Rebane's Ruminations
February 2017
S M T W T F S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728  

ARCHIVES


OUR LINKS


YubaNet
White House Blog
Watts Up With That?
The Union
Sierra Thread
RL “Bob” Crabb
Barry Pruett Blog

[Mr Norm Sauer, a retired attorney who lives in Nevada City, is a member of The Union Editorial Board and  a contributor to these pages.  This submitted piece also appears in the 8feb17 issue of the newspaper (here) and has garnered its expected vituperation from the usual suspects.]

Norm Sauer

A topsy-turvy upheaval characterized the start of Donald Trump’s presidency. Everything is in flux not seen since 1932 when Franklin D. Roosevelt defeated and distanced himself from Herbert Hoover. Mainstream Democrats and even Republicans are either infuriated or vexed over the outsider Trump.

Giving President Trump his due, his inaugural speech recognized ‘the forgotten man,’ and reminded us that “… a nation exists to serve its citizens … When you open your heart to patriotism, there is no room for prejudice …”

The media collusion with the Clinton campaign was endemic in the WikiLeaks email disclosures. The complicity destroyed any idea that establishment journalists are disinterested and principled. The press has turned from eight years of obsequiousness to frenzied hostility toward the White House: Senate filibusters are no longer subversive, but vital, and if Trump follows Obama’s example of presidential fiats, he will be considered seditious.

Meanwhile, Democrats remain concerned that Obama’s legacy has destroyed the party. How can they continue to advocate identity politics but capture the irredeemable deplorables that cost them the Rust Belt states? Civil war exists between the party leaders, but it seems lessons have not been learned, nor are Democrats getting the message.

Take, for example, the hearing vetting Betsy DeVos, Trump’s nominee for Secretary of Education.

DeVos, a billionaire from Michigan, has endeavored as a dedicated philanthropist for 30 years to fulfill the goal that all parents, and primarily low-income parents, have the opportunity to choose the best educational setting for their children so that all children have the opportunity to fulfill their God-given potential. She is a natural champion for the voucher-based policies Trump has promoted to help poor families afford to send their children to private schools.

My watching her being vetted in the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee was instructive of political divide. While each Republican senator focused on the best interests of America’s children, the Democrat senators expressed no such concern.

In an effort to appease teachers union bosses, the Democrats were tripping all over themselves to smear DeVos, each attack more bizarre than the next. An example is Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), who questioned whether DeVos had ever run a bank: “Do you have any direct experience running a bank? Have you ever managed or overseen a trillion-dollar loan program?”

DeVos politely answered no, and pointed out that neither of President Obama’s Education Secretaries, Arne Duncan and John King, had ever run massive banks either.

Now, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) promises for himself and all Senate Democrats not to vote for DeVos based on an over-the-top claim that she would “single-handedly decimate our public education system if she were confirmed.”

In discussing the state of public education in America, U. S. News & World Report offered a bleak and candid assessment: “In urban school districts across the country,” an education reporter wrote in 2015, “student performance is flat, poor, and minority students are experiencing staggering inequalities, and the picture is especially troubling for black students.”

Is this the status quo Schumer and the Democrats want to protect? Why do they stand in front of the doors of failing schools to keep minority and other children in? Sadly, Democrats know where their bread is buttered, and as long as teachers’ union bosses keep doling out cash to Democrats, they will continue to treat America’s students as second-class citizens.

President Trump and DeVos represent a new way of thinking. It is time to stop playing politics with our nation’s children, especially minorities and those of low income.

Consider that many sectors in our economy are moving away from old business models and trending toward more personalization, service, and flexibility. People who pick up an iPhone, summon an Uber, or order concert tickets online don’t understand why they can’t choose from a menu of school options. As technology has become ubiquitous, we have been trained to expect more choices and more options.

This trend toward individualism and choices has collided with the traditional district public education system and the powerful teachers unions that fund the Democrat Party. The education choice movement should consider vouchers, tax credits, education savings accounts, home schooling, charter schools, and private schools.

