

It was gratifying that the head of the State pot growers sued the state recently for doing exactly what we warned about. It is said that imitation is the sincerest form of flattery, if that’s the case, thanks Hez.

According to Hezekiah Allen, executive director of the California Growers Association, which filed the suit in Sacramento County Superior Court, the farm-size caps are essential to stop the industry from becoming β€œBig Tobacco 2.0”

Last week I was at another press conference in SF. I was standing shoulder to shoulder with the Catholic Archdiocese of SF, the head of the Congress On Racial Equality (CORE) and The Pacific Justice Foundation among others. The event was held in a very special location.

We were in the magnificent Chinese Episcopal Church on Noriega in SF. A Church that has a full day care and all day long bi-lingual tutoring. The planning commission in SF had made the egregious decision to allow a pot shop across the street in violation of prop 64.  The worst part is it was a politically connected former mayor of Oakland that got the ok. The righteous uproar forced even the SF Board of Supervisors to grant the appeal to protect the neighborhood. A neighborhood of color.

The facts are that most liquor stores and pot shops are in neighborhoods of color.

I spoke about the facts in NorCal.

We have had elected officials in Truckee threatened when the community wisely rejected commercial weed.

Nevada County has too many stories of abused neighborhoods like Wolf Dr.   Do any of you feel safer in your neighborhood? I hear NO in a big way every day.

The audit of the commercial pot shops in Sac. City showed they were selling black market weed, lying, cheating and even refusing entry to auditors even though the license required it. On Kathleen Ave in Sac the city is not protecting homeowners who are getting harassed for opposing a license applicant who is running without a license.

We were promised that things would get better, have they for your neighborhood?

What I hear from people who failed in other states in the weed business and locals who have no idea about what real world business plans are is that we MUST make what they want to do legal here everywhere.  Do we really? I think we need to see an enforcement model in CA that works first.

Posted in , ,

84 responses to “Why should the neighborhoods suffer revisited?”

  1. Jaye Smith Avatar

    With the Bost Ave. processing plant, the dispensary on the South Yuba Club site and (I think) the purchase of the main So Yuba Club building for something MJ related, Nevada City has its very own MJ business incubator complex.

    Like

  2. Mary Wanna Avatar

    Monica Senter wrote a good MJ related piece in yesterday’s TheUnion.com.
    Good to know we have some voices of reason to counter the fear-based hyperbole being tossed around by a few.
    http://bit.ly/2Ciplwr

    Like

  3. George Rebane Avatar

    MaryW 736am – Ms Senter did indeed write good MJ piece in the 13feb18 Union. In a calm reasoned voice she laid out the facts that –
    1. MJ grows have been a neighborhood nuisance problem.
    2. Additional MJ grows still are and will continue to be a problem.
    3. There is no known or accepted solutions to residential MJ grow problems.
    4. There is no guarantee that MJ regulations and local jurisdiction ordinances will either solve MJ nuisance problems or significantly reduce the illegal production and distribution of MJ.
    And today at the Rood Center we will hear what our county Supes have learned from the recent CAG, and how they will advise staff to draft our new MJ ordinance.

    Like

  4. jon smith Avatar
    jon smith

    Agreed. It is refreshing to have people like Monica who can communicate in an emotion free, factual basis. She is what the CAG was shopping for, not the razor bearded “just say no” pontificators or “weed for everyone, all the time, everywhere” folks. Solid information with a large and honest dose of, “We don’t pretend to have all answers, and there are no universal solutions.” Thank you.

    Like

  5. Mary Wanna Avatar

    Dogs off leashes have been a neighborhood nuisance problem.
    Additional dogs off leashes still are and will continue to be a problem.
    There is no known or accepted solutions to residential dogs off leashes problems.
    There is no guarantee that dog leash regulations and local jurisdiction ordinances will either solve dogs off leashes nuisance problems or significantly reduce the the number of dogs off leashes.

