Rebane's Ruminations
April 2017
S M T W T F S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30  

ARCHIVES


OUR LINKS


YubaNet
White House Blog
Watts Up With That?
The Union
Sierra Thread
RL “Bob” Crabb
Barry Pruett Blog

George Rebane

Hallelujah!  Judge Neil Gorsuch was confirmed by the Senate and will now fill the ‘Scalia seat’ on SCOTUS.  This brilliant constitutional jurist is just what the country needs to slow our headlong rush to socialism, and assure us all that the high court will fulfill its constitutional role without encroaching on Congress or acting in its silence as an extension of the Executive.

The ‘Nuclear Option’ used to confirm Judge Gorsuch does not spell the end of federal governance as we know it, no matter the gnashing of teeth and rending of garment by the Dems.  After all, it was they who came up with that little piece of weaponry in the legislative arsenal.  We are also reminded that the Senate’s 60-vote cloture rule did not come down from Sinai, nor is it ensconced in the Constitution.  Our senators can pretty much do what they like when they cobble together or mend the rules which guide their proceedings.  But having gone nuclear should now make elections and party control of Congress much more interesting, important, and volatile.

Tomahawks over Syria, about time.  Without parsing the exact see-saws of Trump’s or even Washington’s wisdom about escalating the conflict in that part of the Middle (actually Near) East, it is good on its own that the US again showed the willingness to use its tooth and claw.  No matter whether/how the bombardment of Assad’s Syria continues, it is important for bad actors from Putin, through Iran’s mullahs, to the fat kid in North Korea to see that there’s a new order and resolve in Washington.  And the constant carping about ‘consistency’ by our Dems be damned.  Under Obama the world came to know us as consistently lame; now a little sampler of inconsistency should make people appropriately apprehensive about how this man will play the hand he was dealt.

[8apr17 update]  ‘Where Non-Techies Can Get With the Programming’ reports on the growing popularity of computer programming courses across the nation.  These courses range from the introductory/survey type all the way to multi-month programs that pump out certificated coders who are ready to earn a living in industry.  Almost all universities now have programming courses for their non-STEM majors, and for-profit training factories charge in the tens of thousands to make a programmer out of you in three to six months.

The importance of algorithms and the ability to algorize has finally been recognized by our non-techie business and (gasp!) humanities communities as a pre-requisite for critical or systems thinking.  This gospel has been preached here for years, and now it has bubbled up to the level where even folks at the NYT appreciate how algorizing is actually a fundamental skill that is also the foundational common denominator of creativity (more here).  Everyone who learns to code becomes an algorist, and can eventually learn to think thoughts denied to mere mortals (cf. Sapir-Whorf and all that).  For those heading for STEM careers, computer programming is a natural gateway to the systems sciences the tools of which many of us have come to know open up more than a lucrative livelihood for their practitioners. Here is something I wrote years ago as a short intro to algorithmics at a time when using the word algorithm was beyond the communal ken and thought to be only obscure jargon and propeller-head talk.  The times they are a’changin’.

[10apr17 update] Regarding this morning’s shootings at a San Bernardino elementary school about which we at this time know very little, but which is again raising all the gun control questions in the minds of our left-leaning neighbors.  A commenter below asks for my “pragmatic approach to the 2nd Amendment” in view of this latest tragedy, and the question deserves a more considered answer.  For the present let me just reiterate that the 2nd Amendment is not about duck hunting, and that the right of a large free peoples – now sheltering under a gossamer social contract while sharing fewer cultural assets than ever – to possess firearms does not come without a palpable price.  And that price should be viewed as calmly and reasonably as possible when from time-to-time it must be paid.  For recent readers and those who may have forgotten, my past scribblings – philosophical, pragmatic, and practical – on the private ownership of guns can be reviewed here, here, here, here, and here.

[11apr17 update]  In days of yore when a store had to order some out of stock item for you, the typical wait was usually somewhere between 2-4 weeks.  And we were OK with that.  Today, it’s a given that an online order will arrive tomorrow or the next day; and from a brick and mortar outlet the pressure is to replicate that service or the customer will go elsewhere.  Now that Amazon has set the new standard, there have sprung up dozens of new shipping companies to serve the small retailers desperate to compete.  And the new paradigm is that these shipping companies are offering inventory stocking warehouses to which retailers can have their suppliers deliver the designated SKUs for rapid fulfillment. (more here)  Ever wonder if UPS and FedEx missed the march by not expanding their package shipping/distribution centers to also offer inventory stocking services?  Big online retailers like Amazon are not shy in also entering the shipping business.  Changing times.