We should all work together for reform that does something big and bold to help our nation’s greatest treasure — the next generation. Let us all work together to make an American education great again.

Posted in ,

93 responses to “The Democrats are blocking the way to make education great”

  1. Gregory Avatar
    Gregory

    Paul, establish that as an arguable fact. More than Paul Emery’s heartfelt testimony.
    I poured over the STAR test results and that charter did very poorly despite taking children from college educated parents (thanks to cherry picking, that was most of them, if I recall correctly they’re the highest socioeconomic status family mix in Nevada County) and educating them in the subjects that got mom and dad to the colleges they went to.
    Well educated parents often do a decent job filling in the gaps left by incompetent schools, and it takes a spectacularly inadequate curriculum, teaching and administration to get on the bottom of a 100 Similar Schools list.

    Like

  2. Don Bessee Avatar
    Don Bessee

    Ah, a relapse of Bush Derangement Syndrome eh PE @ 445? In case you missed it President Trump is not a Bush R! 😉

    Like

  3. Gregory Avatar
    Gregory

    Paul, the state of California, after the meltdown of school achievement caused by the whole language and whole math debacles of the ’90’s, did put in a system. The STAR data I was citing was a result and we were one the few states that had actually done this before NCLB required it. Parents and politicians wanted information about what schools were failing, and STAR delivered. It also killed off math programs like MathLand and CPM that were the vanguard of constructivist Whole Math because people like me and my cohorts in groups like Mathematically Correct kept people’s feet to the fire.
    I still remember Jon Byerrum (that’s Holly Hermansen’s current husband), Super of the GVSD, at the board meeting after my son’s cohort’s STAR result was published in the light of day on the State website, there for all the world to see… half of all kids that class were in the BOTTOM quartile in math and language. Jon’s reaction? I quote as accurately as I can after 20 years… “Mathland has some holes we’ll have to patch”. Like any true believer, he kept the failed programs several years longer.
    [Excuse the repetition from the past, but Whole Math was poured into California by Phil Daro, who had no math degree or a career in teaching it, and it’s failure was rewarded by being the initial chairman of the Common Core math standards drafting, hired by someone spending Gates Foundation money in 2008 when Common Core started up]

    Like

  4. Paul Emery Avatar
    Paul Emery

    Gregory
    Once again if you’d like direct information from parents I will be glad to set you up. If you are truly concerned you should take my offer otherwise I assume you’ll be satisfied with government collected data. There are certain types of “education” that don’t quantify on test scores .

    Like

  5. Walt Avatar

    Paul I have seen plenty of those “LIB approved” text books. No wonder kids don’t know anything. Just to add insult to injury, Common core rears it’s ugly head. Another LIB “hot idea”. 8+8 in twelve easy steps. Whoever dreamed that up when on LSD, should be dragged out and shot in the street. OH Ya.. Lets make life even harder on the kids.

    Like

  6. fish Avatar
    fish

    There are certain types of “education” that don’t quantify on test scores .
    Like the proper selection of words used in a sentence.

    Like

  7. Gregory Avatar
    Gregory

    Paul, 503, been there, done that. And the data spigot was turned off with haste when the Common Core was adopted in Sacramento despite the new “standards” not even being finished.
    St.Sensibles across the world, including Mt.St. Mary’s Academy, manage to teach a great deal besides math and language while still doing a fantastic job teaching what needs to be understood to progress in math, science etc etc academic careers if they so choose. The only college successes heard of in my prior YRCS investigations were cites of kids choosing medicine and computer science, two paths that don’t require much math.
    And it wouldn’t matter much of a few more came to light. Most people want schools that help their children to succeed, not ones where some kids manage to succeed despite the school.

    Like

  8. Gregory Avatar
    Gregory

    fish 508
    The Stanford Achievement Test series that St. Mary’s used for years at the beginning of every year (my son took one entering the 2nd grade when we bailed out of Hennessey) does a great job assessing such things as a students facility with vocabulary and sentence structure. And it was the SAT9 chosen in Sacramento that was that first STAR test that gave Byerrum the bad news. As California created its own standards, the actual SAT9 was modified to better align with our curriculum standards, created by professors from Stanford and Berkeley to replace the nonstandards drafted by the likes of Phil Daro in 1992.