    Like

  6. George Rebane Avatar

    MaryW 1051am – Excellent revelatory reply Ms Wanna. And pray, how in your mind does your pithy example relate in scope or magnitude to the problem of nationally legalizing MJ with which CA and the several states today are wrestling?

    Like

  7. Bill Tozer Avatar

    Mary
    Hit them in the pocket book. Second offense for an unleashed potentially dangerous dog is 500 smackers. And if you walk them, they must be muzzled and on a leash no longer than 6 feet in length. And that is just for killing chickens or kittens. 3 rd offense is a thousand dollar fine and LE getting a court order to kill the dog. Now, that is how you solve the problem of potentially dangerous dogs running amok…er…unleashed. Fine that crap out of Mrs. Jones for having 7 plants, not 6. 3 strikes and off to the marble orchard.

    Like

  8. Paul Emery Avatar
    Paul Emery

    George
    Can I assume that you defer to States Rights when it comes to conflicts with MJ laws and regulations?

    Like

  9. Gregory Avatar
    Gregory

    Paul 1250
    Can I assume you don’t have a rational basis for your 1250?
    I expect people who don’t think mota is a good thing to use statutes and regulations to make it as difficult as possible to grow, buy, and smoke in California despite a vote in a statewide election. Don’t you?

    Like

  10. Walt Avatar

    Wrong Mary. There is solutions to that dog problem. As a former rancher, any dog molesting livestock died of lead poisoning.
    In your case, call the dog catcher That’s his elected job.
    Your pretty good at bitching here, so use that talent around your own neighborhood.
    The dope house near by made all sorts or racket in the dead of night. So the next day, the gun range in my backyard was open for business all afternoon. They got the message.

    Like

  11. Walt Avatar

    Back on that kick Paul? FEDS trump state’s rights. I know how you like to pick and choose. Right now “local control”( which you spoke so highly of) ain’t working in your favor at the moment. Now you want the state to wack the county’s peepee?
    Never mind the state hates the Bill of Rights as it is. Look no further than the 2ND Amendment. The state hates the interstate commerce clause. ” we don’t like coal. No coal exports form “our” ports.
    So when Calexit happens, we can help you pack.

    Like

  12. Gregory Avatar
    Gregory

    Walt… Feds trump State when they have the power and authority under the Constitution.
    I am quite sure the ICC does trump California’s right to stop coal from flowing from sea towards inland states or vice versa, but the religion of Climate Change leads many to decide stopping the ‘trains of death’ is the right thing to do. I say tough.
    But with pot, how can the Feds decide that some stoner growing pot in NSJ and it being smoked by some stoner in Chico has anything to do with interstate commerce? The only argument I’ve heard are a variation on if you’re stoned all the time you won’t work and make all of us wealthier… but do you have a right to someone else’s time and productivity? If you say no, then you must agree with me that it goes both ways and that would mean the stoners don’t have a right to expect health care because you are eating, breathing and prefer being stoned to being fed, clothed and medicated by drugs that don’t just grow in the ground. Recombinant DNA cures aren’t cheap, nor is the decades of education that must occur before the brainstorms.
    But at least one incredible breakthrough was a result of a scientist thinking about his problem du jour tripping on LSD. Should that be illegal?
    There are no easy answers.

    Like

  13. Bill Tozer Avatar

    ICC
    The Supreme Court has since relied heavily on Filburn in upholding the power of the federal government to prosecute individuals who grow their own medicinal marijuana pursuant to state law. The Supreme Court subsequently held that, as with the home-grown wheat at issue in the present case, home-grown marijuana is a legitimate subject of federal regulation because it competes with marijuana that moves in interstate commerce. As the Court explained in Gonzales v. Raich (2005):
    Wickard thus establishes that Congress can regulate purely intrastate activity that is not itself “commercial”, in that it is not produced for sale, if it concludes that failure to regulate that class of activity would undercut the regulation of the interstate market in that commodity.
    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wickard_v._Filburn

    Like

  14. Paul Emery Avatar
    Paul Emery

    What is your view Walt? Do you personally support the Feds in this matter?