[13apr17 update] Softballing the opioid epidemic.  Fox News’ decline as a hard-hitting right-oriented network proceeds apace.  They now want to enlarge their audience from the sea of double dummies.  Covering the opioid epidemic which is reported to kill 91 Americans per day, FN goes into hyper-anecdotal mode reporting on the tragic death of a good looking 20-something young man by sticking a mike into the faces of his bereaved parents.  Opioids have a tremendous salutary effect as a prescribed pain killer that is used properly by millions of Americans.  We can only put the ‘epidemic’ in perspective if given the ratio of opioid abusers (including gateways to heroin) to those consuming it properly to alleviate pain.  But that stat is considered a yawn by the likes of FN.  We already know how to do such tradeoffs for societal benefit.  Traffic accidents also kill about 90 people a day, yet no one is proposing to curb the use of vehicular traffic in the US. Somehow those deaths are worth the price for the benefit we derive from a facile, low cost transportation system.

Posted in , , ,

110 responses to “Ruminations – 7apr17 (updated 13apr17)”

  1. fish Avatar
    fish

    Posted by: Paul Emery | 10 April 2017 at 05:03 PM
    Interesting! Feel that way about the rest of the Bill of Rights?

    No comment?

    Like

  2. Paul Emery Avatar
    Paul Emery

    Not really Fish. Just talking about these two issues right now.

    Like

  3. George Rebane Avatar

    PaulE 428pm – “I believe the right to bear arms is contingent on strict training, evaluation and regular renewal. Might stop a few of the crazies with guns.” In fact, it is not. But you and others are imposing those additional restrictions. More important is your the restatement of a liberal’s values on bearing arms – you’re willing to constructively remove the 2nd amendment to see if it “might stop a few crazies with guns.” On the price question I raised you are, of course, silent.

    Like

  4. Steve Frisch Avatar
    Steve Frisch

    Hmm…lets see, Don is [was?] the Director of SAM; SAM is a campaign finance violator….enough said.
    http://www.latimes.com/politics/essential/la-pol-ca-essential-politics-updates-national-anti-pot-group-faces-fines-for-1491849434-htmlstory.html

    Like

  5. Walt Avatar

    Nice try Paul. People still drive drunk. Dope will still be sold without paying the soon to be taxes. Felons will still acquire guns. Take the car away from a drunk driver, he or she will find another one. But bitch about guns. BTW… How many gun laws are on the books?
    OH Yaa.. Ca. reduced the penaltys for gun crimes. Imagine that.

    Like

  6. Walt Avatar

    Pardon me. I have yet to hear Paul throw a hissy fit about bars with parking lots.
    A car becomes a cruse missile with a messed up guidance system. Guns are just easier to complain about.

    Like

  7. Don Bessee Avatar
    Don Bessee

    Yes sf, still SAM I am. Being exec director is not the same as head of or officer of the fppc campaign committee. 😉

    Like

  8. Paul Emery Avatar
    Paul Emery

    George
    We are not likely to break new ground in discussing our divergent values concern the 2nd Amendment. I’m still interested in your view of the Presidents ability to engage in an act of war against a sovereign state without congressional approval. What is the defination of your pragmatic view on this matter that in your view gives Trump the right to bomb the Syrian military without Congressional approval? Could he continue bombing just because he wants to?

    Like

  9. Walt Avatar

    Keep whipping that dead horse Paul. I gave you proof that “O” did it without a gripe.
    As they say, what’s good for one. Besides. ” News reports quoted U.S. officials as saying Trump had the right to use force to defend national interests and to protect civilians from atrocities.”
    http://www.politifact.com/wisconsin/statements/2017/apr/07/mark-pocan/mark-pocan-wrongly-claims-donald-trump-had-no-lega/
    Now remember. this is NOT a deceleration of war. That requires approval. As a news man you should know where to find that.

    Like

  10. Paul Emery Avatar
    Paul Emery

    I would think Walt that bombing the airfield of a sovereign nation would be an act of war and would need congressional approval.