    Like

  9. Don Bessee Avatar
    Don Bessee

    Now there you go Gregory, confusing poor ol’ PE with pesky facts, now we will see PE put words in mouths and ask silly questions. If PE is feeling really pressed he will now change the subject. 😉

    Like

  10. Paul Emery Avatar
    Paul Emery

    Well noted Fish

    Like

  11. Paul Emery Avatar
    Paul Emery

    I am not trying to prove anything Bessee just making a recommendation to Gregory about how he can further his education about Charter Schools by actually talking with the parents of the children.

    Like

  12. Paul Emery Avatar
    Paul Emery

    I usually abandon a conversation when it’s hopeless so unless Gregory actually would peruse talking to parents and students from the school there is no point in continuing. I perused this conversation to express my support of Charter Schools and the parents that choose to send their children to them. I would think that position would be supported by the so called “Conservatives” that reside here.

    Like

  13. Gregory Avatar
    Gregory

    I have talked to Yuba River parents, Paul. Why do you think their (and your) glowing testimony is any more valid than, say, testimony of the members of an evangelical church who like to dance, as if in a trance, holding rattlesnakes as to the efficacy of their beliefs?
    I worked for years with an early Waldorf devotee whose son lost a year of education when the teacher just couldn’t deliver; my memory is that it was a painful flameout. He transferred to one of the formerly great Nevada City public schools and last I heard he was thriving in college.
    At one point I even dated a lovely Canadian woman (almost my age) who was a Steiner College student (Fair Oaks, down the hill) and got an insider view most don’t… she took the “worlds smallest political quiz” at my suggestion and finally figure out why she didn’t quite fit in. She found she was a left-libertarian (in US terms, a solid liberal Democrat in the Tim Russert/Daniel Patrick Moynihan mold with a Canuck slant), while the Steiner staff and incoming true believers were all hard left progressive pod people. Rather than take the long program she initially wanted, she changed to a shorter program that was more of a basic certification for Steiner schools.
    Magical thinking has its shortcomings, and Steiner was, in academic terms, a raving lunatic. In my opinion.

    Like

  14. Gregory Avatar
    Gregory

    Punchy, you always run away when your attempts to score any points fail; your 600 is classic “sour grapes”.
    Beyond “parents are happy with it” you have nothing to add.

    Like

  15. Bill Tozer Avatar
    Bill Tozer

    Beyond “parents are happy with it” you have nothing to add.
    That is because that is all he knows on the subject. Can’t get blood out of a turnip.
    Suppose the litmus test is if the kids (or some of them) are prepared to jump into college and keep up with skills they have learned. And we have not even discussed the proverbial elephant in the room, regular ole standard public education in “regular” schools.
    Easy major is Business Administration. Don’t need to know math or English comp. Dime a dozen.

    Like

  16. Gregory Avatar
    Gregory

    Toes, there are a number of routes to a college degree that don’t include much math or decent written language skills. I know one fine musician who is a popular (and more than competent) music teacher, and his SAT M+V was only around 900… (think 90IQ as far as the SAT knowledge is concerned, that’s how the SAT is normed). You wouldn’t want your kid’s English teacher to have a 90IQ but by some surveys, 900 to 950 is about the average of K-12 certificated staff… meaning half scored even lower.
    I’ll repeat one of my pipe dreams: I want all schools to report the average SAT M+V of their certificated staff, assuming they are large enough to not be violating their privacy… that would not be appropriate for a one room schoolhouse. That policy would let parents and other stakeholders know the district standards for that school, and means an idiot administrator would feel forced to hire teachers smarter than they are and accept their pushback from stupid ideas pushed down from the central orifice.
    Teachers already on staff who can’t get their scores reported can have some grace period before their pay raises get frozen to give them time to retake the test.
    Easy… but the NEA and CTA would scream bloody murder. All teachers are already special. You don’t need to know their SAT averages. These aren’t the dolts you’re looking for. Move along.