    Like

  15. Walt Avatar

    The point I was trying to make was that The state and choice LIBS are playing the “state’s rights” card on just about everything. From guns to drugs to what goes through shipping ports. SCREW the FEDs.
    HELL! This state thinks it’s entitled to grant money.” You can’t cut off our welfare!”
    I’m sure there is some wise ass out there that would make the argument that if “the state”, passed a law making killing someone A OK if the bastard desperately needed kill’n. “The FEDS can’t tough ME! State’s rights”.”

    Like

  16. Paul Emery Avatar
    Paul Emery

    Lying Walt wrote this “Now you want the state to wack the county’s peepee”
    Can you show our readers where I said that? A direct quote from this blog will do.

    Like

  17. Paul Emery Avatar
    Paul Emery

    Don

    Jeff Sessions’ marijuana decision may not have immediate impacts in Colorado, but it has set off a political firestorm
    Cory Gardner, Mike Coffman accuse Trump administration of overstepping into state’s rights”
    If illegal pot is such a bad thing in Colorado how do you explain the uproar by even republicans over Sessions moves to enforce federal law. Republican Senator Cory Gardner writes:
    β€œBefore I voted to confirm Attorney General Sessions, he assured me that marijuana would not be a priority for this administration,” Gardner said in a statement. β€œToday’s action directly contradicts what I was told, and I am prepared to take all steps necessary, including holding (Justice Department) nominees, until the attorney general lives up to the commitment he made to me prior to his confirmation.”
    https://www.denverpost.com/2018/01/04/jeff-sessions-marijuana-colorado-firestorm/

    Like

  18. fish Avatar
    fish

    Posted by: Walt | 13 February 2018 at 02:33 PM
    Remember Walt…..anybody who is in favor of States Rights is a racist who wants to bring back segregation and eventually slavery.
    I’m just glad Paul has finally admitted that this is his goal.

    Like

  19. Paul Emery Avatar
    Paul Emery

    Fish
    what is your view on States Rights and the question of marijuana both recreational and medical.

    Like

  20. Bill Tozer Avatar

    Punchy,
    It’s not a matter of what or how someone β€œpersonally feels.” It’s a matter of what the Supreme Court says. Commerence clause and all that. Growing wheat to feed your cows? That’s a Bozo No-no.
    It’s that Jeff Rasict Sessions up to his lying ways that gets you sweating bullets….again. The fly in the ointment, the hitch in the plan, your Matrix is not perfect. Obama did not declassify the houchy houchy flowers and leaves as a Class 1 drug and neither will that anti-dope smoker Sessions. Sweet dreamies, butterfly kisses, and keep looking over your shoulder.
    Play it again, Sam. β€œParanoia runs deep, into your life it will creep, it starts when you are always afraid….step out of line and The Man comes and takes you away.”
    Oh, the best laid plans of mice and man.

    Like

  21. fish Avatar
    fish

    Posted by: Paul Emery | 13 February 2018 at 06:17 PM
    Now Punch….you of all people know that I refuse to engage in your Matlock bit. Where you clumsily employ a series of vague, open ended questions in an attempt to get the questionee to make a mistake that allows to to pounce and make some bold, self satisfied exclamation like…..ARE YOU TRYING TO SAY..or…IS IT REALLY YOUR POSITION….etc.
    The fact remains that the left has long used “States Rights” as a code word for crypto-racist thought. Your former colleague (and convicted sex offender) Bernie Ward of KGO fame was famous for this accusation. Somehow I find myself believing that you would find yourself in substantial agreement with Mr. Ward on most matters states rights related.

    Like

  22. Paul Emery Avatar
    Paul Emery

    I thought you were a Conservative Fish. Sure got that wrong.

    Like

  23. Paul Emery Avatar
    Paul Emery

    Don’t know Bernie Ward Fish. Must be a friend of yours.

    Like

  24. Paul Emery Avatar
    Paul Emery

    Bill, what is your view about States Rights in this matter? what side are you on?