    Like

  11. Bill Tozer Avatar
    Bill Tozer

    Well, only the US Congress can declare war. But Congress would rather let someone else (like a POTUS) do the tough calls for awhile now. Congress was been ducking their duties for too long, IMHO.
    With that said, there are 150 incidences where former Presidents have done exactly the same thing as Trump and no violation of the law. Now, if the Prez is going to send our men and women in uniform to some foreign shore and the operation will take some time, then that be War as war has been interpreted.
    Protocol calls for POTUS to inform Congress of his intentions and see if it was a one off, a reasonable courtesy after the strike. Loose lips and all that stuff requires secrecy before the strike. Found it odd that My Gal Hillary called for bombing their airfields hours before the Tomahawks became airborne. Figured somebody tipped her off, or it could have been one heck of a coincidence. Go figure. She is still getting bad Intel though. You don’t use Tomahawks to destroy airfields. Ain’t designed for that. Geeze Louise.

    Like

  12. George Rebane Avatar

    PaulE 825pm – My view on war declarations will greet you in the morning.
    SteveF 641pm – Perhaps you missed it, but this kind of comment belongs in a sandbox somewhere. Todd Juvinall has one up and running on his blog. Please continue this thread there or elsewhere.

    Like

  13. Bill Tozer Avatar
    Bill Tozer

    As far as the Apr 10 Update goes, all I can say is The Matrix is not perfect…..but it is irrevocable. Preceeds government. It’s a cultural thang…goes way back. Now government, back I say, back. Down greedy dog, down!. Sit.

    Like

  14. Gregory Avatar
    Gregory

    Paul Emery 428
    “I believe the right to vote is contingent on strict education, literacy testing and regular renewal fees”.
    Yes, I changed that just a bit… but how is that different? Voting is a right, owning and carrying guns is a right. In fact, it’s a whole lot easier to learn everything you really need to know about guns… always assume it’s loaded, and don’t point it at anything living unless there’s a good and ethical reason you might need it to stop living and you are willing to go to prison or worse if a jury of your peers disagree.
    See? It’s all very simple.
    How did that song by Tom Lehrer go? “Poll tax, how I love ya, how I love ya, my dear old poll tax”. And of course, that dicta in the majority opinion in the worst SCOTUS ruling in our history, Dred Scott v Sanford:

    For if they were so received, and entitled to the privileges and immunities of citizens, it would exempt them from the operation of the special laws and from the police [60 U.S. 393, 417] regulations which they considered to be necessary for their own safety. It would give to persons of the negro race, who were recognised as citizens in any one State of the Union, the right to enter every other State whenever they pleased, singly or in companies, without pass or passport, and without obstruction, to sojourn there as long as they pleased, to go where they pleased at every hour of the day or night without molestation, unless they committed some violation of law for which a white man would be punished; and it would give them the full liberty of speech in public and in private upon all subjects upon which its own citizens might speak; to hold public meetings upon political affairs, and to keep and carry arms wherever they went.

    Gorsuch is sitting in the Scalia chair; maybe the chair stolen from Bork being warmed by Kennedy will be next…

    Like

  15. fish Avatar
    fish

    Hmmm…..not a soul upset about Aerojet punching out? Then there shouldn’t be any issue at all with this…..

    Kubota Tractor Moves Headquarters To Texas From California.

    http://www.weaselzippers.us/333396-kubota-tractor-moves-headquarters-to-texas-from-california/

    Like

  16. fish Avatar
    fish

    Yes Paul….more training would have helped matters immeasurably!

    Teacher, boy die when husband opens fire in California class

    Extra special bonus points for the “No Trespassing” and “No Firearm” signage on the chain link fence!
    http://www.sfgate.com/news/education/article/Official-Multiple-shot-at-San-Bernardino-11063242.php

    Like

  17. Walt Avatar

    Nice find there Bill. The Left won’t allow duels. 9 times out of 10, the Lefty would lose that gun fight. First off, they would be hard pressed to understand which end the bullets come out of.