    Like

  17. Paul Emery Avatar
    Paul Emery

    Gregory
    You “want all schools to report the average SAT M+V of their certificated staff” Are you in favor of imposing some kind of penalty on schools that don’t have the right numbers? Who would enforce that penalty.

    Like

  18. Scott Obermuller Avatar

    “Who would enforce that penalty.”
    Uh – the parents, if they had a choice of what schools to send their kids to. Vouchers are the best way to handle the situation. Not perfect, but it would be the best. It’s quite easy to figure out what the govt schools spend per student. Hand it over to the parents and let them decide which schools to give the vouchers to. Parents that home school would be the financial losers but they are now anyway and it doesn’t stop them.

    Like

  19. Gregory Avatar
    Gregory

    Paul, there would be no right numbers, just an informed public who can use that to decide which schools they want their kids to attend. Much easier than testing all kids every year, don’t you think? It’s a test that virtually all prospective college students take so virtually all teachers already have a score when they first walk into a classroom.
    Every district would be free to hire teachers with any score, as long as they met legal requirements… they just have to make the average M+V public knowledge. What problem do you have with that?

    Like

  20. Gregory Avatar
    Gregory

    Scott, it would also get every real estate agent and homeowner pressuring schools to get with the program… would you buy a house whose local school(s) had an effective room temperature SAT IQ?
    The lowest SAT score possible (an effective zero) is 400 out of a possible 1600. Converting to a percentile, that 900 is the equivalent of a 42% score….eeeesh.

    Like

  21. Paul Emery Avatar
    Paul Emery

    Gregory
    what evidence do you have that show teachers with higher SAT’s are better teachers?

    Like

  22. George Rebane Avatar

    PaulE 933pm – Because you can’t teach what you don’t know.

    Like

  23. Bill Tozer Avatar
    Bill Tozer

    You can’t transmit what you don’t have.

    Like

  24. Paul Emery Avatar
    Paul Emery

    But teaching skills are a special skill and aptitude in itself that may not show up on test scores.

    Like

  25. Gregory Avatar
    Gregory

    Paul, why do you think they wouldn’t be?
    Currently, the only exam all teachers in California must pass (the last time I looked) was the CBEST… and a seventh grader at grade level could pass it.
    Even so, there were multiple lawsuits to overturn the requirement.
    OK, they can legally teach… and they have at least one four year college degree. Just tell me some measure of what they learned in K-12 before they profess to have the knowledge to teach K-12. And, if they were late bloomers, they can take it again to measure their progress in basic skills after high school, while they were earning that BA/MA/Ed.D.
    Now, the chance this could pass political muster anywhere in the US probably approaches zero, but if parental choice and liberal private charter school rules mean non-religious non-government schools for the working low to upper middle classes became viable, it would be a hell of a marketing tool and public schools faced with real competition could find themselves at a real disadvantage.
    A school starting from zero has little credibility… but what if they could document that no teacher or administrator scored below the average entering freshman in the UC system… would that be worth something? They know what your child must know!
    Now, that might be too much a burden for elementary school teachers… make it the average for freshmen in the CSU system, which produces the largest number of teachers in California.

    Like

  26. Don Bessee Avatar
    Don Bessee

    So what test metric captures that ‘special skill’ PE, careful before you answer and remember the programs that take people without a teaching degree and puts them in the class room? The military does just fine with technical training using people who are first tested, then trained in the specialty with a high test standard and only then trained to be an instructor. 😉

    Like

  27. Gregory Avatar
    Gregory

    Yes, Paul, 10:39, that’s what teachers who did poorly in high school and college tell themselves. Special talents. Magical, even. Can only be detected by other magical teachers. Unique snowflakes.
    Every teacher with an inferiority complex will share a story of some PhD who couldn’t teach high school. These probably exist, somewhere. I never saw one as a student or a parent or in my short stint as a teacher.