    Like

  25. Walt Avatar

    Paul It’s your position that the state needs to come marching in and set the county right (and GV too) that dope growing and sales is legal? Fines and penalties!,, Right? When local control isn’t going as you planed. Correct?
    Ca. is still part of the Union.. Correct? The state signed an agreement to become part of the Union.. Correct? In that agreement the people of the state (every damned one..)are to follow all the FED laws. Correct?
    Now go and dig up all the “rights” the State DIDN’T secede to the Union.
    Show me MJ as part of that… Dare you.
    So if the FEDS care to march through the county on a scorched earth policy to rid the place of every dope grow, they can.(not that they actually will)

    Like

  26. fish Avatar
    fish

    Posted by: Paul Emery | 13 February 2018 at 06:46 PM
    I thought you were a Conservative Fish. Sure got that wrong.

    Unsurprisingly Punch you absolutely did get that wrong.
    You conceded the libertarian nature of my position on the marijuana issue a year or so ago here at Rebanes. Further I am absent from the weed discussions at RR’s because I have no real position on the matter and imagine that in a couple of years most of the details will have sorted themselves out and this unpleasantness will be behind us.

    Like

  27. Bill Tozer Avatar

    @ 6:31pm.
    Now Punch….you of all people know that I refuse to engage in your Matlock bit. Where you clumsily employ a series of vague, open ended questions in an attempt to get the questionee to make a mistake that allows to to pounce and make some bold, self satisfied exclamation like…..ARE YOU TRYING TO SAY..or…IS IT REALLY YOUR POSITION….etc.
    https://www.facebook.com/lastamericapatriots/photos/a.235087906641439.1073741826.235086849974878/998029060347316/?type=3&theater

    Like

  28. fish Avatar
    fish

    Posted by: Paul Emery | 13 February 2018 at 06:46 PM
    Don’t know Bernie Ward Fish. Must be a friend of yours.

    I find this mildly amusing from someone in radio. You are either lying or more likely simply forgotten a major player on the progressive side of talk radio.
    Might be time to hang up those cans Punch!

    Like

  29. Bill Tozer Avatar

    Paul,
    I am on the side of law and order. I may or may not like SCOTUS ruling, but after either bitchin’ about a decision or popping champagne corks, I come around to acceptance of the Constitutional rule of law.
    Do you want to talk about your pain? Can I assume you need to talk about your pain,
    Why should neighborhoods suffer?
    https://www.facebook.com/RowdyConservatives/photos/a.217983685002343.55586.217926015008110/1257062061094495/?type=3&theater
    Yep, I stand on the side of the law.

    Like

  30. Walt Avatar

    Why should we all suffer?????
    https://www.theunion.com/news/nid-fears-pot-grows-could-make-water-conservation-more-challenging/ Since some don’t read links,,,Paul,,,
    “The Nevada Irrigation District on Tuesday said it may have to re-work its master plan, which projects NID’s water needs until 2023, to account for water usage associated with legal marijuana grows.
    Because California’s new cannabis regulations allow for the cultivation of up to six plants indoors, NID customers not associated with agricultural water use could potentially be using additional water, the district said.
    NID, which follows conservation mandates levied by the state, also said Tuesday it fears a potential uptick in cannabis cultivation could pose challenges in meeting California’s requirements.”
    Naaa we don’t need anymore dams. Canyons choked with overgrowth and a wildfire waiting to happen,, is considered “pretty”.

    Like

  31. Don Bessee Avatar
    Don Bessee

    This kinda tells the story but leaves out some significant issues like ceqa/water that the Supervisors discussed as a limiting factor to how commercial many grows there can be.
    https://www.theunion.com/news/local-news/nevada-county-staff-now-prepped-to-write-draft-marijuana-ordinance/
    πŸ˜‰

    Like

  32. Don Bessee Avatar
    Don Bessee

    DOH! many commercial grows there can be. πŸ˜‰

    Like

  33. Don Bessee Avatar
    Don Bessee

    Here is the actual report Walt @736-
    http://nidwater.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/021318_WHO_Item3.pdf
    πŸ˜‰

    Like

Leave a comment