    Like

  18. Bill Tozer Avatar
    Bill Tozer

    https://www.facebook.com/PatriotPost/photos/a.82108390913.80726.51560645913/10154610691055914/?type=3&theater
    SCOTUS: Bless their little hearts. Everything they do blows up in their faces.
    https://www.facebook.com/PatriotPost/photos/a.82108390913.80726.51560645913/10154610691055914/?type=3&theater
    What ever happened to the Putin-Trump bromance story.? Odd. Maybe they just took a few days off. I am certain it will be back on the front page soon enough.

    Like

  19. Steve Frisch Avatar
    Steve Frisch

    Posted by: Don Bessee | 10 April 2017 at 07:36 PM
    SAM I am: of course it’s different…how kind of you to point out that it is…we all know that associations one has with entities that do things we might occasionally disagree with are common in an interconnected world and that we are not individually responsible for those….a concept that others here, yourself included, might want to remember occasionally and correct in our fellows 🙂

    Like

  20. Paul Emery Avatar
    Paul Emery

    Fish
    Many gun deaths are caused by accidents or irresponsible availability of guns to children.
    “Using information collected by the Gun Violence Archive, a nonpartisan research group, news reports and public sources, the news media outlets spent six months analyzing the circumstances of every death and injury from accidental shootings involving children ages 17 and younger from Jan. 1, 2014, to June 30 of this year — more than 1,000 incidents in all.”
    https://www.usatoday.com/news/

    Like

  21. George Rebane Avatar

    PaulE 1147am – Assuming that the cited stat has a connected point re the Second Amendment, I would dearly like to hear it.
    Additionally, it would be instructive for some of our brethren (and cistern) to view a smattering of similar deaths of young people from other accidents to see if the same people suggest equivalent preventatives.
    To constructively further restrict gun availability, ownership, and usage based on ‘saving the young’ needs to be weighed with a host of other factors and causes, starting with gang banging and drug overdoses. The former having no relation to the legal ownership of guns.
    BTW, I believe it was you who here and elsewhere have been a voluble opponent of booking unenforceable laws.

    Like

  22. fish Avatar
    fish

    Posted by: Paul Emery | 11 April 2017 at 11:47 AM
    Many gun deaths are caused by accidents or irresponsible availability of guns to children.

    Neither of these things had anything to do with yesterdays tragedy! A tragedy that you used as a pretext to call in to question the legitimate exercise of the 2nd amendment.

    Like

  23. Paul Emery Avatar
    Paul Emery

    What specific laws are you referring to George ?
    I do believe that the right to bear arms assumes responsibilities. One of those responsibilities would be storing guns in a place and manner that makes them on available to children A clear understanding of that responsibility would be part of gun use training that in my view should be a prerequisite for anyone owning a gun
    Mental fitness in my view is another requirement. A good friend of mine recently went through an experience where her daughter wasvirtually held captive by a Veteran Who had a long history of PTSD who was under treatment as a veteran but was still was able to purchase an assault rifle and a large stash of ammunition She managed to escape and the soldier was eventually restrained and is receiving proper medical treatment In my view he should not have been able to legally purchase an assault rifle

    Like

  24. Todd Juvinall Avatar
    Todd Juvinall

    How many people are killed in auto accidents and guns?

    Like

  25. Paul Emery Avatar
    Paul Emery

    Lots of auto deaths Todd. Are you proposing there shouldn’t be drivers licenses in order to drive a car ?

    Like

  26. fish Avatar
    fish

    Posted by: Paul Emery | 11 April 2017 at 01:13 PM
    Mental fitness in my view is another requirement. A good friend of mine recently went through an experience where her daughter wasvirtually held captive by a Veteran Who had a long history of PTSD who was under treatment as a veteran but was still was able to purchase an assault rifle and a large stash of ammunition She managed to escape and the soldier was eventually restrained and is receiving proper medical treatment In my view he should not have been able to legally purchase an assault rifle

    There is a “Mental Fitness” qualifier on the ATF Form 4473, Firearms Transaction Record revised Oct 2016. Evidently this person wasn’t formally adjudicated (though I’m absolutely sure that the left would like nothing more than to make the pursuit of gun ownership prima facie evidence of mental illness) as a mental defective or having been committed to a mental institution. Either of those would have been disqualifying.

    Like

  27. Paul Emery Avatar
    Paul Emery

    either way this person was able to purchase an assault rifle and a large amount of Ammunition legally under current laws.