    Like

  28. George Rebane Avatar

    Last time I looked, the ONLY government sponsored educational programs that are an unqualified success are those conducted by our armed forces. There we effectively teach and learn some of the most complex stuff that humans can pass on. And there teachers learn how to teach, and students learn how to learn. I started my teaching career in the military teaching complex weapons systems operations and tactics, and then teaching high school math courses to soldiers earning their HS diplomas after hours.
    I’ve relayed my experiences here with the teachers’ unions after being invited to teach some advanced stuff at Santa Monica High School. (I even took the CBEST test which is a joke as described above.). But even with extensive military and university level teaching experience, the union decided to dis-invite me because they were afraid what I would discover about the competency of my colleagues at SMHS.
    Bottom line, there is no special magic to becoming an effective teacher – yes, like in all fields there are outstanding exceptions, but in the aggregate anyone who has a command of the material to be taught can very quickly learn how to effectively present the material and measure how well their students have absorbed it.
    The trouble with barrel bottom teachers is that they don’t know their stuff, even before we get to screwed up curricula and PC teaching methods.

    Like

  29. Gregory Avatar
    Gregory

    Here’s what the Center for Public Education has to say about effective teachers:

    The Key Characteristics
    When looking for a qualified teacher, look for a combination of these characteristics:
    High SAT or other college entrance scores
    A degree from a selective, rigorous college
    High scores on the Praxis, or other licensing exam
    More than four years of experience
    Strong subject-matter knowledge

    There is a paragraph that directly answers Paul, with citations:

    Unlike the other three indicators of subject-matter knowledge, teachers with higher test scores are more effective at both the elementary and high school levels. At the elementary level in North Carolina, students who were taught by teachers who scored higher on the math section of the state’s licensure exam made more academic gains in math than students taught by teachers who scored lower (Clotfelder et al. 2007a).The same was true for reading. Even at the elementary level, teachers in New York City who scored higher on the SAT math section were more effective than teachers who scored lower (Boyd et al. 2007).

    This is a site sponsored by the National School Boards Assn. Interesting page.
    http://www.centerforpubliceducation.org/Main-Menu/Staffingstudents/How-good-are-your-teachers-Trying-to-define-teacher-quality/Does-highly-qualified-mean-highly-effective.GMEditor.html
    Now, the be all and end all is not to force all kids on a college track, but I think our democratic Republic demands that all kids walking in the door of a publicly funded school as fresh faced Kindergärtners should have a path that leads, if they so desire and were able to do the work, to a top school in a rigorous math-based subject. Not as the be all and end all… but any kid starting school, and their parents, should not be shut out of that life because their schools were not capable of keeping their charges generally at grade level using, for example, the California Content Standards in math and language that were superceded by Common Core, which aren’t bad per se but are a grade level behind.

    Like

  30. ScenesFromTheApocalypse Avatar
    ScenesFromTheApocalypse

    George @ 10:30
    “in the aggregate anyone who has a command of the material to be taught can very quickly learn how to effectively present the material and measure how well their students have absorbed it.”
    Aside from research, is there any good reason for the existence of a degree in education then? It sounds like teaching is a skill best learned from a few short courses plus OJT.

    Like

  31. George Rebane Avatar

    Scenes 1211pm – Yes, there is a benefit from learning how to teach, but to devote an extended university curriculum to develop that skill is more than a bit of overkill. One can become an effective classroom teacher by taking a properly structured one semester course (that includes practicum). The finer points will develop later through experience and ancillary subjects if one seeks to teach students in, say, the +/- two sigma regions.

    Like

  32. ScenesFromTheApocalypse Avatar
    ScenesFromTheApocalypse

    12:21PM.
    So you can make the argument that universities should offer a teaching certificate received as a result of that semester, and that that should be sufficient for most teaching jobs. I can see exceptions (Special Ed teachers perhaps? specialized training for K-3 teachers?).
    Well, I’m sold. What is DeVos’ email address?

