Rebane's Ruminations
August 2017
S M T W T F S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

ARCHIVES


OUR LINKS


YubaNet
White House Blog
Watts Up With That?
The Union
Sierra Thread
RL “Bob” Crabb
Barry Pruett Blog

George Rebane

A most puzzling question – why is Putin acting as if Russia’s chances for achieving its national interests under the present US-led world order are worse than under an unknown world order that will arise when/if Putin, Islam, and the American Left successfully upsets US leadership?

Absent any believable and propitious policy initiatives from the Democrats, the Left is reduced to its historical MO of pandering to people who don’t have the intellectual tools to understand or evaluate what they are told.  The current diversionary full-court press in the lamestream media appears to be a political redoubt into which they have retreated, to then do what??  Emerge with some new killer program of initiatives that will sweep all opposition from the public mind?  Or just hunker down and continue lobbing politically correct ‘bombshells’, hoping one of them will finally derail Team Trump, or in the interval see the Republicans splinter and eat their own?

Look for Google to go into corporatist hyper-drive in the coming years.  The left-leaning company has now become so politically correct with its internal policies – especially with regard to race, gender, and ideology – and office milieu that an unnamed male software engineer has written an extended sober critique of the situation for his colleagues which has gone viral (here)  The Left, of course, is outraged and its newly hired VP of Diversity discombobulated by the unauthorized and freewheeling discussions/debate the memo has launched.  And here is a better measure of the depth of this disease; this is the response from one of the software engineer’s bosses who “wrote the memo ‘troubled me deeply’ because it suggested ‘most women, or men, feel or act a certain way. That is stereotyping, and it is harmful.’” (yes; you really can’t make this up)

But what it all reveals about Google is most interesting.  When companies manage to achieve this stage of entangled undies, their competitive performance inevitably suffers and future fortunes must be bought and paid for through and to appropriate government contacts.  It was ever thus.

[8aug17 update]  Well I’ll be a sumbich, Google fired Mr James Damore, the software engineer who wrote the memo.  And the reason?  Wrongthink.  Yes, boys and girls, our society has now undeniably arrived on the outskirts of the Orwellian world in which you can be proscribed and punished for revealing that you are thinking ‘wrong thoughts’.  (more here)

But here’s the important point yet to be raised in the debate on this action by one of the world’s largest and most influential corporations.  If a private corporation restricts its employee policy to work related functions that support its commercial objectives, then one can argue that employees should restrict their workplace behaviors to the business at hand, and not use the work hours and venue to proselytize their thoughts on other topics.  However, if the corporation itself addends to its employee policy and proselytizes in the workplace such things as ideology-driven social engineering desiderata, then it should be the commensurate ‘right’ of every employee to express their own ideas about said desiderata in the workplace.  And if that means pushing back on the corporation’s extra-commercial messaging, then so be it, the corporation has no grounds for dunning the employee for equally sharing their thoughts as long as such activity does not subtract from the employee’s productivity.  After all, the purpose of the corporation was to make a profit selling its goods/services, and not to act as an adjunct ideological re-education center for its workers.  (The 8aug17 WSJ dances around this topic here, but doesn’t quite connect the dots.)

However, that clearly is not the case today where diversity VPs also wear the hat of corporate thought police, and can severely punish workers who dare voice opinions and ideas that are counter to the corporation’s politically correct lines of thought.  Welcome to the early onset of 2084.

[9aug17 update]  More on the joys of Obamacare, Rasmussen reports that 6.5 million Americans paid their fine rather than sign up for that latest progressive-promoted paragon of social engineering – a fact studiously ignored by the lamestream and leftwingers everywhere. (more here)

Posted in , ,

54 responses to “Scattershots – 7aug17 (updated 9aug17)”

  1. Bill Tozer Avatar
    Bill Tozer

    RE: Google update
    “It is not clear who is behind the ads, but the content echoes defenses of the memo’s author, James Damore, who was swiftly fired from Google after the memo was made public. His firing has since become a lightening rod for the alt-right, a relatively new offshoot of conservatism that includes pundits and media personalities who espouse white supremacism, conspiracy theories like Pizzagate, and are savvy about using social networks to reach followers.”
    Media personalities who espouse white supremacism….???? What the hay. From the USA Today no less. Yep, we have reached the point of no return in journalism. And they call the us Flat Earthers. Go figure.
    https://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/2017/08/11/anti-google-ads-appear-outside-google-offices-response-controversial-memo/559603001/

    Like

  2. George Rebane Avatar

    Readers might be interested in James Damore’s response to his dismissal from Google in today’s (12aug17) WSJ – a considered piece, well written.
    https://www.wsj.com/articles/why-i-was-fired-by-google-1502481290

    Like

  3. ScenesFromTheApocalypse Avatar
    ScenesFromTheApocalypse

    re: BillT several days ago:
    “Marxism does not allow for any nuances or differentiations among the sheep who make up the working class. The working class is the working class, never more, never less, comprised of zero unique attributes amidst its tribal members.. When the workers failed to overthrow the factory owners, the Libs came up with a new form of the oppressed workers; thus today we have Identity Politics.”
    That actually happened some time ago. I’m no expert at this (it would take a lot of study to be), but once the rubber hit the road, Marxists took on the idea of tribalism as a tool on the way to a finished, non-tribal, work of government. Engels wrote about “enduring national characteristics”. I’ve heard it referred to as ‘strategic Marxism’, which I believe implies the use of national forces on the way to a world of classical Marxism.
    There ain’t nothin’ new in this world.

    Like

Leave a comment