    Like

  28. fish Avatar
    fish

    Posted by: Paul Emery | 11 April 2017 at 01:43 PM
    Well I’m sure that just one more law on the books would have solved your friends problem.

    Like

  29. Paul Emery Avatar
    Paul Emery

    So Fish you have no problem with a person being legally mentally disabled and being treated for severe PTSD under doctors care being able to buy an assault weapon?

    Like

  30. Gregory Avatar
    Gregory

    Paul E, an “assault rifle” is, under civilian law, a machine gun and has never been available for sale to civilians in California. Where was this?
    Fish, coercive Utopians of both the right and the left think all you need to do is hire a good person to decide on a case by case basis who gets a gun and who doesn’t. When this was first put into practice in the USA it tended to be poor blacks in the south who just did not merit the right to own and carry a gun.

    Like

  31. fish Avatar
    fish

    Posted by: Paul Emery | 11 April 2017 at 02:21 PM
    Paul he either wasn’t legally adjudicated as “Mentally Defective”, there was no formal committal to a mental institution (formal language from the regulation). Had either of those things been in his background the purchase should have been stopped by the NICS process. Why it didn’t catch this person….not a clue?
    Still this is the system that we have to deal with right now. If you think it should be stricter than I urge you to contact your state and federal legislators and ask them to make the check more stringent.

    Like

  32. George Rebane Avatar

    PaulE – You have waxed eloquent on the futility of all kinds of unenforceable laws ranging from MJ production and consumption to specific building codes imposed on the homeowner.
    And a more useful response from you re gun control would be to leave the arena of the anecdote, and instead cite the aggregate tradeoffs you are promoting with new gun laws viz the purpose and intent of the constitutional right to bear arms. As long as you propose nothing specific, your endless stream of questions (some obviously gotchaesque) competes well with tedium.

    Like

  33. ScenesFromTheApocalypse Avatar
    ScenesFromTheApocalypse

    “So Fish you have no problem with a person being legally mentally disabled and being treated for severe PTSD under doctors care being able to buy an assault weapon?”
    ‘Assault weapon’, a tricky definition to be sure. How about just ‘gun’?
    Should a legally mentally disabled/PTSD person be able to vote? buy alcohol? drive a car? pull jury duty? This is actually a valid question.

    Like

  34. Gregory Avatar
    Gregory

    Scenes, there is also a difference between being a certifiable loon, and being certified a loon.
    The rants I take least seriously are the ones that start with “gun deaths”, signaling they are mixing suicides with criminal homicides (yes, Martha, there are also justifiable homicides and even accidental homicides that don’t involve criminal negligence) to get a scary number… and then rant about large magazines.
    Perhaps someone can point out a gun suicide where more than one shot was fired.
    I also think it was Senator Clinton who was challenging people to tell her why they needed a large capacity magazine, but I never got to ask her what the capacity of the magazines carried by her body guards was.

    Like

  35. Paul Emery Avatar
    Paul Emery

    Not all questions George. I’m looking for solutions to the annual slaughter caused by irresponsible gun possessors. Also you have expressed opposition to MJ illegality and the glut of regulations imposed on business and homeowners. I thought that was something we agreed on.
    Scenes
    In this case it was a military assault rifle by definition and it is legal to sell those in Arizona, where this incident happened.

    Like

  36. Walt Avatar

    Paul. Provide proof of said “full auto” capability. You have any idea of how much those cost? The hoops one has to go through to get that FFL licence? Sorry dude, I don’t buy your story. No, you can’t walk in and buy a full auto weapon. Not even in AZ.
    But any idiot can buy a car. Today. Cars kill more people than guns. Yet no gripe from you.
    Not a peep about bars with parking lots.(why not Paul?)
    http://www.vpc.org/regulating-the-gun-industry/gun-deaths-compared-to-motor-vehicle-deaths/
    Not long ago people got mowed down on the Vegas strip.(by a car) Funny, I don’t remember you fussing about that.
    Nope, I’m not giving up my guns because you don’t like them.

    Like

  37. Don Bessee Avatar
    Don Bessee

    Well Walt some stupid newspaper in Sweden actually advocated for banning cars from city centers in response to jihadi truck attack. No, seriously, we laughed at that prospect some time back yet here it is in the real world. Well as real as the PC political set in Sweden can be. 😉

    Like

  38. Walt Avatar

    I think they got the idea from Frisco. But for different reasons. Frisco believes cars are rolling gas chambers.(not the inhabitants of the car, the people on the street.) You know,, those planet killers.