    Like

  33. Gregory Avatar
    Gregory

    Scenes, UCLA started as a “Normal School”, which trained high school graduates to be primary school teachers. I gather Normal Schools generally awarded a Bachelor in Education in one or two years.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Normal_school
    My late first wife Teri (BS Math, Mudd, MSEE LMU) when she was trying to get a 2nd career started teaching high school math was informed by the then chair of NUHS’ department that when he started teaching math, besides a BA/BS Math, it took about one semester to get a credential… mostly classroom management and student teaching, which is the one of the few skills a BS/MS in a real subject doesn’t cover.
    Colleges of Education tend to focus on pedagogy… how they think students should be taught… and it’s pretty universally agreed in those places that kids should work in groups to discover the stuff for themselves, with the teacher as “a guide on the side” rather than “a sage on the stage”… and those phrases have been around for decades.
    What the Ed school pedagogists forget is that anyone with a solid BA/BS in a solid subject has about 17 years of observing good teaching methods and bad teaching methods, and many semesters of barrel bottom academics telling them which ones are good or bad is likely to make them desire to do something other than teaching. Seccondary teachers with subject matter degrees really only need a quick course in the basics of teacher survival and then released into the wild to come up to speed with the help of their colleagues.

    Like

  34. Bill Tozer Avatar
    Bill Tozer

    Quotes:
    Alpha Jackass: “[V]oucher programs will lead to more suicides. Betsy DeVos’s policies will kill children. That is not an exaggeration in any sense. … Strong public schools are the bedrock of a thriving, autonomous middle class. No wonder zealot billionaires want to get rid of them!” —Vanity Fair’s Richard Lawson
    And last… “The focus of our education system is the transfer of tax dollars between politicians and unions. Educating children is its waste product.” —Frank Fleming

    Like

  35. George Rebane Avatar

    Scenes 1238pm – “I can see exceptions (Special Ed teachers perhaps? specialized training for K-3 teachers?).” = GeorgeR 1221pm “The finer points will develop later through experience and ancillary subjects if one seeks to teach students in, say, the +/- two sigma regions.” 😉

    Like

  36. Gregory Avatar
    Gregory

    It should be noted that the discovery and inquiry methods driving Common Core are outgrowths of Special Education methods. In particular, CPM, the wretchedly misnamed “College Preparatory Math” that was the inspiration for the reform group Mathematically Correct that helped drive the late lamented California Content Standards, was specifically started to develop a remedial math program that could prepare the mathematically challenged for college work.
    That didn’t work out but many average students faced with CPM in middle or high school were prepared to need remediation in the non-selective colleges they began attending.
    CPM is also used by Ghiddotti and a number of other local schools. An acquaintance of mine who tutors math locally says it’s driving her business, and that of other local tutors, to the moon. Maybe Mr. Pink should check what’s in his kid’s backpack.

    Like

  37. Gregory Avatar
    Gregory

    I’m going to guess that “Robert Cross” is willfully blind enough to not notice that was labeled as a satirical piece. In small print to confuse the small minded.

    Like

  38. Scott Obermuller Avatar

    No Greg – he’s just that stupid.
    Of course, he’ll come back soon claiming he knew all along it was just a joke.
    Right.

    Like

  39. Robert Cross Avatar
    Robert Cross

    This is like fish in a barrel…you will bite on anything. anyway it’s alternate facts. not satire… you know like Kellyanne Conway likes to pass on. Either way Besty DeVos is that stupid. The fact that you support the most controversial cabinet nominee in history who bought her way into position she literally has no clue about is astonishing. You ideology blinds you. Talk about stupid.

    Like

  40. Gregory Avatar
    Gregory

    RC 926
    No, Scott is more likely right, you really are that stupid.
    DeVos was never my pick for Ed Secy because she’s paid homage to progressive ed school lunacies in the past, but she may be the one of the more effective available candidates to piss off teacher’s unions by increasing the power parents have to choose the education for their children.
    In other words, DeVos may be the most qualified candidate to break the current modus operandi of the Dept. of Ed. Look at the bright side… the Feds don’t actually teach any kids and never did.

    Like

Leave a comment