    Like

  39. ScenesFromTheApocalypse Avatar
    ScenesFromTheApocalypse

    re: PEmery @ 3:26PM
    http://www.dictionary.com/browse/assault-rifle
    Notice the ‘military’ part of the definition. In any case, getting wound up in gun definitions is a loser’s game. Anyone wanting to do serious damage would use a couple of large capacity handguns and maybe a 1100 Remington just for the heck of it. Just view it all as putting a dangerous amount of kinetic energy downrange.
    So, let’s say that the second amendment (and it’s living backers) didn’t exist. What would you suggest? Perhaps an easy answer would be to define groups of people who are more likely to cause problems with guns and restrict ownership of firearms to people who don’t belong to those groups. What do you think? Would reducing death rates to roughly those seen in Western Europe be a reasonable drop?

    Like

  40. George Rebane Avatar

    Re PaulE 326pm – Readers should note that for the Left to claim private ownership of military weapons, it has to be done only by the fiat of “definition”, since in actuality they cannot qualify as a modern military style weapon, assault or otherwise.

    Like

  41. Paul Emery Avatar
    Paul Emery

    George would you consider an M-16 military style rifle?

    Like

  42. Paul Emery Avatar
    Paul Emery

    George would you consider an M-16 a military style rifle?

    Like

  43. Gregory Avatar
    Gregory

    Paul, the M-16 was a military assault rifle. Selective fire (semiauto, 3 shot burst, full auto). Legally a machine gun. Never sold in California to civilians.

    Like

  44. Gregory Avatar
    Gregory

    Paul, a legally possessed real M16 (or any other NFA firearm) would have been only after the equivalent of a Secret Clearance investigation and yes, since the freezing of the total number during the Clinton administration, the prices have gone sky high.
    I vaguely recall one has never been implicated in a crime.

    Like

  45. ScenesFromTheApocalypse Avatar
    ScenesFromTheApocalypse

    re: Gregory@10:23
    Movie companies usually have a papal dispensation.
    re: Paul@10:04PM
    My gift to you. I don’t believe that this includes the latest half dozen laws which are guaranteed to Make California Great Again. It’s probably best to get all this pew pew pew machine gun business out of your head, they’re rare and expensive.
    http://www.calguns.net/caawid/flowchart.pdf

    Like

  46. George Rebane Avatar

    PaulE 1004pm – Are we now walking this discussion back to a firearm’s “style”, which has nothing to do with literally anything germain here. If the civilian AR looks from a distance like a M-16, so what? Throughout American history civilians have carried and used arms that looked like their contemporaneous military counterparts. (Often the civilian firearms were even more capable than what then was military issue.) Today people (I know) still hunt with the WW1 Springfield, the WW2 Garand M-1 and the M-1 Carbine, and, of course, the AR version of the M-16. So what?

    Like

  47. George Rebane Avatar

    scenes 701am – Than you Mr scenes for that link. Readers who want to know literally anything about shooting guns in California are invited to peruse Calguns website –
    http://www.calguns.net/calgunforum/index.php
    I have no idea why we are recircling this barn again and again without bringing anything new to the discussion. The bottom line for understanding all gun laws passed in the last 75 years is that they are intended to constructively abrogate the Second Amendment bit by piece. The obvious intent has always been to make the law abiding American citizen helpless to resist the state in whatever form it may take over time.
    The laws have no effect on criminals and ideological terrorists, and extract a minimal societal cost from killers motivated by episodic emotions and/or psychological impediments. So what’s new when the most recent of these tragedies take place, other than the statists’ desire to use them for tightening the ratchet another notch on an once free people?

    Like

  48. Walt Avatar

    Paul. I have what’s known as an AR10. The Grand Daddy of the AR15. BTW. “AR” does not stand for “automatic rifle”. (we know how you get a woody on terminology)
    It’s a really good hunting rifle. I would never think twice about taking a deer at 300 yards with it. It shoots the same bullet as any other .308
    What is a gun? A short piece of pipe with a firing pin. Yet you and ill informed anti gunners have your knickers in a knot over looks.

    Like

Leave a comment